Loading…

Seroprevalence and risk factors of caprine brucellosis in Khartoum state, Sudan

This cross-sectional study was conducted from April to July 2012 in Khartoum state, Sudan, to determine the seroprevalence of brucellosis in goats and to investigate potential risk factors associated with this disease. A total of 307 serum samples were collected from both sexes of goats in four diff...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Veterinary World 2018-04, Vol.11 (4), p.511-518
Main Authors: Mohamed, Eman Mohamed-Ahmed, Elfadil, Abdelhamid Ahemd Mohamed, El-Sanousi, Enaam Mohamed, Ibrahaem, Hatim Hamad, Mohamed-Noor, Saad El-Tiab, Abdalla, Mohamed Abdelsalam, Shuaib, Yassir Adam
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-5016d59addd8187b70b068090009673be3bb374d5dfc22873979d7161ebeae693
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-5016d59addd8187b70b068090009673be3bb374d5dfc22873979d7161ebeae693
container_end_page 518
container_issue 4
container_start_page 511
container_title Veterinary World
container_volume 11
creator Mohamed, Eman Mohamed-Ahmed
Elfadil, Abdelhamid Ahemd Mohamed
El-Sanousi, Enaam Mohamed
Ibrahaem, Hatim Hamad
Mohamed-Noor, Saad El-Tiab
Abdalla, Mohamed Abdelsalam
Shuaib, Yassir Adam
description This cross-sectional study was conducted from April to July 2012 in Khartoum state, Sudan, to determine the seroprevalence of brucellosis in goats and to investigate potential risk factors associated with this disease. A total of 307 serum samples were collected from both sexes of goats in four different localities and were subjected to testing for brucellosis using rose bengal plate test (RBPT), serum agglutination test (SAT), and competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA). The overall seroprevalence was 11.4% (n=35) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 7.80 to 15.0. Out of these 35 RBPT-positive samples, the positivity of 18 and 17 were confirmed by SAT and cELISA, respectively. A significant statistical variation was observed between brucellosis seroprevalences in goats purchased from local animal markets and goats that were raised at the farm. Conversely, such significant variations were not observed among the categories of other risk factors with seroprevalences ranging from 3.0% (95% CI between 0.40 and 7.20) to 16.3% (95% CI between 10.4 and 22.3). Location ( =9.33, df=3, p=0.02), breed ( =3.52, df=1, p=0.05), herd size ( =6.59, df=2, p=0.03), and herd expansion ( =5.39, df=1, p=0.02) were associated with RBPT-positive status for brucella in the two-tailed Chi-square test. In addition, Sharq an-Nil locality and goats raised at the farm had increased odds of being RBPT positive. Brucellosis was detected in goats in all surveyed localities. An effort should be made to educate goat owners/herders about brucellosis as well as about the importance of vaccination.
doi_str_mv 10.14202/vetworld.2018.511-518
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_827d82e8fbd343eeae4e715616b991aa</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A581424526</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_827d82e8fbd343eeae4e715616b991aa</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A581424526</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-5016d59addd8187b70b068090009673be3bb374d5dfc22873979d7161ebeae693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUttuEzEQXSEQjUp_oVqJFx7Y4Mv69oJUVVwqKvWh8Gz5Mps6bOxg7wbx9zhNWwjCljXS-JzjmfFpmnOMlrgniLzbwfQz5dEvCcJyyTDuGJbPmgUhFHdIYf68WSAlSCeVlCfNWSlrVFePiCLsZXNClESMYLlobm4hp22GnRkhOmhN9G0O5Xs7GDelXNo0tM5sc4jQ2jw7GMdUQmlDbL_cmTyledOWyUzwtr2dvYmvmheDGQucPcTT5tvHD18vP3fXN5-uLi-uO8cEmzqGMPdMGe-9xFJYgSziEqlapOKCWqDWUtF75gdHiBRUCeUF5hgsGOCKnjZXB12fzFrX-jYm_9LJBH2fSHmla3XBjaAlEV4SkIP1tKdQ-T0IzDjmVilsTNV6f9DaznYD3kGcshmPRI9vYrjTq7TTTHEkFKkCbx4EcvoxQ5n0JpT9qEyENBdNUM8Rrj3TCn39D3Sd5hzrqCqKC4J7rtAf1Kp-iw5xSPVdtxfVF0xWD_SM8Ipa_gdVt4dNcCnCEGr-iMAPBJdTKRmGpx4x0vfO0o_O0ntn6eqsemQlnv89oSfao4_obz0xyl4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2067214690</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seroprevalence and risk factors of caprine brucellosis in Khartoum state, Sudan</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mohamed, Eman Mohamed-Ahmed ; Elfadil, Abdelhamid Ahemd Mohamed ; El-Sanousi, Enaam Mohamed ; Ibrahaem, Hatim Hamad ; Mohamed-Noor, Saad El-Tiab ; Abdalla, Mohamed Abdelsalam ; Shuaib, Yassir Adam</creator><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Eman Mohamed-Ahmed ; Elfadil, Abdelhamid Ahemd Mohamed ; El-Sanousi, Enaam Mohamed ; Ibrahaem, Hatim Hamad ; Mohamed-Noor, Saad El-Tiab ; Abdalla, Mohamed Abdelsalam ; Shuaib, Yassir Adam</creatorcontrib><description>This cross-sectional study was conducted from April to July 2012 in Khartoum state, Sudan, to determine the seroprevalence of brucellosis in goats and to investigate potential risk factors associated with this disease. A total of 307 serum samples were collected from both sexes of goats in four different localities and were subjected to testing for brucellosis using rose bengal plate test (RBPT), serum agglutination test (SAT), and competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA). The overall seroprevalence was 11.4% (n=35) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 7.80 to 15.0. Out of these 35 RBPT-positive samples, the positivity of 18 and 17 were confirmed by SAT and cELISA, respectively. A significant statistical variation was observed between brucellosis seroprevalences in goats purchased from local animal markets and goats that were raised at the farm. Conversely, such significant variations were not observed among the categories of other risk factors with seroprevalences ranging from 3.0% (95% CI between 0.40 and 7.20) to 16.3% (95% CI between 10.4 and 22.3). Location ( =9.33, df=3, p=0.02), breed ( =3.52, df=1, p=0.05), herd size ( =6.59, df=2, p=0.03), and herd expansion ( =5.39, df=1, p=0.02) were associated with RBPT-positive status for brucella in the two-tailed Chi-square test. In addition, Sharq an-Nil locality and goats raised at the farm had increased odds of being RBPT positive. Brucellosis was detected in goats in all surveyed localities. An effort should be made to educate goat owners/herders about brucellosis as well as about the importance of vaccination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-8988</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2231-0916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.511-518</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29805218</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Veterinary World</publisher><subject>Agglutination ; Beef cattle ; Brucellosis ; Caprinae ; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Enzymes ; Geographical variations ; Goats ; Health risks ; Risk factors ; rose bengal plate test ; Serology ; seroprevalence ; Statistical analysis ; Sudan ; Vaccination</subject><ispartof>Veterinary World, 2018-04, Vol.11 (4), p.511-518</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Veterinary World</rights><rights>2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © Mohamed, . 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-5016d59addd8187b70b068090009673be3bb374d5dfc22873979d7161ebeae693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-5016d59addd8187b70b068090009673be3bb374d5dfc22873979d7161ebeae693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5960792/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2067214690?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29805218$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Eman Mohamed-Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elfadil, Abdelhamid Ahemd Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Sanousi, Enaam Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibrahaem, Hatim Hamad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed-Noor, Saad El-Tiab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdalla, Mohamed Abdelsalam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuaib, Yassir Adam</creatorcontrib><title>Seroprevalence and risk factors of caprine brucellosis in Khartoum state, Sudan</title><title>Veterinary World</title><addtitle>Vet World</addtitle><description>This cross-sectional study was conducted from April to July 2012 in Khartoum state, Sudan, to determine the seroprevalence of brucellosis in goats and to investigate potential risk factors associated with this disease. A total of 307 serum samples were collected from both sexes of goats in four different localities and were subjected to testing for brucellosis using rose bengal plate test (RBPT), serum agglutination test (SAT), and competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA). The overall seroprevalence was 11.4% (n=35) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 7.80 to 15.0. Out of these 35 RBPT-positive samples, the positivity of 18 and 17 were confirmed by SAT and cELISA, respectively. A significant statistical variation was observed between brucellosis seroprevalences in goats purchased from local animal markets and goats that were raised at the farm. Conversely, such significant variations were not observed among the categories of other risk factors with seroprevalences ranging from 3.0% (95% CI between 0.40 and 7.20) to 16.3% (95% CI between 10.4 and 22.3). Location ( =9.33, df=3, p=0.02), breed ( =3.52, df=1, p=0.05), herd size ( =6.59, df=2, p=0.03), and herd expansion ( =5.39, df=1, p=0.02) were associated with RBPT-positive status for brucella in the two-tailed Chi-square test. In addition, Sharq an-Nil locality and goats raised at the farm had increased odds of being RBPT positive. Brucellosis was detected in goats in all surveyed localities. An effort should be made to educate goat owners/herders about brucellosis as well as about the importance of vaccination.</description><subject>Agglutination</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Brucellosis</subject><subject>Caprinae</subject><subject>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Geographical variations</subject><subject>Goats</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>rose bengal plate test</subject><subject>Serology</subject><subject>seroprevalence</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Sudan</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><issn>0972-8988</issn><issn>2231-0916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUttuEzEQXSEQjUp_oVqJFx7Y4Mv69oJUVVwqKvWh8Gz5Mps6bOxg7wbx9zhNWwjCljXS-JzjmfFpmnOMlrgniLzbwfQz5dEvCcJyyTDuGJbPmgUhFHdIYf68WSAlSCeVlCfNWSlrVFePiCLsZXNClESMYLlobm4hp22GnRkhOmhN9G0O5Xs7GDelXNo0tM5sc4jQ2jw7GMdUQmlDbL_cmTyledOWyUzwtr2dvYmvmheDGQucPcTT5tvHD18vP3fXN5-uLi-uO8cEmzqGMPdMGe-9xFJYgSziEqlapOKCWqDWUtF75gdHiBRUCeUF5hgsGOCKnjZXB12fzFrX-jYm_9LJBH2fSHmla3XBjaAlEV4SkIP1tKdQ-T0IzDjmVilsTNV6f9DaznYD3kGcshmPRI9vYrjTq7TTTHEkFKkCbx4EcvoxQ5n0JpT9qEyENBdNUM8Rrj3TCn39D3Sd5hzrqCqKC4J7rtAf1Kp-iw5xSPVdtxfVF0xWD_SM8Ipa_gdVt4dNcCnCEGr-iMAPBJdTKRmGpx4x0vfO0o_O0ntn6eqsemQlnv89oSfao4_obz0xyl4</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Mohamed, Eman Mohamed-Ahmed</creator><creator>Elfadil, Abdelhamid Ahemd Mohamed</creator><creator>El-Sanousi, Enaam Mohamed</creator><creator>Ibrahaem, Hatim Hamad</creator><creator>Mohamed-Noor, Saad El-Tiab</creator><creator>Abdalla, Mohamed Abdelsalam</creator><creator>Shuaib, Yassir Adam</creator><general>Veterinary World</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>04Q</scope><scope>04S</scope><scope>04W</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Seroprevalence and risk factors of caprine brucellosis in Khartoum state, Sudan</title><author>Mohamed, Eman Mohamed-Ahmed ; Elfadil, Abdelhamid Ahemd Mohamed ; El-Sanousi, Enaam Mohamed ; Ibrahaem, Hatim Hamad ; Mohamed-Noor, Saad El-Tiab ; Abdalla, Mohamed Abdelsalam ; Shuaib, Yassir Adam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-5016d59addd8187b70b068090009673be3bb374d5dfc22873979d7161ebeae693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agglutination</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Brucellosis</topic><topic>Caprinae</topic><topic>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Geographical variations</topic><topic>Goats</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>rose bengal plate test</topic><topic>Serology</topic><topic>seroprevalence</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Sudan</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Eman Mohamed-Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elfadil, Abdelhamid Ahemd Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Sanousi, Enaam Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibrahaem, Hatim Hamad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed-Noor, Saad El-Tiab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdalla, Mohamed Abdelsalam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuaib, Yassir Adam</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>India Database</collection><collection>India Database: Business</collection><collection>India Database: Science &amp; Technology</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Veterinary World</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mohamed, Eman Mohamed-Ahmed</au><au>Elfadil, Abdelhamid Ahemd Mohamed</au><au>El-Sanousi, Enaam Mohamed</au><au>Ibrahaem, Hatim Hamad</au><au>Mohamed-Noor, Saad El-Tiab</au><au>Abdalla, Mohamed Abdelsalam</au><au>Shuaib, Yassir Adam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seroprevalence and risk factors of caprine brucellosis in Khartoum state, Sudan</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary World</jtitle><addtitle>Vet World</addtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>511</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>511-518</pages><issn>0972-8988</issn><eissn>2231-0916</eissn><abstract>This cross-sectional study was conducted from April to July 2012 in Khartoum state, Sudan, to determine the seroprevalence of brucellosis in goats and to investigate potential risk factors associated with this disease. A total of 307 serum samples were collected from both sexes of goats in four different localities and were subjected to testing for brucellosis using rose bengal plate test (RBPT), serum agglutination test (SAT), and competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA). The overall seroprevalence was 11.4% (n=35) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 7.80 to 15.0. Out of these 35 RBPT-positive samples, the positivity of 18 and 17 were confirmed by SAT and cELISA, respectively. A significant statistical variation was observed between brucellosis seroprevalences in goats purchased from local animal markets and goats that were raised at the farm. Conversely, such significant variations were not observed among the categories of other risk factors with seroprevalences ranging from 3.0% (95% CI between 0.40 and 7.20) to 16.3% (95% CI between 10.4 and 22.3). Location ( =9.33, df=3, p=0.02), breed ( =3.52, df=1, p=0.05), herd size ( =6.59, df=2, p=0.03), and herd expansion ( =5.39, df=1, p=0.02) were associated with RBPT-positive status for brucella in the two-tailed Chi-square test. In addition, Sharq an-Nil locality and goats raised at the farm had increased odds of being RBPT positive. Brucellosis was detected in goats in all surveyed localities. An effort should be made to educate goat owners/herders about brucellosis as well as about the importance of vaccination.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Veterinary World</pub><pmid>29805218</pmid><doi>10.14202/vetworld.2018.511-518</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0972-8988
ispartof Veterinary World, 2018-04, Vol.11 (4), p.511-518
issn 0972-8988
2231-0916
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_827d82e8fbd343eeae4e715616b991aa
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Agglutination
Beef cattle
Brucellosis
Caprinae
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Enzymes
Geographical variations
Goats
Health risks
Risk factors
rose bengal plate test
Serology
seroprevalence
Statistical analysis
Sudan
Vaccination
title Seroprevalence and risk factors of caprine brucellosis in Khartoum state, Sudan
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T15%3A32%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seroprevalence%20and%20risk%20factors%20of%20caprine%20brucellosis%20in%20Khartoum%20state,%20Sudan&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20World&rft.au=Mohamed,%20Eman%20Mohamed-Ahmed&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=511&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=511-518&rft.issn=0972-8988&rft.eissn=2231-0916&rft_id=info:doi/10.14202/vetworld.2018.511-518&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA581424526%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-5016d59addd8187b70b068090009673be3bb374d5dfc22873979d7161ebeae693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2067214690&rft_id=info:pmid/29805218&rft_galeid=A581424526&rfr_iscdi=true