Variability between Different Hand-Held Dynamometers for Measuring Muscle Strength

• Published in: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2024-03, Vol.24 (6), p.1861
• Main Authors: Du, William, Cornett, Kayla M D, Donlevy, Gabrielle A, Burns, Joshua, McKay, Marnee J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ankle; Atrophy; clinical outcome assessments; Clinical trials; clinical trials and cohort studies; Force; Hand Strength - physiology; Humans; Hydraulics; isometric muscle strength; load cell dynamometer; Muscle strength; Muscle Strength - physiology; Neuromuscular diseases; outcome measures; Reproducibility of Results; Shoulder; Upper Extremity
• ISSN: 1424-8220; 1424-8220
• DOI: 10.3390/s24061861

Muscle strength is routinely measured in patients with neuromuscular disorders by hand-held dynamometry incorporating a wireless load cell to evaluate disease severity and therapeutic efficacy, with magnitude of effect often based on normative reference values. While several hand-held dynamometers exist, their interchangeability is unknown which limits the utility of normative data. We investigated the variability between six commercially available dynamometers for measuring the isometric muscle strength of four muscle groups in thirty healthy individuals. Following electro-mechanical sensor calibration against knowns loads, Citec, Nicholas, MicroFET2, and Commander dynamometers were used to assess the strength of ankle dorsiflexors, hip internal rotators, and shoulder external rotators. Citec, Jamar Plus, and Baseline Hydraulic dynamometers were used to capture hand grip strength. Variability between dynamometers was represented as percent differences and statistical significance was calculated with one-way repeated measures ANOVA. Percent differences between dynamometers ranged from 0.2% to 16%. No significant differences were recorded between the Citec, Nicholas, and MicroFET2 dynamometers ( > 0.05). Citec grip strength measures differed to the Jamar Plus and Baseline Hydraulic dynamometers ( < 0.01). However, when controlling for grip circumference, they were comparable ( > 0.05). Several hand-held dynamometers can be used interchangeably to measure upper and lower limb strength, thereby maximising the use of normative reference values.