Loading…

Preoperative predictors of restoration in quality of life after surgery for lung cancer

Background The preoperative predictors of quality of life (QOL) in patients who undergo lung resection for lung cancer are poorly known. Here, we investigated these predictors in such patients using two QOL measures. Methods In this single‐institutional prospective cohort study, we administered the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Thoracic cancer 2021-03, Vol.12 (6), p.835-844
Main Authors: Ichimura, Hideo, Kobayashi, Keisuke, Gosho, Masahiko, Nakaoka, Kojiro, Yanagihara, Takahiro, Ueda, Sho, Saeki, Yusuke, Maki, Naoki, Kobayashi, Naohiro, Kikuchi, Shinji, Suzuki, Hisashi, Goto, Yukinobu, Sato, Yukio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6439-388cb5545e133012e460a2c0375082dd248ff388419c97c5a2ba705ad45bfd163
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6439-388cb5545e133012e460a2c0375082dd248ff388419c97c5a2ba705ad45bfd163
container_end_page 844
container_issue 6
container_start_page 835
container_title Thoracic cancer
container_volume 12
creator Ichimura, Hideo
Kobayashi, Keisuke
Gosho, Masahiko
Nakaoka, Kojiro
Yanagihara, Takahiro
Ueda, Sho
Saeki, Yusuke
Maki, Naoki
Kobayashi, Naohiro
Kikuchi, Shinji
Suzuki, Hisashi
Goto, Yukinobu
Sato, Yukio
description Background The preoperative predictors of quality of life (QOL) in patients who undergo lung resection for lung cancer are poorly known. Here, we investigated these predictors in such patients using two QOL measures. Methods In this single‐institutional prospective cohort study, we administered the EQ‐5D‐5 levels (EQ‐5D‐5L) from January 2015, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire with 30 items from April 2015 to April 2018 preoperatively (Pre) and at one month postoperatively (M1), and one year postoperatively (Y1). General health status was measured by the EQ‐5D visual analogue scale (VAS) and EORTC global health status/QOL (GHS) scores. Multivariable linear regression analyses were used to explore the preoperative predictors of QOL at Y1. Results A total of 223 patients were included in the study. The EQ‐5D VAS and EORTC GHS scores, at Pre, M1, and Y1, were 80 ± 15, 77 ± 15, and 84 ± 11; and 74 ± 19, 65 ± 20, and 78 ± 17, respectively. In the multivariable analyses, the albumin level, preoperative VAS score, and preoperative pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression were identified as predictors by the EQ‐5D VAS score. The preoperative EORTC GHS score, absence of diabetes mellitus, preoperative cognitive function score, and preoperative symptom score of pain were identified as predictors by the EORTC GHS score. Conclusions The EQ‐5D VAS and EORTC GHS scores traced similar trajectories of QOL. In both QOL measures, preoperative pain was found as a common predictor. These predictors may help improve patient/survivor care in the future. We investigated the preoperative predictors of QOL in surgical patients with lung cancer. General health status/QOL was measured by EQ‐5D VAS and EORTC GHS scores. Multivariable linear regression analyses were used. Although each QOL measure detected some preoperative predictors, preoperative pain was a common predictor in both, one year after surgery. Predictors detected in this study were possible targets for patient/survivor care.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1759-7714.13819
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_82b765c249cb4c869eb98426b1809650</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_82b765c249cb4c869eb98426b1809650</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2500220632</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6439-388cb5545e133012e460a2c0375082dd248ff388419c97c5a2ba705ad45bfd163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkstr3DAQh01paUKac29F0Esvm-hpSZdCWPoIBNpDSo9ClsdbLV5rM7IT9r-vHKdL00vnomHmp495VdVbRi9YsUumlV1pzeQFE4bZF9XpMfLy6NP6pDrPeUuLCWMpV6-rEyEUNcaK0-rnd4S0B_RjvAeyR2hjGBNmkjqCkItbMmkgcSB3k-_jeJgzfeyA-G4EJHnCDeCBdAlJPw0bEvwQAN9UrzrfZzh_es-qH58_3a6_rm6-fbleX92sQi2FXQljQqOUVMCEoIyDrKnngQpdCuRty6XpuiKSzAarg_K88Zoq30rVdC2rxVl1vXDb5Lduj3Hn8eCSj-4xkHDjPI4x9OAMb3StApc2NDKY2kJjjeR1wwy1taKF9XFh7admB22AYUTfP4M-zwzxl9uke6et4trqAvjwBMB0N5XpuV3MAfreD5Cm7Eo3ZVGcGV6k7_-RbtOEQxmV44pSzmktZtXlogqYckbojsUw6uYbcPOW3bxx93gD5ce7v3s46v9svAjUIniIPRz-x3O366sF_BvMpLpP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2500220632</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preoperative predictors of restoration in quality of life after surgery for lung cancer</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ichimura, Hideo ; Kobayashi, Keisuke ; Gosho, Masahiko ; Nakaoka, Kojiro ; Yanagihara, Takahiro ; Ueda, Sho ; Saeki, Yusuke ; Maki, Naoki ; Kobayashi, Naohiro ; Kikuchi, Shinji ; Suzuki, Hisashi ; Goto, Yukinobu ; Sato, Yukio</creator><creatorcontrib>Ichimura, Hideo ; Kobayashi, Keisuke ; Gosho, Masahiko ; Nakaoka, Kojiro ; Yanagihara, Takahiro ; Ueda, Sho ; Saeki, Yusuke ; Maki, Naoki ; Kobayashi, Naohiro ; Kikuchi, Shinji ; Suzuki, Hisashi ; Goto, Yukinobu ; Sato, Yukio</creatorcontrib><description>Background The preoperative predictors of quality of life (QOL) in patients who undergo lung resection for lung cancer are poorly known. Here, we investigated these predictors in such patients using two QOL measures. Methods In this single‐institutional prospective cohort study, we administered the EQ‐5D‐5 levels (EQ‐5D‐5L) from January 2015, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire with 30 items from April 2015 to April 2018 preoperatively (Pre) and at one month postoperatively (M1), and one year postoperatively (Y1). General health status was measured by the EQ‐5D visual analogue scale (VAS) and EORTC global health status/QOL (GHS) scores. Multivariable linear regression analyses were used to explore the preoperative predictors of QOL at Y1. Results A total of 223 patients were included in the study. The EQ‐5D VAS and EORTC GHS scores, at Pre, M1, and Y1, were 80 ± 15, 77 ± 15, and 84 ± 11; and 74 ± 19, 65 ± 20, and 78 ± 17, respectively. In the multivariable analyses, the albumin level, preoperative VAS score, and preoperative pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression were identified as predictors by the EQ‐5D VAS score. The preoperative EORTC GHS score, absence of diabetes mellitus, preoperative cognitive function score, and preoperative symptom score of pain were identified as predictors by the EORTC GHS score. Conclusions The EQ‐5D VAS and EORTC GHS scores traced similar trajectories of QOL. In both QOL measures, preoperative pain was found as a common predictor. These predictors may help improve patient/survivor care in the future. We investigated the preoperative predictors of QOL in surgical patients with lung cancer. General health status/QOL was measured by EQ‐5D VAS and EORTC GHS scores. Multivariable linear regression analyses were used. Although each QOL measure detected some preoperative predictors, preoperative pain was a common predictor in both, one year after surgery. Predictors detected in this study were possible targets for patient/survivor care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1759-7706</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1759-7714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13819</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33508893</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Comorbidity ; Lung cancer ; lung resection ; Original ; Ostomy ; Outpatient care facilities ; Patients ; preoperative pain ; Quality of life ; Questionnaires ; survivor care ; Thoracic surgery</subject><ispartof>Thoracic cancer, 2021-03, Vol.12 (6), p.835-844</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6439-388cb5545e133012e460a2c0375082dd248ff388419c97c5a2ba705ad45bfd163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6439-388cb5545e133012e460a2c0375082dd248ff388419c97c5a2ba705ad45bfd163</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2779-0108 ; 0000-0001-9338-8224</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2500220632/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2500220632?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,11541,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,46027,46451,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33508893$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ichimura, Hideo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosho, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakaoka, Kojiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagihara, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueda, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeki, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maki, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Naohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kikuchi, Shinji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Hisashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goto, Yukinobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Yukio</creatorcontrib><title>Preoperative predictors of restoration in quality of life after surgery for lung cancer</title><title>Thoracic cancer</title><addtitle>Thorac Cancer</addtitle><description>Background The preoperative predictors of quality of life (QOL) in patients who undergo lung resection for lung cancer are poorly known. Here, we investigated these predictors in such patients using two QOL measures. Methods In this single‐institutional prospective cohort study, we administered the EQ‐5D‐5 levels (EQ‐5D‐5L) from January 2015, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire with 30 items from April 2015 to April 2018 preoperatively (Pre) and at one month postoperatively (M1), and one year postoperatively (Y1). General health status was measured by the EQ‐5D visual analogue scale (VAS) and EORTC global health status/QOL (GHS) scores. Multivariable linear regression analyses were used to explore the preoperative predictors of QOL at Y1. Results A total of 223 patients were included in the study. The EQ‐5D VAS and EORTC GHS scores, at Pre, M1, and Y1, were 80 ± 15, 77 ± 15, and 84 ± 11; and 74 ± 19, 65 ± 20, and 78 ± 17, respectively. In the multivariable analyses, the albumin level, preoperative VAS score, and preoperative pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression were identified as predictors by the EQ‐5D VAS score. The preoperative EORTC GHS score, absence of diabetes mellitus, preoperative cognitive function score, and preoperative symptom score of pain were identified as predictors by the EORTC GHS score. Conclusions The EQ‐5D VAS and EORTC GHS scores traced similar trajectories of QOL. In both QOL measures, preoperative pain was found as a common predictor. These predictors may help improve patient/survivor care in the future. We investigated the preoperative predictors of QOL in surgical patients with lung cancer. General health status/QOL was measured by EQ‐5D VAS and EORTC GHS scores. Multivariable linear regression analyses were used. Although each QOL measure detected some preoperative predictors, preoperative pain was a common predictor in both, one year after surgery. Predictors detected in this study were possible targets for patient/survivor care.</description><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>lung resection</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Outpatient care facilities</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>preoperative pain</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>survivor care</subject><subject>Thoracic surgery</subject><issn>1759-7706</issn><issn>1759-7714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkstr3DAQh01paUKac29F0Esvm-hpSZdCWPoIBNpDSo9ClsdbLV5rM7IT9r-vHKdL00vnomHmp495VdVbRi9YsUumlV1pzeQFE4bZF9XpMfLy6NP6pDrPeUuLCWMpV6-rEyEUNcaK0-rnd4S0B_RjvAeyR2hjGBNmkjqCkItbMmkgcSB3k-_jeJgzfeyA-G4EJHnCDeCBdAlJPw0bEvwQAN9UrzrfZzh_es-qH58_3a6_rm6-fbleX92sQi2FXQljQqOUVMCEoIyDrKnngQpdCuRty6XpuiKSzAarg_K88Zoq30rVdC2rxVl1vXDb5Lduj3Hn8eCSj-4xkHDjPI4x9OAMb3StApc2NDKY2kJjjeR1wwy1taKF9XFh7admB22AYUTfP4M-zwzxl9uke6et4trqAvjwBMB0N5XpuV3MAfreD5Cm7Eo3ZVGcGV6k7_-RbtOEQxmV44pSzmktZtXlogqYckbojsUw6uYbcPOW3bxx93gD5ce7v3s46v9svAjUIniIPRz-x3O366sF_BvMpLpP</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Ichimura, Hideo</creator><creator>Kobayashi, Keisuke</creator><creator>Gosho, Masahiko</creator><creator>Nakaoka, Kojiro</creator><creator>Yanagihara, Takahiro</creator><creator>Ueda, Sho</creator><creator>Saeki, Yusuke</creator><creator>Maki, Naoki</creator><creator>Kobayashi, Naohiro</creator><creator>Kikuchi, Shinji</creator><creator>Suzuki, Hisashi</creator><creator>Goto, Yukinobu</creator><creator>Sato, Yukio</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2779-0108</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9338-8224</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Preoperative predictors of restoration in quality of life after surgery for lung cancer</title><author>Ichimura, Hideo ; Kobayashi, Keisuke ; Gosho, Masahiko ; Nakaoka, Kojiro ; Yanagihara, Takahiro ; Ueda, Sho ; Saeki, Yusuke ; Maki, Naoki ; Kobayashi, Naohiro ; Kikuchi, Shinji ; Suzuki, Hisashi ; Goto, Yukinobu ; Sato, Yukio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6439-388cb5545e133012e460a2c0375082dd248ff388419c97c5a2ba705ad45bfd163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>lung resection</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Outpatient care facilities</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>preoperative pain</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>survivor care</topic><topic>Thoracic surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ichimura, Hideo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosho, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakaoka, Kojiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagihara, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueda, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeki, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maki, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Naohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kikuchi, Shinji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Hisashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goto, Yukinobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Yukio</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Thoracic cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ichimura, Hideo</au><au>Kobayashi, Keisuke</au><au>Gosho, Masahiko</au><au>Nakaoka, Kojiro</au><au>Yanagihara, Takahiro</au><au>Ueda, Sho</au><au>Saeki, Yusuke</au><au>Maki, Naoki</au><au>Kobayashi, Naohiro</au><au>Kikuchi, Shinji</au><au>Suzuki, Hisashi</au><au>Goto, Yukinobu</au><au>Sato, Yukio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preoperative predictors of restoration in quality of life after surgery for lung cancer</atitle><jtitle>Thoracic cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Thorac Cancer</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>835</spage><epage>844</epage><pages>835-844</pages><issn>1759-7706</issn><eissn>1759-7714</eissn><abstract>Background The preoperative predictors of quality of life (QOL) in patients who undergo lung resection for lung cancer are poorly known. Here, we investigated these predictors in such patients using two QOL measures. Methods In this single‐institutional prospective cohort study, we administered the EQ‐5D‐5 levels (EQ‐5D‐5L) from January 2015, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire with 30 items from April 2015 to April 2018 preoperatively (Pre) and at one month postoperatively (M1), and one year postoperatively (Y1). General health status was measured by the EQ‐5D visual analogue scale (VAS) and EORTC global health status/QOL (GHS) scores. Multivariable linear regression analyses were used to explore the preoperative predictors of QOL at Y1. Results A total of 223 patients were included in the study. The EQ‐5D VAS and EORTC GHS scores, at Pre, M1, and Y1, were 80 ± 15, 77 ± 15, and 84 ± 11; and 74 ± 19, 65 ± 20, and 78 ± 17, respectively. In the multivariable analyses, the albumin level, preoperative VAS score, and preoperative pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression were identified as predictors by the EQ‐5D VAS score. The preoperative EORTC GHS score, absence of diabetes mellitus, preoperative cognitive function score, and preoperative symptom score of pain were identified as predictors by the EORTC GHS score. Conclusions The EQ‐5D VAS and EORTC GHS scores traced similar trajectories of QOL. In both QOL measures, preoperative pain was found as a common predictor. These predictors may help improve patient/survivor care in the future. We investigated the preoperative predictors of QOL in surgical patients with lung cancer. General health status/QOL was measured by EQ‐5D VAS and EORTC GHS scores. Multivariable linear regression analyses were used. Although each QOL measure detected some preoperative predictors, preoperative pain was a common predictor in both, one year after surgery. Predictors detected in this study were possible targets for patient/survivor care.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>33508893</pmid><doi>10.1111/1759-7714.13819</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2779-0108</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9338-8224</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1759-7706
ispartof Thoracic cancer, 2021-03, Vol.12 (6), p.835-844
issn 1759-7706
1759-7714
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_82b765c249cb4c869eb98426b1809650
source Publicly Available Content Database; Wiley Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Comorbidity
Lung cancer
lung resection
Original
Ostomy
Outpatient care facilities
Patients
preoperative pain
Quality of life
Questionnaires
survivor care
Thoracic surgery
title Preoperative predictors of restoration in quality of life after surgery for lung cancer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T23%3A01%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preoperative%20predictors%20of%20restoration%20in%20quality%20of%20life%20after%20surgery%20for%20lung%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Thoracic%20cancer&rft.au=Ichimura,%20Hideo&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=835&rft.epage=844&rft.pages=835-844&rft.issn=1759-7706&rft.eissn=1759-7714&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1759-7714.13819&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2500220632%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6439-388cb5545e133012e460a2c0375082dd248ff388419c97c5a2ba705ad45bfd163%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2500220632&rft_id=info:pmid/33508893&rfr_iscdi=true