Loading…
Changes in Shrimping Effort in the Gulf of Mexico and the Impacts to Red Snapper
Despite a complex management landscape and decades of overfishing, Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) stocks have grown substantially in the Gulf of Mexico and restrictions on the fisheries that catch them are being loosened. This year, annual shrimping effort was allowed to increase by 21% after Na...
Saved in:
| Published in: | iScience 2020-05, Vol.23 (5), p.101111-101111, Article 101111 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-6813e9faabc3b3d6bd40ce2c4f56b7bdd30c28f1bf1ea98f0dc2c295a289f4f3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-6813e9faabc3b3d6bd40ce2c4f56b7bdd30c28f1bf1ea98f0dc2c295a289f4f3 |
| container_end_page | 101111 |
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 101111 |
| container_title | iScience |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Gallaway, Benny J. Raborn, Scott W. Picariello, Laura Putman, Nathan F. |
| description | Despite a complex management landscape and decades of overfishing, Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) stocks have grown substantially in the Gulf of Mexico and restrictions on the fisheries that catch them are being loosened. This year, annual shrimping effort was allowed to increase by 21% after National Marine Fisheries Service scientists concluded that the resulting bycatch of Red Snapper would only reduce the annual allowable catch in other fisheries by ∼1% and have no impact on population growth. Nonetheless, the recreational fishing sector intensely campaigned against this rule, fueled by wild mischaracterization of shrimp trawl bycatch in media outlets targeting anglers. Here, we aim to elevate the debates surrounding Red Snapper management by presenting scientific and historical context for the potential impacts from shrimping. We discuss our views of the current problems facing Red Snapper and key ecological questions to address for more effective management of this resource.
[Display omitted]
Environmental Science; Ecology; Biological Sciences |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101111 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_82f019143896493bb8335492c6144c1e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2589004220302960</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_82f019143896493bb8335492c6144c1e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2406303194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-6813e9faabc3b3d6bd40ce2c4f56b7bdd30c28f1bf1ea98f0dc2c295a289f4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtPGzEUha2qVUGUP9BF5WU3Sf2aYSxVlaoIaCRQEbC3_LhOHE3GU9tB7b_HyQCCTb2xdXzu5-t7EPpMyZwS2n7bzEO2Yc4IOwh1vUPHrOnkjBDB3r86H6HTnDeEVCdhQrYf0RFngneckWN0s1jrYQUZhwHfrVPYjmFY4XPvYyp7rawBX-56j6PH1_A32Ij14A7ycjtqWzIuEd-Cw3eDHkdIn9AHr_sMp0_7Cbq_OL9f_Jpd_b5cLn5ezWzDaJm1HeUgvdbGcsNda5wgFpgVvmnNmXGOE8s6T42noGXnibPMMtlo1kkvPD9Bywnrot6osTau0z8VdVAHIaaV0qkE24PqmCdU0vpj2QrJjek4b4RktqVCWAqV9WNijTuzBWdhKEn3b6Bvb4awVqv4oM6YqJNvKuDrEyDFPzvIRW1rOND3eoC4y6raWk44laJa2WS1KeacwL88Q4naB6s2ah-s2gerpmBr0ZfXDb6UPMdYDd8nA9SJPwRIqiJgsOBCAlvqTML_-I_EfrMK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2406303194</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changes in Shrimping Effort in the Gulf of Mexico and the Impacts to Red Snapper</title><source>ScienceDirect (Online service)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Gallaway, Benny J. ; Raborn, Scott W. ; Picariello, Laura ; Putman, Nathan F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gallaway, Benny J. ; Raborn, Scott W. ; Picariello, Laura ; Putman, Nathan F.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite a complex management landscape and decades of overfishing, Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) stocks have grown substantially in the Gulf of Mexico and restrictions on the fisheries that catch them are being loosened. This year, annual shrimping effort was allowed to increase by 21% after National Marine Fisheries Service scientists concluded that the resulting bycatch of Red Snapper would only reduce the annual allowable catch in other fisheries by ∼1% and have no impact on population growth. Nonetheless, the recreational fishing sector intensely campaigned against this rule, fueled by wild mischaracterization of shrimp trawl bycatch in media outlets targeting anglers. Here, we aim to elevate the debates surrounding Red Snapper management by presenting scientific and historical context for the potential impacts from shrimping. We discuss our views of the current problems facing Red Snapper and key ecological questions to address for more effective management of this resource.
[Display omitted]
Environmental Science; Ecology; Biological Sciences</description><identifier>ISSN: 2589-0042</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2589-0042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101111</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32438320</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological Sciences ; Ecology ; Environmental Science ; Review</subject><ispartof>iScience, 2020-05, Vol.23 (5), p.101111-101111, Article 101111</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020 The Authors 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-6813e9faabc3b3d6bd40ce2c4f56b7bdd30c28f1bf1ea98f0dc2c295a289f4f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-6813e9faabc3b3d6bd40ce2c4f56b7bdd30c28f1bf1ea98f0dc2c295a289f4f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8485-7455</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7240115/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004220302960$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3535,27903,27904,45759,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32438320$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gallaway, Benny J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raborn, Scott W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Picariello, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Putman, Nathan F.</creatorcontrib><title>Changes in Shrimping Effort in the Gulf of Mexico and the Impacts to Red Snapper</title><title>iScience</title><addtitle>iScience</addtitle><description>Despite a complex management landscape and decades of overfishing, Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) stocks have grown substantially in the Gulf of Mexico and restrictions on the fisheries that catch them are being loosened. This year, annual shrimping effort was allowed to increase by 21% after National Marine Fisheries Service scientists concluded that the resulting bycatch of Red Snapper would only reduce the annual allowable catch in other fisheries by ∼1% and have no impact on population growth. Nonetheless, the recreational fishing sector intensely campaigned against this rule, fueled by wild mischaracterization of shrimp trawl bycatch in media outlets targeting anglers. Here, we aim to elevate the debates surrounding Red Snapper management by presenting scientific and historical context for the potential impacts from shrimping. We discuss our views of the current problems facing Red Snapper and key ecological questions to address for more effective management of this resource.
[Display omitted]
Environmental Science; Ecology; Biological Sciences</description><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Science</subject><subject>Review</subject><issn>2589-0042</issn><issn>2589-0042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtPGzEUha2qVUGUP9BF5WU3Sf2aYSxVlaoIaCRQEbC3_LhOHE3GU9tB7b_HyQCCTb2xdXzu5-t7EPpMyZwS2n7bzEO2Yc4IOwh1vUPHrOnkjBDB3r86H6HTnDeEVCdhQrYf0RFngneckWN0s1jrYQUZhwHfrVPYjmFY4XPvYyp7rawBX-56j6PH1_A32Ij14A7ycjtqWzIuEd-Cw3eDHkdIn9AHr_sMp0_7Cbq_OL9f_Jpd_b5cLn5ezWzDaJm1HeUgvdbGcsNda5wgFpgVvmnNmXGOE8s6T42noGXnibPMMtlo1kkvPD9Bywnrot6osTau0z8VdVAHIaaV0qkE24PqmCdU0vpj2QrJjek4b4RktqVCWAqV9WNijTuzBWdhKEn3b6Bvb4awVqv4oM6YqJNvKuDrEyDFPzvIRW1rOND3eoC4y6raWk44laJa2WS1KeacwL88Q4naB6s2ah-s2gerpmBr0ZfXDb6UPMdYDd8nA9SJPwRIqiJgsOBCAlvqTML_-I_EfrMK</recordid><startdate>20200522</startdate><enddate>20200522</enddate><creator>Gallaway, Benny J.</creator><creator>Raborn, Scott W.</creator><creator>Picariello, Laura</creator><creator>Putman, Nathan F.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8485-7455</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200522</creationdate><title>Changes in Shrimping Effort in the Gulf of Mexico and the Impacts to Red Snapper</title><author>Gallaway, Benny J. ; Raborn, Scott W. ; Picariello, Laura ; Putman, Nathan F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-6813e9faabc3b3d6bd40ce2c4f56b7bdd30c28f1bf1ea98f0dc2c295a289f4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biological Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Science</topic><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gallaway, Benny J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raborn, Scott W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Picariello, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Putman, Nathan F.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>iScience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gallaway, Benny J.</au><au>Raborn, Scott W.</au><au>Picariello, Laura</au><au>Putman, Nathan F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changes in Shrimping Effort in the Gulf of Mexico and the Impacts to Red Snapper</atitle><jtitle>iScience</jtitle><addtitle>iScience</addtitle><date>2020-05-22</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>101111</spage><epage>101111</epage><pages>101111-101111</pages><artnum>101111</artnum><issn>2589-0042</issn><eissn>2589-0042</eissn><abstract>Despite a complex management landscape and decades of overfishing, Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) stocks have grown substantially in the Gulf of Mexico and restrictions on the fisheries that catch them are being loosened. This year, annual shrimping effort was allowed to increase by 21% after National Marine Fisheries Service scientists concluded that the resulting bycatch of Red Snapper would only reduce the annual allowable catch in other fisheries by ∼1% and have no impact on population growth. Nonetheless, the recreational fishing sector intensely campaigned against this rule, fueled by wild mischaracterization of shrimp trawl bycatch in media outlets targeting anglers. Here, we aim to elevate the debates surrounding Red Snapper management by presenting scientific and historical context for the potential impacts from shrimping. We discuss our views of the current problems facing Red Snapper and key ecological questions to address for more effective management of this resource.
[Display omitted]
Environmental Science; Ecology; Biological Sciences</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32438320</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.isci.2020.101111</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8485-7455</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2589-0042 |
| ispartof | iScience, 2020-05, Vol.23 (5), p.101111-101111, Article 101111 |
| issn | 2589-0042 2589-0042 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_82f019143896493bb8335492c6144c1e |
| source | ScienceDirect (Online service); PubMed Central |
| subjects | Biological Sciences Ecology Environmental Science Review |
| title | Changes in Shrimping Effort in the Gulf of Mexico and the Impacts to Red Snapper |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T13%3A55%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changes%20in%20Shrimping%20Effort%20in%20the%20Gulf%20of%20Mexico%20and%20the%20Impacts%20to%20Red%20Snapper&rft.jtitle=iScience&rft.au=Gallaway,%20Benny%20J.&rft.date=2020-05-22&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=101111&rft.epage=101111&rft.pages=101111-101111&rft.artnum=101111&rft.issn=2589-0042&rft.eissn=2589-0042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101111&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2406303194%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-6813e9faabc3b3d6bd40ce2c4f56b7bdd30c28f1bf1ea98f0dc2c295a289f4f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2406303194&rft_id=info:pmid/32438320&rfr_iscdi=true |