Loading…
Neoadjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival for T3/4N+M0 rectal cancer patients: a population-based study of 20300 patients
Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to improve local control; however, whether it can improve overall survival (OS) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients remains controversial. We therefore aimed to examine the benefits of surgery alone, neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT), adjuvant R...
Saved in:
Published in: | Radiation oncology (London, England) England), 2020-02, Vol.15 (1), p.49-11, Article 49 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-65bbbdc3c45f5c4560fefd8407e3f4c3bce0533bd4aac208e647f16552342f833 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-65bbbdc3c45f5c4560fefd8407e3f4c3bce0533bd4aac208e647f16552342f833 |
container_end_page | 11 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 49 |
container_title | Radiation oncology (London, England) |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Zhao, Feng Wang, Jili Yu, Hao Cheng, Xiaofei Li, Xinke Zhu, Xuan Xu, Xiangming Lin, Jianjiang Chen, Xin Yan, Senxiang |
description | Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to improve local control; however, whether it can improve overall survival (OS) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients remains controversial. We therefore aimed to examine the benefits of surgery alone, neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT), adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy in stage II (T3/4N0M0) and III (any T and N + M0) on the OS of rectal cancer patients.
Date from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were used. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to compare patient prognoses across different treatment modalities. Cox hazard regression analysis were used to identify independent predictors of OS.
For stage T3/4N0M0 patients, neoadjuvant RT, adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy resulted in similar OS (all p > 0.05; mean survival, 115.89 months (M), 111.97 M, and 117.22 M, respectively), with better OS observed in these patients than in patients who underwent surgery alone (all p 0.05; mean survival, 121.50 M, 124.25 M, and 121.20 M, respectively), with better OS observed in these patients than in patients who underwent surgery alone (all p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13014-020-01497-4 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_83102504c9124ef7b240b0e35556c754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A616427573</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_83102504c9124ef7b240b0e35556c754</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A616427573</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-65bbbdc3c45f5c4560fefd8407e3f4c3bce0533bd4aac208e647f16552342f833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUl1rFDEUDaLYuvoHfJCAj2Xam-9ZH4RS_CjU-lLBt5DJJNsss5MxmRnYV3-52W5duyCBm-Tm3MM9NwehtwTOCanlRSYMCK-AQlX2par4M3RKFK8rRdTP50_OJ-hVzmsALhgsX6ITRgkwJcQp-n3romnX02z6ESfThjjeu2SGLQ6bIcXZZVxCMl2H85TmMJsO-5jwHbvgt2ffACdnx5Kzprcu4cGMwfVj_oANHuIwdeUe-6ox2bU4j1O7xdFjCgzggH2NXnjTZffmcV-gH58_3V19rW6-f7m-uryprJBsrKRomqa1zHLhRQkSvPNtzUE55rlljXUgGGtaboylUDvJlSdSCMo49TVjC3S9522jWeshhY1JWx1N0A-JmFbapDHYzumaEaACuF0Syp1XDeXQgGNCCGmV4IXr455rmJqNa23RUWZ0RHr80od7vYqzVuUPeBn-Ar1_JEjx1-TyqNdxSn3RrylTNV8Cl-wfamVKV6H3sZDZTchWX0oiOVVC7VDn_0GV1bpNsLF3PpT8UQHdF9gUc07OHxonoHfW0ntr6WIt_WAtvZP87qnkQ8lfL7E_q5_I8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2378490463</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neoadjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival for T3/4N+M0 rectal cancer patients: a population-based study of 20300 patients</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Zhao, Feng ; Wang, Jili ; Yu, Hao ; Cheng, Xiaofei ; Li, Xinke ; Zhu, Xuan ; Xu, Xiangming ; Lin, Jianjiang ; Chen, Xin ; Yan, Senxiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Feng ; Wang, Jili ; Yu, Hao ; Cheng, Xiaofei ; Li, Xinke ; Zhu, Xuan ; Xu, Xiangming ; Lin, Jianjiang ; Chen, Xin ; Yan, Senxiang</creatorcontrib><description>Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to improve local control; however, whether it can improve overall survival (OS) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients remains controversial. We therefore aimed to examine the benefits of surgery alone, neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT), adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy in stage II (T3/4N0M0) and III (any T and N + M0) on the OS of rectal cancer patients.
Date from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were used. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to compare patient prognoses across different treatment modalities. Cox hazard regression analysis were used to identify independent predictors of OS.
For stage T3/4N0M0 patients, neoadjuvant RT, adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy resulted in similar OS (all p > 0.05; mean survival, 115.89 months (M), 111.97 M, and 117.22 M, respectively), with better OS observed in these patients than in patients who underwent surgery alone (all p < 0.001, mean survival, 88.96 M). For stage T1/2N + M0 patients, neoadjuvant RT, adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy resulted in similar OS (all p > 0.05; mean survival, 121.50 M, 124.25 M, and 121.20 M, respectively), with better OS observed in these patients than in patients who underwent surgery alone (all p < 0.001, mean survival 83.81 M). For stage T3/4N + M0 patients, neoadjuvant RT (HR = 0.436; 95% CI, 0.396~0.478; p < 0.001) resulted in significantly longer OS than adjuvant RT and surgery plus chemotherapy (mean survival, 104.47 M, 93.94 M, and 93.62 M, respectively), with better OS observed in these patients than in patients who underwent surgery alone (all p < 0.001, mean survival 54.87 M). Older age (> 60 years), black race, unmarried status, high tumour grade, and tumour size > 5 cm were all associated with a poor prognosis (all p < 0.05).
Neoadjuvant RT, adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy results in better OS than surgery alone in LARC patients. Neoadjuvant RT has the potential to be highly recommended over adjuvant RT and surgery plus chemotherapy for T3/4N + M0 patients; however, it showed no OS advantage over adjuvant RT or surgery plus chemotherapy for T3/4N0M0 and T1/2N + M0 patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-717X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-717X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01497-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32103755</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; African Continental Ancestry Group ; Age ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cancer patients ; Cancer research ; Cancer therapies ; Cancer treatment ; Care and treatment ; Chemotherapy ; Colorectal cancer ; Development and progression ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Health risk assessment ; Humans ; Intelligence gathering ; Male ; Marital status ; Medical research ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Overall survival (OS) ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; Population ; Population studies ; Population-based studies ; Prognosis ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Radiation ; Radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy (RT) ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Rectal cancer ; Rectal Neoplasms - mortality ; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Rectal Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Rectum ; Regression analysis ; Retirement benefits ; Studies ; Surgery ; Therapeutics ; Tumors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Radiation oncology (London, England), 2020-02, Vol.15 (1), p.49-11, Article 49</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-65bbbdc3c45f5c4560fefd8407e3f4c3bce0533bd4aac208e647f16552342f833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-65bbbdc3c45f5c4560fefd8407e3f4c3bce0533bd4aac208e647f16552342f833</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4441-9992</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045410/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2378490463?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103755$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Xiaofei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xinke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiangming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Jianjiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Senxiang</creatorcontrib><title>Neoadjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival for T3/4N+M0 rectal cancer patients: a population-based study of 20300 patients</title><title>Radiation oncology (London, England)</title><addtitle>Radiat Oncol</addtitle><description>Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to improve local control; however, whether it can improve overall survival (OS) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients remains controversial. We therefore aimed to examine the benefits of surgery alone, neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT), adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy in stage II (T3/4N0M0) and III (any T and N + M0) on the OS of rectal cancer patients.
Date from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were used. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to compare patient prognoses across different treatment modalities. Cox hazard regression analysis were used to identify independent predictors of OS.
For stage T3/4N0M0 patients, neoadjuvant RT, adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy resulted in similar OS (all p > 0.05; mean survival, 115.89 months (M), 111.97 M, and 117.22 M, respectively), with better OS observed in these patients than in patients who underwent surgery alone (all p < 0.001, mean survival, 88.96 M). For stage T1/2N + M0 patients, neoadjuvant RT, adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy resulted in similar OS (all p > 0.05; mean survival, 121.50 M, 124.25 M, and 121.20 M, respectively), with better OS observed in these patients than in patients who underwent surgery alone (all p < 0.001, mean survival 83.81 M). For stage T3/4N + M0 patients, neoadjuvant RT (HR = 0.436; 95% CI, 0.396~0.478; p < 0.001) resulted in significantly longer OS than adjuvant RT and surgery plus chemotherapy (mean survival, 104.47 M, 93.94 M, and 93.62 M, respectively), with better OS observed in these patients than in patients who underwent surgery alone (all p < 0.001, mean survival 54.87 M). Older age (> 60 years), black race, unmarried status, high tumour grade, and tumour size > 5 cm were all associated with a poor prognosis (all p < 0.05).
Neoadjuvant RT, adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy results in better OS than surgery alone in LARC patients. Neoadjuvant RT has the potential to be highly recommended over adjuvant RT and surgery plus chemotherapy for T3/4N + M0 patients; however, it showed no OS advantage over adjuvant RT or surgery plus chemotherapy for T3/4N0M0 and T1/2N + M0 patients.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>African Continental Ancestry Group</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cancer treatment</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intelligence gathering</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marital status</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Overall survival (OS)</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Population-based studies</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy (RT)</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Rectal cancer</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Retirement benefits</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Therapeutics</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1748-717X</issn><issn>1748-717X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUl1rFDEUDaLYuvoHfJCAj2Xam-9ZH4RS_CjU-lLBt5DJJNsss5MxmRnYV3-52W5duyCBm-Tm3MM9NwehtwTOCanlRSYMCK-AQlX2par4M3RKFK8rRdTP50_OJ-hVzmsALhgsX6ITRgkwJcQp-n3romnX02z6ESfThjjeu2SGLQ6bIcXZZVxCMl2H85TmMJsO-5jwHbvgt2ffACdnx5Kzprcu4cGMwfVj_oANHuIwdeUe-6ox2bU4j1O7xdFjCgzggH2NXnjTZffmcV-gH58_3V19rW6-f7m-uryprJBsrKRomqa1zHLhRQkSvPNtzUE55rlljXUgGGtaboylUDvJlSdSCMo49TVjC3S9522jWeshhY1JWx1N0A-JmFbapDHYzumaEaACuF0Syp1XDeXQgGNCCGmV4IXr455rmJqNa23RUWZ0RHr80od7vYqzVuUPeBn-Ar1_JEjx1-TyqNdxSn3RrylTNV8Cl-wfamVKV6H3sZDZTchWX0oiOVVC7VDn_0GV1bpNsLF3PpT8UQHdF9gUc07OHxonoHfW0ntr6WIt_WAtvZP87qnkQ8lfL7E_q5_I8Q</recordid><startdate>20200227</startdate><enddate>20200227</enddate><creator>Zhao, Feng</creator><creator>Wang, Jili</creator><creator>Yu, Hao</creator><creator>Cheng, Xiaofei</creator><creator>Li, Xinke</creator><creator>Zhu, Xuan</creator><creator>Xu, Xiangming</creator><creator>Lin, Jianjiang</creator><creator>Chen, Xin</creator><creator>Yan, Senxiang</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4441-9992</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200227</creationdate><title>Neoadjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival for T3/4N+M0 rectal cancer patients: a population-based study of 20300 patients</title><author>Zhao, Feng ; Wang, Jili ; Yu, Hao ; Cheng, Xiaofei ; Li, Xinke ; Zhu, Xuan ; Xu, Xiangming ; Lin, Jianjiang ; Chen, Xin ; Yan, Senxiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-65bbbdc3c45f5c4560fefd8407e3f4c3bce0533bd4aac208e647f16552342f833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>African Continental Ancestry Group</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cancer treatment</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intelligence gathering</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marital status</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Overall survival (OS)</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Population-based studies</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy (RT)</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Rectal cancer</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Retirement benefits</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Therapeutics</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Xiaofei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xinke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiangming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Jianjiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Senxiang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Radiation oncology (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Feng</au><au>Wang, Jili</au><au>Yu, Hao</au><au>Cheng, Xiaofei</au><au>Li, Xinke</au><au>Zhu, Xuan</au><au>Xu, Xiangming</au><au>Lin, Jianjiang</au><au>Chen, Xin</au><au>Yan, Senxiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neoadjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival for T3/4N+M0 rectal cancer patients: a population-based study of 20300 patients</atitle><jtitle>Radiation oncology (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Oncol</addtitle><date>2020-02-27</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>49-11</pages><artnum>49</artnum><issn>1748-717X</issn><eissn>1748-717X</eissn><abstract>Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to improve local control; however, whether it can improve overall survival (OS) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients remains controversial. We therefore aimed to examine the benefits of surgery alone, neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT), adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy in stage II (T3/4N0M0) and III (any T and N + M0) on the OS of rectal cancer patients.
Date from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were used. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to compare patient prognoses across different treatment modalities. Cox hazard regression analysis were used to identify independent predictors of OS.
For stage T3/4N0M0 patients, neoadjuvant RT, adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy resulted in similar OS (all p > 0.05; mean survival, 115.89 months (M), 111.97 M, and 117.22 M, respectively), with better OS observed in these patients than in patients who underwent surgery alone (all p < 0.001, mean survival, 88.96 M). For stage T1/2N + M0 patients, neoadjuvant RT, adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy resulted in similar OS (all p > 0.05; mean survival, 121.50 M, 124.25 M, and 121.20 M, respectively), with better OS observed in these patients than in patients who underwent surgery alone (all p < 0.001, mean survival 83.81 M). For stage T3/4N + M0 patients, neoadjuvant RT (HR = 0.436; 95% CI, 0.396~0.478; p < 0.001) resulted in significantly longer OS than adjuvant RT and surgery plus chemotherapy (mean survival, 104.47 M, 93.94 M, and 93.62 M, respectively), with better OS observed in these patients than in patients who underwent surgery alone (all p < 0.001, mean survival 54.87 M). Older age (> 60 years), black race, unmarried status, high tumour grade, and tumour size > 5 cm were all associated with a poor prognosis (all p < 0.05).
Neoadjuvant RT, adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy results in better OS than surgery alone in LARC patients. Neoadjuvant RT has the potential to be highly recommended over adjuvant RT and surgery plus chemotherapy for T3/4N + M0 patients; however, it showed no OS advantage over adjuvant RT or surgery plus chemotherapy for T3/4N0M0 and T1/2N + M0 patients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>32103755</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13014-020-01497-4</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4441-9992</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-717X |
ispartof | Radiation oncology (London, England), 2020-02, Vol.15 (1), p.49-11, Article 49 |
issn | 1748-717X 1748-717X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_83102504c9124ef7b240b0e35556c754 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Adolescent Adult African Continental Ancestry Group Age Age Factors Aged Aged, 80 and over Cancer patients Cancer research Cancer therapies Cancer treatment Care and treatment Chemotherapy Colorectal cancer Development and progression Epidemiology Female Health risk assessment Humans Intelligence gathering Male Marital status Medical research Methods Middle Aged Neoplasm Staging Overall survival (OS) Patient outcomes Patients Population Population studies Population-based studies Prognosis Proportional Hazards Models Radiation Radiation therapy Radiotherapy Radiotherapy (RT) Radiotherapy, Adjuvant Rectal cancer Rectal Neoplasms - mortality Rectal Neoplasms - pathology Rectal Neoplasms - radiotherapy Rectum Regression analysis Retirement benefits Studies Surgery Therapeutics Tumors Young Adult |
title | Neoadjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival for T3/4N+M0 rectal cancer patients: a population-based study of 20300 patients |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T07%3A33%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neoadjuvant%20radiotherapy%20improves%20overall%20survival%20for%20T3/4N+M0%20rectal%20cancer%20patients:%20a%20population-based%20study%20of%2020300%20patients&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20oncology%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Zhao,%20Feng&rft.date=2020-02-27&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=49-11&rft.artnum=49&rft.issn=1748-717X&rft.eissn=1748-717X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13014-020-01497-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA616427573%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-65bbbdc3c45f5c4560fefd8407e3f4c3bce0533bd4aac208e647f16552342f833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2378490463&rft_id=info:pmid/32103755&rft_galeid=A616427573&rfr_iscdi=true |