Three bedside techniques to quantify dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation in mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

• Published in: Annals of intensive care 2021-12, Vol.11 (1), p.167-167, Article 167
• Main Authors: Roesthuis, L. H., van der Hoeven, J. G., Guérin, C., Doorduin, J., Heunks, L. M. A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Airway management; Anesthesiology; Bedside techniques; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Critical Care Medicine; Dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation; Emergency Medicine; Intensive; Intensive care; Mechanical ventilation; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Respiratory distress syndrome; Ventilators; Volume at end-inspiration
• ISSN: 2110-5820; 2110-5820
• DOI: 10.1186/s13613-021-00948-9

Background Dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation may develop in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) due to dynamic airway collapse and/or increased airway resistance, increasing the risk of volutrauma and hemodynamic compromise. The reference standard to quantify dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation is the measurement of the volume at end-inspiration (Vei). As this is cumbersome, the aim of this study was to evaluate if methods that are easier to perform at the bedside can accurately reflect Vei. Methods Vei was assessed in COPD patients under controlled protective mechanical ventilation (7 ± mL/kg) on zero end-expiratory pressure, using three techniques in a fixed order: (1) reference standard (Vei reference ): passive exhalation to atmosphere from end-inspiration in a calibrated glass burette; (2) ventilator maneuver (Vei maneuver ): measuring the expired volume during a passive exhalation of 45s using the ventilator flow sensor; (3) formula (Vei formula ): (Vt ×  P plateau )/( P plateau  − PEEP i ), with Vt tidal volume, P plateau is plateau pressure after an end-inspiratory occlusion, and PEEP i is intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure after an end-expiratory occlusion. A convenience sample of 17 patients was recruited. Results Vei reference was 1030 ± 380 mL and had no significant correlation with P plateau ( r 2  = 0.06; P  = 0.3710) or PEEP i ( r 2  = 0.11; P  = 0.2156), and was inversely related with P drive (calculated as P plateau  −PEEP i ) ( r 2  = 0.49; P  = 0.0024). A low bias but rather wide limits of agreement and fairly good correlations were found when comparing Vei maneuver and Vei formula to Vei reference . Vei remained stable during the study period (low bias 15 mL with high agreement (95% limits of agreement from − 100 to 130 mL) and high correlation ( r 2  = 0.98; P