Loading…

Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) of a flood monitoring system based on the Internet of Things (IoT)

Indonesia records exceptionally high rainfall, particularly during the rainy season when almost all areas of the country are consistently showered with heavy rain. Vigilance is therefore crucial due to the risk of flooding from overflowing rivers or dams. It is essential to develop flood monitoring...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:E3S web of conferences 2023-01, Vol.464, p.1004
Main Authors: Rachmawardani, Agustina, Hernandi Virgianto, Rista, Giarno, Prabowo, Djoko, Nardi, Widiatmoko Wastumirad, Adi, Firyal Rasya, Muhammad, Majdi Ash-Shiddiqyi, Khaerul
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Indonesia records exceptionally high rainfall, particularly during the rainy season when almost all areas of the country are consistently showered with heavy rain. Vigilance is therefore crucial due to the risk of flooding from overflowing rivers or dams. It is essential to develop flood monitoring systems to mitigate the risk and impact of flooding. This study aimed to design and build a flood monitoring system with parameters that support flood warnings. These include measurement of the water level using an ultrasonic sensor and rainfall using a tipping bucket-based hall sensor. The flood detection system was installed at Pondok Aren, Tangerang Selatan, Banten. A website was developed to display information on water levels and rainfall measurements every 10 minutes, as well as cumulative rainfall over 24 hours, presented in values, tables, and graphs. The device design included a warning feature in the form of a strobe light that would activate if the water level exceeded the minimum threshold in addition to providing rainfall status notifications. The system performed well in trials, with data transmitted to the database every 10 minutes. Raingauge sensors exhibited a 0.86% error rate, while the ultrasonic sensor showed an average error rate of just 0.25%.
ISSN:2267-1242
2267-1242
DOI:10.1051/e3sconf/202346401004