Loading…
Exploring the potential of computer vision analysis of pupae size dimorphism for adaptive sex sorting systems of various vector mosquito species
Several mosquito population suppression strategies based on the rearing and release of sterile males have provided promising results. However, the lack of an efficient male selection method has hampered the expansion of these approaches into large-scale operational programmes. Currently, most of the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Parasites & vectors 2018-12, Vol.11 (Suppl 2), p.656-656, Article 656 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-7dcc8a81479748fba3fc0ed4f231e6143b34515068d2f9758c87a90f25b6ae303 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-7dcc8a81479748fba3fc0ed4f231e6143b34515068d2f9758c87a90f25b6ae303 |
container_end_page | 656 |
container_issue | Suppl 2 |
container_start_page | 656 |
container_title | Parasites & vectors |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Zacarés, Mario Salvador-Herranz, Gustavo Almenar, David Tur, Carles Argilés, Rafael Bourtzis, Kostas Bossin, Hervé Pla, Ignacio |
description | Several mosquito population suppression strategies based on the rearing and release of sterile males have provided promising results. However, the lack of an efficient male selection method has hampered the expansion of these approaches into large-scale operational programmes. Currently, most of these programmes targeting Aedes mosquitoes rely on sorting methods based on the sexual size dimorphism (SSD) at the pupal stage. The currently available sorting methods have not been developed based on biometric analysis, and there is therefore potential for improvement. We applied an automated pupal size estimator developed by Grupo Tragsa with laboratory samples of Anopheles arabiensis, Aedes albopictus, Ae. polynesiensis, and three strains of Ae. aegypti. The frequency distribution of the pupal size was analyzed. We propose a general model for the analysis of the frequency distribution of mosquito pupae in the context of SSD-sorting methods, which is based on a Gaussian mixture distribution functions, thus making possible the analysis of performance (% males recovery) and purity (% males on the sorted sample).
For the three Aedes species, the distribution of the pupae size can be modeled by a mixture of two Gaussian distribution functions and the proposed model fitted the experimental data. For a given population, each size threshold is linked to a specific outcome of male recovery. Two dimensionless parameters that measure the suitability for SSD-based sorting of a specific batch of pupae are provided. The optimal sorting results are predicted for the highest values of SSD and lowest values of intra-batch variance. Rearing conditions have a strong influence in the performance of the SSD-sorting methods and non-standard rearing can lead to increase pupae size heterogeneity.
Sex sorting of pupae based on size dimorphism can be achieved with a high performance (% males recovery) and a reasonably high purity (% males on the sorted sample) for the different Aedes species and strains. The purity and performance of a sex sorting operation in the tested Aedes species are linked parameters whose relation can be modeled. The conclusions of this analysis are applicable to all the existing SSD-sorting methods. The efficiency of the SSD-sorting methods can be improved by reducing the heterogeneity of pupae size within rearing containers. The heterogeneity between batches does not strongly affect the quality of the sex sorting, as long as a specific separation threshold is |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13071-018-3221-x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_839ffb08151f45909c6b2bc72f5a4fe5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A569156097</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_839ffb08151f45909c6b2bc72f5a4fe5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A569156097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-7dcc8a81479748fba3fc0ed4f231e6143b34515068d2f9758c87a90f25b6ae303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkstu1DAYhSMEoqXwAGyQJTZlkeJLfMkGaVQVOtJISFzWluPYMx4lcWo7oxmegkfGc6G03aAsEv3_d07ik1MUbxG8QkiwjxERyFEJkSgJxqjcPivOEaesJATS5w-ez4pXMa4hZLCm7GVxlkeCcIzPi98327HzwQ1LkFYGjD6ZITnVAW-B9v04JRPAxkXnB6AG1e2ii_vdOI3KgOh-GdC63odx5WIPrA9AtWpMbpOXZguiD2nvHXcxmf6g3Kjg_BTBxuiU8d7Hu8klD-JotDPxdfHCqi6aN6f7RfHz882P69ty8fXL_Hq2KDUjJJW81VoogSpe80rYRhGroWkriwkyDFWkIRVFFDLRYltzKrTgqoYW04YpQyC5KOZH39artRyD61XYSa-cPAx8WEqVv113RgpSW9tAgSiyFa1hrVmDG82xpaqyhmavT0evcWp60-ocYVDdI9PHm8Gt5NJvJCOw4oxlgw9Hg9UT2e1sIfcziCEkNcQblNnL08uCv5tMTLJ3UZuuU4PJuUqMMRQ1qkn1fxQxSBjhFcno-yfo2k8h__ADJTiuqwN1daSWKufiBuvzcXS-WtM77QdjXZ7PKKsRzV3j_w52EmQmmW1aqilGOf_-7TGLjqwOPsZg7H0SCMp93-Wx7zL3Xe77LrdZ8-5h8veKvwUnfwDWZPyd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2168729443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring the potential of computer vision analysis of pupae size dimorphism for adaptive sex sorting systems of various vector mosquito species</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Zacarés, Mario ; Salvador-Herranz, Gustavo ; Almenar, David ; Tur, Carles ; Argilés, Rafael ; Bourtzis, Kostas ; Bossin, Hervé ; Pla, Ignacio</creator><creatorcontrib>Zacarés, Mario ; Salvador-Herranz, Gustavo ; Almenar, David ; Tur, Carles ; Argilés, Rafael ; Bourtzis, Kostas ; Bossin, Hervé ; Pla, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><description>Several mosquito population suppression strategies based on the rearing and release of sterile males have provided promising results. However, the lack of an efficient male selection method has hampered the expansion of these approaches into large-scale operational programmes. Currently, most of these programmes targeting Aedes mosquitoes rely on sorting methods based on the sexual size dimorphism (SSD) at the pupal stage. The currently available sorting methods have not been developed based on biometric analysis, and there is therefore potential for improvement. We applied an automated pupal size estimator developed by Grupo Tragsa with laboratory samples of Anopheles arabiensis, Aedes albopictus, Ae. polynesiensis, and three strains of Ae. aegypti. The frequency distribution of the pupal size was analyzed. We propose a general model for the analysis of the frequency distribution of mosquito pupae in the context of SSD-sorting methods, which is based on a Gaussian mixture distribution functions, thus making possible the analysis of performance (% males recovery) and purity (% males on the sorted sample).
For the three Aedes species, the distribution of the pupae size can be modeled by a mixture of two Gaussian distribution functions and the proposed model fitted the experimental data. For a given population, each size threshold is linked to a specific outcome of male recovery. Two dimensionless parameters that measure the suitability for SSD-based sorting of a specific batch of pupae are provided. The optimal sorting results are predicted for the highest values of SSD and lowest values of intra-batch variance. Rearing conditions have a strong influence in the performance of the SSD-sorting methods and non-standard rearing can lead to increase pupae size heterogeneity.
Sex sorting of pupae based on size dimorphism can be achieved with a high performance (% males recovery) and a reasonably high purity (% males on the sorted sample) for the different Aedes species and strains. The purity and performance of a sex sorting operation in the tested Aedes species are linked parameters whose relation can be modeled. The conclusions of this analysis are applicable to all the existing SSD-sorting methods. The efficiency of the SSD-sorting methods can be improved by reducing the heterogeneity of pupae size within rearing containers. The heterogeneity between batches does not strongly affect the quality of the sex sorting, as long as a specific separation threshold is not pre-set before the sorting process. For new developments, we recommend using adaptive and precise threshold selection methods applied individually to each batch or to a mix of batches. Adaptive and precise thresholds will allow the sex-sorting of mixed batches in operational conditions maintaining the target purity at the cost of a reduction in performance. We also recommend a strategy whereby an acceptable level of purity is pre-selected and remains constant across the different batches of pupae while the performance varies from batch to batch to fit with the desired purity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-3305</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-3305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13071-018-3221-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30583722</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptive systems ; Aedes ; Aedes aegypti ; Aedes albopictus ; Aedes polynesiensis ; Anopheles arabiensis ; Aquatic insects ; Automation ; Biometrical analysis ; biometry ; Computer aided design ; Computer vision ; Containers ; Dimorphism (Biology) ; Distribution functions ; Efficiency ; Frequency distribution ; Gaussian distribution ; Heterogeneity ; Human health and pathology ; Identification and classification ; Individual rearing ; Infectious diseases ; Innovations ; Life Sciences ; male sterility ; Males ; Mathematical models ; Methods ; Morphometrics frequency distribution models ; Mosquitoes ; Normal distribution ; Observations ; Parameters ; Pupae ; Purity ; rearing ; Recovery ; selection methods ; Sex ; Sex sorting methods ; Sexual dimorphism ; Sexual size dimorphism ; Species ; Sterile insect technique ; variance ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Parasites & vectors, 2018-12, Vol.11 (Suppl 2), p.656-656, Article 656</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-7dcc8a81479748fba3fc0ed4f231e6143b34515068d2f9758c87a90f25b6ae303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-7dcc8a81479748fba3fc0ed4f231e6143b34515068d2f9758c87a90f25b6ae303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304766/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2168729443?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25732,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30583722$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02003902$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zacarés, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvador-Herranz, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almenar, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tur, Carles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argilés, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourtzis, Kostas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossin, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pla, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring the potential of computer vision analysis of pupae size dimorphism for adaptive sex sorting systems of various vector mosquito species</title><title>Parasites & vectors</title><addtitle>Parasit Vectors</addtitle><description>Several mosquito population suppression strategies based on the rearing and release of sterile males have provided promising results. However, the lack of an efficient male selection method has hampered the expansion of these approaches into large-scale operational programmes. Currently, most of these programmes targeting Aedes mosquitoes rely on sorting methods based on the sexual size dimorphism (SSD) at the pupal stage. The currently available sorting methods have not been developed based on biometric analysis, and there is therefore potential for improvement. We applied an automated pupal size estimator developed by Grupo Tragsa with laboratory samples of Anopheles arabiensis, Aedes albopictus, Ae. polynesiensis, and three strains of Ae. aegypti. The frequency distribution of the pupal size was analyzed. We propose a general model for the analysis of the frequency distribution of mosquito pupae in the context of SSD-sorting methods, which is based on a Gaussian mixture distribution functions, thus making possible the analysis of performance (% males recovery) and purity (% males on the sorted sample).
For the three Aedes species, the distribution of the pupae size can be modeled by a mixture of two Gaussian distribution functions and the proposed model fitted the experimental data. For a given population, each size threshold is linked to a specific outcome of male recovery. Two dimensionless parameters that measure the suitability for SSD-based sorting of a specific batch of pupae are provided. The optimal sorting results are predicted for the highest values of SSD and lowest values of intra-batch variance. Rearing conditions have a strong influence in the performance of the SSD-sorting methods and non-standard rearing can lead to increase pupae size heterogeneity.
Sex sorting of pupae based on size dimorphism can be achieved with a high performance (% males recovery) and a reasonably high purity (% males on the sorted sample) for the different Aedes species and strains. The purity and performance of a sex sorting operation in the tested Aedes species are linked parameters whose relation can be modeled. The conclusions of this analysis are applicable to all the existing SSD-sorting methods. The efficiency of the SSD-sorting methods can be improved by reducing the heterogeneity of pupae size within rearing containers. The heterogeneity between batches does not strongly affect the quality of the sex sorting, as long as a specific separation threshold is not pre-set before the sorting process. For new developments, we recommend using adaptive and precise threshold selection methods applied individually to each batch or to a mix of batches. Adaptive and precise thresholds will allow the sex-sorting of mixed batches in operational conditions maintaining the target purity at the cost of a reduction in performance. We also recommend a strategy whereby an acceptable level of purity is pre-selected and remains constant across the different batches of pupae while the performance varies from batch to batch to fit with the desired purity.</description><subject>Adaptive systems</subject><subject>Aedes</subject><subject>Aedes aegypti</subject><subject>Aedes albopictus</subject><subject>Aedes polynesiensis</subject><subject>Anopheles arabiensis</subject><subject>Aquatic insects</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Biometrical analysis</subject><subject>biometry</subject><subject>Computer aided design</subject><subject>Computer vision</subject><subject>Containers</subject><subject>Dimorphism (Biology)</subject><subject>Distribution functions</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Frequency distribution</subject><subject>Gaussian distribution</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Identification and classification</subject><subject>Individual rearing</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>male sterility</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Morphometrics frequency distribution models</subject><subject>Mosquitoes</subject><subject>Normal distribution</subject><subject>Observations</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Pupae</subject><subject>Purity</subject><subject>rearing</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>selection methods</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex sorting methods</subject><subject>Sexual dimorphism</subject><subject>Sexual size dimorphism</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Sterile insect technique</subject><subject>variance</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>1756-3305</issn><issn>1756-3305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkstu1DAYhSMEoqXwAGyQJTZlkeJLfMkGaVQVOtJISFzWluPYMx4lcWo7oxmegkfGc6G03aAsEv3_d07ik1MUbxG8QkiwjxERyFEJkSgJxqjcPivOEaesJATS5w-ez4pXMa4hZLCm7GVxlkeCcIzPi98327HzwQ1LkFYGjD6ZITnVAW-B9v04JRPAxkXnB6AG1e2ii_vdOI3KgOh-GdC63odx5WIPrA9AtWpMbpOXZguiD2nvHXcxmf6g3Kjg_BTBxuiU8d7Hu8klD-JotDPxdfHCqi6aN6f7RfHz882P69ty8fXL_Hq2KDUjJJW81VoogSpe80rYRhGroWkriwkyDFWkIRVFFDLRYltzKrTgqoYW04YpQyC5KOZH39artRyD61XYSa-cPAx8WEqVv113RgpSW9tAgSiyFa1hrVmDG82xpaqyhmavT0evcWp60-ocYVDdI9PHm8Gt5NJvJCOw4oxlgw9Hg9UT2e1sIfcziCEkNcQblNnL08uCv5tMTLJ3UZuuU4PJuUqMMRQ1qkn1fxQxSBjhFcno-yfo2k8h__ADJTiuqwN1daSWKufiBuvzcXS-WtM77QdjXZ7PKKsRzV3j_w52EmQmmW1aqilGOf_-7TGLjqwOPsZg7H0SCMp93-Wx7zL3Xe77LrdZ8-5h8veKvwUnfwDWZPyd</recordid><startdate>20181224</startdate><enddate>20181224</enddate><creator>Zacarés, Mario</creator><creator>Salvador-Herranz, Gustavo</creator><creator>Almenar, David</creator><creator>Tur, Carles</creator><creator>Argilés, Rafael</creator><creator>Bourtzis, Kostas</creator><creator>Bossin, Hervé</creator><creator>Pla, Ignacio</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181224</creationdate><title>Exploring the potential of computer vision analysis of pupae size dimorphism for adaptive sex sorting systems of various vector mosquito species</title><author>Zacarés, Mario ; Salvador-Herranz, Gustavo ; Almenar, David ; Tur, Carles ; Argilés, Rafael ; Bourtzis, Kostas ; Bossin, Hervé ; Pla, Ignacio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-7dcc8a81479748fba3fc0ed4f231e6143b34515068d2f9758c87a90f25b6ae303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adaptive systems</topic><topic>Aedes</topic><topic>Aedes aegypti</topic><topic>Aedes albopictus</topic><topic>Aedes polynesiensis</topic><topic>Anopheles arabiensis</topic><topic>Aquatic insects</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Biometrical analysis</topic><topic>biometry</topic><topic>Computer aided design</topic><topic>Computer vision</topic><topic>Containers</topic><topic>Dimorphism (Biology)</topic><topic>Distribution functions</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Frequency distribution</topic><topic>Gaussian distribution</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Identification and classification</topic><topic>Individual rearing</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>male sterility</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Morphometrics frequency distribution models</topic><topic>Mosquitoes</topic><topic>Normal distribution</topic><topic>Observations</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Pupae</topic><topic>Purity</topic><topic>rearing</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>selection methods</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex sorting methods</topic><topic>Sexual dimorphism</topic><topic>Sexual size dimorphism</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Sterile insect technique</topic><topic>variance</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zacarés, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvador-Herranz, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almenar, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tur, Carles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argilés, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourtzis, Kostas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossin, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pla, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale in Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Parasites & vectors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zacarés, Mario</au><au>Salvador-Herranz, Gustavo</au><au>Almenar, David</au><au>Tur, Carles</au><au>Argilés, Rafael</au><au>Bourtzis, Kostas</au><au>Bossin, Hervé</au><au>Pla, Ignacio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring the potential of computer vision analysis of pupae size dimorphism for adaptive sex sorting systems of various vector mosquito species</atitle><jtitle>Parasites & vectors</jtitle><addtitle>Parasit Vectors</addtitle><date>2018-12-24</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>656</spage><epage>656</epage><pages>656-656</pages><artnum>656</artnum><issn>1756-3305</issn><eissn>1756-3305</eissn><abstract>Several mosquito population suppression strategies based on the rearing and release of sterile males have provided promising results. However, the lack of an efficient male selection method has hampered the expansion of these approaches into large-scale operational programmes. Currently, most of these programmes targeting Aedes mosquitoes rely on sorting methods based on the sexual size dimorphism (SSD) at the pupal stage. The currently available sorting methods have not been developed based on biometric analysis, and there is therefore potential for improvement. We applied an automated pupal size estimator developed by Grupo Tragsa with laboratory samples of Anopheles arabiensis, Aedes albopictus, Ae. polynesiensis, and three strains of Ae. aegypti. The frequency distribution of the pupal size was analyzed. We propose a general model for the analysis of the frequency distribution of mosquito pupae in the context of SSD-sorting methods, which is based on a Gaussian mixture distribution functions, thus making possible the analysis of performance (% males recovery) and purity (% males on the sorted sample).
For the three Aedes species, the distribution of the pupae size can be modeled by a mixture of two Gaussian distribution functions and the proposed model fitted the experimental data. For a given population, each size threshold is linked to a specific outcome of male recovery. Two dimensionless parameters that measure the suitability for SSD-based sorting of a specific batch of pupae are provided. The optimal sorting results are predicted for the highest values of SSD and lowest values of intra-batch variance. Rearing conditions have a strong influence in the performance of the SSD-sorting methods and non-standard rearing can lead to increase pupae size heterogeneity.
Sex sorting of pupae based on size dimorphism can be achieved with a high performance (% males recovery) and a reasonably high purity (% males on the sorted sample) for the different Aedes species and strains. The purity and performance of a sex sorting operation in the tested Aedes species are linked parameters whose relation can be modeled. The conclusions of this analysis are applicable to all the existing SSD-sorting methods. The efficiency of the SSD-sorting methods can be improved by reducing the heterogeneity of pupae size within rearing containers. The heterogeneity between batches does not strongly affect the quality of the sex sorting, as long as a specific separation threshold is not pre-set before the sorting process. For new developments, we recommend using adaptive and precise threshold selection methods applied individually to each batch or to a mix of batches. Adaptive and precise thresholds will allow the sex-sorting of mixed batches in operational conditions maintaining the target purity at the cost of a reduction in performance. We also recommend a strategy whereby an acceptable level of purity is pre-selected and remains constant across the different batches of pupae while the performance varies from batch to batch to fit with the desired purity.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>30583722</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13071-018-3221-x</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1756-3305 |
ispartof | Parasites & vectors, 2018-12, Vol.11 (Suppl 2), p.656-656, Article 656 |
issn | 1756-3305 1756-3305 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_839ffb08151f45909c6b2bc72f5a4fe5 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central |
subjects | Adaptive systems Aedes Aedes aegypti Aedes albopictus Aedes polynesiensis Anopheles arabiensis Aquatic insects Automation Biometrical analysis biometry Computer aided design Computer vision Containers Dimorphism (Biology) Distribution functions Efficiency Frequency distribution Gaussian distribution Heterogeneity Human health and pathology Identification and classification Individual rearing Infectious diseases Innovations Life Sciences male sterility Males Mathematical models Methods Morphometrics frequency distribution models Mosquitoes Normal distribution Observations Parameters Pupae Purity rearing Recovery selection methods Sex Sex sorting methods Sexual dimorphism Sexual size dimorphism Species Sterile insect technique variance Variance analysis |
title | Exploring the potential of computer vision analysis of pupae size dimorphism for adaptive sex sorting systems of various vector mosquito species |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A21%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20the%20potential%20of%20computer%20vision%20analysis%20of%20pupae%20size%20dimorphism%20for%20adaptive%20sex%20sorting%20systems%20of%20various%20vector%20mosquito%20species&rft.jtitle=Parasites%20&%20vectors&rft.au=Zacar%C3%A9s,%20Mario&rft.date=2018-12-24&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=656&rft.epage=656&rft.pages=656-656&rft.artnum=656&rft.issn=1756-3305&rft.eissn=1756-3305&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13071-018-3221-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA569156097%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-7dcc8a81479748fba3fc0ed4f231e6143b34515068d2f9758c87a90f25b6ae303%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2168729443&rft_id=info:pmid/30583722&rft_galeid=A569156097&rfr_iscdi=true |