Loading…

Exploring the potential of computer vision analysis of pupae size dimorphism for adaptive sex sorting systems of various vector mosquito species

Several mosquito population suppression strategies based on the rearing and release of sterile males have provided promising results. However, the lack of an efficient male selection method has hampered the expansion of these approaches into large-scale operational programmes. Currently, most of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Parasites & vectors 2018-12, Vol.11 (Suppl 2), p.656-656, Article 656
Main Authors: Zacarés, Mario, Salvador-Herranz, Gustavo, Almenar, David, Tur, Carles, Argilés, Rafael, Bourtzis, Kostas, Bossin, Hervé, Pla, Ignacio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-7dcc8a81479748fba3fc0ed4f231e6143b34515068d2f9758c87a90f25b6ae303
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-7dcc8a81479748fba3fc0ed4f231e6143b34515068d2f9758c87a90f25b6ae303
container_end_page 656
container_issue Suppl 2
container_start_page 656
container_title Parasites & vectors
container_volume 11
creator Zacarés, Mario
Salvador-Herranz, Gustavo
Almenar, David
Tur, Carles
Argilés, Rafael
Bourtzis, Kostas
Bossin, Hervé
Pla, Ignacio
description Several mosquito population suppression strategies based on the rearing and release of sterile males have provided promising results. However, the lack of an efficient male selection method has hampered the expansion of these approaches into large-scale operational programmes. Currently, most of these programmes targeting Aedes mosquitoes rely on sorting methods based on the sexual size dimorphism (SSD) at the pupal stage. The currently available sorting methods have not been developed based on biometric analysis, and there is therefore potential for improvement. We applied an automated pupal size estimator developed by Grupo Tragsa with laboratory samples of Anopheles arabiensis, Aedes albopictus, Ae. polynesiensis, and three strains of Ae. aegypti. The frequency distribution of the pupal size was analyzed. We propose a general model for the analysis of the frequency distribution of mosquito pupae in the context of SSD-sorting methods, which is based on a Gaussian mixture distribution functions, thus making possible the analysis of performance (% males recovery) and purity (% males on the sorted sample). For the three Aedes species, the distribution of the pupae size can be modeled by a mixture of two Gaussian distribution functions and the proposed model fitted the experimental data. For a given population, each size threshold is linked to a specific outcome of male recovery. Two dimensionless parameters that measure the suitability for SSD-based sorting of a specific batch of pupae are provided. The optimal sorting results are predicted for the highest values of SSD and lowest values of intra-batch variance. Rearing conditions have a strong influence in the performance of the SSD-sorting methods and non-standard rearing can lead to increase pupae size heterogeneity. Sex sorting of pupae based on size dimorphism can be achieved with a high performance (% males recovery) and a reasonably high purity (% males on the sorted sample) for the different Aedes species and strains. The purity and performance of a sex sorting operation in the tested Aedes species are linked parameters whose relation can be modeled. The conclusions of this analysis are applicable to all the existing SSD-sorting methods. The efficiency of the SSD-sorting methods can be improved by reducing the heterogeneity of pupae size within rearing containers. The heterogeneity between batches does not strongly affect the quality of the sex sorting, as long as a specific separation threshold is
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s13071-018-3221-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_839ffb08151f45909c6b2bc72f5a4fe5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A569156097</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_839ffb08151f45909c6b2bc72f5a4fe5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A569156097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-7dcc8a81479748fba3fc0ed4f231e6143b34515068d2f9758c87a90f25b6ae303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkstu1DAYhSMEoqXwAGyQJTZlkeJLfMkGaVQVOtJISFzWluPYMx4lcWo7oxmegkfGc6G03aAsEv3_d07ik1MUbxG8QkiwjxERyFEJkSgJxqjcPivOEaesJATS5w-ez4pXMa4hZLCm7GVxlkeCcIzPi98327HzwQ1LkFYGjD6ZITnVAW-B9v04JRPAxkXnB6AG1e2ii_vdOI3KgOh-GdC63odx5WIPrA9AtWpMbpOXZguiD2nvHXcxmf6g3Kjg_BTBxuiU8d7Hu8klD-JotDPxdfHCqi6aN6f7RfHz882P69ty8fXL_Hq2KDUjJJW81VoogSpe80rYRhGroWkriwkyDFWkIRVFFDLRYltzKrTgqoYW04YpQyC5KOZH39artRyD61XYSa-cPAx8WEqVv113RgpSW9tAgSiyFa1hrVmDG82xpaqyhmavT0evcWp60-ocYVDdI9PHm8Gt5NJvJCOw4oxlgw9Hg9UT2e1sIfcziCEkNcQblNnL08uCv5tMTLJ3UZuuU4PJuUqMMRQ1qkn1fxQxSBjhFcno-yfo2k8h__ADJTiuqwN1daSWKufiBuvzcXS-WtM77QdjXZ7PKKsRzV3j_w52EmQmmW1aqilGOf_-7TGLjqwOPsZg7H0SCMp93-Wx7zL3Xe77LrdZ8-5h8veKvwUnfwDWZPyd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2168729443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring the potential of computer vision analysis of pupae size dimorphism for adaptive sex sorting systems of various vector mosquito species</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Zacarés, Mario ; Salvador-Herranz, Gustavo ; Almenar, David ; Tur, Carles ; Argilés, Rafael ; Bourtzis, Kostas ; Bossin, Hervé ; Pla, Ignacio</creator><creatorcontrib>Zacarés, Mario ; Salvador-Herranz, Gustavo ; Almenar, David ; Tur, Carles ; Argilés, Rafael ; Bourtzis, Kostas ; Bossin, Hervé ; Pla, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><description>Several mosquito population suppression strategies based on the rearing and release of sterile males have provided promising results. However, the lack of an efficient male selection method has hampered the expansion of these approaches into large-scale operational programmes. Currently, most of these programmes targeting Aedes mosquitoes rely on sorting methods based on the sexual size dimorphism (SSD) at the pupal stage. The currently available sorting methods have not been developed based on biometric analysis, and there is therefore potential for improvement. We applied an automated pupal size estimator developed by Grupo Tragsa with laboratory samples of Anopheles arabiensis, Aedes albopictus, Ae. polynesiensis, and three strains of Ae. aegypti. The frequency distribution of the pupal size was analyzed. We propose a general model for the analysis of the frequency distribution of mosquito pupae in the context of SSD-sorting methods, which is based on a Gaussian mixture distribution functions, thus making possible the analysis of performance (% males recovery) and purity (% males on the sorted sample). For the three Aedes species, the distribution of the pupae size can be modeled by a mixture of two Gaussian distribution functions and the proposed model fitted the experimental data. For a given population, each size threshold is linked to a specific outcome of male recovery. Two dimensionless parameters that measure the suitability for SSD-based sorting of a specific batch of pupae are provided. The optimal sorting results are predicted for the highest values of SSD and lowest values of intra-batch variance. Rearing conditions have a strong influence in the performance of the SSD-sorting methods and non-standard rearing can lead to increase pupae size heterogeneity. Sex sorting of pupae based on size dimorphism can be achieved with a high performance (% males recovery) and a reasonably high purity (% males on the sorted sample) for the different Aedes species and strains. The purity and performance of a sex sorting operation in the tested Aedes species are linked parameters whose relation can be modeled. The conclusions of this analysis are applicable to all the existing SSD-sorting methods. The efficiency of the SSD-sorting methods can be improved by reducing the heterogeneity of pupae size within rearing containers. The heterogeneity between batches does not strongly affect the quality of the sex sorting, as long as a specific separation threshold is not pre-set before the sorting process. For new developments, we recommend using adaptive and precise threshold selection methods applied individually to each batch or to a mix of batches. Adaptive and precise thresholds will allow the sex-sorting of mixed batches in operational conditions maintaining the target purity at the cost of a reduction in performance. We also recommend a strategy whereby an acceptable level of purity is pre-selected and remains constant across the different batches of pupae while the performance varies from batch to batch to fit with the desired purity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-3305</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-3305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13071-018-3221-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30583722</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptive systems ; Aedes ; Aedes aegypti ; Aedes albopictus ; Aedes polynesiensis ; Anopheles arabiensis ; Aquatic insects ; Automation ; Biometrical analysis ; biometry ; Computer aided design ; Computer vision ; Containers ; Dimorphism (Biology) ; Distribution functions ; Efficiency ; Frequency distribution ; Gaussian distribution ; Heterogeneity ; Human health and pathology ; Identification and classification ; Individual rearing ; Infectious diseases ; Innovations ; Life Sciences ; male sterility ; Males ; Mathematical models ; Methods ; Morphometrics frequency distribution models ; Mosquitoes ; Normal distribution ; Observations ; Parameters ; Pupae ; Purity ; rearing ; Recovery ; selection methods ; Sex ; Sex sorting methods ; Sexual dimorphism ; Sexual size dimorphism ; Species ; Sterile insect technique ; variance ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Parasites &amp; vectors, 2018-12, Vol.11 (Suppl 2), p.656-656, Article 656</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-7dcc8a81479748fba3fc0ed4f231e6143b34515068d2f9758c87a90f25b6ae303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-7dcc8a81479748fba3fc0ed4f231e6143b34515068d2f9758c87a90f25b6ae303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304766/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2168729443?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25732,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30583722$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02003902$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zacarés, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvador-Herranz, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almenar, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tur, Carles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argilés, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourtzis, Kostas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossin, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pla, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring the potential of computer vision analysis of pupae size dimorphism for adaptive sex sorting systems of various vector mosquito species</title><title>Parasites &amp; vectors</title><addtitle>Parasit Vectors</addtitle><description>Several mosquito population suppression strategies based on the rearing and release of sterile males have provided promising results. However, the lack of an efficient male selection method has hampered the expansion of these approaches into large-scale operational programmes. Currently, most of these programmes targeting Aedes mosquitoes rely on sorting methods based on the sexual size dimorphism (SSD) at the pupal stage. The currently available sorting methods have not been developed based on biometric analysis, and there is therefore potential for improvement. We applied an automated pupal size estimator developed by Grupo Tragsa with laboratory samples of Anopheles arabiensis, Aedes albopictus, Ae. polynesiensis, and three strains of Ae. aegypti. The frequency distribution of the pupal size was analyzed. We propose a general model for the analysis of the frequency distribution of mosquito pupae in the context of SSD-sorting methods, which is based on a Gaussian mixture distribution functions, thus making possible the analysis of performance (% males recovery) and purity (% males on the sorted sample). For the three Aedes species, the distribution of the pupae size can be modeled by a mixture of two Gaussian distribution functions and the proposed model fitted the experimental data. For a given population, each size threshold is linked to a specific outcome of male recovery. Two dimensionless parameters that measure the suitability for SSD-based sorting of a specific batch of pupae are provided. The optimal sorting results are predicted for the highest values of SSD and lowest values of intra-batch variance. Rearing conditions have a strong influence in the performance of the SSD-sorting methods and non-standard rearing can lead to increase pupae size heterogeneity. Sex sorting of pupae based on size dimorphism can be achieved with a high performance (% males recovery) and a reasonably high purity (% males on the sorted sample) for the different Aedes species and strains. The purity and performance of a sex sorting operation in the tested Aedes species are linked parameters whose relation can be modeled. The conclusions of this analysis are applicable to all the existing SSD-sorting methods. The efficiency of the SSD-sorting methods can be improved by reducing the heterogeneity of pupae size within rearing containers. The heterogeneity between batches does not strongly affect the quality of the sex sorting, as long as a specific separation threshold is not pre-set before the sorting process. For new developments, we recommend using adaptive and precise threshold selection methods applied individually to each batch or to a mix of batches. Adaptive and precise thresholds will allow the sex-sorting of mixed batches in operational conditions maintaining the target purity at the cost of a reduction in performance. We also recommend a strategy whereby an acceptable level of purity is pre-selected and remains constant across the different batches of pupae while the performance varies from batch to batch to fit with the desired purity.</description><subject>Adaptive systems</subject><subject>Aedes</subject><subject>Aedes aegypti</subject><subject>Aedes albopictus</subject><subject>Aedes polynesiensis</subject><subject>Anopheles arabiensis</subject><subject>Aquatic insects</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Biometrical analysis</subject><subject>biometry</subject><subject>Computer aided design</subject><subject>Computer vision</subject><subject>Containers</subject><subject>Dimorphism (Biology)</subject><subject>Distribution functions</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Frequency distribution</subject><subject>Gaussian distribution</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Identification and classification</subject><subject>Individual rearing</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>male sterility</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Morphometrics frequency distribution models</subject><subject>Mosquitoes</subject><subject>Normal distribution</subject><subject>Observations</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Pupae</subject><subject>Purity</subject><subject>rearing</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>selection methods</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex sorting methods</subject><subject>Sexual dimorphism</subject><subject>Sexual size dimorphism</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Sterile insect technique</subject><subject>variance</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>1756-3305</issn><issn>1756-3305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkstu1DAYhSMEoqXwAGyQJTZlkeJLfMkGaVQVOtJISFzWluPYMx4lcWo7oxmegkfGc6G03aAsEv3_d07ik1MUbxG8QkiwjxERyFEJkSgJxqjcPivOEaesJATS5w-ez4pXMa4hZLCm7GVxlkeCcIzPi98327HzwQ1LkFYGjD6ZITnVAW-B9v04JRPAxkXnB6AG1e2ii_vdOI3KgOh-GdC63odx5WIPrA9AtWpMbpOXZguiD2nvHXcxmf6g3Kjg_BTBxuiU8d7Hu8klD-JotDPxdfHCqi6aN6f7RfHz882P69ty8fXL_Hq2KDUjJJW81VoogSpe80rYRhGroWkriwkyDFWkIRVFFDLRYltzKrTgqoYW04YpQyC5KOZH39artRyD61XYSa-cPAx8WEqVv113RgpSW9tAgSiyFa1hrVmDG82xpaqyhmavT0evcWp60-ocYVDdI9PHm8Gt5NJvJCOw4oxlgw9Hg9UT2e1sIfcziCEkNcQblNnL08uCv5tMTLJ3UZuuU4PJuUqMMRQ1qkn1fxQxSBjhFcno-yfo2k8h__ADJTiuqwN1daSWKufiBuvzcXS-WtM77QdjXZ7PKKsRzV3j_w52EmQmmW1aqilGOf_-7TGLjqwOPsZg7H0SCMp93-Wx7zL3Xe77LrdZ8-5h8veKvwUnfwDWZPyd</recordid><startdate>20181224</startdate><enddate>20181224</enddate><creator>Zacarés, Mario</creator><creator>Salvador-Herranz, Gustavo</creator><creator>Almenar, David</creator><creator>Tur, Carles</creator><creator>Argilés, Rafael</creator><creator>Bourtzis, Kostas</creator><creator>Bossin, Hervé</creator><creator>Pla, Ignacio</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181224</creationdate><title>Exploring the potential of computer vision analysis of pupae size dimorphism for adaptive sex sorting systems of various vector mosquito species</title><author>Zacarés, Mario ; Salvador-Herranz, Gustavo ; Almenar, David ; Tur, Carles ; Argilés, Rafael ; Bourtzis, Kostas ; Bossin, Hervé ; Pla, Ignacio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-7dcc8a81479748fba3fc0ed4f231e6143b34515068d2f9758c87a90f25b6ae303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adaptive systems</topic><topic>Aedes</topic><topic>Aedes aegypti</topic><topic>Aedes albopictus</topic><topic>Aedes polynesiensis</topic><topic>Anopheles arabiensis</topic><topic>Aquatic insects</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Biometrical analysis</topic><topic>biometry</topic><topic>Computer aided design</topic><topic>Computer vision</topic><topic>Containers</topic><topic>Dimorphism (Biology)</topic><topic>Distribution functions</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Frequency distribution</topic><topic>Gaussian distribution</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Identification and classification</topic><topic>Individual rearing</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>male sterility</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Morphometrics frequency distribution models</topic><topic>Mosquitoes</topic><topic>Normal distribution</topic><topic>Observations</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Pupae</topic><topic>Purity</topic><topic>rearing</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>selection methods</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex sorting methods</topic><topic>Sexual dimorphism</topic><topic>Sexual size dimorphism</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Sterile insect technique</topic><topic>variance</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zacarés, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvador-Herranz, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almenar, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tur, Carles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argilés, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourtzis, Kostas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossin, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pla, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale in Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Parasites &amp; vectors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zacarés, Mario</au><au>Salvador-Herranz, Gustavo</au><au>Almenar, David</au><au>Tur, Carles</au><au>Argilés, Rafael</au><au>Bourtzis, Kostas</au><au>Bossin, Hervé</au><au>Pla, Ignacio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring the potential of computer vision analysis of pupae size dimorphism for adaptive sex sorting systems of various vector mosquito species</atitle><jtitle>Parasites &amp; vectors</jtitle><addtitle>Parasit Vectors</addtitle><date>2018-12-24</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>656</spage><epage>656</epage><pages>656-656</pages><artnum>656</artnum><issn>1756-3305</issn><eissn>1756-3305</eissn><abstract>Several mosquito population suppression strategies based on the rearing and release of sterile males have provided promising results. However, the lack of an efficient male selection method has hampered the expansion of these approaches into large-scale operational programmes. Currently, most of these programmes targeting Aedes mosquitoes rely on sorting methods based on the sexual size dimorphism (SSD) at the pupal stage. The currently available sorting methods have not been developed based on biometric analysis, and there is therefore potential for improvement. We applied an automated pupal size estimator developed by Grupo Tragsa with laboratory samples of Anopheles arabiensis, Aedes albopictus, Ae. polynesiensis, and three strains of Ae. aegypti. The frequency distribution of the pupal size was analyzed. We propose a general model for the analysis of the frequency distribution of mosquito pupae in the context of SSD-sorting methods, which is based on a Gaussian mixture distribution functions, thus making possible the analysis of performance (% males recovery) and purity (% males on the sorted sample). For the three Aedes species, the distribution of the pupae size can be modeled by a mixture of two Gaussian distribution functions and the proposed model fitted the experimental data. For a given population, each size threshold is linked to a specific outcome of male recovery. Two dimensionless parameters that measure the suitability for SSD-based sorting of a specific batch of pupae are provided. The optimal sorting results are predicted for the highest values of SSD and lowest values of intra-batch variance. Rearing conditions have a strong influence in the performance of the SSD-sorting methods and non-standard rearing can lead to increase pupae size heterogeneity. Sex sorting of pupae based on size dimorphism can be achieved with a high performance (% males recovery) and a reasonably high purity (% males on the sorted sample) for the different Aedes species and strains. The purity and performance of a sex sorting operation in the tested Aedes species are linked parameters whose relation can be modeled. The conclusions of this analysis are applicable to all the existing SSD-sorting methods. The efficiency of the SSD-sorting methods can be improved by reducing the heterogeneity of pupae size within rearing containers. The heterogeneity between batches does not strongly affect the quality of the sex sorting, as long as a specific separation threshold is not pre-set before the sorting process. For new developments, we recommend using adaptive and precise threshold selection methods applied individually to each batch or to a mix of batches. Adaptive and precise thresholds will allow the sex-sorting of mixed batches in operational conditions maintaining the target purity at the cost of a reduction in performance. We also recommend a strategy whereby an acceptable level of purity is pre-selected and remains constant across the different batches of pupae while the performance varies from batch to batch to fit with the desired purity.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>30583722</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13071-018-3221-x</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1756-3305
ispartof Parasites & vectors, 2018-12, Vol.11 (Suppl 2), p.656-656, Article 656
issn 1756-3305
1756-3305
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_839ffb08151f45909c6b2bc72f5a4fe5
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central
subjects Adaptive systems
Aedes
Aedes aegypti
Aedes albopictus
Aedes polynesiensis
Anopheles arabiensis
Aquatic insects
Automation
Biometrical analysis
biometry
Computer aided design
Computer vision
Containers
Dimorphism (Biology)
Distribution functions
Efficiency
Frequency distribution
Gaussian distribution
Heterogeneity
Human health and pathology
Identification and classification
Individual rearing
Infectious diseases
Innovations
Life Sciences
male sterility
Males
Mathematical models
Methods
Morphometrics frequency distribution models
Mosquitoes
Normal distribution
Observations
Parameters
Pupae
Purity
rearing
Recovery
selection methods
Sex
Sex sorting methods
Sexual dimorphism
Sexual size dimorphism
Species
Sterile insect technique
variance
Variance analysis
title Exploring the potential of computer vision analysis of pupae size dimorphism for adaptive sex sorting systems of various vector mosquito species
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A21%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20the%20potential%20of%20computer%20vision%20analysis%20of%20pupae%20size%20dimorphism%20for%20adaptive%20sex%20sorting%20systems%20of%20various%20vector%20mosquito%20species&rft.jtitle=Parasites%20&%20vectors&rft.au=Zacar%C3%A9s,%20Mario&rft.date=2018-12-24&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=656&rft.epage=656&rft.pages=656-656&rft.artnum=656&rft.issn=1756-3305&rft.eissn=1756-3305&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13071-018-3221-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA569156097%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-7dcc8a81479748fba3fc0ed4f231e6143b34515068d2f9758c87a90f25b6ae303%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2168729443&rft_id=info:pmid/30583722&rft_galeid=A569156097&rfr_iscdi=true