Loading…

Flexibility of Electric Vehicle Charging With Demand Response and Vehicle-to-Grid for Power System Benefit

As charging load from electric vehicles (EVs) increases, its temporal demand may challenge existing power systems. However, as EVs could also supply power to the grid, they could provide benefits for the power systems. Moreover, by controlling the charging, they could reduce their charging costs. Th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE access 2024, Vol.12, p.131419-131441
Main Authors: Jokinen, Ilkka, Lehtonen, Matti
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-2de2628008e1935012805f0ca9ff41372f417fc2ff35937f9113b7ca987ab1383
container_end_page 131441
container_issue
container_start_page 131419
container_title IEEE access
container_volume 12
creator Jokinen, Ilkka
Lehtonen, Matti
description As charging load from electric vehicles (EVs) increases, its temporal demand may challenge existing power systems. However, as EVs could also supply power to the grid, they could provide benefits for the power systems. Moreover, by controlling the charging, they could reduce their charging costs. Thus, in this study the flexibility of EV charging load within charging events was modeled, considering available charging power, ambient temperature, and unidirectional and bidirectional controlled charging. Then, the charging flexibility was first analyzed by minimizing the charging costs for individual EVs. The results showed that with high electricity market prices, with high fluctuation, the EVs could reduce their charging costs up to 27% and 35%, with unidirectional and bidirectional controlled charging respectively, compared to uncontrolled charging. Secondly, the EV charging flexibility was analyzed for the benefit of the power system by an aggregator, assuming a fully electrified car sector. The benefit was measured by the required additional power source capacity and generation. During the analyzed period, 2018-2023 which peak load was 14.7 GW, the required power source capacity increased significantly with uncontrolled charging, by 2-2.8 GW (40-54%), whereas with controlled unidirectional charging the increase was 0.3-0.8 GW (7-15%), and with bidirectional charging the capacity was the same as without EVs, or slightly less (−11-1%). However, the yearly differences were notable, and during 2020, with bidirectional charging, this capacity increased. Moreover, the required power source generation was greatly affected by the assumed power generation capacities, and was lower with controlled charging, compared to uncontrolled charging.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3459053
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_840330574bb94fc98692de69e4e2c308</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10679130</ieee_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_840330574bb94fc98692de69e4e2c308</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3109488712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-2de2628008e1935012805f0ca9ff41372f417fc2ff35937f9113b7ca987ab1383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUdFu2yAUtaZNWtX2C7oHpD07A65t4LHz0q5SpVXNtj4iTC4JkWMycNXl74fraCoPcLmcc-4RpyiuGF0wRtWX67ZdrlYLTnm1gKpWtIZ3xRlnjSqhhub9m_pjcZnSjuYlc6sWZ8Xupse_vvO9H48kOLLs0Y7RW_Ibt972SNqtiRs_bMiTH7fkG-7NsCaPmA5hSEimywlZjqG8jX5NXIjkIbxgJKtjGnFPvuKAzo8XxQdn-oSXp_O8-HWz_Nl-L-9_3N611_el5VKNJV8jb7jMFpEpqCnLde2oNcq5ioHgeRfOcuegViCcYgw6kZ-lMB0DCefF3ay7DmanD9HvTTzqYLx-bYS40SaOk2UtKwpAa1F1naqcVbJReXyjsEJugU5an2etQwx_njGNehee45Dta8h_X0kpGM8omFE2hpQiuv9TGdVTRnrOSE8Z6VNGmfVpZnlEfMNohGJA4R_l64tn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3109488712</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flexibility of Electric Vehicle Charging With Demand Response and Vehicle-to-Grid for Power System Benefit</title><source>IEEE Open Access Journals</source><creator>Jokinen, Ilkka ; Lehtonen, Matti</creator><creatorcontrib>Jokinen, Ilkka ; Lehtonen, Matti</creatorcontrib><description>As charging load from electric vehicles (EVs) increases, its temporal demand may challenge existing power systems. However, as EVs could also supply power to the grid, they could provide benefits for the power systems. Moreover, by controlling the charging, they could reduce their charging costs. Thus, in this study the flexibility of EV charging load within charging events was modeled, considering available charging power, ambient temperature, and unidirectional and bidirectional controlled charging. Then, the charging flexibility was first analyzed by minimizing the charging costs for individual EVs. The results showed that with high electricity market prices, with high fluctuation, the EVs could reduce their charging costs up to 27% and 35%, with unidirectional and bidirectional controlled charging respectively, compared to uncontrolled charging. Secondly, the EV charging flexibility was analyzed for the benefit of the power system by an aggregator, assuming a fully electrified car sector. The benefit was measured by the required additional power source capacity and generation. During the analyzed period, 2018-2023 which peak load was 14.7 GW, the required power source capacity increased significantly with uncontrolled charging, by 2-2.8 GW (40-54%), whereas with controlled unidirectional charging the increase was 0.3-0.8 GW (7-15%), and with bidirectional charging the capacity was the same as without EVs, or slightly less (−11-1%). However, the yearly differences were notable, and during 2020, with bidirectional charging, this capacity increased. Moreover, the required power source generation was greatly affected by the assumed power generation capacities, and was lower with controlled charging, compared to uncontrolled charging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3459053</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IAECCG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>Ambient temperature ; Automobiles ; Batteries ; Cost benefit analysis ; Costs ; demand response ; Electric power demand ; Electric power systems ; Electric vehicle ; Electric vehicle charging ; Electric vehicles ; Electrical loads ; Electricity pricing ; Energy costs ; Flexibility ; Load modeling ; Peak load ; Power sources ; power system flexibility ; Power systems ; renewable energy generation ; Renewable energy sources ; Vehicle-to-grid</subject><ispartof>IEEE access, 2024, Vol.12, p.131419-131441</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-2de2628008e1935012805f0ca9ff41372f417fc2ff35937f9113b7ca987ab1383</cites><orcidid>0009-0008-5281-2322 ; 0000-0002-9979-7333</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10679130$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27633,27923,27924,27925,54933</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jokinen, Ilkka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehtonen, Matti</creatorcontrib><title>Flexibility of Electric Vehicle Charging With Demand Response and Vehicle-to-Grid for Power System Benefit</title><title>IEEE access</title><addtitle>Access</addtitle><description>As charging load from electric vehicles (EVs) increases, its temporal demand may challenge existing power systems. However, as EVs could also supply power to the grid, they could provide benefits for the power systems. Moreover, by controlling the charging, they could reduce their charging costs. Thus, in this study the flexibility of EV charging load within charging events was modeled, considering available charging power, ambient temperature, and unidirectional and bidirectional controlled charging. Then, the charging flexibility was first analyzed by minimizing the charging costs for individual EVs. The results showed that with high electricity market prices, with high fluctuation, the EVs could reduce their charging costs up to 27% and 35%, with unidirectional and bidirectional controlled charging respectively, compared to uncontrolled charging. Secondly, the EV charging flexibility was analyzed for the benefit of the power system by an aggregator, assuming a fully electrified car sector. The benefit was measured by the required additional power source capacity and generation. During the analyzed period, 2018-2023 which peak load was 14.7 GW, the required power source capacity increased significantly with uncontrolled charging, by 2-2.8 GW (40-54%), whereas with controlled unidirectional charging the increase was 0.3-0.8 GW (7-15%), and with bidirectional charging the capacity was the same as without EVs, or slightly less (−11-1%). However, the yearly differences were notable, and during 2020, with bidirectional charging, this capacity increased. Moreover, the required power source generation was greatly affected by the assumed power generation capacities, and was lower with controlled charging, compared to uncontrolled charging.</description><subject>Ambient temperature</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Batteries</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>demand response</subject><subject>Electric power demand</subject><subject>Electric power systems</subject><subject>Electric vehicle</subject><subject>Electric vehicle charging</subject><subject>Electric vehicles</subject><subject>Electrical loads</subject><subject>Electricity pricing</subject><subject>Energy costs</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Load modeling</subject><subject>Peak load</subject><subject>Power sources</subject><subject>power system flexibility</subject><subject>Power systems</subject><subject>renewable energy generation</subject><subject>Renewable energy sources</subject><subject>Vehicle-to-grid</subject><issn>2169-3536</issn><issn>2169-3536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUdFu2yAUtaZNWtX2C7oHpD07A65t4LHz0q5SpVXNtj4iTC4JkWMycNXl74fraCoPcLmcc-4RpyiuGF0wRtWX67ZdrlYLTnm1gKpWtIZ3xRlnjSqhhub9m_pjcZnSjuYlc6sWZ8Xupse_vvO9H48kOLLs0Y7RW_Ibt972SNqtiRs_bMiTH7fkG-7NsCaPmA5hSEimywlZjqG8jX5NXIjkIbxgJKtjGnFPvuKAzo8XxQdn-oSXp_O8-HWz_Nl-L-9_3N611_el5VKNJV8jb7jMFpEpqCnLde2oNcq5ioHgeRfOcuegViCcYgw6kZ-lMB0DCefF3ay7DmanD9HvTTzqYLx-bYS40SaOk2UtKwpAa1F1naqcVbJReXyjsEJugU5an2etQwx_njGNehee45Dta8h_X0kpGM8omFE2hpQiuv9TGdVTRnrOSE8Z6VNGmfVpZnlEfMNohGJA4R_l64tn</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Jokinen, Ilkka</creator><creator>Lehtonen, Matti</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5281-2322</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9979-7333</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Flexibility of Electric Vehicle Charging With Demand Response and Vehicle-to-Grid for Power System Benefit</title><author>Jokinen, Ilkka ; Lehtonen, Matti</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-2de2628008e1935012805f0ca9ff41372f417fc2ff35937f9113b7ca987ab1383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Ambient temperature</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Batteries</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>demand response</topic><topic>Electric power demand</topic><topic>Electric power systems</topic><topic>Electric vehicle</topic><topic>Electric vehicle charging</topic><topic>Electric vehicles</topic><topic>Electrical loads</topic><topic>Electricity pricing</topic><topic>Energy costs</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Load modeling</topic><topic>Peak load</topic><topic>Power sources</topic><topic>power system flexibility</topic><topic>Power systems</topic><topic>renewable energy generation</topic><topic>Renewable energy sources</topic><topic>Vehicle-to-grid</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jokinen, Ilkka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehtonen, Matti</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore (IEEE/IET Electronic Library - IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jokinen, Ilkka</au><au>Lehtonen, Matti</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flexibility of Electric Vehicle Charging With Demand Response and Vehicle-to-Grid for Power System Benefit</atitle><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle><stitle>Access</stitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>131419</spage><epage>131441</epage><pages>131419-131441</pages><issn>2169-3536</issn><eissn>2169-3536</eissn><coden>IAECCG</coden><abstract>As charging load from electric vehicles (EVs) increases, its temporal demand may challenge existing power systems. However, as EVs could also supply power to the grid, they could provide benefits for the power systems. Moreover, by controlling the charging, they could reduce their charging costs. Thus, in this study the flexibility of EV charging load within charging events was modeled, considering available charging power, ambient temperature, and unidirectional and bidirectional controlled charging. Then, the charging flexibility was first analyzed by minimizing the charging costs for individual EVs. The results showed that with high electricity market prices, with high fluctuation, the EVs could reduce their charging costs up to 27% and 35%, with unidirectional and bidirectional controlled charging respectively, compared to uncontrolled charging. Secondly, the EV charging flexibility was analyzed for the benefit of the power system by an aggregator, assuming a fully electrified car sector. The benefit was measured by the required additional power source capacity and generation. During the analyzed period, 2018-2023 which peak load was 14.7 GW, the required power source capacity increased significantly with uncontrolled charging, by 2-2.8 GW (40-54%), whereas with controlled unidirectional charging the increase was 0.3-0.8 GW (7-15%), and with bidirectional charging the capacity was the same as without EVs, or slightly less (−11-1%). However, the yearly differences were notable, and during 2020, with bidirectional charging, this capacity increased. Moreover, the required power source generation was greatly affected by the assumed power generation capacities, and was lower with controlled charging, compared to uncontrolled charging.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3459053</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5281-2322</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9979-7333</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-3536
ispartof IEEE access, 2024, Vol.12, p.131419-131441
issn 2169-3536
2169-3536
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_840330574bb94fc98692de69e4e2c308
source IEEE Open Access Journals
subjects Ambient temperature
Automobiles
Batteries
Cost benefit analysis
Costs
demand response
Electric power demand
Electric power systems
Electric vehicle
Electric vehicle charging
Electric vehicles
Electrical loads
Electricity pricing
Energy costs
Flexibility
Load modeling
Peak load
Power sources
power system flexibility
Power systems
renewable energy generation
Renewable energy sources
Vehicle-to-grid
title Flexibility of Electric Vehicle Charging With Demand Response and Vehicle-to-Grid for Power System Benefit
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A54%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flexibility%20of%20Electric%20Vehicle%20Charging%20With%20Demand%20Response%20and%20Vehicle-to-Grid%20for%20Power%20System%20Benefit&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20access&rft.au=Jokinen,%20Ilkka&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=131419&rft.epage=131441&rft.pages=131419-131441&rft.issn=2169-3536&rft.eissn=2169-3536&rft.coden=IAECCG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3459053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3109488712%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-2de2628008e1935012805f0ca9ff41372f417fc2ff35937f9113b7ca987ab1383%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3109488712&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10679130&rfr_iscdi=true