Loading…
Flexibility of Electric Vehicle Charging With Demand Response and Vehicle-to-Grid for Power System Benefit
As charging load from electric vehicles (EVs) increases, its temporal demand may challenge existing power systems. However, as EVs could also supply power to the grid, they could provide benefits for the power systems. Moreover, by controlling the charging, they could reduce their charging costs. Th...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE access 2024, Vol.12, p.131419-131441 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-2de2628008e1935012805f0ca9ff41372f417fc2ff35937f9113b7ca987ab1383 |
container_end_page | 131441 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 131419 |
container_title | IEEE access |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Jokinen, Ilkka Lehtonen, Matti |
description | As charging load from electric vehicles (EVs) increases, its temporal demand may challenge existing power systems. However, as EVs could also supply power to the grid, they could provide benefits for the power systems. Moreover, by controlling the charging, they could reduce their charging costs. Thus, in this study the flexibility of EV charging load within charging events was modeled, considering available charging power, ambient temperature, and unidirectional and bidirectional controlled charging. Then, the charging flexibility was first analyzed by minimizing the charging costs for individual EVs. The results showed that with high electricity market prices, with high fluctuation, the EVs could reduce their charging costs up to 27% and 35%, with unidirectional and bidirectional controlled charging respectively, compared to uncontrolled charging. Secondly, the EV charging flexibility was analyzed for the benefit of the power system by an aggregator, assuming a fully electrified car sector. The benefit was measured by the required additional power source capacity and generation. During the analyzed period, 2018-2023 which peak load was 14.7 GW, the required power source capacity increased significantly with uncontrolled charging, by 2-2.8 GW (40-54%), whereas with controlled unidirectional charging the increase was 0.3-0.8 GW (7-15%), and with bidirectional charging the capacity was the same as without EVs, or slightly less (−11-1%). However, the yearly differences were notable, and during 2020, with bidirectional charging, this capacity increased. Moreover, the required power source generation was greatly affected by the assumed power generation capacities, and was lower with controlled charging, compared to uncontrolled charging. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3459053 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_840330574bb94fc98692de69e4e2c308</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10679130</ieee_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_840330574bb94fc98692de69e4e2c308</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3109488712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-2de2628008e1935012805f0ca9ff41372f417fc2ff35937f9113b7ca987ab1383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUdFu2yAUtaZNWtX2C7oHpD07A65t4LHz0q5SpVXNtj4iTC4JkWMycNXl74fraCoPcLmcc-4RpyiuGF0wRtWX67ZdrlYLTnm1gKpWtIZ3xRlnjSqhhub9m_pjcZnSjuYlc6sWZ8Xupse_vvO9H48kOLLs0Y7RW_Ibt972SNqtiRs_bMiTH7fkG-7NsCaPmA5hSEimywlZjqG8jX5NXIjkIbxgJKtjGnFPvuKAzo8XxQdn-oSXp_O8-HWz_Nl-L-9_3N611_el5VKNJV8jb7jMFpEpqCnLde2oNcq5ioHgeRfOcuegViCcYgw6kZ-lMB0DCefF3ay7DmanD9HvTTzqYLx-bYS40SaOk2UtKwpAa1F1naqcVbJReXyjsEJugU5an2etQwx_njGNehee45Dta8h_X0kpGM8omFE2hpQiuv9TGdVTRnrOSE8Z6VNGmfVpZnlEfMNohGJA4R_l64tn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3109488712</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flexibility of Electric Vehicle Charging With Demand Response and Vehicle-to-Grid for Power System Benefit</title><source>IEEE Open Access Journals</source><creator>Jokinen, Ilkka ; Lehtonen, Matti</creator><creatorcontrib>Jokinen, Ilkka ; Lehtonen, Matti</creatorcontrib><description>As charging load from electric vehicles (EVs) increases, its temporal demand may challenge existing power systems. However, as EVs could also supply power to the grid, they could provide benefits for the power systems. Moreover, by controlling the charging, they could reduce their charging costs. Thus, in this study the flexibility of EV charging load within charging events was modeled, considering available charging power, ambient temperature, and unidirectional and bidirectional controlled charging. Then, the charging flexibility was first analyzed by minimizing the charging costs for individual EVs. The results showed that with high electricity market prices, with high fluctuation, the EVs could reduce their charging costs up to 27% and 35%, with unidirectional and bidirectional controlled charging respectively, compared to uncontrolled charging. Secondly, the EV charging flexibility was analyzed for the benefit of the power system by an aggregator, assuming a fully electrified car sector. The benefit was measured by the required additional power source capacity and generation. During the analyzed period, 2018-2023 which peak load was 14.7 GW, the required power source capacity increased significantly with uncontrolled charging, by 2-2.8 GW (40-54%), whereas with controlled unidirectional charging the increase was 0.3-0.8 GW (7-15%), and with bidirectional charging the capacity was the same as without EVs, or slightly less (−11-1%). However, the yearly differences were notable, and during 2020, with bidirectional charging, this capacity increased. Moreover, the required power source generation was greatly affected by the assumed power generation capacities, and was lower with controlled charging, compared to uncontrolled charging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3459053</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IAECCG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>Ambient temperature ; Automobiles ; Batteries ; Cost benefit analysis ; Costs ; demand response ; Electric power demand ; Electric power systems ; Electric vehicle ; Electric vehicle charging ; Electric vehicles ; Electrical loads ; Electricity pricing ; Energy costs ; Flexibility ; Load modeling ; Peak load ; Power sources ; power system flexibility ; Power systems ; renewable energy generation ; Renewable energy sources ; Vehicle-to-grid</subject><ispartof>IEEE access, 2024, Vol.12, p.131419-131441</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-2de2628008e1935012805f0ca9ff41372f417fc2ff35937f9113b7ca987ab1383</cites><orcidid>0009-0008-5281-2322 ; 0000-0002-9979-7333</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10679130$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27633,27923,27924,27925,54933</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jokinen, Ilkka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehtonen, Matti</creatorcontrib><title>Flexibility of Electric Vehicle Charging With Demand Response and Vehicle-to-Grid for Power System Benefit</title><title>IEEE access</title><addtitle>Access</addtitle><description>As charging load from electric vehicles (EVs) increases, its temporal demand may challenge existing power systems. However, as EVs could also supply power to the grid, they could provide benefits for the power systems. Moreover, by controlling the charging, they could reduce their charging costs. Thus, in this study the flexibility of EV charging load within charging events was modeled, considering available charging power, ambient temperature, and unidirectional and bidirectional controlled charging. Then, the charging flexibility was first analyzed by minimizing the charging costs for individual EVs. The results showed that with high electricity market prices, with high fluctuation, the EVs could reduce their charging costs up to 27% and 35%, with unidirectional and bidirectional controlled charging respectively, compared to uncontrolled charging. Secondly, the EV charging flexibility was analyzed for the benefit of the power system by an aggregator, assuming a fully electrified car sector. The benefit was measured by the required additional power source capacity and generation. During the analyzed period, 2018-2023 which peak load was 14.7 GW, the required power source capacity increased significantly with uncontrolled charging, by 2-2.8 GW (40-54%), whereas with controlled unidirectional charging the increase was 0.3-0.8 GW (7-15%), and with bidirectional charging the capacity was the same as without EVs, or slightly less (−11-1%). However, the yearly differences were notable, and during 2020, with bidirectional charging, this capacity increased. Moreover, the required power source generation was greatly affected by the assumed power generation capacities, and was lower with controlled charging, compared to uncontrolled charging.</description><subject>Ambient temperature</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Batteries</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>demand response</subject><subject>Electric power demand</subject><subject>Electric power systems</subject><subject>Electric vehicle</subject><subject>Electric vehicle charging</subject><subject>Electric vehicles</subject><subject>Electrical loads</subject><subject>Electricity pricing</subject><subject>Energy costs</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Load modeling</subject><subject>Peak load</subject><subject>Power sources</subject><subject>power system flexibility</subject><subject>Power systems</subject><subject>renewable energy generation</subject><subject>Renewable energy sources</subject><subject>Vehicle-to-grid</subject><issn>2169-3536</issn><issn>2169-3536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUdFu2yAUtaZNWtX2C7oHpD07A65t4LHz0q5SpVXNtj4iTC4JkWMycNXl74fraCoPcLmcc-4RpyiuGF0wRtWX67ZdrlYLTnm1gKpWtIZ3xRlnjSqhhub9m_pjcZnSjuYlc6sWZ8Xupse_vvO9H48kOLLs0Y7RW_Ibt972SNqtiRs_bMiTH7fkG-7NsCaPmA5hSEimywlZjqG8jX5NXIjkIbxgJKtjGnFPvuKAzo8XxQdn-oSXp_O8-HWz_Nl-L-9_3N611_el5VKNJV8jb7jMFpEpqCnLde2oNcq5ioHgeRfOcuegViCcYgw6kZ-lMB0DCefF3ay7DmanD9HvTTzqYLx-bYS40SaOk2UtKwpAa1F1naqcVbJReXyjsEJugU5an2etQwx_njGNehee45Dta8h_X0kpGM8omFE2hpQiuv9TGdVTRnrOSE8Z6VNGmfVpZnlEfMNohGJA4R_l64tn</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Jokinen, Ilkka</creator><creator>Lehtonen, Matti</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5281-2322</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9979-7333</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Flexibility of Electric Vehicle Charging With Demand Response and Vehicle-to-Grid for Power System Benefit</title><author>Jokinen, Ilkka ; Lehtonen, Matti</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-2de2628008e1935012805f0ca9ff41372f417fc2ff35937f9113b7ca987ab1383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Ambient temperature</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Batteries</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>demand response</topic><topic>Electric power demand</topic><topic>Electric power systems</topic><topic>Electric vehicle</topic><topic>Electric vehicle charging</topic><topic>Electric vehicles</topic><topic>Electrical loads</topic><topic>Electricity pricing</topic><topic>Energy costs</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Load modeling</topic><topic>Peak load</topic><topic>Power sources</topic><topic>power system flexibility</topic><topic>Power systems</topic><topic>renewable energy generation</topic><topic>Renewable energy sources</topic><topic>Vehicle-to-grid</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jokinen, Ilkka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehtonen, Matti</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore (IEEE/IET Electronic Library - IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jokinen, Ilkka</au><au>Lehtonen, Matti</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flexibility of Electric Vehicle Charging With Demand Response and Vehicle-to-Grid for Power System Benefit</atitle><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle><stitle>Access</stitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>131419</spage><epage>131441</epage><pages>131419-131441</pages><issn>2169-3536</issn><eissn>2169-3536</eissn><coden>IAECCG</coden><abstract>As charging load from electric vehicles (EVs) increases, its temporal demand may challenge existing power systems. However, as EVs could also supply power to the grid, they could provide benefits for the power systems. Moreover, by controlling the charging, they could reduce their charging costs. Thus, in this study the flexibility of EV charging load within charging events was modeled, considering available charging power, ambient temperature, and unidirectional and bidirectional controlled charging. Then, the charging flexibility was first analyzed by minimizing the charging costs for individual EVs. The results showed that with high electricity market prices, with high fluctuation, the EVs could reduce their charging costs up to 27% and 35%, with unidirectional and bidirectional controlled charging respectively, compared to uncontrolled charging. Secondly, the EV charging flexibility was analyzed for the benefit of the power system by an aggregator, assuming a fully electrified car sector. The benefit was measured by the required additional power source capacity and generation. During the analyzed period, 2018-2023 which peak load was 14.7 GW, the required power source capacity increased significantly with uncontrolled charging, by 2-2.8 GW (40-54%), whereas with controlled unidirectional charging the increase was 0.3-0.8 GW (7-15%), and with bidirectional charging the capacity was the same as without EVs, or slightly less (−11-1%). However, the yearly differences were notable, and during 2020, with bidirectional charging, this capacity increased. Moreover, the required power source generation was greatly affected by the assumed power generation capacities, and was lower with controlled charging, compared to uncontrolled charging.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3459053</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5281-2322</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9979-7333</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-3536 |
ispartof | IEEE access, 2024, Vol.12, p.131419-131441 |
issn | 2169-3536 2169-3536 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_840330574bb94fc98692de69e4e2c308 |
source | IEEE Open Access Journals |
subjects | Ambient temperature Automobiles Batteries Cost benefit analysis Costs demand response Electric power demand Electric power systems Electric vehicle Electric vehicle charging Electric vehicles Electrical loads Electricity pricing Energy costs Flexibility Load modeling Peak load Power sources power system flexibility Power systems renewable energy generation Renewable energy sources Vehicle-to-grid |
title | Flexibility of Electric Vehicle Charging With Demand Response and Vehicle-to-Grid for Power System Benefit |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A54%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flexibility%20of%20Electric%20Vehicle%20Charging%20With%20Demand%20Response%20and%20Vehicle-to-Grid%20for%20Power%20System%20Benefit&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20access&rft.au=Jokinen,%20Ilkka&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=131419&rft.epage=131441&rft.pages=131419-131441&rft.issn=2169-3536&rft.eissn=2169-3536&rft.coden=IAECCG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3459053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3109488712%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-2de2628008e1935012805f0ca9ff41372f417fc2ff35937f9113b7ca987ab1383%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3109488712&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10679130&rfr_iscdi=true |