Loading…
Cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic- a qualitative study in Norway
The COVID-19 pandemic triggered an unprecedented demand for digital health technology solutions, such as remote monitoring. Previous research has focused on patients with chronic diseases, and their experiences with remote monitoring during the pandemic. Several recommendations have been presented t...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC health services research 2022-04, Vol.22 (1), p.453-9, Article 453 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-994ad4c7692719f0a1da406b0f3e457ebdc22cdf28a1b011bc01911e0f8279da3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-994ad4c7692719f0a1da406b0f3e457ebdc22cdf28a1b011bc01911e0f8279da3 |
container_end_page | 9 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 453 |
container_title | BMC health services research |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist Helgesen, Ann Karin Stensvold, Andreas Magnussen, Jannik Grøndahl, Vigdis A |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic triggered an unprecedented demand for digital health technology solutions, such as remote monitoring. Previous research has focused on patients with chronic diseases, and their experiences with remote monitoring during the pandemic. Several recommendations have been presented to reduce the frequency of cancer patients' visits to oncology centers and minimizing the risk of exposure to COVID-19, such as remote monitoring. However, few studies have explored how this has influenced the healthcare services to cancer patients.
To explore cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The study had a qualitative design, using in-depth, individual interviews.
A total of eleven interviews were conducted with patients who received remote monitoring during the COVID-19 outbreak. Three of the interviews were conducted by telephone, and eight on a digital platform, audio recorded, and transcribed verbatime. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis as recommended by Braun & Clarke.
All participants were conscious about being vulnerable to infections due to having cancer and receiving cancer treatment, and the pandemic to them represented an extra burden. Most of the participants experienced that their healthcare services had changed due to the pandemic, but there was no consensus on how the services had changed. All of the participants presented remote monitoring as something «new». Whether they received remote monitoring by telephone, video consultations or more advanced solutions with the possibility to complete a questionnaire or fill in measurements, did not seem to impact their views. However, all agreed that remote monitoring could never totally replace physical consultations in hospital. Participants' views seemed to grow more positive over time, but still they emphasized both positive and negative aspects of remote monitoring solutions in cancer care.
Remote monitoring was introduced as a necessity in cancer care during the COVID-19 outbreak. This may seem as an efficient solution, allowing for patients to stay at home and avoid infection. Our results indicate that, in the case of cancer patients, it is important that healthcare personnel balance the remote monitoring solution with person-to-person contact. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12913-022-07897-4 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_84820164434b4015965eddc1c6467336</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A699692944</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_84820164434b4015965eddc1c6467336</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A699692944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-994ad4c7692719f0a1da406b0f3e457ebdc22cdf28a1b011bc01911e0f8279da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkktvEzEUhUcIREvhD7BAlliUzRS_xh5vkKrwilTRDbC1PLYncTRjp7YnKP8eT1JKg5AXfp3zWff6VNVrBK8Qatn7hLBApIYY15C3gtf0SXWOKMc1E4w8fbQ-q16ktIEQ8Rbz59UZaUjLGW3Oq91CeW0j2KrsrM_pEmxtTFurs9vZBIIH0Y4hWzAG73KIzq-AymAdRgvMdNjmtQWL25_LjzUSheONHZ2ugQJ3kxpcVjMJpDyZPXAefAvxl9q_rJ71akj21f18Uf34_On74mt9c_tlubi-qTUVJNdCUGWo5kxgjkQPFTKKQtbBnljacNsZjbE2PW4V6iBCnYZIIGRhX-oURpGLannkmqA2chvdqOJeBuXk4SDElVQxOz1Y2dIWQ8QoJbSjEDWCNdYYjTSjjBPCCuvDkbWdutEaXdoV1XACPb3xbi1XYSdb0TYNQwXw7h4Qw91kU5ajS9oOg_I2TEliRlvIGoxxkb79R7oJU_SlVUXVYEgx5PSvaqVKAc73obyrZ6i8ZkKUrgk6q67-oyrj8FHB296V8xMDPhp0DClF2z_UiKCckyePyZMlefKQPDmb3jzuzoPlT9TIb81J0iI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2652042074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic- a qualitative study in Norway</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist ; Helgesen, Ann Karin ; Stensvold, Andreas ; Magnussen, Jannik ; Grøndahl, Vigdis A</creator><creatorcontrib>Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist ; Helgesen, Ann Karin ; Stensvold, Andreas ; Magnussen, Jannik ; Grøndahl, Vigdis A</creatorcontrib><description>The COVID-19 pandemic triggered an unprecedented demand for digital health technology solutions, such as remote monitoring. Previous research has focused on patients with chronic diseases, and their experiences with remote monitoring during the pandemic. Several recommendations have been presented to reduce the frequency of cancer patients' visits to oncology centers and minimizing the risk of exposure to COVID-19, such as remote monitoring. However, few studies have explored how this has influenced the healthcare services to cancer patients.
To explore cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The study had a qualitative design, using in-depth, individual interviews.
A total of eleven interviews were conducted with patients who received remote monitoring during the COVID-19 outbreak. Three of the interviews were conducted by telephone, and eight on a digital platform, audio recorded, and transcribed verbatime. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis as recommended by Braun & Clarke.
All participants were conscious about being vulnerable to infections due to having cancer and receiving cancer treatment, and the pandemic to them represented an extra burden. Most of the participants experienced that their healthcare services had changed due to the pandemic, but there was no consensus on how the services had changed. All of the participants presented remote monitoring as something «new». Whether they received remote monitoring by telephone, video consultations or more advanced solutions with the possibility to complete a questionnaire or fill in measurements, did not seem to impact their views. However, all agreed that remote monitoring could never totally replace physical consultations in hospital. Participants' views seemed to grow more positive over time, but still they emphasized both positive and negative aspects of remote monitoring solutions in cancer care.
Remote monitoring was introduced as a necessity in cancer care during the COVID-19 outbreak. This may seem as an efficient solution, allowing for patients to stay at home and avoid infection. Our results indicate that, in the case of cancer patients, it is important that healthcare personnel balance the remote monitoring solution with person-to-person contact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6963</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07897-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35387645</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Cancer care ; Cancer patients ; Care and treatment ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; Diabetes ; Disease transmission ; Epidemics ; Health care access ; Health Personnel ; Health services ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Interviews ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Nurses ; Pandemics ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients’ experiences ; Qualitative Research ; Reflexivity ; Remote monitoring ; Research methodology ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Social aspects ; Systematic review ; Telemedicine</subject><ispartof>BMC health services research, 2022-04, Vol.22 (1), p.453-9, Article 453</ispartof><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-994ad4c7692719f0a1da406b0f3e457ebdc22cdf28a1b011bc01911e0f8279da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-994ad4c7692719f0a1da406b0f3e457ebdc22cdf28a1b011bc01911e0f8279da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8985561/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2652042074?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11687,25752,27923,27924,36059,36060,37011,37012,38515,43894,44362,44589,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387645$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helgesen, Ann Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stensvold, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnussen, Jannik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grøndahl, Vigdis A</creatorcontrib><title>Cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic- a qualitative study in Norway</title><title>BMC health services research</title><addtitle>BMC Health Serv Res</addtitle><description>The COVID-19 pandemic triggered an unprecedented demand for digital health technology solutions, such as remote monitoring. Previous research has focused on patients with chronic diseases, and their experiences with remote monitoring during the pandemic. Several recommendations have been presented to reduce the frequency of cancer patients' visits to oncology centers and minimizing the risk of exposure to COVID-19, such as remote monitoring. However, few studies have explored how this has influenced the healthcare services to cancer patients.
To explore cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The study had a qualitative design, using in-depth, individual interviews.
A total of eleven interviews were conducted with patients who received remote monitoring during the COVID-19 outbreak. Three of the interviews were conducted by telephone, and eight on a digital platform, audio recorded, and transcribed verbatime. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis as recommended by Braun & Clarke.
All participants were conscious about being vulnerable to infections due to having cancer and receiving cancer treatment, and the pandemic to them represented an extra burden. Most of the participants experienced that their healthcare services had changed due to the pandemic, but there was no consensus on how the services had changed. All of the participants presented remote monitoring as something «new». Whether they received remote monitoring by telephone, video consultations or more advanced solutions with the possibility to complete a questionnaire or fill in measurements, did not seem to impact their views. However, all agreed that remote monitoring could never totally replace physical consultations in hospital. Participants' views seemed to grow more positive over time, but still they emphasized both positive and negative aspects of remote monitoring solutions in cancer care.
Remote monitoring was introduced as a necessity in cancer care during the COVID-19 outbreak. This may seem as an efficient solution, allowing for patients to stay at home and avoid infection. Our results indicate that, in the case of cancer patients, it is important that healthcare personnel balance the remote monitoring solution with person-to-person contact.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer care</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients’ experiences</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Reflexivity</subject><subject>Remote monitoring</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><issn>1472-6963</issn><issn>1472-6963</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkktvEzEUhUcIREvhD7BAlliUzRS_xh5vkKrwilTRDbC1PLYncTRjp7YnKP8eT1JKg5AXfp3zWff6VNVrBK8Qatn7hLBApIYY15C3gtf0SXWOKMc1E4w8fbQ-q16ktIEQ8Rbz59UZaUjLGW3Oq91CeW0j2KrsrM_pEmxtTFurs9vZBIIH0Y4hWzAG73KIzq-AymAdRgvMdNjmtQWL25_LjzUSheONHZ2ugQJ3kxpcVjMJpDyZPXAefAvxl9q_rJ71akj21f18Uf34_On74mt9c_tlubi-qTUVJNdCUGWo5kxgjkQPFTKKQtbBnljacNsZjbE2PW4V6iBCnYZIIGRhX-oURpGLannkmqA2chvdqOJeBuXk4SDElVQxOz1Y2dIWQ8QoJbSjEDWCNdYYjTSjjBPCCuvDkbWdutEaXdoV1XACPb3xbi1XYSdb0TYNQwXw7h4Qw91kU5ajS9oOg_I2TEliRlvIGoxxkb79R7oJU_SlVUXVYEgx5PSvaqVKAc73obyrZ6i8ZkKUrgk6q67-oyrj8FHB296V8xMDPhp0DClF2z_UiKCckyePyZMlefKQPDmb3jzuzoPlT9TIb81J0iI</recordid><startdate>20220406</startdate><enddate>20220406</enddate><creator>Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist</creator><creator>Helgesen, Ann Karin</creator><creator>Stensvold, Andreas</creator><creator>Magnussen, Jannik</creator><creator>Grøndahl, Vigdis A</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220406</creationdate><title>Cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic- a qualitative study in Norway</title><author>Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist ; Helgesen, Ann Karin ; Stensvold, Andreas ; Magnussen, Jannik ; Grøndahl, Vigdis A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-994ad4c7692719f0a1da406b0f3e457ebdc22cdf28a1b011bc01911e0f8279da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer care</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients’ experiences</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Reflexivity</topic><topic>Remote monitoring</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helgesen, Ann Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stensvold, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnussen, Jannik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grøndahl, Vigdis A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC health services research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist</au><au>Helgesen, Ann Karin</au><au>Stensvold, Andreas</au><au>Magnussen, Jannik</au><au>Grøndahl, Vigdis A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic- a qualitative study in Norway</atitle><jtitle>BMC health services research</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Health Serv Res</addtitle><date>2022-04-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>453</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>453-9</pages><artnum>453</artnum><issn>1472-6963</issn><eissn>1472-6963</eissn><abstract>The COVID-19 pandemic triggered an unprecedented demand for digital health technology solutions, such as remote monitoring. Previous research has focused on patients with chronic diseases, and their experiences with remote monitoring during the pandemic. Several recommendations have been presented to reduce the frequency of cancer patients' visits to oncology centers and minimizing the risk of exposure to COVID-19, such as remote monitoring. However, few studies have explored how this has influenced the healthcare services to cancer patients.
To explore cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The study had a qualitative design, using in-depth, individual interviews.
A total of eleven interviews were conducted with patients who received remote monitoring during the COVID-19 outbreak. Three of the interviews were conducted by telephone, and eight on a digital platform, audio recorded, and transcribed verbatime. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis as recommended by Braun & Clarke.
All participants were conscious about being vulnerable to infections due to having cancer and receiving cancer treatment, and the pandemic to them represented an extra burden. Most of the participants experienced that their healthcare services had changed due to the pandemic, but there was no consensus on how the services had changed. All of the participants presented remote monitoring as something «new». Whether they received remote monitoring by telephone, video consultations or more advanced solutions with the possibility to complete a questionnaire or fill in measurements, did not seem to impact their views. However, all agreed that remote monitoring could never totally replace physical consultations in hospital. Participants' views seemed to grow more positive over time, but still they emphasized both positive and negative aspects of remote monitoring solutions in cancer care.
Remote monitoring was introduced as a necessity in cancer care during the COVID-19 outbreak. This may seem as an efficient solution, allowing for patients to stay at home and avoid infection. Our results indicate that, in the case of cancer patients, it is important that healthcare personnel balance the remote monitoring solution with person-to-person contact.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>35387645</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12913-022-07897-4</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1472-6963 |
ispartof | BMC health services research, 2022-04, Vol.22 (1), p.453-9, Article 453 |
issn | 1472-6963 1472-6963 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_84820164434b4015965eddc1c6467336 |
source | PMC (PubMed Central); ABI/INFORM Global; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Cancer Cancer care Cancer patients Care and treatment Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 - epidemiology Diabetes Disease transmission Epidemics Health care access Health Personnel Health services Hospitals Humans Interviews Medical personnel Medical research Neoplasms - epidemiology Neoplasms - therapy Nurses Pandemics Patient satisfaction Patients’ experiences Qualitative Research Reflexivity Remote monitoring Research methodology SARS-CoV-2 Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Social aspects Systematic review Telemedicine |
title | Cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic- a qualitative study in Norway |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A51%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cancer%20patients'%20perspectives%20on%20remote%20monitoring%20at%20home%20during%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic-%20a%20qualitative%20study%20in%20Norway&rft.jtitle=BMC%20health%20services%20research&rft.au=Leonardsen,%20Ann-Chatrin%20Linqvist&rft.date=2022-04-06&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=453&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=453-9&rft.artnum=453&rft.issn=1472-6963&rft.eissn=1472-6963&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12913-022-07897-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA699692944%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-994ad4c7692719f0a1da406b0f3e457ebdc22cdf28a1b011bc01911e0f8279da3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2652042074&rft_id=info:pmid/35387645&rft_galeid=A699692944&rfr_iscdi=true |