Loading…

Cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic- a qualitative study in Norway

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered an unprecedented demand for digital health technology solutions, such as remote monitoring. Previous research has focused on patients with chronic diseases, and their experiences with remote monitoring during the pandemic. Several recommendations have been presented t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC health services research 2022-04, Vol.22 (1), p.453-9, Article 453
Main Authors: Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist, Helgesen, Ann Karin, Stensvold, Andreas, Magnussen, Jannik, Grøndahl, Vigdis A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-994ad4c7692719f0a1da406b0f3e457ebdc22cdf28a1b011bc01911e0f8279da3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-994ad4c7692719f0a1da406b0f3e457ebdc22cdf28a1b011bc01911e0f8279da3
container_end_page 9
container_issue 1
container_start_page 453
container_title BMC health services research
container_volume 22
creator Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist
Helgesen, Ann Karin
Stensvold, Andreas
Magnussen, Jannik
Grøndahl, Vigdis A
description The COVID-19 pandemic triggered an unprecedented demand for digital health technology solutions, such as remote monitoring. Previous research has focused on patients with chronic diseases, and their experiences with remote monitoring during the pandemic. Several recommendations have been presented to reduce the frequency of cancer patients' visits to oncology centers and minimizing the risk of exposure to COVID-19, such as remote monitoring. However, few studies have explored how this has influenced the healthcare services to cancer patients. To explore cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study had a qualitative design, using in-depth, individual interviews. A total of eleven interviews were conducted with patients who received remote monitoring during the COVID-19 outbreak. Three of the interviews were conducted by telephone, and eight on a digital platform, audio recorded, and transcribed verbatime. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis as recommended by Braun & Clarke. All participants were conscious about being vulnerable to infections due to having cancer and receiving cancer treatment, and the pandemic to them represented an extra burden. Most of the participants experienced that their healthcare services had changed due to the pandemic, but there was no consensus on how the services had changed. All of the participants presented remote monitoring as something «new». Whether they received remote monitoring by telephone, video consultations or more advanced solutions with the possibility to complete a questionnaire or fill in measurements, did not seem to impact their views. However, all agreed that remote monitoring could never totally replace physical consultations in hospital. Participants' views seemed to grow more positive over time, but still they emphasized both positive and negative aspects of remote monitoring solutions in cancer care. Remote monitoring was introduced as a necessity in cancer care during the COVID-19 outbreak. This may seem as an efficient solution, allowing for patients to stay at home and avoid infection. Our results indicate that, in the case of cancer patients, it is important that healthcare personnel balance the remote monitoring solution with person-to-person contact.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12913-022-07897-4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_84820164434b4015965eddc1c6467336</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A699692944</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_84820164434b4015965eddc1c6467336</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A699692944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-994ad4c7692719f0a1da406b0f3e457ebdc22cdf28a1b011bc01911e0f8279da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkktvEzEUhUcIREvhD7BAlliUzRS_xh5vkKrwilTRDbC1PLYncTRjp7YnKP8eT1JKg5AXfp3zWff6VNVrBK8Qatn7hLBApIYY15C3gtf0SXWOKMc1E4w8fbQ-q16ktIEQ8Rbz59UZaUjLGW3Oq91CeW0j2KrsrM_pEmxtTFurs9vZBIIH0Y4hWzAG73KIzq-AymAdRgvMdNjmtQWL25_LjzUSheONHZ2ugQJ3kxpcVjMJpDyZPXAefAvxl9q_rJ71akj21f18Uf34_On74mt9c_tlubi-qTUVJNdCUGWo5kxgjkQPFTKKQtbBnljacNsZjbE2PW4V6iBCnYZIIGRhX-oURpGLannkmqA2chvdqOJeBuXk4SDElVQxOz1Y2dIWQ8QoJbSjEDWCNdYYjTSjjBPCCuvDkbWdutEaXdoV1XACPb3xbi1XYSdb0TYNQwXw7h4Qw91kU5ajS9oOg_I2TEliRlvIGoxxkb79R7oJU_SlVUXVYEgx5PSvaqVKAc73obyrZ6i8ZkKUrgk6q67-oyrj8FHB296V8xMDPhp0DClF2z_UiKCckyePyZMlefKQPDmb3jzuzoPlT9TIb81J0iI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2652042074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic- a qualitative study in Norway</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist ; Helgesen, Ann Karin ; Stensvold, Andreas ; Magnussen, Jannik ; Grøndahl, Vigdis A</creator><creatorcontrib>Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist ; Helgesen, Ann Karin ; Stensvold, Andreas ; Magnussen, Jannik ; Grøndahl, Vigdis A</creatorcontrib><description>The COVID-19 pandemic triggered an unprecedented demand for digital health technology solutions, such as remote monitoring. Previous research has focused on patients with chronic diseases, and their experiences with remote monitoring during the pandemic. Several recommendations have been presented to reduce the frequency of cancer patients' visits to oncology centers and minimizing the risk of exposure to COVID-19, such as remote monitoring. However, few studies have explored how this has influenced the healthcare services to cancer patients. To explore cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study had a qualitative design, using in-depth, individual interviews. A total of eleven interviews were conducted with patients who received remote monitoring during the COVID-19 outbreak. Three of the interviews were conducted by telephone, and eight on a digital platform, audio recorded, and transcribed verbatime. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis as recommended by Braun &amp; Clarke. All participants were conscious about being vulnerable to infections due to having cancer and receiving cancer treatment, and the pandemic to them represented an extra burden. Most of the participants experienced that their healthcare services had changed due to the pandemic, but there was no consensus on how the services had changed. All of the participants presented remote monitoring as something «new». Whether they received remote monitoring by telephone, video consultations or more advanced solutions with the possibility to complete a questionnaire or fill in measurements, did not seem to impact their views. However, all agreed that remote monitoring could never totally replace physical consultations in hospital. Participants' views seemed to grow more positive over time, but still they emphasized both positive and negative aspects of remote monitoring solutions in cancer care. Remote monitoring was introduced as a necessity in cancer care during the COVID-19 outbreak. This may seem as an efficient solution, allowing for patients to stay at home and avoid infection. Our results indicate that, in the case of cancer patients, it is important that healthcare personnel balance the remote monitoring solution with person-to-person contact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6963</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07897-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35387645</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Cancer care ; Cancer patients ; Care and treatment ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; Diabetes ; Disease transmission ; Epidemics ; Health care access ; Health Personnel ; Health services ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Interviews ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Nurses ; Pandemics ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients’ experiences ; Qualitative Research ; Reflexivity ; Remote monitoring ; Research methodology ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Social aspects ; Systematic review ; Telemedicine</subject><ispartof>BMC health services research, 2022-04, Vol.22 (1), p.453-9, Article 453</ispartof><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-994ad4c7692719f0a1da406b0f3e457ebdc22cdf28a1b011bc01911e0f8279da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-994ad4c7692719f0a1da406b0f3e457ebdc22cdf28a1b011bc01911e0f8279da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8985561/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2652042074?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11687,25752,27923,27924,36059,36060,37011,37012,38515,43894,44362,44589,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387645$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helgesen, Ann Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stensvold, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnussen, Jannik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grøndahl, Vigdis A</creatorcontrib><title>Cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic- a qualitative study in Norway</title><title>BMC health services research</title><addtitle>BMC Health Serv Res</addtitle><description>The COVID-19 pandemic triggered an unprecedented demand for digital health technology solutions, such as remote monitoring. Previous research has focused on patients with chronic diseases, and their experiences with remote monitoring during the pandemic. Several recommendations have been presented to reduce the frequency of cancer patients' visits to oncology centers and minimizing the risk of exposure to COVID-19, such as remote monitoring. However, few studies have explored how this has influenced the healthcare services to cancer patients. To explore cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study had a qualitative design, using in-depth, individual interviews. A total of eleven interviews were conducted with patients who received remote monitoring during the COVID-19 outbreak. Three of the interviews were conducted by telephone, and eight on a digital platform, audio recorded, and transcribed verbatime. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis as recommended by Braun &amp; Clarke. All participants were conscious about being vulnerable to infections due to having cancer and receiving cancer treatment, and the pandemic to them represented an extra burden. Most of the participants experienced that their healthcare services had changed due to the pandemic, but there was no consensus on how the services had changed. All of the participants presented remote monitoring as something «new». Whether they received remote monitoring by telephone, video consultations or more advanced solutions with the possibility to complete a questionnaire or fill in measurements, did not seem to impact their views. However, all agreed that remote monitoring could never totally replace physical consultations in hospital. Participants' views seemed to grow more positive over time, but still they emphasized both positive and negative aspects of remote monitoring solutions in cancer care. Remote monitoring was introduced as a necessity in cancer care during the COVID-19 outbreak. This may seem as an efficient solution, allowing for patients to stay at home and avoid infection. Our results indicate that, in the case of cancer patients, it is important that healthcare personnel balance the remote monitoring solution with person-to-person contact.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer care</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients’ experiences</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Reflexivity</subject><subject>Remote monitoring</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><issn>1472-6963</issn><issn>1472-6963</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkktvEzEUhUcIREvhD7BAlliUzRS_xh5vkKrwilTRDbC1PLYncTRjp7YnKP8eT1JKg5AXfp3zWff6VNVrBK8Qatn7hLBApIYY15C3gtf0SXWOKMc1E4w8fbQ-q16ktIEQ8Rbz59UZaUjLGW3Oq91CeW0j2KrsrM_pEmxtTFurs9vZBIIH0Y4hWzAG73KIzq-AymAdRgvMdNjmtQWL25_LjzUSheONHZ2ugQJ3kxpcVjMJpDyZPXAefAvxl9q_rJ71akj21f18Uf34_On74mt9c_tlubi-qTUVJNdCUGWo5kxgjkQPFTKKQtbBnljacNsZjbE2PW4V6iBCnYZIIGRhX-oURpGLannkmqA2chvdqOJeBuXk4SDElVQxOz1Y2dIWQ8QoJbSjEDWCNdYYjTSjjBPCCuvDkbWdutEaXdoV1XACPb3xbi1XYSdb0TYNQwXw7h4Qw91kU5ajS9oOg_I2TEliRlvIGoxxkb79R7oJU_SlVUXVYEgx5PSvaqVKAc73obyrZ6i8ZkKUrgk6q67-oyrj8FHB296V8xMDPhp0DClF2z_UiKCckyePyZMlefKQPDmb3jzuzoPlT9TIb81J0iI</recordid><startdate>20220406</startdate><enddate>20220406</enddate><creator>Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist</creator><creator>Helgesen, Ann Karin</creator><creator>Stensvold, Andreas</creator><creator>Magnussen, Jannik</creator><creator>Grøndahl, Vigdis A</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220406</creationdate><title>Cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic- a qualitative study in Norway</title><author>Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist ; Helgesen, Ann Karin ; Stensvold, Andreas ; Magnussen, Jannik ; Grøndahl, Vigdis A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-994ad4c7692719f0a1da406b0f3e457ebdc22cdf28a1b011bc01911e0f8279da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer care</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients’ experiences</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Reflexivity</topic><topic>Remote monitoring</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helgesen, Ann Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stensvold, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnussen, Jannik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grøndahl, Vigdis A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC health services research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist</au><au>Helgesen, Ann Karin</au><au>Stensvold, Andreas</au><au>Magnussen, Jannik</au><au>Grøndahl, Vigdis A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic- a qualitative study in Norway</atitle><jtitle>BMC health services research</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Health Serv Res</addtitle><date>2022-04-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>453</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>453-9</pages><artnum>453</artnum><issn>1472-6963</issn><eissn>1472-6963</eissn><abstract>The COVID-19 pandemic triggered an unprecedented demand for digital health technology solutions, such as remote monitoring. Previous research has focused on patients with chronic diseases, and their experiences with remote monitoring during the pandemic. Several recommendations have been presented to reduce the frequency of cancer patients' visits to oncology centers and minimizing the risk of exposure to COVID-19, such as remote monitoring. However, few studies have explored how this has influenced the healthcare services to cancer patients. To explore cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study had a qualitative design, using in-depth, individual interviews. A total of eleven interviews were conducted with patients who received remote monitoring during the COVID-19 outbreak. Three of the interviews were conducted by telephone, and eight on a digital platform, audio recorded, and transcribed verbatime. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis as recommended by Braun &amp; Clarke. All participants were conscious about being vulnerable to infections due to having cancer and receiving cancer treatment, and the pandemic to them represented an extra burden. Most of the participants experienced that their healthcare services had changed due to the pandemic, but there was no consensus on how the services had changed. All of the participants presented remote monitoring as something «new». Whether they received remote monitoring by telephone, video consultations or more advanced solutions with the possibility to complete a questionnaire or fill in measurements, did not seem to impact their views. However, all agreed that remote monitoring could never totally replace physical consultations in hospital. Participants' views seemed to grow more positive over time, but still they emphasized both positive and negative aspects of remote monitoring solutions in cancer care. Remote monitoring was introduced as a necessity in cancer care during the COVID-19 outbreak. This may seem as an efficient solution, allowing for patients to stay at home and avoid infection. Our results indicate that, in the case of cancer patients, it is important that healthcare personnel balance the remote monitoring solution with person-to-person contact.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>35387645</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12913-022-07897-4</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1472-6963
ispartof BMC health services research, 2022-04, Vol.22 (1), p.453-9, Article 453
issn 1472-6963
1472-6963
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_84820164434b4015965eddc1c6467336
source PMC (PubMed Central); ABI/INFORM Global; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Cancer
Cancer care
Cancer patients
Care and treatment
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
COVID-19 - epidemiology
Diabetes
Disease transmission
Epidemics
Health care access
Health Personnel
Health services
Hospitals
Humans
Interviews
Medical personnel
Medical research
Neoplasms - epidemiology
Neoplasms - therapy
Nurses
Pandemics
Patient satisfaction
Patients’ experiences
Qualitative Research
Reflexivity
Remote monitoring
Research methodology
SARS-CoV-2
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Social aspects
Systematic review
Telemedicine
title Cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic- a qualitative study in Norway
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A51%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cancer%20patients'%20perspectives%20on%20remote%20monitoring%20at%20home%20during%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic-%20a%20qualitative%20study%20in%20Norway&rft.jtitle=BMC%20health%20services%20research&rft.au=Leonardsen,%20Ann-Chatrin%20Linqvist&rft.date=2022-04-06&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=453&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=453-9&rft.artnum=453&rft.issn=1472-6963&rft.eissn=1472-6963&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12913-022-07897-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA699692944%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-994ad4c7692719f0a1da406b0f3e457ebdc22cdf28a1b011bc01911e0f8279da3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2652042074&rft_id=info:pmid/35387645&rft_galeid=A699692944&rfr_iscdi=true