Loading…

Short-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: a propensity score-matched analysis

To date, the evidence on the safety and benefits of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) in elderly patients is still controversy. This study aim to compare the risk and benefit between MIPD and open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) in elderly patients. From 2016 to 2020, we retrospective enro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC surgery 2021-01, Vol.21 (1), p.60-60, Article 60
Main Authors: Yin, Shih-Min, Liu, Yueh-Wei, Liu, Yu-Yin, Yong, Chee-Chien, Wang, Chih-Chi, Li, Wei-Feng, Yeh, Cheng-Hsi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To date, the evidence on the safety and benefits of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) in elderly patients is still controversy. This study aim to compare the risk and benefit between MIPD and open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) in elderly patients. From 2016 to 2020, we retrospective enrolled 26 patients underwent MIPD and other 119 patients underwent OPD. We firstly compared the baseline characteristics, 90-day mortality and short-term surgical outcomes of MIPD and OPD. Propensity score matching was applied for old age patient (≥ 65-year-old vs.
ISSN:1471-2482
1471-2482
DOI:10.1186/s12893-021-01052-2