Loading…
Microbiability and microbiome-wide association analyses of feed efficiency and performance traits in pigs
The objective of the present study was to investigate how variation in the faecal microbial composition is associated with variation in average daily gain (ADG), backfat thickness (BFT), daily feed intake (DFI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and residual feed intake (RFI), using data from two experim...
Saved in:
Published in: | Genetics selection evolution (Paris) 2022-04, Vol.54 (1), p.29-29, Article 29 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-3850b2b341d0da51a67d83119f1f3ae053f4361a7c9a694085118bc8852038fa3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-3850b2b341d0da51a67d83119f1f3ae053f4361a7c9a694085118bc8852038fa3 |
container_end_page | 29 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 29 |
container_title | Genetics selection evolution (Paris) |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Aliakbari, Amir Zemb, Olivier Cauquil, Laurent Barilly, Céline Billon, Yvon Gilbert, Hélène |
description | The objective of the present study was to investigate how variation in the faecal microbial composition is associated with variation in average daily gain (ADG), backfat thickness (BFT), daily feed intake (DFI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and residual feed intake (RFI), using data from two experimental pig lines that were divergent for feed efficiency. Estimates of microbiability were obtained by a Bayesian approach using animal mixed models. Microbiome-wide association analyses (MWAS) were conducted by single-operational taxonomic units (OTU) regression and by back-solving solutions of best linear unbiased prediction using a microbiome covariance matrix. In addition, accuracy of microbiome predictions of phenotypes using the microbiome covariance matrix was evaluated.
Estimates of heritability ranged from 0.31 ± 0.13 for FCR to 0.51 ± 0.10 for BFT. Estimates of microbiability were lower than those of heritability for all traits and were 0.11 ± 0.09 for RFI, 0.20 ± 0.11 for FCR, 0.04 ± 0.03 for DFI, 0.03 ± 0.03 for ADG, and 0.02 ± 0.03 for BFT. Bivariate analyses showed a high microbial correlation of 0.70 ± 0.34 between RFI and FCR. The two approaches used for MWAS showed similar results. Overall, eight OTU with significant or suggestive effects on the five traits were identified. They belonged to the genera and families that are mainly involved in producing short-chain fatty acids and digestive enzymes. Prediction accuracy of phenotypes using a full model including the genetic and microbiota components ranged from 0.60 ± 0.19 to 0.78 ± 0.05. Similar accuracies of predictions of the microbial component were observed using models that did or did not include an additive animal effect, suggesting no interaction with the genetic effect.
Our results showed substantial associations of the faecal microbiome with feed efficiency related traits but negligible effects with growth traits. Microbiome data incorporated as a covariance matrix can be used to predict phenotypes of animals that do not (yet) have phenotypic information. Connecting breeding environment between training sets and predicted populations could be necessary to obtain reliable microbiome predictions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12711-022-00717-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_84d66e1b37e64cf9b4dfc42c84aba348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A701627194</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_84d66e1b37e64cf9b4dfc42c84aba348</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A701627194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-3850b2b341d0da51a67d83119f1f3ae053f4361a7c9a694085118bc8852038fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkktv1DAUhSNERUvhD7BAkdjQRYodP7NBGlVARxqExGNt3djXU1dJPMSZwvx7PE1bdRAL5IWt6-8c-16donhFyTmlWr5LtFaUVqSuK0IUVZV6UpzQulFVI7V8-uh8XDxP6ZoQIrnkz4pjJrjUipOTInwOdoxtgDZ0YdqVMLiyn0uxx-pXcFhCStEGmEIc8j10u4SpjL70iK5E74MNONhZu8HRx7GHwWI5jRCmVIah3IR1elEceegSvrzbT4sfHz98v7isVl8-LS8Wq8pKJqeKaUHaumWcOuJAUJDKaUZp46lngEQwz5mkoGwDsuFEizyL1motasK0B3ZaLGdfF-HabMbQw7gzEYK5LcRxbWCcgu3QaO6kRNoyhZJb37Tcectrqzm0wLjOXu9nr8227dFZHHJP3YHp4c0Qrsw63piGMKmUyAZns8HVX7LLxcrsa5kTRJHmhmb27d1jY_y5xTSZPiSLXQcDxm0ytZSk0U3NyH-gQghJpNq38GZG15A7DoOP-aN2j5uFIlTmCDU8U-f_oPJymNMQB_Qh1w8EZweCzEz4e1rDNiWz_Pb1kK1nNscqpRH9wyQoMfskmznJJifZ3CbZqCx6_Xj0D5L76LI_UQfsbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2655560678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microbiability and microbiome-wide association analyses of feed efficiency and performance traits in pigs</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Aliakbari, Amir ; Zemb, Olivier ; Cauquil, Laurent ; Barilly, Céline ; Billon, Yvon ; Gilbert, Hélène</creator><creatorcontrib>Aliakbari, Amir ; Zemb, Olivier ; Cauquil, Laurent ; Barilly, Céline ; Billon, Yvon ; Gilbert, Hélène</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of the present study was to investigate how variation in the faecal microbial composition is associated with variation in average daily gain (ADG), backfat thickness (BFT), daily feed intake (DFI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and residual feed intake (RFI), using data from two experimental pig lines that were divergent for feed efficiency. Estimates of microbiability were obtained by a Bayesian approach using animal mixed models. Microbiome-wide association analyses (MWAS) were conducted by single-operational taxonomic units (OTU) regression and by back-solving solutions of best linear unbiased prediction using a microbiome covariance matrix. In addition, accuracy of microbiome predictions of phenotypes using the microbiome covariance matrix was evaluated.
Estimates of heritability ranged from 0.31 ± 0.13 for FCR to 0.51 ± 0.10 for BFT. Estimates of microbiability were lower than those of heritability for all traits and were 0.11 ± 0.09 for RFI, 0.20 ± 0.11 for FCR, 0.04 ± 0.03 for DFI, 0.03 ± 0.03 for ADG, and 0.02 ± 0.03 for BFT. Bivariate analyses showed a high microbial correlation of 0.70 ± 0.34 between RFI and FCR. The two approaches used for MWAS showed similar results. Overall, eight OTU with significant or suggestive effects on the five traits were identified. They belonged to the genera and families that are mainly involved in producing short-chain fatty acids and digestive enzymes. Prediction accuracy of phenotypes using a full model including the genetic and microbiota components ranged from 0.60 ± 0.19 to 0.78 ± 0.05. Similar accuracies of predictions of the microbial component were observed using models that did or did not include an additive animal effect, suggesting no interaction with the genetic effect.
Our results showed substantial associations of the faecal microbiome with feed efficiency related traits but negligible effects with growth traits. Microbiome data incorporated as a covariance matrix can be used to predict phenotypes of animals that do not (yet) have phenotypic information. Connecting breeding environment between training sets and predicted populations could be necessary to obtain reliable microbiome predictions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1297-9686</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0999-193X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1297-9686</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12711-022-00717-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35468740</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animal biology ; Animal Feed - analysis ; Animals ; average daily gain ; backfat ; Bayes Theorem ; Bayesian theory ; Behavior ; Biotechnology ; Costs (Law) ; Eating - genetics ; Fatty acids ; feed conversion ; feed intake ; Food and Nutrition ; heritability ; Life Sciences ; Microbiology and Parasitology ; microbiome ; Microbiota ; Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) ; microorganisms ; Phenotype ; prediction ; Swine ; Swine - genetics ; variance covariance matrix ; Veterinary medicine and animal Health</subject><ispartof>Genetics selection evolution (Paris), 2022-04, Vol.54 (1), p.29-29, Article 29</ispartof><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-3850b2b341d0da51a67d83119f1f3ae053f4361a7c9a694085118bc8852038fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-3850b2b341d0da51a67d83119f1f3ae053f4361a7c9a694085118bc8852038fa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5213-054X ; 0000-0002-0384-8811 ; 0000-0002-1347-3785 ; 0000-0002-4385-3228 ; 0000-0003-3900-5522</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9036775/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9036775/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,36990,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468740$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03650709$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aliakbari, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zemb, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cauquil, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barilly, Céline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billon, Yvon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Hélène</creatorcontrib><title>Microbiability and microbiome-wide association analyses of feed efficiency and performance traits in pigs</title><title>Genetics selection evolution (Paris)</title><addtitle>Genet Sel Evol</addtitle><description>The objective of the present study was to investigate how variation in the faecal microbial composition is associated with variation in average daily gain (ADG), backfat thickness (BFT), daily feed intake (DFI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and residual feed intake (RFI), using data from two experimental pig lines that were divergent for feed efficiency. Estimates of microbiability were obtained by a Bayesian approach using animal mixed models. Microbiome-wide association analyses (MWAS) were conducted by single-operational taxonomic units (OTU) regression and by back-solving solutions of best linear unbiased prediction using a microbiome covariance matrix. In addition, accuracy of microbiome predictions of phenotypes using the microbiome covariance matrix was evaluated.
Estimates of heritability ranged from 0.31 ± 0.13 for FCR to 0.51 ± 0.10 for BFT. Estimates of microbiability were lower than those of heritability for all traits and were 0.11 ± 0.09 for RFI, 0.20 ± 0.11 for FCR, 0.04 ± 0.03 for DFI, 0.03 ± 0.03 for ADG, and 0.02 ± 0.03 for BFT. Bivariate analyses showed a high microbial correlation of 0.70 ± 0.34 between RFI and FCR. The two approaches used for MWAS showed similar results. Overall, eight OTU with significant or suggestive effects on the five traits were identified. They belonged to the genera and families that are mainly involved in producing short-chain fatty acids and digestive enzymes. Prediction accuracy of phenotypes using a full model including the genetic and microbiota components ranged from 0.60 ± 0.19 to 0.78 ± 0.05. Similar accuracies of predictions of the microbial component were observed using models that did or did not include an additive animal effect, suggesting no interaction with the genetic effect.
Our results showed substantial associations of the faecal microbiome with feed efficiency related traits but negligible effects with growth traits. Microbiome data incorporated as a covariance matrix can be used to predict phenotypes of animals that do not (yet) have phenotypic information. Connecting breeding environment between training sets and predicted populations could be necessary to obtain reliable microbiome predictions.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal biology</subject><subject>Animal Feed - analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>average daily gain</subject><subject>backfat</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bayesian theory</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Costs (Law)</subject><subject>Eating - genetics</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>feed conversion</subject><subject>feed intake</subject><subject>Food and Nutrition</subject><subject>heritability</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microbiology and Parasitology</subject><subject>microbiome</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</subject><subject>microorganisms</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Swine - genetics</subject><subject>variance covariance matrix</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine and animal Health</subject><issn>1297-9686</issn><issn>0999-193X</issn><issn>1297-9686</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkktv1DAUhSNERUvhD7BAkdjQRYodP7NBGlVARxqExGNt3djXU1dJPMSZwvx7PE1bdRAL5IWt6-8c-16donhFyTmlWr5LtFaUVqSuK0IUVZV6UpzQulFVI7V8-uh8XDxP6ZoQIrnkz4pjJrjUipOTInwOdoxtgDZ0YdqVMLiyn0uxx-pXcFhCStEGmEIc8j10u4SpjL70iK5E74MNONhZu8HRx7GHwWI5jRCmVIah3IR1elEceegSvrzbT4sfHz98v7isVl8-LS8Wq8pKJqeKaUHaumWcOuJAUJDKaUZp46lngEQwz5mkoGwDsuFEizyL1motasK0B3ZaLGdfF-HabMbQw7gzEYK5LcRxbWCcgu3QaO6kRNoyhZJb37Tcectrqzm0wLjOXu9nr8227dFZHHJP3YHp4c0Qrsw63piGMKmUyAZns8HVX7LLxcrsa5kTRJHmhmb27d1jY_y5xTSZPiSLXQcDxm0ytZSk0U3NyH-gQghJpNq38GZG15A7DoOP-aN2j5uFIlTmCDU8U-f_oPJymNMQB_Qh1w8EZweCzEz4e1rDNiWz_Pb1kK1nNscqpRH9wyQoMfskmznJJifZ3CbZqCx6_Xj0D5L76LI_UQfsbw</recordid><startdate>20220425</startdate><enddate>20220425</enddate><creator>Aliakbari, Amir</creator><creator>Zemb, Olivier</creator><creator>Cauquil, Laurent</creator><creator>Barilly, Céline</creator><creator>Billon, Yvon</creator><creator>Gilbert, Hélène</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5213-054X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0384-8811</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1347-3785</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4385-3228</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3900-5522</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220425</creationdate><title>Microbiability and microbiome-wide association analyses of feed efficiency and performance traits in pigs</title><author>Aliakbari, Amir ; Zemb, Olivier ; Cauquil, Laurent ; Barilly, Céline ; Billon, Yvon ; Gilbert, Hélène</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-3850b2b341d0da51a67d83119f1f3ae053f4361a7c9a694085118bc8852038fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal biology</topic><topic>Animal Feed - analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>average daily gain</topic><topic>backfat</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bayesian theory</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Costs (Law)</topic><topic>Eating - genetics</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>feed conversion</topic><topic>feed intake</topic><topic>Food and Nutrition</topic><topic>heritability</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microbiology and Parasitology</topic><topic>microbiome</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</topic><topic>microorganisms</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Swine - genetics</topic><topic>variance covariance matrix</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine and animal Health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aliakbari, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zemb, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cauquil, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barilly, Céline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billon, Yvon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Hélène</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Science in Context</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Genetics selection evolution (Paris)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aliakbari, Amir</au><au>Zemb, Olivier</au><au>Cauquil, Laurent</au><au>Barilly, Céline</au><au>Billon, Yvon</au><au>Gilbert, Hélène</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microbiability and microbiome-wide association analyses of feed efficiency and performance traits in pigs</atitle><jtitle>Genetics selection evolution (Paris)</jtitle><addtitle>Genet Sel Evol</addtitle><date>2022-04-25</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>29-29</pages><artnum>29</artnum><issn>1297-9686</issn><issn>0999-193X</issn><eissn>1297-9686</eissn><abstract>The objective of the present study was to investigate how variation in the faecal microbial composition is associated with variation in average daily gain (ADG), backfat thickness (BFT), daily feed intake (DFI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and residual feed intake (RFI), using data from two experimental pig lines that were divergent for feed efficiency. Estimates of microbiability were obtained by a Bayesian approach using animal mixed models. Microbiome-wide association analyses (MWAS) were conducted by single-operational taxonomic units (OTU) regression and by back-solving solutions of best linear unbiased prediction using a microbiome covariance matrix. In addition, accuracy of microbiome predictions of phenotypes using the microbiome covariance matrix was evaluated.
Estimates of heritability ranged from 0.31 ± 0.13 for FCR to 0.51 ± 0.10 for BFT. Estimates of microbiability were lower than those of heritability for all traits and were 0.11 ± 0.09 for RFI, 0.20 ± 0.11 for FCR, 0.04 ± 0.03 for DFI, 0.03 ± 0.03 for ADG, and 0.02 ± 0.03 for BFT. Bivariate analyses showed a high microbial correlation of 0.70 ± 0.34 between RFI and FCR. The two approaches used for MWAS showed similar results. Overall, eight OTU with significant or suggestive effects on the five traits were identified. They belonged to the genera and families that are mainly involved in producing short-chain fatty acids and digestive enzymes. Prediction accuracy of phenotypes using a full model including the genetic and microbiota components ranged from 0.60 ± 0.19 to 0.78 ± 0.05. Similar accuracies of predictions of the microbial component were observed using models that did or did not include an additive animal effect, suggesting no interaction with the genetic effect.
Our results showed substantial associations of the faecal microbiome with feed efficiency related traits but negligible effects with growth traits. Microbiome data incorporated as a covariance matrix can be used to predict phenotypes of animals that do not (yet) have phenotypic information. Connecting breeding environment between training sets and predicted populations could be necessary to obtain reliable microbiome predictions.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>35468740</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12711-022-00717-7</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5213-054X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0384-8811</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1347-3785</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4385-3228</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3900-5522</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1297-9686 |
ispartof | Genetics selection evolution (Paris), 2022-04, Vol.54 (1), p.29-29, Article 29 |
issn | 1297-9686 0999-193X 1297-9686 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_84d66e1b37e64cf9b4dfc42c84aba348 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Analysis Animal biology Animal Feed - analysis Animals average daily gain backfat Bayes Theorem Bayesian theory Behavior Biotechnology Costs (Law) Eating - genetics Fatty acids feed conversion feed intake Food and Nutrition heritability Life Sciences Microbiology and Parasitology microbiome Microbiota Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) microorganisms Phenotype prediction Swine Swine - genetics variance covariance matrix Veterinary medicine and animal Health |
title | Microbiability and microbiome-wide association analyses of feed efficiency and performance traits in pigs |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A44%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microbiability%20and%20microbiome-wide%20association%20analyses%20of%20feed%20efficiency%20and%20performance%20traits%20in%20pigs&rft.jtitle=Genetics%20selection%20evolution%20(Paris)&rft.au=Aliakbari,%20Amir&rft.date=2022-04-25&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=29-29&rft.artnum=29&rft.issn=1297-9686&rft.eissn=1297-9686&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12711-022-00717-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA701627194%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-3850b2b341d0da51a67d83119f1f3ae053f4361a7c9a694085118bc8852038fa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2655560678&rft_id=info:pmid/35468740&rft_galeid=A701627194&rfr_iscdi=true |