Impact of COVID-19 on post graduate medical education and training

• Published in: BMC medical education 2021-11, Vol.21 (1), p.1-580, Article 580
• Main Authors: Enujioke, Sharon C, McBrayer, Kimberly, Soe, Katherine C, Imburgia, Teresa M, Robbins, Cynthia
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anesthesiology; Burnout; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; COVID-19 diagnostic tests; Data Analysis; Dentistry; Depression (Psychology); Educational aspects; Educational Technology; Epidemics; Fellowships; Females; Forecasts and trends; Graduate Medical Education; Influence; Inservice Education; Inservice training; Marital Status; Medical education; Mental health; Non-binary gender; Pandemics; Personal protective equipment; Physicians; Postgraduate medical education; Quality of life; Regression (Statistics); Regression analysis; Scholarships & fellowships; Sexual Identity; Statistical Analysis; Stress; Trainees; Transgender persons; United States; Videoconferencing; Well being
• ISSN: 1472-6920; 1472-6920
• DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-03019-6

Purpose The novel Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) has had a significant impact worldwide that led to changes in healthcare. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on trainee's mental health and educational preparedness. Methods Trainees at the Indiana University School of Medicine were surveyed regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their training. Using a Likert scale, participants were asked questions pertaining to educational preparedness, mental health, and clinical work during the pandemic. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 27. The study was approved as exempt by the Institutional review Board (IRB). Results 324 of the 1204 trainees responded to the survey. The respondents were 76% white with an equal distribution of males and females. A majority of the respondents were first year residents with an equal distribution of second, third, and fourth year residents. Twenty-three percent of respondents were in a procedural residency or fellowship program. Better perceived educational preparedness was associated with an improved home-work balance during COVID-19 ([beta] = 0.506, p < 0.0001) and having a department that advocated/supported focus on mental health during COVID-19 ([beta] = 0.177, p < 0.0001). Worse perceived educational preparedness was associated with being in procedural vs. non-procedural dominant training program ([beta] = - 0.122, p = 0.01). Conclusion COVID-19 has had a significant impact on the training experience of residents and fellows. Departmental support increased mental well-being and perceived education preparedness in trainees. Trainees that felt they had a better home-work life balance had better educational preparedness compared to their peers. Also, trainees in procedural programs had less educational preparedness compared to their peers in non-procedural programs. This study highlights the importance for programs to find avenues to increase educational preparedness in their trainees while being attuned to the mental health of their trainees.