Loading…

Effect of Rootstock on Vineyard Establishment Using Green-Growing Benchgrafts

Demand for vine plant material has increased drastically due to the ongoing expansion of viticulture, and recent widespread replanting efforts. Nurseries and growers are turning to green-grafted vines to meet demand. Unfortunately, most vineyard establishment studies have centered around dormant ben...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agronomy (Basel) 2023-06, Vol.13 (6), p.1586
Main Authors: Munoz, Jose R., Stauch, Samantha J., Wootten, Jennifer, Kitchen, Matthew, Abreu, Matteo, Rodriguez, Christian Jose, Casassa, L. Federico, Wolpert, James A., Dodson Peterson, Jean Catherine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-74b431902f1842e06775edc0b1476d974094e88ae9764b1b2691ba0514edf5063
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1586
container_title Agronomy (Basel)
container_volume 13
creator Munoz, Jose R.
Stauch, Samantha J.
Wootten, Jennifer
Kitchen, Matthew
Abreu, Matteo
Rodriguez, Christian Jose
Casassa, L. Federico
Wolpert, James A.
Dodson Peterson, Jean Catherine
description Demand for vine plant material has increased drastically due to the ongoing expansion of viticulture, and recent widespread replanting efforts. Nurseries and growers are turning to green-grafted vines to meet demand. Unfortunately, most vineyard establishment studies have centered around dormant benchgrafted vines. Thus, little is known regarding the specific establishment trends of green-growing benchgrafts. This study aimed to explore the role rootstock selection has in green-growing benchgraft establishment and development over the first four years post-planting. Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sauvignon blanc was grafted onto multiple rootstocks of varying parentage, including ‘101-14MGT’ (V. riparia × V. rupestris), ‘1103P’ (V. berlandieri × V. rupestris), ‘110R’ (V. berlandieri × V. rupestris), ‘420A MGT’ (V. berlandieri × V. riparia), and ‘Teleki 5C’ (V. berlandieri × V. riparia). The experimental site was organized using a completely randomized design (n = 12) with all vines managed to industry-standard cultural practices. Vines grafted onto 1103P had the largest average trunk diameter (p = 0.0012) and circumference (p < 0.0001) at 22.2 mm and 7.57 cm, respectively. Vines grafted onto 110R had the second-largest trunk circumference at 6.65 cm. Vines grafted onto 110R had the largest concentration of total non-structural carbohydrates at planting at 1.47 g/L, followed by 1103P at 1.25 g/L (p < 0.0001). Total non-structural carbohydrate concentrations in the trunk during dormancy was the highest in 110R at 16.0% total dry weight (p = 0.0008). The larger trunk size and more extensive carbohydrate reserves suggest that green-growing benchgrafts using 110R or 1103P have a higher capacity and likelihood of establishment success.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/agronomy13061586
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8539041f348040a58dc3117ef32890c5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A754972862</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8539041f348040a58dc3117ef32890c5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A754972862</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-74b431902f1842e06775edc0b1476d974094e88ae9764b1b2691ba0514edf5063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUV1rVDEQvYiCpfbdxws-3zr5Th5rWddCRRDra8jNndxm3U1qkiL775u6IuLMw3xwzmGYMwxvCVwyZuC9W0tO-XAkDCQRWr4YzigoNnFmxMt_-tfDRa076GEI06DOhs-bENC3MYfxa86ttux_jDmN32PCoyvLuKnNzftY7w-Y2nhXY1rHbUFM07bkX8_TB0z-fi0utPpmeBXcvuLFn3o-3H3cfLv-NN1-2d5cX91OninSJsVnzogBGojmFEEqJXDxMBOu5GIUB8NRa4dGST6TmUpDZgeCcFyCAMnOh5uT7pLdzj6UeHDlaLOL9vcil9W60qLfo9WiP4iTwLgGDk7oxTNCFAZGtQEvuta7k9ZDyT8fsTa7y48l9fMt1dRIIwzRHXV5Qq2ui8YUcivO91zwEH1OGGLfXynBjaJa0k6AE8GXXGvB8PdMAvbZNPu_aewJ_VGJBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2829695918</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Rootstock on Vineyard Establishment Using Green-Growing Benchgrafts</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Munoz, Jose R. ; Stauch, Samantha J. ; Wootten, Jennifer ; Kitchen, Matthew ; Abreu, Matteo ; Rodriguez, Christian Jose ; Casassa, L. Federico ; Wolpert, James A. ; Dodson Peterson, Jean Catherine</creator><creatorcontrib>Munoz, Jose R. ; Stauch, Samantha J. ; Wootten, Jennifer ; Kitchen, Matthew ; Abreu, Matteo ; Rodriguez, Christian Jose ; Casassa, L. Federico ; Wolpert, James A. ; Dodson Peterson, Jean Catherine</creatorcontrib><description>Demand for vine plant material has increased drastically due to the ongoing expansion of viticulture, and recent widespread replanting efforts. Nurseries and growers are turning to green-grafted vines to meet demand. Unfortunately, most vineyard establishment studies have centered around dormant benchgrafted vines. Thus, little is known regarding the specific establishment trends of green-growing benchgrafts. This study aimed to explore the role rootstock selection has in green-growing benchgraft establishment and development over the first four years post-planting. Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sauvignon blanc was grafted onto multiple rootstocks of varying parentage, including ‘101-14MGT’ (V. riparia × V. rupestris), ‘1103P’ (V. berlandieri × V. rupestris), ‘110R’ (V. berlandieri × V. rupestris), ‘420A MGT’ (V. berlandieri × V. riparia), and ‘Teleki 5C’ (V. berlandieri × V. riparia). The experimental site was organized using a completely randomized design (n = 12) with all vines managed to industry-standard cultural practices. Vines grafted onto 1103P had the largest average trunk diameter (p = 0.0012) and circumference (p &lt; 0.0001) at 22.2 mm and 7.57 cm, respectively. Vines grafted onto 110R had the second-largest trunk circumference at 6.65 cm. Vines grafted onto 110R had the largest concentration of total non-structural carbohydrates at planting at 1.47 g/L, followed by 1103P at 1.25 g/L (p &lt; 0.0001). Total non-structural carbohydrate concentrations in the trunk during dormancy was the highest in 110R at 16.0% total dry weight (p = 0.0008). The larger trunk size and more extensive carbohydrate reserves suggest that green-growing benchgrafts using 110R or 1103P have a higher capacity and likelihood of establishment success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4395</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4395</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13061586</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>California Central Coast ; Carbohydrates ; Circumferences ; Diameters ; Dormancy ; establishment ; Grafting ; Grapes ; Horticultural industry ; non-structural carbohydrates ; Phenology ; Planting ; Radiation ; Revegetation ; rootstock ; Rootstocks ; Senescence ; Success ; Vines ; Vineyards ; Viticulture ; Vitis rupestris ; Vitis vinifera ; Wine ; Wine industry ; Wineries ; Wineries &amp; vineyards</subject><ispartof>Agronomy (Basel), 2023-06, Vol.13 (6), p.1586</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-74b431902f1842e06775edc0b1476d974094e88ae9764b1b2691ba0514edf5063</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5063-1412 ; 0000-0002-7586-1468</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2829695918/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2829695918?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,74998</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Munoz, Jose R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stauch, Samantha J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wootten, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitchen, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abreu, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Christian Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casassa, L. Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolpert, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodson Peterson, Jean Catherine</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Rootstock on Vineyard Establishment Using Green-Growing Benchgrafts</title><title>Agronomy (Basel)</title><description>Demand for vine plant material has increased drastically due to the ongoing expansion of viticulture, and recent widespread replanting efforts. Nurseries and growers are turning to green-grafted vines to meet demand. Unfortunately, most vineyard establishment studies have centered around dormant benchgrafted vines. Thus, little is known regarding the specific establishment trends of green-growing benchgrafts. This study aimed to explore the role rootstock selection has in green-growing benchgraft establishment and development over the first four years post-planting. Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sauvignon blanc was grafted onto multiple rootstocks of varying parentage, including ‘101-14MGT’ (V. riparia × V. rupestris), ‘1103P’ (V. berlandieri × V. rupestris), ‘110R’ (V. berlandieri × V. rupestris), ‘420A MGT’ (V. berlandieri × V. riparia), and ‘Teleki 5C’ (V. berlandieri × V. riparia). The experimental site was organized using a completely randomized design (n = 12) with all vines managed to industry-standard cultural practices. Vines grafted onto 1103P had the largest average trunk diameter (p = 0.0012) and circumference (p &lt; 0.0001) at 22.2 mm and 7.57 cm, respectively. Vines grafted onto 110R had the second-largest trunk circumference at 6.65 cm. Vines grafted onto 110R had the largest concentration of total non-structural carbohydrates at planting at 1.47 g/L, followed by 1103P at 1.25 g/L (p &lt; 0.0001). Total non-structural carbohydrate concentrations in the trunk during dormancy was the highest in 110R at 16.0% total dry weight (p = 0.0008). The larger trunk size and more extensive carbohydrate reserves suggest that green-growing benchgrafts using 110R or 1103P have a higher capacity and likelihood of establishment success.</description><subject>California Central Coast</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Circumferences</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Dormancy</subject><subject>establishment</subject><subject>Grafting</subject><subject>Grapes</subject><subject>Horticultural industry</subject><subject>non-structural carbohydrates</subject><subject>Phenology</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Revegetation</subject><subject>rootstock</subject><subject>Rootstocks</subject><subject>Senescence</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Vines</subject><subject>Vineyards</subject><subject>Viticulture</subject><subject>Vitis rupestris</subject><subject>Vitis vinifera</subject><subject>Wine</subject><subject>Wine industry</subject><subject>Wineries</subject><subject>Wineries &amp; vineyards</subject><issn>2073-4395</issn><issn>2073-4395</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUV1rVDEQvYiCpfbdxws-3zr5Th5rWddCRRDra8jNndxm3U1qkiL775u6IuLMw3xwzmGYMwxvCVwyZuC9W0tO-XAkDCQRWr4YzigoNnFmxMt_-tfDRa076GEI06DOhs-bENC3MYfxa86ttux_jDmN32PCoyvLuKnNzftY7w-Y2nhXY1rHbUFM07bkX8_TB0z-fi0utPpmeBXcvuLFn3o-3H3cfLv-NN1-2d5cX91OninSJsVnzogBGojmFEEqJXDxMBOu5GIUB8NRa4dGST6TmUpDZgeCcFyCAMnOh5uT7pLdzj6UeHDlaLOL9vcil9W60qLfo9WiP4iTwLgGDk7oxTNCFAZGtQEvuta7k9ZDyT8fsTa7y48l9fMt1dRIIwzRHXV5Qq2ui8YUcivO91zwEH1OGGLfXynBjaJa0k6AE8GXXGvB8PdMAvbZNPu_aewJ_VGJBg</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Munoz, Jose R.</creator><creator>Stauch, Samantha J.</creator><creator>Wootten, Jennifer</creator><creator>Kitchen, Matthew</creator><creator>Abreu, Matteo</creator><creator>Rodriguez, Christian Jose</creator><creator>Casassa, L. Federico</creator><creator>Wolpert, James A.</creator><creator>Dodson Peterson, Jean Catherine</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5063-1412</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7586-1468</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Effect of Rootstock on Vineyard Establishment Using Green-Growing Benchgrafts</title><author>Munoz, Jose R. ; Stauch, Samantha J. ; Wootten, Jennifer ; Kitchen, Matthew ; Abreu, Matteo ; Rodriguez, Christian Jose ; Casassa, L. Federico ; Wolpert, James A. ; Dodson Peterson, Jean Catherine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-74b431902f1842e06775edc0b1476d974094e88ae9764b1b2691ba0514edf5063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>California Central Coast</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Circumferences</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Dormancy</topic><topic>establishment</topic><topic>Grafting</topic><topic>Grapes</topic><topic>Horticultural industry</topic><topic>non-structural carbohydrates</topic><topic>Phenology</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Revegetation</topic><topic>rootstock</topic><topic>Rootstocks</topic><topic>Senescence</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Vines</topic><topic>Vineyards</topic><topic>Viticulture</topic><topic>Vitis rupestris</topic><topic>Vitis vinifera</topic><topic>Wine</topic><topic>Wine industry</topic><topic>Wineries</topic><topic>Wineries &amp; vineyards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Munoz, Jose R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stauch, Samantha J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wootten, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitchen, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abreu, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Christian Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casassa, L. Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolpert, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodson Peterson, Jean Catherine</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Agronomy (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Munoz, Jose R.</au><au>Stauch, Samantha J.</au><au>Wootten, Jennifer</au><au>Kitchen, Matthew</au><au>Abreu, Matteo</au><au>Rodriguez, Christian Jose</au><au>Casassa, L. Federico</au><au>Wolpert, James A.</au><au>Dodson Peterson, Jean Catherine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Rootstock on Vineyard Establishment Using Green-Growing Benchgrafts</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy (Basel)</jtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1586</spage><pages>1586-</pages><issn>2073-4395</issn><eissn>2073-4395</eissn><abstract>Demand for vine plant material has increased drastically due to the ongoing expansion of viticulture, and recent widespread replanting efforts. Nurseries and growers are turning to green-grafted vines to meet demand. Unfortunately, most vineyard establishment studies have centered around dormant benchgrafted vines. Thus, little is known regarding the specific establishment trends of green-growing benchgrafts. This study aimed to explore the role rootstock selection has in green-growing benchgraft establishment and development over the first four years post-planting. Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sauvignon blanc was grafted onto multiple rootstocks of varying parentage, including ‘101-14MGT’ (V. riparia × V. rupestris), ‘1103P’ (V. berlandieri × V. rupestris), ‘110R’ (V. berlandieri × V. rupestris), ‘420A MGT’ (V. berlandieri × V. riparia), and ‘Teleki 5C’ (V. berlandieri × V. riparia). The experimental site was organized using a completely randomized design (n = 12) with all vines managed to industry-standard cultural practices. Vines grafted onto 1103P had the largest average trunk diameter (p = 0.0012) and circumference (p &lt; 0.0001) at 22.2 mm and 7.57 cm, respectively. Vines grafted onto 110R had the second-largest trunk circumference at 6.65 cm. Vines grafted onto 110R had the largest concentration of total non-structural carbohydrates at planting at 1.47 g/L, followed by 1103P at 1.25 g/L (p &lt; 0.0001). Total non-structural carbohydrate concentrations in the trunk during dormancy was the highest in 110R at 16.0% total dry weight (p = 0.0008). The larger trunk size and more extensive carbohydrate reserves suggest that green-growing benchgrafts using 110R or 1103P have a higher capacity and likelihood of establishment success.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/agronomy13061586</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5063-1412</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7586-1468</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4395
ispartof Agronomy (Basel), 2023-06, Vol.13 (6), p.1586
issn 2073-4395
2073-4395
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8539041f348040a58dc3117ef32890c5
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects California Central Coast
Carbohydrates
Circumferences
Diameters
Dormancy
establishment
Grafting
Grapes
Horticultural industry
non-structural carbohydrates
Phenology
Planting
Radiation
Revegetation
rootstock
Rootstocks
Senescence
Success
Vines
Vineyards
Viticulture
Vitis rupestris
Vitis vinifera
Wine
Wine industry
Wineries
Wineries & vineyards
title Effect of Rootstock on Vineyard Establishment Using Green-Growing Benchgrafts
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A35%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Rootstock%20on%20Vineyard%20Establishment%20Using%20Green-Growing%20Benchgrafts&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20(Basel)&rft.au=Munoz,%20Jose%20R.&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1586&rft.pages=1586-&rft.issn=2073-4395&rft.eissn=2073-4395&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/agronomy13061586&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA754972862%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-74b431902f1842e06775edc0b1476d974094e88ae9764b1b2691ba0514edf5063%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2829695918&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A754972862&rfr_iscdi=true