Loading…
A study to assess completeness of project application forms submitted to Institutional Ethics Committees (IEC) of a tertiary care hospital
To review Ethics Committee (EC) application forms and to find out similarities and differences in content of five ECs forms in India. THE COMPLETENESS OF EC APPLICATION FORMS WAS ASSESSED ON THE FOLLOWING THEMES: title, study team, sponsor responsibility, scientific aspects, patient safety, regulato...
Saved in:
Published in: | Perspectives in clinical research 2012-10, Vol.3 (4), p.133-138 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4024-f8bdbe53b35960ee3864b4a72447cda73c34f477b1f42921ad29bd1142bdbca63 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 138 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 133 |
container_title | Perspectives in clinical research |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Shetty, Yashashri C Marathe, Padmaja A Billa, Gauri V Nambiar, C P Neelima |
description | To review Ethics Committee (EC) application forms and to find out similarities and differences in content of five ECs forms in India.
THE COMPLETENESS OF EC APPLICATION FORMS WAS ASSESSED ON THE FOLLOWING THEMES: title, study team, sponsor responsibility, scientific aspects, patient safety, regulatory permissions, Informed consent process from 2008-2009. Application forms (available online) of 5 ECs were studied and compared.
A total of 445 application forms were analyzed, 382 were academic, 63 were sponsored. The common deficiencies in academic studies were inappropriate titles (25.13%), lack of budget details (90%). More than 95% studies had not mentioned the method of recruitment. The issue of vulnerability was not marked in more than 50% of studies. Compensation for participation/injury was poorly stated in academic (99%) studies. Among industry sponsored studies, 98% were compliant with regulatory permissions and 41% were CTRI registered. The information pertaining to Informed Consent was mentioned in all forms. Comparative analysis of application forms of 5 ECs showed that the requirements for submission were similar except 1-2 ECs asked for additional information like percentage of time allotted by investigator for studies, GCP training of study team, certification by investigator regarding accuracy of local versions of Informed consent.
Our study recommends that increased awareness and vigilance by investigators of academic studies regarding submission of applications to EC will increase efficiency and speed of review process. A common application form for all ECs across India would be an important step to achieve uniformity in functioning of ethics committees. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/2229-3485.103594 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_854a50f9b2fa49c1926dd7b3af2c8c1c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A312136666</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_854a50f9b2fa49c1926dd7b3af2c8c1c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A312136666</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4024-f8bdbe53b35960ee3864b4a72447cda73c34f477b1f42921ad29bd1142bdbca63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1vEzEQXSEQrUrvnJAlLuWQ4K_9uiBFUSiRKnGBszXrj8TR7nqxvUj9C_xq7CStGoR9sGfmvWfP6BXFe4KXnGD2mVLaLhhvymWKypa_Kq6PqZI3zevzPZevitsQDjgtXlZVxd8WV5TRltUVvi7-rFCIs3pE0SEIQYeApBumXkc95sAZNHl30DIimKbeSojWjcg4PwQU5m6wMWqV2dsxRBvnXIYebeLeyoDWbjgidEB32836U9YDFLWPFvwjkuA12rsw2Qj9u-KNgT7o2_N5U_z8uvmx_rZ4-H6_Xa8eFpJjyhem6VSnS9alniusNWsq3nGoKee1VFAzybjhdd0Rw2lLCSjadooQThNPQsVuiu1JVzk4iMnbIX1FOLDimHB-JyD9T_ZaNCWHEpu2owZ4K0lLK6XqjoGhspFEJq0vJ60pjUIrqcfoob8QvayMdi927rdgJcNtg5PA3VnAu1-zDlEMNkjd9zBqNwdBaM1oyWvMEvTjP9CDm30adkI1JeO0xuQFagepATsal96VWVSsGKGEJQvkGSz_g0pb6cFKN2pjU_6CgE8E6V0IXpvnHgkW2Y4i-01kv4mTHRPlw8vZPBOezMf-AgVx2sM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1853427013</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A study to assess completeness of project application forms submitted to Institutional Ethics Committees (IEC) of a tertiary care hospital</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>IngentaConnect Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Shetty, Yashashri C ; Marathe, Padmaja A ; Billa, Gauri V ; Nambiar, C P Neelima</creator><creatorcontrib>Shetty, Yashashri C ; Marathe, Padmaja A ; Billa, Gauri V ; Nambiar, C P Neelima</creatorcontrib><description>To review Ethics Committee (EC) application forms and to find out similarities and differences in content of five ECs forms in India.
THE COMPLETENESS OF EC APPLICATION FORMS WAS ASSESSED ON THE FOLLOWING THEMES: title, study team, sponsor responsibility, scientific aspects, patient safety, regulatory permissions, Informed consent process from 2008-2009. Application forms (available online) of 5 ECs were studied and compared.
A total of 445 application forms were analyzed, 382 were academic, 63 were sponsored. The common deficiencies in academic studies were inappropriate titles (25.13%), lack of budget details (90%). More than 95% studies had not mentioned the method of recruitment. The issue of vulnerability was not marked in more than 50% of studies. Compensation for participation/injury was poorly stated in academic (99%) studies. Among industry sponsored studies, 98% were compliant with regulatory permissions and 41% were CTRI registered. The information pertaining to Informed Consent was mentioned in all forms. Comparative analysis of application forms of 5 ECs showed that the requirements for submission were similar except 1-2 ECs asked for additional information like percentage of time allotted by investigator for studies, GCP training of study team, certification by investigator regarding accuracy of local versions of Informed consent.
Our study recommends that increased awareness and vigilance by investigators of academic studies regarding submission of applications to EC will increase efficiency and speed of review process. A common application form for all ECs across India would be an important step to achieve uniformity in functioning of ethics committees.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2229-3485</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2229-5488</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/2229-3485.103594</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23293760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic ; application form ; clinical trial ; completeness ; Ethics ; ethics committee ; Original ; sponsored</subject><ispartof>Perspectives in clinical research, 2012-10, Vol.3 (4), p.133-138</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd Oct-Dec 2012</rights><rights>Copyright: © Perspectives in Clinical Research 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4024-f8bdbe53b35960ee3864b4a72447cda73c34f477b1f42921ad29bd1142bdbca63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3530980/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1853427013?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23293760$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shetty, Yashashri C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marathe, Padmaja A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billa, Gauri V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nambiar, C P Neelima</creatorcontrib><title>A study to assess completeness of project application forms submitted to Institutional Ethics Committees (IEC) of a tertiary care hospital</title><title>Perspectives in clinical research</title><addtitle>Perspect Clin Res</addtitle><description>To review Ethics Committee (EC) application forms and to find out similarities and differences in content of five ECs forms in India.
THE COMPLETENESS OF EC APPLICATION FORMS WAS ASSESSED ON THE FOLLOWING THEMES: title, study team, sponsor responsibility, scientific aspects, patient safety, regulatory permissions, Informed consent process from 2008-2009. Application forms (available online) of 5 ECs were studied and compared.
A total of 445 application forms were analyzed, 382 were academic, 63 were sponsored. The common deficiencies in academic studies were inappropriate titles (25.13%), lack of budget details (90%). More than 95% studies had not mentioned the method of recruitment. The issue of vulnerability was not marked in more than 50% of studies. Compensation for participation/injury was poorly stated in academic (99%) studies. Among industry sponsored studies, 98% were compliant with regulatory permissions and 41% were CTRI registered. The information pertaining to Informed Consent was mentioned in all forms. Comparative analysis of application forms of 5 ECs showed that the requirements for submission were similar except 1-2 ECs asked for additional information like percentage of time allotted by investigator for studies, GCP training of study team, certification by investigator regarding accuracy of local versions of Informed consent.
Our study recommends that increased awareness and vigilance by investigators of academic studies regarding submission of applications to EC will increase efficiency and speed of review process. A common application form for all ECs across India would be an important step to achieve uniformity in functioning of ethics committees.</description><subject>Academic</subject><subject>application form</subject><subject>clinical trial</subject><subject>completeness</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>ethics committee</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>sponsored</subject><issn>2229-3485</issn><issn>2229-5488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1vEzEQXSEQrUrvnJAlLuWQ4K_9uiBFUSiRKnGBszXrj8TR7nqxvUj9C_xq7CStGoR9sGfmvWfP6BXFe4KXnGD2mVLaLhhvymWKypa_Kq6PqZI3zevzPZevitsQDjgtXlZVxd8WV5TRltUVvi7-rFCIs3pE0SEIQYeApBumXkc95sAZNHl30DIimKbeSojWjcg4PwQU5m6wMWqV2dsxRBvnXIYebeLeyoDWbjgidEB32836U9YDFLWPFvwjkuA12rsw2Qj9u-KNgT7o2_N5U_z8uvmx_rZ4-H6_Xa8eFpJjyhem6VSnS9alniusNWsq3nGoKee1VFAzybjhdd0Rw2lLCSjadooQThNPQsVuiu1JVzk4iMnbIX1FOLDimHB-JyD9T_ZaNCWHEpu2owZ4K0lLK6XqjoGhspFEJq0vJ60pjUIrqcfoob8QvayMdi927rdgJcNtg5PA3VnAu1-zDlEMNkjd9zBqNwdBaM1oyWvMEvTjP9CDm30adkI1JeO0xuQFagepATsal96VWVSsGKGEJQvkGSz_g0pb6cFKN2pjU_6CgE8E6V0IXpvnHgkW2Y4i-01kv4mTHRPlw8vZPBOezMf-AgVx2sM</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>Shetty, Yashashri C</creator><creator>Marathe, Padmaja A</creator><creator>Billa, Gauri V</creator><creator>Nambiar, C P Neelima</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>A study to assess completeness of project application forms submitted to Institutional Ethics Committees (IEC) of a tertiary care hospital</title><author>Shetty, Yashashri C ; Marathe, Padmaja A ; Billa, Gauri V ; Nambiar, C P Neelima</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4024-f8bdbe53b35960ee3864b4a72447cda73c34f477b1f42921ad29bd1142bdbca63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Academic</topic><topic>application form</topic><topic>clinical trial</topic><topic>completeness</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>ethics committee</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>sponsored</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shetty, Yashashri C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marathe, Padmaja A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billa, Gauri V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nambiar, C P Neelima</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Perspectives in clinical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shetty, Yashashri C</au><au>Marathe, Padmaja A</au><au>Billa, Gauri V</au><au>Nambiar, C P Neelima</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A study to assess completeness of project application forms submitted to Institutional Ethics Committees (IEC) of a tertiary care hospital</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives in clinical research</jtitle><addtitle>Perspect Clin Res</addtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>133-138</pages><issn>2229-3485</issn><eissn>2229-5488</eissn><abstract>To review Ethics Committee (EC) application forms and to find out similarities and differences in content of five ECs forms in India.
THE COMPLETENESS OF EC APPLICATION FORMS WAS ASSESSED ON THE FOLLOWING THEMES: title, study team, sponsor responsibility, scientific aspects, patient safety, regulatory permissions, Informed consent process from 2008-2009. Application forms (available online) of 5 ECs were studied and compared.
A total of 445 application forms were analyzed, 382 were academic, 63 were sponsored. The common deficiencies in academic studies were inappropriate titles (25.13%), lack of budget details (90%). More than 95% studies had not mentioned the method of recruitment. The issue of vulnerability was not marked in more than 50% of studies. Compensation for participation/injury was poorly stated in academic (99%) studies. Among industry sponsored studies, 98% were compliant with regulatory permissions and 41% were CTRI registered. The information pertaining to Informed Consent was mentioned in all forms. Comparative analysis of application forms of 5 ECs showed that the requirements for submission were similar except 1-2 ECs asked for additional information like percentage of time allotted by investigator for studies, GCP training of study team, certification by investigator regarding accuracy of local versions of Informed consent.
Our study recommends that increased awareness and vigilance by investigators of academic studies regarding submission of applications to EC will increase efficiency and speed of review process. A common application form for all ECs across India would be an important step to achieve uniformity in functioning of ethics committees.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>23293760</pmid><doi>10.4103/2229-3485.103594</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2229-3485 |
ispartof | Perspectives in clinical research, 2012-10, Vol.3 (4), p.133-138 |
issn | 2229-3485 2229-5488 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_854a50f9b2fa49c1926dd7b3af2c8c1c |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; IngentaConnect Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Academic application form clinical trial completeness Ethics ethics committee Original sponsored |
title | A study to assess completeness of project application forms submitted to Institutional Ethics Committees (IEC) of a tertiary care hospital |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A45%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20study%20to%20assess%20completeness%20of%20project%20application%20forms%20submitted%20to%20Institutional%20Ethics%20Committees%20(IEC)%20of%20a%20tertiary%20care%20hospital&rft.jtitle=Perspectives%20in%20clinical%20research&rft.au=Shetty,%20Yashashri%20C&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=133-138&rft.issn=2229-3485&rft.eissn=2229-5488&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/2229-3485.103594&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA312136666%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4024-f8bdbe53b35960ee3864b4a72447cda73c34f477b1f42921ad29bd1142bdbca63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1853427013&rft_id=info:pmid/23293760&rft_galeid=A312136666&rfr_iscdi=true |