Loading…

Call‐specific patterns of neural activation in auditory processing of Richardson’s ground squirrel alarm calls

Introduction Richardson's ground squirrels use alarm calls to warn conspecifics about potential predatory threats. Chirp calls typically indicate high levels of threat from airborne predators, while whistle calls are associated with lower levels of threat from terrestrial predators. These types...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brain and behavior 2020-06, Vol.10 (6), p.e01629-n/a
Main Authors: Freeman, Angela R., Hare, James F., Caldwell, Heather K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5379-53892f73060583f2d8f0df7e5a475f6272d6458215520e4e780a0f78887265673
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5379-53892f73060583f2d8f0df7e5a475f6272d6458215520e4e780a0f78887265673
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 6
container_start_page e01629
container_title Brain and behavior
container_volume 10
creator Freeman, Angela R.
Hare, James F.
Caldwell, Heather K.
description Introduction Richardson's ground squirrels use alarm calls to warn conspecifics about potential predatory threats. Chirp calls typically indicate high levels of threat from airborne predators, while whistle calls are associated with lower levels of threat from terrestrial predators. These types of calls primarily elicit escape behaviors and increased vigilance in receivers, respectively. While much is known about the neural mechanisms involved in the production of vocalizations, less is known about the mechanisms important for the perception of alarm calls by receivers, and whether changes in perceived risk are associated with unique patterns of neuronal activation. Thus, to determine whether alarm calls associated with different levels of predation risk result in differential neuronal activation, we used immunohistochemistry to identify and quantify c‐Fos immunopositive cells in brain regions important in stress, fear, danger, and reward, following alarm call reception. Methods We exposed 29 female Richardson's ground squirrels (10 control, 10 whistle receivers, and 9 chirp receivers) to playbacks of whistles, chirps, or a no‐vocalization control. We then assessed neuronal activation via c‐Fos immunohistochemistry in 12 brain regions. Results Ground squirrels receiving high‐threat “chirp” vocalizations had reduced neuronal activation in the medial amygdala and superior colliculus compared with controls. It is likely that changes in activity in these brain regions serve to alter the balance between approach and avoidance in turn promoting escape behaviors. Conclusions Thus, we conclude that in Richardson's ground squirrels, these brain regions are important for the perception of risk resulting from receiving alarm calls and allow for appropriate behavioral responses by receivers. Richardson's ground squirrels use alarm calls to warn conspecifics about potential predatory threats. The “chirp” alarm call is thought to indicate high levels of threat, while the “whistle” is thought to indicate low levels of threat. Chirps typically elicit escape behaviors in receivers, which, we show, are supported by call‐specific neural activation patterns.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/brb3.1629
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8593eae643164692842d588f5802e01d</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8593eae643164692842d588f5802e01d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2463568102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5379-53892f73060583f2d8f0df7e5a475f6272d6458215520e4e780a0f78887265673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1qVDEUxy-i2FK78AXkghtdTJucfN6NYAc_CgWh6Dpk8jHNcCe5Te5tmV0fwa2v1ycx06mlFTSbE5Ifv-Qc_k3zGqMjjBAcL_KCHGEO3bNmH2qdERDd80f7veawlBWqi2EKFL1s9ggQJKSE_SbPdd_f3vwsgzPBB9MOehxdjqVNvo1uyrpvtRnDlR5Dim2IrZ5sGFPetENOxpUS4nLLngdzobMtKd7e_CrtMqcp2rZcTiFnVx29zuvW1MfKq-aF131xh_f1oPnx-dP3-dfZ2bcvp_OPZzPDiOhmjMgOvCCIIyaJBys9sl44pqlgnoMAyymTgBkD5KgTEmnka1dSAGdckIPmdOe1Sa_UkMNa541KOqi7g5SXSucxmN4pyTritOOUYE55B5KCZVJ6JhE4hG11fdi5hmmxdta4ONbJPJE-vYnhQi3TlRIEEy5kFby7F-R0ObkyqnUoxvW9ji5NRQHpgHJEKa7o27_QVZpyrKNSFSGMS4zg_xSmrJOUs0q931Emp1Ky8w9fxkht46O28VHb-FT2zeMeH8g_YanA8Q64Dr3b_NukTs5PyJ3yN5S7zp8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2414598465</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Call‐specific patterns of neural activation in auditory processing of Richardson’s ground squirrel alarm calls</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><source>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Freeman, Angela R. ; Hare, James F. ; Caldwell, Heather K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Angela R. ; Hare, James F. ; Caldwell, Heather K.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Richardson's ground squirrels use alarm calls to warn conspecifics about potential predatory threats. Chirp calls typically indicate high levels of threat from airborne predators, while whistle calls are associated with lower levels of threat from terrestrial predators. These types of calls primarily elicit escape behaviors and increased vigilance in receivers, respectively. While much is known about the neural mechanisms involved in the production of vocalizations, less is known about the mechanisms important for the perception of alarm calls by receivers, and whether changes in perceived risk are associated with unique patterns of neuronal activation. Thus, to determine whether alarm calls associated with different levels of predation risk result in differential neuronal activation, we used immunohistochemistry to identify and quantify c‐Fos immunopositive cells in brain regions important in stress, fear, danger, and reward, following alarm call reception. Methods We exposed 29 female Richardson's ground squirrels (10 control, 10 whistle receivers, and 9 chirp receivers) to playbacks of whistles, chirps, or a no‐vocalization control. We then assessed neuronal activation via c‐Fos immunohistochemistry in 12 brain regions. Results Ground squirrels receiving high‐threat “chirp” vocalizations had reduced neuronal activation in the medial amygdala and superior colliculus compared with controls. It is likely that changes in activity in these brain regions serve to alter the balance between approach and avoidance in turn promoting escape behaviors. Conclusions Thus, we conclude that in Richardson's ground squirrels, these brain regions are important for the perception of risk resulting from receiving alarm calls and allow for appropriate behavioral responses by receivers. Richardson's ground squirrels use alarm calls to warn conspecifics about potential predatory threats. The “chirp” alarm call is thought to indicate high levels of threat, while the “whistle” is thought to indicate low levels of threat. Chirps typically elicit escape behaviors in receivers, which, we show, are supported by call‐specific neural activation patterns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2162-3279</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-3279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1629</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32307882</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>amygdala ; Animal behavior ; Anxiety ; Brain research ; Communication ; Females ; genes ; Hypothalamus ; immediate‐early genes ; Original Research ; Rodents ; sciuridae ; superior colliculi ; vigilance</subject><ispartof>Brain and behavior, 2020-06, Vol.10 (6), p.e01629-n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC.</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC.</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5379-53892f73060583f2d8f0df7e5a475f6272d6458215520e4e780a0f78887265673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5379-53892f73060583f2d8f0df7e5a475f6272d6458215520e4e780a0f78887265673</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5103-5674</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2463568102/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2463568102?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11561,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,46051,46475,53790,53792,74897</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32307882$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Angela R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hare, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldwell, Heather K.</creatorcontrib><title>Call‐specific patterns of neural activation in auditory processing of Richardson’s ground squirrel alarm calls</title><title>Brain and behavior</title><addtitle>Brain Behav</addtitle><description>Introduction Richardson's ground squirrels use alarm calls to warn conspecifics about potential predatory threats. Chirp calls typically indicate high levels of threat from airborne predators, while whistle calls are associated with lower levels of threat from terrestrial predators. These types of calls primarily elicit escape behaviors and increased vigilance in receivers, respectively. While much is known about the neural mechanisms involved in the production of vocalizations, less is known about the mechanisms important for the perception of alarm calls by receivers, and whether changes in perceived risk are associated with unique patterns of neuronal activation. Thus, to determine whether alarm calls associated with different levels of predation risk result in differential neuronal activation, we used immunohistochemistry to identify and quantify c‐Fos immunopositive cells in brain regions important in stress, fear, danger, and reward, following alarm call reception. Methods We exposed 29 female Richardson's ground squirrels (10 control, 10 whistle receivers, and 9 chirp receivers) to playbacks of whistles, chirps, or a no‐vocalization control. We then assessed neuronal activation via c‐Fos immunohistochemistry in 12 brain regions. Results Ground squirrels receiving high‐threat “chirp” vocalizations had reduced neuronal activation in the medial amygdala and superior colliculus compared with controls. It is likely that changes in activity in these brain regions serve to alter the balance between approach and avoidance in turn promoting escape behaviors. Conclusions Thus, we conclude that in Richardson's ground squirrels, these brain regions are important for the perception of risk resulting from receiving alarm calls and allow for appropriate behavioral responses by receivers. Richardson's ground squirrels use alarm calls to warn conspecifics about potential predatory threats. The “chirp” alarm call is thought to indicate high levels of threat, while the “whistle” is thought to indicate low levels of threat. Chirps typically elicit escape behaviors in receivers, which, we show, are supported by call‐specific neural activation patterns.</description><subject>amygdala</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>genes</subject><subject>Hypothalamus</subject><subject>immediate‐early genes</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>sciuridae</subject><subject>superior colliculi</subject><subject>vigilance</subject><issn>2162-3279</issn><issn>2162-3279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks1qVDEUxy-i2FK78AXkghtdTJucfN6NYAc_CgWh6Dpk8jHNcCe5Te5tmV0fwa2v1ycx06mlFTSbE5Ifv-Qc_k3zGqMjjBAcL_KCHGEO3bNmH2qdERDd80f7veawlBWqi2EKFL1s9ggQJKSE_SbPdd_f3vwsgzPBB9MOehxdjqVNvo1uyrpvtRnDlR5Dim2IrZ5sGFPetENOxpUS4nLLngdzobMtKd7e_CrtMqcp2rZcTiFnVx29zuvW1MfKq-aF131xh_f1oPnx-dP3-dfZ2bcvp_OPZzPDiOhmjMgOvCCIIyaJBys9sl44pqlgnoMAyymTgBkD5KgTEmnka1dSAGdckIPmdOe1Sa_UkMNa541KOqi7g5SXSucxmN4pyTritOOUYE55B5KCZVJ6JhE4hG11fdi5hmmxdta4ONbJPJE-vYnhQi3TlRIEEy5kFby7F-R0ObkyqnUoxvW9ji5NRQHpgHJEKa7o27_QVZpyrKNSFSGMS4zg_xSmrJOUs0q931Emp1Ky8w9fxkht46O28VHb-FT2zeMeH8g_YanA8Q64Dr3b_NukTs5PyJ3yN5S7zp8</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Freeman, Angela R.</creator><creator>Hare, James F.</creator><creator>Caldwell, Heather K.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5103-5674</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Call‐specific patterns of neural activation in auditory processing of Richardson’s ground squirrel alarm calls</title><author>Freeman, Angela R. ; Hare, James F. ; Caldwell, Heather K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5379-53892f73060583f2d8f0df7e5a475f6272d6458215520e4e780a0f78887265673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>amygdala</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>genes</topic><topic>Hypothalamus</topic><topic>immediate‐early genes</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>sciuridae</topic><topic>superior colliculi</topic><topic>vigilance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Angela R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hare, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldwell, Heather K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Brain and behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freeman, Angela R.</au><au>Hare, James F.</au><au>Caldwell, Heather K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Call‐specific patterns of neural activation in auditory processing of Richardson’s ground squirrel alarm calls</atitle><jtitle>Brain and behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Behav</addtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e01629</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e01629-n/a</pages><issn>2162-3279</issn><eissn>2162-3279</eissn><abstract>Introduction Richardson's ground squirrels use alarm calls to warn conspecifics about potential predatory threats. Chirp calls typically indicate high levels of threat from airborne predators, while whistle calls are associated with lower levels of threat from terrestrial predators. These types of calls primarily elicit escape behaviors and increased vigilance in receivers, respectively. While much is known about the neural mechanisms involved in the production of vocalizations, less is known about the mechanisms important for the perception of alarm calls by receivers, and whether changes in perceived risk are associated with unique patterns of neuronal activation. Thus, to determine whether alarm calls associated with different levels of predation risk result in differential neuronal activation, we used immunohistochemistry to identify and quantify c‐Fos immunopositive cells in brain regions important in stress, fear, danger, and reward, following alarm call reception. Methods We exposed 29 female Richardson's ground squirrels (10 control, 10 whistle receivers, and 9 chirp receivers) to playbacks of whistles, chirps, or a no‐vocalization control. We then assessed neuronal activation via c‐Fos immunohistochemistry in 12 brain regions. Results Ground squirrels receiving high‐threat “chirp” vocalizations had reduced neuronal activation in the medial amygdala and superior colliculus compared with controls. It is likely that changes in activity in these brain regions serve to alter the balance between approach and avoidance in turn promoting escape behaviors. Conclusions Thus, we conclude that in Richardson's ground squirrels, these brain regions are important for the perception of risk resulting from receiving alarm calls and allow for appropriate behavioral responses by receivers. Richardson's ground squirrels use alarm calls to warn conspecifics about potential predatory threats. The “chirp” alarm call is thought to indicate high levels of threat, while the “whistle” is thought to indicate low levels of threat. Chirps typically elicit escape behaviors in receivers, which, we show, are supported by call‐specific neural activation patterns.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>32307882</pmid><doi>10.1002/brb3.1629</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5103-5674</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2162-3279
ispartof Brain and behavior, 2020-06, Vol.10 (6), p.e01629-n/a
issn 2162-3279
2162-3279
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8593eae643164692842d588f5802e01d
source PubMed Central (Open Access); Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects amygdala
Animal behavior
Anxiety
Brain research
Communication
Females
genes
Hypothalamus
immediate‐early genes
Original Research
Rodents
sciuridae
superior colliculi
vigilance
title Call‐specific patterns of neural activation in auditory processing of Richardson’s ground squirrel alarm calls
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T05%3A17%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Call%E2%80%90specific%20patterns%20of%20neural%20activation%20in%20auditory%20processing%20of%20Richardson%E2%80%99s%20ground%20squirrel%20alarm%20calls&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20behavior&rft.au=Freeman,%20Angela%20R.&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e01629&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e01629-n/a&rft.issn=2162-3279&rft.eissn=2162-3279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/brb3.1629&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2463568102%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5379-53892f73060583f2d8f0df7e5a475f6272d6458215520e4e780a0f78887265673%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2414598465&rft_id=info:pmid/32307882&rfr_iscdi=true