Perspectives and Attitudes of Dutch Healthcare Professionals Regarding the Integration of Complementary Medicine in Oncology

• Published in: Integrative cancer therapies 2023-01, Vol.22, p.15347354231164650-15347354231164650
• Main Authors: Schouten, Aniek E.M., Mentink, Marit D.C., Timmer-Bonte, Johanna (Anja) N.H., Noordman, Janneke, van Dulmen, Sandra
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Alternative medicine; Attitude; Attitude of Health Personnel; Attitudes; cancer; Cancer therapies; complementary medicine; Complementary Therapies; Delivery of Health Care; Female; Health care; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Health Personnel; healthcare professional attitude; Humans; Integration; integrative oncology; Medical Oncology; Medical personnel; Oncology; Patients; Questionnaires; survey; Surveys and Questionnaires
• ISSN: 1534-7354; 1552-695X; 1552-695X
• DOI: 10.1177/15347354231164650

Introduction: Almost half of all patients with cancer use complementary medicine (CM) alongside conventional cancer treatment. Further integration of CM into clinical practice could enhance communication and ensure improved coordination between complementary medicine and conventional care. This study assessed the perspectives of healthcare professionals on the current status of integration of CM in oncology, as well as their attitudes and beliefs toward CM. Methods: A convenience, volunteer sample of healthcare providers and healthcare managers working in oncology in the Netherlands were surveyed, using a self-reporting, anonymous, online questionnaire. The perspectives on the current status of integration and barriers to implementing complementary medicine were characterized in part 1, while part 2 assessed respondents’ attitudes and beliefs regarding CM. Results: A total of 209 people completed part 1 of the survey and 159 people completed the entire questionnaire. Two-thirds (68.4%) of the respondents indicated that their organization has implemented complementary medicine in oncology, or envisions implementation, while 49.3% stated they were missing something to implement CM in oncology. About 86.8% of the respondents (completely) agreed that complementary medicine is an important supplement to oncological treatment. Female respondents were more likely to express positive attitudes, as well as respondents whose institutions have implemented CM. Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that attention is being paid to the integration of CM into oncology. Overall, the attitudes of respondents toward CM were positive. The main barriers for implementing CM activities were missing knowledge, experience, financial support, and support from management. To improve the ability of healthcare providers to guide patients in their use of complementary medicine, these issues should be delved into in future research.