A reliable and robust method for the upper thigh muscle quantification on computed tomography: toward a quantitative biomarker for sarcopenia

• Published in: BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2022-01, Vol.23 (1), p.93-93, Article 93
• Main Authors: Ko, Yousun, Shin, Youngbin, Sung, Yu Sub, Lee, Jiwoo, Lee, Jei Hee, Kim, Jai Keun, Park, Jisuk, Ko, Hye Sun, Kim, Kyung Won, Huh, Jimi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abdomen; Agreements; Analysis; Biological markers; Biomarker; Biomarkers; Computed tomography; Diagnosis; Humans; Landmark; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Medical examination; Medical imaging; Muscle; Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging; Muscle, Skeletal - pathology; Muscles; Musculoskeletal diseases; Musculoskeletal system; Older people; Patients; Risk factors; Sarcopenia; Sarcopenia - diagnostic imaging; Skeletal muscle; Software; Thigh - diagnostic imaging; Tomography; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Variance analysis; Varicose veins
• ISSN: 1471-2474; 1471-2474
• DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05032-2

We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of the upper thigh level as a landmark to measure muscle area for sarcopenia assessment on computed tomography (CT). In the 116 healthy subjects who performed CT scans covering from mid-abdomen to feet, the skeletal muscle area in the upper thigh level at the inferior tip of ischial tuberosity (SMA ), the mid-thigh level (SMA ), and L3 inferior endplate level (SMA ) were measured by two independent readers. Pearson correlation coefficients between SMA , SMA , and SMA were calculated. Inter-reader agreement between the two readers were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots with 95% limit of agreement (LOA). In readers 1 and 2, very high positive correlations were observed between SMA and SMA (r = 0.91 and 0.92, respectively) and between SMA and SMA (r = 0.90 and 0.91, respectively), while high positive correlation were observed between SMA and SMA (r = 0.87 and 0.87, respectively). Based on ICC values, the inter-reader agreement was the best in the SMA (0.999), followed by the SMA (0.990) and SMA (0.956). The 95% LOAs in the Bland-Altman plots indicated that the inter-reader agreement of the SMA (- 0.462 to 1.513) was the best, followed by the SMA (- 9.949 to 7.636) and SMA (- 12.105 to 14.605). Muscle area measurement at the upper thigh level correlates well with those with the mid-thigh and L3 inferior endpoint level and shows the highest inter-reader agreement. Thus, the upper thigh level might be an excellent landmark enabling SMA as a reliable and robust biomarker for muscle area measurement for sarcopenia assessment.