The effect of spraying different disinfectants on condensational silicone impressions; an in vitro study

Dentistry equipment are exposed to different types of pathogenic microorganisms. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of spraying three different types of disinfectants on condensational silicones after 5 and 10 min. Totally, 66 circular samples of condensational silicone impression m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 2015-07, Vol.15 (3), p.263-267
Main Authors: Badrian, Hamid, Davoudi, Amin, Molazem, Meysam, Zare, Mohammad Hossein
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Bacteria
Condensational silicone
Dentistry
Dentists
Disinfectants
disinfection
Disinfection & disinfectants
Fungi
impression materials
Laboratories
Methods
Microorganisms
Original
Protection and preservation
Silicones
spray
Studies
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5031-ba3b26988b27769e81bfcec7604bf2d921480d682762a34e04a3dcfc92770d443
cites
container_end_page 267
container_issue 3
container_start_page 263
container_title The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
container_volume 15
creator Badrian, Hamid
Davoudi, Amin
Molazem, Meysam
Zare, Mohammad Hossein
description Dentistry equipment are exposed to different types of pathogenic microorganisms. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of spraying three different types of disinfectants on condensational silicones after 5 and 10 min. Totally, 66 circular samples of condensational silicone impression materials of 1 cm diameter and 2 mm thickness were contaminated by Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans fungus. Except for control samples, all of them were disinfected with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) 0.525%, Deconex and Epimax by spraying method. Afterward, they kept in plastic bags with humid rolled cotton for 5 and 10 min. In order to isolate microbiotas, the samples were immersed in 2% trypsin for 1 h and diluted with normal saline in a portion of 1, 1/2, and 1/4. The trypsin suspensions were transferred to culture plates for incubation and colony-forming unit assay. The data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney test and SPSS software version 16 at a significant level of 0.05. There was a meaningful difference between disinfection effects of Epimax-Deconex for all mentioned microorganisms after 5 min (P = 0.034), and between disinfection effects of NaOCl 0.525%-Epimax for S. aureus (P = 0.043) and P. aeruginosa (P = 0.046) after 5 min. Furthermore, there was a meaningful difference between disinfection effects of Epimax-Deconex (P = 0.034) and NaOCl 0.525%-Epimax (P = 0.034) for P. aeruginosa after 10 min. Condensational silicone can be effectively disinfected by spraying tested three disinfecting agents. More specifically, Deconex showed the best results compared to the other agents.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/0972-4052.161091
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8657d3adf787444e9122f6f20f48c709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A488478269</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8657d3adf787444e9122f6f20f48c709</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A488478269</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5031-ba3b26988b27769e81bfcec7604bf2d921480d682762a34e04a3dcfc92770d443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1rGzEUXEpL46a991QEhZKLXX15JVEIhJC2gUAv6Vlo9WHLrCVX2g343_dtnLpxKTqsmDdv9mneNM17ghecYPYZK0HnHC_pgrQEK_KimRGl5ASJl83sWD5r3tS6wXgpseSvmzPaKqqWlM2a9f3aIx-CtwPKAdVdMfuYVshFwIpPA9xqTFPdpKGinJDNyflUzRBzMj2qsY8AeRS3u-JrBbR-QSahmNBDHEpGdRjd_m3zKpi--ndP3_Pm59eb--vv87sf326vr-7mdokZmXeGdTCdlB0VolVeki5Yb0WLeReoU5RwiV0rqWipYdxjbpizwSqgY8c5O29uD7oum43elbg1Za-zifoRyGWlTRmi7b2W7VI4ZlwQUnDOvSKUhjZQHLi0AivQujxo7cZu650FO4rpT0RPKymu9So_aA7TMSpB4OJJoORfo6-D3sZqfd-b5PNYNYEnKkmVmOb--A91k8cCBgNLCsFkyyT9y1oZeADsJcN_7SSqr7iUXEgwD1iL_7DgOL993FWIgJ80fHrWsPamH9Y19-O04npKxAeiLbnW4sPRDIL1FEk9ZU5PmdOHSELLh-cmHhv-ZJD9Br5x2gc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877386382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of spraying different disinfectants on condensational silicone impressions; an in vitro study</title><source>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</source><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Badrian, Hamid ; Davoudi, Amin ; Molazem, Meysam ; Zare, Mohammad Hossein</creator><creatorcontrib>Badrian, Hamid ; Davoudi, Amin ; Molazem, Meysam ; Zare, Mohammad Hossein</creatorcontrib><description>Dentistry equipment are exposed to different types of pathogenic microorganisms. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of spraying three different types of disinfectants on condensational silicones after 5 and 10 min. Totally, 66 circular samples of condensational silicone impression materials of 1 cm diameter and 2 mm thickness were contaminated by Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans fungus. Except for control samples, all of them were disinfected with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) 0.525%, Deconex and Epimax by spraying method. Afterward, they kept in plastic bags with humid rolled cotton for 5 and 10 min. In order to isolate microbiotas, the samples were immersed in 2% trypsin for 1 h and diluted with normal saline in a portion of 1, 1/2, and 1/4. The trypsin suspensions were transferred to culture plates for incubation and colony-forming unit assay. The data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney test and SPSS software version 16 at a significant level of 0.05. There was a meaningful difference between disinfection effects of Epimax-Deconex for all mentioned microorganisms after 5 min (P = 0.034), and between disinfection effects of NaOCl 0.525%-Epimax for S. aureus (P = 0.043) and P. aeruginosa (P = 0.046) after 5 min. Furthermore, there was a meaningful difference between disinfection effects of Epimax-Deconex (P = 0.034) and NaOCl 0.525%-Epimax (P = 0.034) for P. aeruginosa after 10 min. Condensational silicone can be effectively disinfected by spraying tested three disinfecting agents. More specifically, Deconex showed the best results compared to the other agents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-4052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-4057</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.161091</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26929523</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Bacteria ; Condensational silicone ; Dentistry ; Dentists ; Disinfectants ; disinfection ; Disinfection &amp; disinfectants ; Fungi ; impression materials ; Laboratories ; Methods ; Microorganisms ; Original ; Protection and preservation ; Silicones ; spray ; Studies</subject><ispartof>The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 2015-07, Vol.15 (3), p.263-267</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd Jul-Sep 2015</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2015 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5031-ba3b26988b27769e81bfcec7604bf2d921480d682762a34e04a3dcfc92770d443</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762328/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1877386382?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26929523$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Badrian, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davoudi, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molazem, Meysam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zare, Mohammad Hossein</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of spraying different disinfectants on condensational silicone impressions; an in vitro study</title><title>The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</title><addtitle>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</addtitle><description>Dentistry equipment are exposed to different types of pathogenic microorganisms. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of spraying three different types of disinfectants on condensational silicones after 5 and 10 min. Totally, 66 circular samples of condensational silicone impression materials of 1 cm diameter and 2 mm thickness were contaminated by Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans fungus. Except for control samples, all of them were disinfected with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) 0.525%, Deconex and Epimax by spraying method. Afterward, they kept in plastic bags with humid rolled cotton for 5 and 10 min. In order to isolate microbiotas, the samples were immersed in 2% trypsin for 1 h and diluted with normal saline in a portion of 1, 1/2, and 1/4. The trypsin suspensions were transferred to culture plates for incubation and colony-forming unit assay. The data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney test and SPSS software version 16 at a significant level of 0.05. There was a meaningful difference between disinfection effects of Epimax-Deconex for all mentioned microorganisms after 5 min (P = 0.034), and between disinfection effects of NaOCl 0.525%-Epimax for S. aureus (P = 0.043) and P. aeruginosa (P = 0.046) after 5 min. Furthermore, there was a meaningful difference between disinfection effects of Epimax-Deconex (P = 0.034) and NaOCl 0.525%-Epimax (P = 0.034) for P. aeruginosa after 10 min. Condensational silicone can be effectively disinfected by spraying tested three disinfecting agents. More specifically, Deconex showed the best results compared to the other agents.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Condensational silicone</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dentists</subject><subject>Disinfectants</subject><subject>disinfection</subject><subject>Disinfection &amp; disinfectants</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>impression materials</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Silicones</subject><subject>spray</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0972-4052</issn><issn>1998-4057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1rGzEUXEpL46a991QEhZKLXX15JVEIhJC2gUAv6Vlo9WHLrCVX2g343_dtnLpxKTqsmDdv9mneNM17ghecYPYZK0HnHC_pgrQEK_KimRGl5ASJl83sWD5r3tS6wXgpseSvmzPaKqqWlM2a9f3aIx-CtwPKAdVdMfuYVshFwIpPA9xqTFPdpKGinJDNyflUzRBzMj2qsY8AeRS3u-JrBbR-QSahmNBDHEpGdRjd_m3zKpi--ndP3_Pm59eb--vv87sf326vr-7mdokZmXeGdTCdlB0VolVeki5Yb0WLeReoU5RwiV0rqWipYdxjbpizwSqgY8c5O29uD7oum43elbg1Za-zifoRyGWlTRmi7b2W7VI4ZlwQUnDOvSKUhjZQHLi0AivQujxo7cZu650FO4rpT0RPKymu9So_aA7TMSpB4OJJoORfo6-D3sZqfd-b5PNYNYEnKkmVmOb--A91k8cCBgNLCsFkyyT9y1oZeADsJcN_7SSqr7iUXEgwD1iL_7DgOL993FWIgJ80fHrWsPamH9Y19-O04npKxAeiLbnW4sPRDIL1FEk9ZU5PmdOHSELLh-cmHhv-ZJD9Br5x2gc</recordid><startdate>201507</startdate><enddate>201507</enddate><creator>Badrian, Hamid</creator><creator>Davoudi, Amin</creator><creator>Molazem, Meysam</creator><creator>Zare, Mohammad Hossein</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201507</creationdate><title>The effect of spraying different disinfectants on condensational silicone impressions; an in vitro study</title><author>Badrian, Hamid ; Davoudi, Amin ; Molazem, Meysam ; Zare, Mohammad Hossein</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5031-ba3b26988b27769e81bfcec7604bf2d921480d682762a34e04a3dcfc92770d443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Condensational silicone</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dentists</topic><topic>Disinfectants</topic><topic>disinfection</topic><topic>Disinfection &amp; disinfectants</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>impression materials</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Silicones</topic><topic>spray</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Badrian, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davoudi, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molazem, Meysam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zare, Mohammad Hossein</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Badrian, Hamid</au><au>Davoudi, Amin</au><au>Molazem, Meysam</au><au>Zare, Mohammad Hossein</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of spraying different disinfectants on condensational silicone impressions; an in vitro study</atitle><jtitle>The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</jtitle><addtitle>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</addtitle><date>2015-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>263</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>263-267</pages><issn>0972-4052</issn><eissn>1998-4057</eissn><abstract>Dentistry equipment are exposed to different types of pathogenic microorganisms. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of spraying three different types of disinfectants on condensational silicones after 5 and 10 min. Totally, 66 circular samples of condensational silicone impression materials of 1 cm diameter and 2 mm thickness were contaminated by Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans fungus. Except for control samples, all of them were disinfected with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) 0.525%, Deconex and Epimax by spraying method. Afterward, they kept in plastic bags with humid rolled cotton for 5 and 10 min. In order to isolate microbiotas, the samples were immersed in 2% trypsin for 1 h and diluted with normal saline in a portion of 1, 1/2, and 1/4. The trypsin suspensions were transferred to culture plates for incubation and colony-forming unit assay. The data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney test and SPSS software version 16 at a significant level of 0.05. There was a meaningful difference between disinfection effects of Epimax-Deconex for all mentioned microorganisms after 5 min (P = 0.034), and between disinfection effects of NaOCl 0.525%-Epimax for S. aureus (P = 0.043) and P. aeruginosa (P = 0.046) after 5 min. Furthermore, there was a meaningful difference between disinfection effects of Epimax-Deconex (P = 0.034) and NaOCl 0.525%-Epimax (P = 0.034) for P. aeruginosa after 10 min. Condensational silicone can be effectively disinfected by spraying tested three disinfecting agents. More specifically, Deconex showed the best results compared to the other agents.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>26929523</pmid><doi>10.4103/0972-4052.161091</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0972-4052
ispartof The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 2015-07, Vol.15 (3), p.263-267
issn 0972-4052
1998-4057
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8657d3adf787444e9122f6f20f48c709
source Access via ProQuest (Open Access); Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Analysis
Bacteria
Condensational silicone
Dentistry
Dentists
Disinfectants
disinfection
Disinfection & disinfectants
Fungi
impression materials
Laboratories
Methods
Microorganisms
Original
Protection and preservation
Silicones
spray
Studies
title The effect of spraying different disinfectants on condensational silicone impressions; an in vitro study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T20%3A59%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20spraying%20different%20disinfectants%20on%20condensational%20silicone%20impressions;%20an%20in%20vitro%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20Indian%20Prosthodontic%20Society&rft.au=Badrian,%20Hamid&rft.date=2015-07&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=263-267&rft.issn=0972-4052&rft.eissn=1998-4057&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/0972-4052.161091&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA488478269%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5031-ba3b26988b27769e81bfcec7604bf2d921480d682762a34e04a3dcfc92770d443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877386382&rft_id=info:pmid/26929523&rft_galeid=A488478269&rfr_iscdi=true