Loading…
Effect of midazolam on bupivacaine action in intrathecal anesthesia
Background: Subarachnoid anesthesia is regarded as one of the famous neuroaxial block procedures available nowadays. Neuraxial anesthesia offers many benefits over general anesthesia. Objective : This study is designed to compare the effect of adding 1 and 2 mg midazolam to hyperbaric bupivacaine on...
Saved in:
Published in: | Medical Journal of Babylon 2018, Vol.15 (1), p.43-47 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 47 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 43 |
container_title | Medical Journal of Babylon |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Ajam, Anas Amir M. Guri, Ramadan Jafar |
description | Background: Subarachnoid anesthesia is regarded as one of the famous neuroaxial block procedures available nowadays. Neuraxial anesthesia offers many benefits over general anesthesia.
Objective : This study is designed to compare the effect of adding 1 and 2 mg midazolam to
hyperbaric bupivacaine on duration of sensory and motor block and intraoperative hemodynamic changes for the cesarian section under subarachnoid anesthesia.
Methods : Ninety patients with the American Society of Anesthesiology Classifications I/II (range : 18–40 years)
were randomly allocated into three groups and were underwent spinal anesthesia for Cesarean Section in Duhok Maternity Hospital, Iraq. Group A (n = 30) received intrathecal of bupivacaine 12.5 mg + 0.4 ml of normal saline, Group B (n = 30) intrathecal of bupivacaine 12.5 mg
+ 1 mg midazolam, and Group C (n = 30) intrathecal of bupivacaine 12.5 mg + 2 mg midazolam. The study groups were comparable in age
and hemodynamic status changes prior and intra-intervention commencement. Results: The analgesic duration of those patients in Groups C and B were significantly longer, 183.33 and 181.00 min compared to 138.00 min in Group A for motor block (P < 0.0001) and 212.00, 210.00, and 142.00 min, respectively, for sensory block (P < 0.0001) with no any substantial difference in hemodynamic status changes.
Conclusion : The longer duration of analgesic was found using midazolam adjuvant with bupivacaine compared to free adjuvant group in women underwent spinal anesthesia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/MJBL.MJBL_12_18 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_869149e2d3d2493981f4e1bcda2c3e53</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A745549008</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_869149e2d3d2493981f4e1bcda2c3e53</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A745549008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303a-1facb64bd8532aa750d358ba61b8f17ad672994a6384b9bf75fd4984b41ff1413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Ud1LHDEcDKVCD-tznwoLfb4z35s86mFb5cQXBd_Cb_Nho7sbSVaP9q9vzrUWQUlIhmFmfgmD0BeCV5xgdnh-drxZ7Q5DqCHqA1pQRuhSthJ_RAuiKiZCXn9CB6XcYoypErKSC7Q-CcHbqUmhGaKDP6mHoUlj0z3cx0ewEEffgJ1ipeJuTxmmX95C38DoS4Ulwme0F6Av_uD53kdX308u1z-Xm4sfp-ujzdIyzGBJAthO8s4pwShAK7BjQnUgSacCacHJlmrNQTLFO92FVgTHdcWchEA4YfvodM51CW7NfY4D5N8mQTRPRMo3BvIUbe-Nkppw7aljjnLNtCKBe9JZB9QyL1jN-jZn3UCVxzGk-jM7xGLNUcuF4BpjVVWrN1R1OT9Em0YfYuVfGQ5ng82plOzDyzMJNrumzFNJ_5uqjrPZsU395HO56x-2PpvBu7sxbd-zGc7M3JxJwfxrroZ9ncN8nekDvExXjDIm2F-b9qjS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of midazolam on bupivacaine action in intrathecal anesthesia</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><creator>Ajam, Anas Amir M. ; Guri, Ramadan Jafar</creator><creatorcontrib>Ajam, Anas Amir M. ; Guri, Ramadan Jafar</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Subarachnoid anesthesia is regarded as one of the famous neuroaxial block procedures available nowadays. Neuraxial anesthesia offers many benefits over general anesthesia.
Objective : This study is designed to compare the effect of adding 1 and 2 mg midazolam to
hyperbaric bupivacaine on duration of sensory and motor block and intraoperative hemodynamic changes for the cesarian section under subarachnoid anesthesia.
Methods : Ninety patients with the American Society of Anesthesiology Classifications I/II (range : 18–40 years)
were randomly allocated into three groups and were underwent spinal anesthesia for Cesarean Section in Duhok Maternity Hospital, Iraq. Group A (n = 30) received intrathecal of bupivacaine 12.5 mg + 0.4 ml of normal saline, Group B (n = 30) intrathecal of bupivacaine 12.5 mg
+ 1 mg midazolam, and Group C (n = 30) intrathecal of bupivacaine 12.5 mg + 2 mg midazolam. The study groups were comparable in age
and hemodynamic status changes prior and intra-intervention commencement. Results: The analgesic duration of those patients in Groups C and B were significantly longer, 183.33 and 181.00 min compared to 138.00 min in Group A for motor block (P < 0.0001) and 212.00, 210.00, and 142.00 min, respectively, for sensory block (P < 0.0001) with no any substantial difference in hemodynamic status changes.
Conclusion : The longer duration of analgesic was found using midazolam adjuvant with bupivacaine compared to free adjuvant group in women underwent spinal anesthesia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1812-156X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2312-6760</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/MJBL.MJBL_12_18</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Babylon, Iraq: University of Babylon, College of Medicine</publisher><subject>Adjuvant ; Bupivacaine ; Cesarean section ; Complications and side effects ; Dosage and administration ; hyperbaric bupivacaine ; Midazolam ; Nerve block ; Patient outcomes ; subarachnoid anesthesia</subject><ispartof>Medical Journal of Babylon, 2018, Vol.15 (1), p.43-47</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27458,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ajam, Anas Amir M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guri, Ramadan Jafar</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of midazolam on bupivacaine action in intrathecal anesthesia</title><title>Medical Journal of Babylon</title><description>Background: Subarachnoid anesthesia is regarded as one of the famous neuroaxial block procedures available nowadays. Neuraxial anesthesia offers many benefits over general anesthesia.
Objective : This study is designed to compare the effect of adding 1 and 2 mg midazolam to
hyperbaric bupivacaine on duration of sensory and motor block and intraoperative hemodynamic changes for the cesarian section under subarachnoid anesthesia.
Methods : Ninety patients with the American Society of Anesthesiology Classifications I/II (range : 18–40 years)
were randomly allocated into three groups and were underwent spinal anesthesia for Cesarean Section in Duhok Maternity Hospital, Iraq. Group A (n = 30) received intrathecal of bupivacaine 12.5 mg + 0.4 ml of normal saline, Group B (n = 30) intrathecal of bupivacaine 12.5 mg
+ 1 mg midazolam, and Group C (n = 30) intrathecal of bupivacaine 12.5 mg + 2 mg midazolam. The study groups were comparable in age
and hemodynamic status changes prior and intra-intervention commencement. Results: The analgesic duration of those patients in Groups C and B were significantly longer, 183.33 and 181.00 min compared to 138.00 min in Group A for motor block (P < 0.0001) and 212.00, 210.00, and 142.00 min, respectively, for sensory block (P < 0.0001) with no any substantial difference in hemodynamic status changes.
Conclusion : The longer duration of analgesic was found using midazolam adjuvant with bupivacaine compared to free adjuvant group in women underwent spinal anesthesia.</description><subject>Adjuvant</subject><subject>Bupivacaine</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>hyperbaric bupivacaine</subject><subject>Midazolam</subject><subject>Nerve block</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>subarachnoid anesthesia</subject><issn>1812-156X</issn><issn>2312-6760</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Ud1LHDEcDKVCD-tznwoLfb4z35s86mFb5cQXBd_Cb_Nho7sbSVaP9q9vzrUWQUlIhmFmfgmD0BeCV5xgdnh-drxZ7Q5DqCHqA1pQRuhSthJ_RAuiKiZCXn9CB6XcYoypErKSC7Q-CcHbqUmhGaKDP6mHoUlj0z3cx0ewEEffgJ1ipeJuTxmmX95C38DoS4Ulwme0F6Av_uD53kdX308u1z-Xm4sfp-ujzdIyzGBJAthO8s4pwShAK7BjQnUgSacCacHJlmrNQTLFO92FVgTHdcWchEA4YfvodM51CW7NfY4D5N8mQTRPRMo3BvIUbe-Nkppw7aljjnLNtCKBe9JZB9QyL1jN-jZn3UCVxzGk-jM7xGLNUcuF4BpjVVWrN1R1OT9Em0YfYuVfGQ5ng82plOzDyzMJNrumzFNJ_5uqjrPZsU395HO56x-2PpvBu7sxbd-zGc7M3JxJwfxrroZ9ncN8nekDvExXjDIm2F-b9qjS</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Ajam, Anas Amir M.</creator><creator>Guri, Ramadan Jafar</creator><general>University of Babylon, College of Medicine</general><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Effect of midazolam on bupivacaine action in intrathecal anesthesia</title><author>Ajam, Anas Amir M. ; Guri, Ramadan Jafar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303a-1facb64bd8532aa750d358ba61b8f17ad672994a6384b9bf75fd4984b41ff1413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adjuvant</topic><topic>Bupivacaine</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>hyperbaric bupivacaine</topic><topic>Midazolam</topic><topic>Nerve block</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>subarachnoid anesthesia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ajam, Anas Amir M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guri, Ramadan Jafar</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Medical Journal of Babylon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ajam, Anas Amir M.</au><au>Guri, Ramadan Jafar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of midazolam on bupivacaine action in intrathecal anesthesia</atitle><jtitle>Medical Journal of Babylon</jtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>43-47</pages><issn>1812-156X</issn><eissn>2312-6760</eissn><abstract>Background: Subarachnoid anesthesia is regarded as one of the famous neuroaxial block procedures available nowadays. Neuraxial anesthesia offers many benefits over general anesthesia.
Objective : This study is designed to compare the effect of adding 1 and 2 mg midazolam to
hyperbaric bupivacaine on duration of sensory and motor block and intraoperative hemodynamic changes for the cesarian section under subarachnoid anesthesia.
Methods : Ninety patients with the American Society of Anesthesiology Classifications I/II (range : 18–40 years)
were randomly allocated into three groups and were underwent spinal anesthesia for Cesarean Section in Duhok Maternity Hospital, Iraq. Group A (n = 30) received intrathecal of bupivacaine 12.5 mg + 0.4 ml of normal saline, Group B (n = 30) intrathecal of bupivacaine 12.5 mg
+ 1 mg midazolam, and Group C (n = 30) intrathecal of bupivacaine 12.5 mg + 2 mg midazolam. The study groups were comparable in age
and hemodynamic status changes prior and intra-intervention commencement. Results: The analgesic duration of those patients in Groups C and B were significantly longer, 183.33 and 181.00 min compared to 138.00 min in Group A for motor block (P < 0.0001) and 212.00, 210.00, and 142.00 min, respectively, for sensory block (P < 0.0001) with no any substantial difference in hemodynamic status changes.
Conclusion : The longer duration of analgesic was found using midazolam adjuvant with bupivacaine compared to free adjuvant group in women underwent spinal anesthesia.</abstract><cop>Babylon, Iraq</cop><pub>University of Babylon, College of Medicine</pub><doi>10.4103/MJBL.MJBL_12_18</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1812-156X |
ispartof | Medical Journal of Babylon, 2018, Vol.15 (1), p.43-47 |
issn | 1812-156X 2312-6760 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_869149e2d3d2493981f4e1bcda2c3e53 |
source | Medknow Open Access Medical Journals |
subjects | Adjuvant Bupivacaine Cesarean section Complications and side effects Dosage and administration hyperbaric bupivacaine Midazolam Nerve block Patient outcomes subarachnoid anesthesia |
title | Effect of midazolam on bupivacaine action in intrathecal anesthesia |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A15%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20midazolam%20on%20bupivacaine%20action%20in%20intrathecal%20anesthesia&rft.jtitle=Medical%20Journal%20of%20Babylon&rft.au=Ajam,%20Anas%20Amir%20M.&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=43-47&rft.issn=1812-156X&rft.eissn=2312-6760&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/MJBL.MJBL_12_18&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA745549008%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303a-1facb64bd8532aa750d358ba61b8f17ad672994a6384b9bf75fd4984b41ff1413%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A745549008&rfr_iscdi=true |