Decisional Regret Surrounding Dialysis Initiation: A Comparative Analysis

• Published in: Kidney medicine 2024-03, Vol.6 (3), p.100785, Article 100785
• Main Authors: Pawar, Aditya S., Thorsteinsdottir, Bjorg, Whitman, Sam, Pine, Katherine, Lee, Alexander, Espinoza Suarez, Nataly R., Organick Lee, Paige, Thota, Anjali, Lorenz, Elizabeth, Beck, Annika, Albright, Robert, Feely, Molly, Williams, Amy, Behnken, Emma, Boehmer, Kasey R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Hemodialysis; patient-centered care; peritoneal dialysis; shared decision making
• ISSN: 2590-0595; 2590-0595
• DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100785

Dialysis comes with a substantial treatment burden, so patients must select care plans that align with their preferences. We aimed to deepen the understanding of decisional regret with dialysis choices. This study had a mixed-methods explanatory sequential design. All patients from a single academic medical center prescribed maintenance in-center hemodialysis or presenting for home hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis check-up during 3 weeks were approached for survey. A total of 78 patients agreed to participate. Patients with the highest (15 patients) and lowest decisional regret (20 patients) were invited to semistructured interviews. Decisional regret scale and illness intrusiveness scale were used in this study. Quantitatively, we examined correlations between the decision regret scale and illness intrusiveness scale and sorted patients into the highest and lowest decision regret scale quartiles for further interviews; then, we compared patient characteristics between those that consented to interview in high and low decisional regret. Qualitatively, we used an adapted grounded theory approach to examine differences between interviewed patients with high and low decisional regret. Of patients invited to participate in the interviews, 21 patients (8 high regret, 13 low regret) agreed. We observed that patients with high decisional regret displayed resignation toward dialysis, disruption of their sense of self and social roles, and self-blame, whereas patients with low decisional regret demonstrated positivity, integration of dialysis into their identity, and self-compassion. Patients with the highest levels of decisional regret may have already withdrawn from dialysis. Patients could complete interviews in any location (eg, home, dialysis unit, and clinical office), which may have influenced patient disclosure. Although all patients experienced disruption after dialysis initiation, patients’ approach to adversity differs between patients experiencing high versus low regret. This study identifies emotional responses to dialysis that may be modifiable through patient-support interventions. As part of a quality improvement initiative in our dialysis practice, a patient stated, “I wish I never started dialysis.” This quote served as the catalyst for embarking on a research project with the aim to understand why patients living with end-stage kidney disease have regret about starting and continuing dialysis, a lifesaving but time-intensive measure. We survey