Loading…

Comparative study of torque expression among active and passive self-ligating and conventional brackets

The aim of this study was to compare torque expression in active and passive self-ligating and conventional brackets. A total of 300 segments of stainless steel wire 0.019 x 0.025-in and six different brands of brackets (Damon 3MX, Portia, In-Ovation R, Bioquick, Roth SLI and Roth Max) were used. To...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dental press journal of orthodontics 2015-12, Vol.20 (6), p.68-74
Main Authors: Franco, Érika Mendonça Fernandes, Valarelli, Fabrício Pinelli, Fernandes, João Batista, Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont, de Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of this study was to compare torque expression in active and passive self-ligating and conventional brackets. A total of 300 segments of stainless steel wire 0.019 x 0.025-in and six different brands of brackets (Damon 3MX, Portia, In-Ovation R, Bioquick, Roth SLI and Roth Max) were used. Torque moments were measured at 12°, 24°, 36° and 48°, using a wire torsion device associated with a universal testing machine. The data obtained were compared by analysis of variance followed by Tukey test for multiple comparisons. Regression analysis was performed by the least-squares method to generate the mathematical equation of the optimal curve for each brand of bracket. Statistically significant differences were observed in the expression of torque among all evaluated bracket brands in all evaluated torsions (p < 0.05). It was found that Bioquick presented the lowest torque expression in all tested torsions; in contrast, Damon 3MX bracket presented the highest torque expression up to 36° torsion. The connection system between wire/bracket (active, passive self-ligating or conventional with elastic ligature) seems not to interfere in the final torque expression, the latter being probably dependent on the interaction between the wire and the bracket chosen for orthodontic mechanics.
ISSN:2176-9451
2177-6709
2177-6709
2176-9451
DOI:10.1590/2177-6709.20.6.068-074.oar