Loading…

Breast Ultrasound Following a Positive Clinical Breast Examination: Does It Have a Role in Low- and Middle-Income Countries?

Purpose: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide, with an estimated 1.7 million new cases occurring in 2012. The majority of cases and deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where population-based mammography screening is not available and countries must rely...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of global radiology 2015-11, Vol.1 (2)
Main Authors: Tsu, Vivien, Scheel, John, Bishop, Amie, Murray, Marjorie, Weigl, Bernhard, Lehman, Constance
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1875-964c241aabc37b1f127c65c666287a81fd36163aa6b6c365afab6b4ce7b0aed03
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title The journal of global radiology
container_volume 1
creator Tsu, Vivien
Scheel, John
Bishop, Amie
Murray, Marjorie
Weigl, Bernhard
Lehman, Constance
description Purpose: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide, with an estimated 1.7 million new cases occurring in 2012. The majority of cases and deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where population-based mammography screening is not available and countries must rely on clinical breast examination (CBE). Since ultrasound has the potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies by triaging women with palpable or focal breast findings at CBE, we searched for evidence in the literature on the effectiveness of ultrasound in detecting potential breast cancer following positive CBE findings. Methods: We reviewed the literature from 2000 to 2014 for evidence on the performance of breast ultrasound, in the absence of mammography, used to evaluate women after a positive CBE. From the studies meeting our inclusion/exclusion criteria for our analysis, we extracted data on the study design, location, ultrasound transducer parameters, patient age, method for determining positive and negative cases, and number of malignancies detected/total number of women studied. Results: We found 15 studies matching our inclusion/exclusion criteria, 9 from high-income countries and 6 from LMICs. Despite considerable variability in study design and patient populations, breast ultrasound consistently showed high sensitivity (median = 94 percent) and specificity (median = 80 percent) for detecting breast cancer and identifying normal and benign findings not requiring a biopsy. Clear patterns related to transducer frequency or income level were not discernible given the variations in patient populations and final diagnostic determinations. Conclusion: Our systematic review suggests that breast ultrasound following a positive CBE may be a powerful diagnostic test to determine those who do or do not need biopsy. We encourage further research in breast ultrasound use after a positive CBE in LMICs to assess the accuracy of ultrasound in these settings and the feasibility of widespread implementation.
doi_str_mv 10.7191/jgr.2015.1015
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_87a994ad17704e93a398e4ccdc9319c7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_87a994ad17704e93a398e4ccdc9319c7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_87a994ad17704e93a398e4ccdc9319c7</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1875-964c241aabc37b1f127c65c666287a81fd36163aa6b6c365afab6b4ce7b0aed03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkcFKAzEQhhdRsNQevecFtiabbLLxIlpbW6goYs9hNpstKelGktUq-PCmtoiXmWH4-Qbmy7JLgseCSHK1WYdxgUk5JqmcZIOCiiKvGKlO_83n2SjGDcaYMFlQWQ2y77tgIPZo5foA0b93DZp55_zOdmsE6NlH29sPgybOdlaDQ8f89BO2toPe-u4a3XsT0aJHc0hJQC_eGWQ7tPS7HEEiPtqmcSZfdNpvEypd6YM18eYiO2vBRTM69mG2mk1fJ_N8-fSwmNwuc00qUeaSM10wAlBrKmrSkkJoXmrOeVEJqEjbUE44BeA115SX0ELNa6aNqDGYBtNhtjhwGw8b9RbsFsKX8mDV78KHtYLQW-2MSkApGTRECMyMpJC-ZJjWjZaUSC0SKz-wdPAxBtP-8QhWexMqmVB7E2pvgv4AJ0p8Aw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breast Ultrasound Following a Positive Clinical Breast Examination: Does It Have a Role in Low- and Middle-Income Countries?</title><source>Freely Accessible Journals</source><creator>Tsu, Vivien ; Scheel, John ; Bishop, Amie ; Murray, Marjorie ; Weigl, Bernhard ; Lehman, Constance</creator><creatorcontrib>Tsu, Vivien ; Scheel, John ; Bishop, Amie ; Murray, Marjorie ; Weigl, Bernhard ; Lehman, Constance ; Intellectual Ventures Lab/Global Good ; Amie Bishop Consulting, LLC ; University of Washington and Seattle Cancer Care Alliance ; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School ; PATH</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide, with an estimated 1.7 million new cases occurring in 2012. The majority of cases and deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where population-based mammography screening is not available and countries must rely on clinical breast examination (CBE). Since ultrasound has the potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies by triaging women with palpable or focal breast findings at CBE, we searched for evidence in the literature on the effectiveness of ultrasound in detecting potential breast cancer following positive CBE findings. Methods: We reviewed the literature from 2000 to 2014 for evidence on the performance of breast ultrasound, in the absence of mammography, used to evaluate women after a positive CBE. From the studies meeting our inclusion/exclusion criteria for our analysis, we extracted data on the study design, location, ultrasound transducer parameters, patient age, method for determining positive and negative cases, and number of malignancies detected/total number of women studied. Results: We found 15 studies matching our inclusion/exclusion criteria, 9 from high-income countries and 6 from LMICs. Despite considerable variability in study design and patient populations, breast ultrasound consistently showed high sensitivity (median = 94 percent) and specificity (median = 80 percent) for detecting breast cancer and identifying normal and benign findings not requiring a biopsy. Clear patterns related to transducer frequency or income level were not discernible given the variations in patient populations and final diagnostic determinations. Conclusion: Our systematic review suggests that breast ultrasound following a positive CBE may be a powerful diagnostic test to determine those who do or do not need biopsy. We encourage further research in breast ultrasound use after a positive CBE in LMICs to assess the accuracy of ultrasound in these settings and the feasibility of widespread implementation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2372-8418</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2372-8418</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7191/jgr.2015.1015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UMass Chan Medical School</publisher><subject>breast cancer ; clinical breast exam ; developing countries ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>The journal of global radiology, 2015-11, Vol.1 (2)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1875-964c241aabc37b1f127c65c666287a81fd36163aa6b6c365afab6b4ce7b0aed03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tsu, Vivien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheel, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bishop, Amie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Marjorie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weigl, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehman, Constance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Intellectual Ventures Lab/Global Good</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amie Bishop Consulting, LLC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Washington and Seattle Cancer Care Alliance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PATH</creatorcontrib><title>Breast Ultrasound Following a Positive Clinical Breast Examination: Does It Have a Role in Low- and Middle-Income Countries?</title><title>The journal of global radiology</title><description>Purpose: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide, with an estimated 1.7 million new cases occurring in 2012. The majority of cases and deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where population-based mammography screening is not available and countries must rely on clinical breast examination (CBE). Since ultrasound has the potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies by triaging women with palpable or focal breast findings at CBE, we searched for evidence in the literature on the effectiveness of ultrasound in detecting potential breast cancer following positive CBE findings. Methods: We reviewed the literature from 2000 to 2014 for evidence on the performance of breast ultrasound, in the absence of mammography, used to evaluate women after a positive CBE. From the studies meeting our inclusion/exclusion criteria for our analysis, we extracted data on the study design, location, ultrasound transducer parameters, patient age, method for determining positive and negative cases, and number of malignancies detected/total number of women studied. Results: We found 15 studies matching our inclusion/exclusion criteria, 9 from high-income countries and 6 from LMICs. Despite considerable variability in study design and patient populations, breast ultrasound consistently showed high sensitivity (median = 94 percent) and specificity (median = 80 percent) for detecting breast cancer and identifying normal and benign findings not requiring a biopsy. Clear patterns related to transducer frequency or income level were not discernible given the variations in patient populations and final diagnostic determinations. Conclusion: Our systematic review suggests that breast ultrasound following a positive CBE may be a powerful diagnostic test to determine those who do or do not need biopsy. We encourage further research in breast ultrasound use after a positive CBE in LMICs to assess the accuracy of ultrasound in these settings and the feasibility of widespread implementation.</description><subject>breast cancer</subject><subject>clinical breast exam</subject><subject>developing countries</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>2372-8418</issn><issn>2372-8418</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkcFKAzEQhhdRsNQevecFtiabbLLxIlpbW6goYs9hNpstKelGktUq-PCmtoiXmWH4-Qbmy7JLgseCSHK1WYdxgUk5JqmcZIOCiiKvGKlO_83n2SjGDcaYMFlQWQ2y77tgIPZo5foA0b93DZp55_zOdmsE6NlH29sPgybOdlaDQ8f89BO2toPe-u4a3XsT0aJHc0hJQC_eGWQ7tPS7HEEiPtqmcSZfdNpvEypd6YM18eYiO2vBRTM69mG2mk1fJ_N8-fSwmNwuc00qUeaSM10wAlBrKmrSkkJoXmrOeVEJqEjbUE44BeA115SX0ELNa6aNqDGYBtNhtjhwGw8b9RbsFsKX8mDV78KHtYLQW-2MSkApGTRECMyMpJC-ZJjWjZaUSC0SKz-wdPAxBtP-8QhWexMqmVB7E2pvgv4AJ0p8Aw</recordid><startdate>20151116</startdate><enddate>20151116</enddate><creator>Tsu, Vivien</creator><creator>Scheel, John</creator><creator>Bishop, Amie</creator><creator>Murray, Marjorie</creator><creator>Weigl, Bernhard</creator><creator>Lehman, Constance</creator><general>UMass Chan Medical School</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151116</creationdate><title>Breast Ultrasound Following a Positive Clinical Breast Examination: Does It Have a Role in Low- and Middle-Income Countries?</title><author>Tsu, Vivien ; Scheel, John ; Bishop, Amie ; Murray, Marjorie ; Weigl, Bernhard ; Lehman, Constance</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1875-964c241aabc37b1f127c65c666287a81fd36163aa6b6c365afab6b4ce7b0aed03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>breast cancer</topic><topic>clinical breast exam</topic><topic>developing countries</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tsu, Vivien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheel, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bishop, Amie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Marjorie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weigl, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehman, Constance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Intellectual Ventures Lab/Global Good</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amie Bishop Consulting, LLC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Washington and Seattle Cancer Care Alliance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PATH</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>The journal of global radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tsu, Vivien</au><au>Scheel, John</au><au>Bishop, Amie</au><au>Murray, Marjorie</au><au>Weigl, Bernhard</au><au>Lehman, Constance</au><aucorp>Intellectual Ventures Lab/Global Good</aucorp><aucorp>Amie Bishop Consulting, LLC</aucorp><aucorp>University of Washington and Seattle Cancer Care Alliance</aucorp><aucorp>Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School</aucorp><aucorp>PATH</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breast Ultrasound Following a Positive Clinical Breast Examination: Does It Have a Role in Low- and Middle-Income Countries?</atitle><jtitle>The journal of global radiology</jtitle><date>2015-11-16</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>2372-8418</issn><eissn>2372-8418</eissn><abstract>Purpose: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide, with an estimated 1.7 million new cases occurring in 2012. The majority of cases and deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where population-based mammography screening is not available and countries must rely on clinical breast examination (CBE). Since ultrasound has the potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies by triaging women with palpable or focal breast findings at CBE, we searched for evidence in the literature on the effectiveness of ultrasound in detecting potential breast cancer following positive CBE findings. Methods: We reviewed the literature from 2000 to 2014 for evidence on the performance of breast ultrasound, in the absence of mammography, used to evaluate women after a positive CBE. From the studies meeting our inclusion/exclusion criteria for our analysis, we extracted data on the study design, location, ultrasound transducer parameters, patient age, method for determining positive and negative cases, and number of malignancies detected/total number of women studied. Results: We found 15 studies matching our inclusion/exclusion criteria, 9 from high-income countries and 6 from LMICs. Despite considerable variability in study design and patient populations, breast ultrasound consistently showed high sensitivity (median = 94 percent) and specificity (median = 80 percent) for detecting breast cancer and identifying normal and benign findings not requiring a biopsy. Clear patterns related to transducer frequency or income level were not discernible given the variations in patient populations and final diagnostic determinations. Conclusion: Our systematic review suggests that breast ultrasound following a positive CBE may be a powerful diagnostic test to determine those who do or do not need biopsy. We encourage further research in breast ultrasound use after a positive CBE in LMICs to assess the accuracy of ultrasound in these settings and the feasibility of widespread implementation.</abstract><pub>UMass Chan Medical School</pub><doi>10.7191/jgr.2015.1015</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2372-8418
ispartof The journal of global radiology, 2015-11, Vol.1 (2)
issn 2372-8418
2372-8418
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_87a994ad17704e93a398e4ccdc9319c7
source Freely Accessible Journals
subjects breast cancer
clinical breast exam
developing countries
Ultrasound
title Breast Ultrasound Following a Positive Clinical Breast Examination: Does It Have a Role in Low- and Middle-Income Countries?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T06%3A35%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breast%20Ultrasound%20Following%20a%20Positive%20Clinical%20Breast%20Examination:%20Does%20It%20Have%20a%20Role%20in%20Low-%20and%20Middle-Income%20Countries?&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20global%20radiology&rft.au=Tsu,%20Vivien&rft.aucorp=Intellectual%20Ventures%20Lab/Global%20Good&rft.date=2015-11-16&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=2372-8418&rft.eissn=2372-8418&rft_id=info:doi/10.7191/jgr.2015.1015&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_87a994ad17704e93a398e4ccdc9319c7%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1875-964c241aabc37b1f127c65c666287a81fd36163aa6b6c365afab6b4ce7b0aed03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true