Loading…

Somatosensory and auditory deviance detection for outcome prediction during postanoxic coma

Objective Prominent research in patients with disorders of consciousness investigated the electrophysiological correlates of auditory deviance detection as a marker of consciousness recovery. Here, we extend previous studies by investigating whether somatosensory deviance detection provides an added...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of clinical and translational neurology 2018-09, Vol.5 (9), p.1016-1024
Main Authors: Pfeiffer, Christian, Nguissi, Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo, Chytiris, Magali, Bidlingmeyer, Phanie, Haenggi, Matthias, Kurmann, Rebekka, Zubler, Frédéric, Accolla, Ettore, Viceic, Dragana, Rusca, Marco, Oddo, Mauro, Rossetti, Andrea O., De Lucia, Marzia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5040-271cddddba8bb90a93f7380f9110eb23673fd23ed05dec4148a56abe91248bbd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5040-271cddddba8bb90a93f7380f9110eb23673fd23ed05dec4148a56abe91248bbd3
container_end_page 1024
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1016
container_title Annals of clinical and translational neurology
container_volume 5
creator Pfeiffer, Christian
Nguissi, Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo
Chytiris, Magali
Bidlingmeyer, Phanie
Haenggi, Matthias
Kurmann, Rebekka
Zubler, Frédéric
Accolla, Ettore
Viceic, Dragana
Rusca, Marco
Oddo, Mauro
Rossetti, Andrea O.
De Lucia, Marzia
description Objective Prominent research in patients with disorders of consciousness investigated the electrophysiological correlates of auditory deviance detection as a marker of consciousness recovery. Here, we extend previous studies by investigating whether somatosensory deviance detection provides an added value for outcome prediction in postanoxic comatose patients. Methods Electroencephalography responses to frequent and rare stimuli were obtained from 66 patients on the first and second day after coma onset. Results Multivariate decoding analysis revealed an above chance‐level auditory discrimination in 25 patients on the first day and in 31 patients on the second day. Tactile discrimination was significant in 16 patients on the first day and in 23 patients on the second day. Single‐day sensory discrimination was unrelated to patients’ outcome in both modalities. However, improvement of auditory discrimination from first to the second day was predictive of good outcome with a positive predictive power (PPV) of 0.73 (CI = 0.52–0.88). Analyses considering the improvement of tactile, auditory and tactile, or either auditory or tactile discrimination showed no significant prediction of good outcome (PPVs = 0.58–0.68). Interpretation Our results show that in the acute phase of coma deviance detection is largely preserved for both auditory and tactile modalities. However, we found no evidence for an added value of somatosensory to auditory deviance detection function for coma‐outcome prediction.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acn3.600
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_883ab7d92f27461cb57813c0577dc685</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_883ab7d92f27461cb57813c0577dc685</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2112197324</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5040-271cddddba8bb90a93f7380f9110eb23673fd23ed05dec4148a56abe91248bbd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kkFvFCEUgCdGY5vaxF9gJvHiZeoDhoG5mDSb2jZp9KCePJA3wKxsZmAFprr_XtattTWRC4_Hx5cX3quqlwTOCAB9i9qzsw7gSXVMGZVNz4E9fRAfVacpbQCAEMqZoM-rIwaUg-T9cfX1U5gxh2R9CnFXozc1Lsbl_cHYW4de2xJkq7MLvh5DrMOSdZhtvY3WuEPaLNH5db0NKaMPP52uC4EvqmcjTsme3u0n1Zf3F59XV83Nx8vr1flNozm00FBBtClrQDkMPWDPRsEkjD0hYAfKOsFGQ5k1wI3VLWkl8g4H2xPalheGnVTXB68JuFHb6GaMOxXQqd-JENcKY3Z6skpKhoMwPR2paDuiBy4kYRq4EEZ3khfXu4NruwyzNdr6HHF6JH184903tQ63qiNtWawI3twJYvi-2JTV7JK204TehiUpWrpAesFoW9DX_6CbsERfvqpQICX0kou_Qh1DStGO98UQUPsBUPsBUGUACvrqYfH34J92F6A5AD_cZHf_Fanz1Qe2F_4CzxO6jA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2108809857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Somatosensory and auditory deviance detection for outcome prediction during postanoxic coma</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Pfeiffer, Christian ; Nguissi, Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo ; Chytiris, Magali ; Bidlingmeyer, Phanie ; Haenggi, Matthias ; Kurmann, Rebekka ; Zubler, Frédéric ; Accolla, Ettore ; Viceic, Dragana ; Rusca, Marco ; Oddo, Mauro ; Rossetti, Andrea O. ; De Lucia, Marzia</creator><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, Christian ; Nguissi, Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo ; Chytiris, Magali ; Bidlingmeyer, Phanie ; Haenggi, Matthias ; Kurmann, Rebekka ; Zubler, Frédéric ; Accolla, Ettore ; Viceic, Dragana ; Rusca, Marco ; Oddo, Mauro ; Rossetti, Andrea O. ; De Lucia, Marzia</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Prominent research in patients with disorders of consciousness investigated the electrophysiological correlates of auditory deviance detection as a marker of consciousness recovery. Here, we extend previous studies by investigating whether somatosensory deviance detection provides an added value for outcome prediction in postanoxic comatose patients. Methods Electroencephalography responses to frequent and rare stimuli were obtained from 66 patients on the first and second day after coma onset. Results Multivariate decoding analysis revealed an above chance‐level auditory discrimination in 25 patients on the first day and in 31 patients on the second day. Tactile discrimination was significant in 16 patients on the first day and in 23 patients on the second day. Single‐day sensory discrimination was unrelated to patients’ outcome in both modalities. However, improvement of auditory discrimination from first to the second day was predictive of good outcome with a positive predictive power (PPV) of 0.73 (CI = 0.52–0.88). Analyses considering the improvement of tactile, auditory and tactile, or either auditory or tactile discrimination showed no significant prediction of good outcome (PPVs = 0.58–0.68). Interpretation Our results show that in the acute phase of coma deviance detection is largely preserved for both auditory and tactile modalities. However, we found no evidence for an added value of somatosensory to auditory deviance detection function for coma‐outcome prediction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2328-9503</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-9503</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acn3.600</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30250859</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Coma ; Consciousness</subject><ispartof>Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2018-09, Vol.5 (9), p.1016-1024</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc on behalf of American Neurological Association.</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5040-271cddddba8bb90a93f7380f9110eb23673fd23ed05dec4148a56abe91248bbd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5040-271cddddba8bb90a93f7380f9110eb23673fd23ed05dec4148a56abe91248bbd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7825-7701 ; 0000-0001-8792-7885</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2108809857/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2108809857?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,11541,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,46027,46451,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30250859$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguissi, Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chytiris, Magali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bidlingmeyer, Phanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haenggi, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurmann, Rebekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zubler, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Accolla, Ettore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viceic, Dragana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rusca, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oddo, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossetti, Andrea O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Lucia, Marzia</creatorcontrib><title>Somatosensory and auditory deviance detection for outcome prediction during postanoxic coma</title><title>Annals of clinical and translational neurology</title><addtitle>Ann Clin Transl Neurol</addtitle><description>Objective Prominent research in patients with disorders of consciousness investigated the electrophysiological correlates of auditory deviance detection as a marker of consciousness recovery. Here, we extend previous studies by investigating whether somatosensory deviance detection provides an added value for outcome prediction in postanoxic comatose patients. Methods Electroencephalography responses to frequent and rare stimuli were obtained from 66 patients on the first and second day after coma onset. Results Multivariate decoding analysis revealed an above chance‐level auditory discrimination in 25 patients on the first day and in 31 patients on the second day. Tactile discrimination was significant in 16 patients on the first day and in 23 patients on the second day. Single‐day sensory discrimination was unrelated to patients’ outcome in both modalities. However, improvement of auditory discrimination from first to the second day was predictive of good outcome with a positive predictive power (PPV) of 0.73 (CI = 0.52–0.88). Analyses considering the improvement of tactile, auditory and tactile, or either auditory or tactile discrimination showed no significant prediction of good outcome (PPVs = 0.58–0.68). Interpretation Our results show that in the acute phase of coma deviance detection is largely preserved for both auditory and tactile modalities. However, we found no evidence for an added value of somatosensory to auditory deviance detection function for coma‐outcome prediction.</description><subject>Coma</subject><subject>Consciousness</subject><issn>2328-9503</issn><issn>2328-9503</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kkFvFCEUgCdGY5vaxF9gJvHiZeoDhoG5mDSb2jZp9KCePJA3wKxsZmAFprr_XtattTWRC4_Hx5cX3quqlwTOCAB9i9qzsw7gSXVMGZVNz4E9fRAfVacpbQCAEMqZoM-rIwaUg-T9cfX1U5gxh2R9CnFXozc1Lsbl_cHYW4de2xJkq7MLvh5DrMOSdZhtvY3WuEPaLNH5db0NKaMPP52uC4EvqmcjTsme3u0n1Zf3F59XV83Nx8vr1flNozm00FBBtClrQDkMPWDPRsEkjD0hYAfKOsFGQ5k1wI3VLWkl8g4H2xPalheGnVTXB68JuFHb6GaMOxXQqd-JENcKY3Z6skpKhoMwPR2paDuiBy4kYRq4EEZ3khfXu4NruwyzNdr6HHF6JH184903tQ63qiNtWawI3twJYvi-2JTV7JK204TehiUpWrpAesFoW9DX_6CbsERfvqpQICX0kou_Qh1DStGO98UQUPsBUPsBUGUACvrqYfH34J92F6A5AD_cZHf_Fanz1Qe2F_4CzxO6jA</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Pfeiffer, Christian</creator><creator>Nguissi, Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo</creator><creator>Chytiris, Magali</creator><creator>Bidlingmeyer, Phanie</creator><creator>Haenggi, Matthias</creator><creator>Kurmann, Rebekka</creator><creator>Zubler, Frédéric</creator><creator>Accolla, Ettore</creator><creator>Viceic, Dragana</creator><creator>Rusca, Marco</creator><creator>Oddo, Mauro</creator><creator>Rossetti, Andrea O.</creator><creator>De Lucia, Marzia</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7825-7701</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8792-7885</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Somatosensory and auditory deviance detection for outcome prediction during postanoxic coma</title><author>Pfeiffer, Christian ; Nguissi, Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo ; Chytiris, Magali ; Bidlingmeyer, Phanie ; Haenggi, Matthias ; Kurmann, Rebekka ; Zubler, Frédéric ; Accolla, Ettore ; Viceic, Dragana ; Rusca, Marco ; Oddo, Mauro ; Rossetti, Andrea O. ; De Lucia, Marzia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5040-271cddddba8bb90a93f7380f9110eb23673fd23ed05dec4148a56abe91248bbd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Coma</topic><topic>Consciousness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguissi, Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chytiris, Magali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bidlingmeyer, Phanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haenggi, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurmann, Rebekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zubler, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Accolla, Ettore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viceic, Dragana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rusca, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oddo, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossetti, Andrea O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Lucia, Marzia</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Annals of clinical and translational neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pfeiffer, Christian</au><au>Nguissi, Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo</au><au>Chytiris, Magali</au><au>Bidlingmeyer, Phanie</au><au>Haenggi, Matthias</au><au>Kurmann, Rebekka</au><au>Zubler, Frédéric</au><au>Accolla, Ettore</au><au>Viceic, Dragana</au><au>Rusca, Marco</au><au>Oddo, Mauro</au><au>Rossetti, Andrea O.</au><au>De Lucia, Marzia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Somatosensory and auditory deviance detection for outcome prediction during postanoxic coma</atitle><jtitle>Annals of clinical and translational neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Clin Transl Neurol</addtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1016</spage><epage>1024</epage><pages>1016-1024</pages><issn>2328-9503</issn><eissn>2328-9503</eissn><abstract>Objective Prominent research in patients with disorders of consciousness investigated the electrophysiological correlates of auditory deviance detection as a marker of consciousness recovery. Here, we extend previous studies by investigating whether somatosensory deviance detection provides an added value for outcome prediction in postanoxic comatose patients. Methods Electroencephalography responses to frequent and rare stimuli were obtained from 66 patients on the first and second day after coma onset. Results Multivariate decoding analysis revealed an above chance‐level auditory discrimination in 25 patients on the first day and in 31 patients on the second day. Tactile discrimination was significant in 16 patients on the first day and in 23 patients on the second day. Single‐day sensory discrimination was unrelated to patients’ outcome in both modalities. However, improvement of auditory discrimination from first to the second day was predictive of good outcome with a positive predictive power (PPV) of 0.73 (CI = 0.52–0.88). Analyses considering the improvement of tactile, auditory and tactile, or either auditory or tactile discrimination showed no significant prediction of good outcome (PPVs = 0.58–0.68). Interpretation Our results show that in the acute phase of coma deviance detection is largely preserved for both auditory and tactile modalities. However, we found no evidence for an added value of somatosensory to auditory deviance detection function for coma‐outcome prediction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30250859</pmid><doi>10.1002/acn3.600</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7825-7701</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8792-7885</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2328-9503
ispartof Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2018-09, Vol.5 (9), p.1016-1024
issn 2328-9503
2328-9503
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_883ab7d92f27461cb57813c0577dc685
source PubMed (Medline); Wiley Online Library Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Coma
Consciousness
title Somatosensory and auditory deviance detection for outcome prediction during postanoxic coma
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A17%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Somatosensory%20and%20auditory%20deviance%20detection%20for%20outcome%20prediction%20during%20postanoxic%20coma&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20clinical%20and%20translational%20neurology&rft.au=Pfeiffer,%20Christian&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1016&rft.epage=1024&rft.pages=1016-1024&rft.issn=2328-9503&rft.eissn=2328-9503&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acn3.600&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2112197324%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5040-271cddddba8bb90a93f7380f9110eb23673fd23ed05dec4148a56abe91248bbd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2108809857&rft_id=info:pmid/30250859&rfr_iscdi=true