Loading…
Somatosensory and auditory deviance detection for outcome prediction during postanoxic coma
Objective Prominent research in patients with disorders of consciousness investigated the electrophysiological correlates of auditory deviance detection as a marker of consciousness recovery. Here, we extend previous studies by investigating whether somatosensory deviance detection provides an added...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of clinical and translational neurology 2018-09, Vol.5 (9), p.1016-1024 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5040-271cddddba8bb90a93f7380f9110eb23673fd23ed05dec4148a56abe91248bbd3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5040-271cddddba8bb90a93f7380f9110eb23673fd23ed05dec4148a56abe91248bbd3 |
container_end_page | 1024 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1016 |
container_title | Annals of clinical and translational neurology |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Pfeiffer, Christian Nguissi, Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo Chytiris, Magali Bidlingmeyer, Phanie Haenggi, Matthias Kurmann, Rebekka Zubler, Frédéric Accolla, Ettore Viceic, Dragana Rusca, Marco Oddo, Mauro Rossetti, Andrea O. De Lucia, Marzia |
description | Objective
Prominent research in patients with disorders of consciousness investigated the electrophysiological correlates of auditory deviance detection as a marker of consciousness recovery. Here, we extend previous studies by investigating whether somatosensory deviance detection provides an added value for outcome prediction in postanoxic comatose patients.
Methods
Electroencephalography responses to frequent and rare stimuli were obtained from 66 patients on the first and second day after coma onset.
Results
Multivariate decoding analysis revealed an above chance‐level auditory discrimination in 25 patients on the first day and in 31 patients on the second day. Tactile discrimination was significant in 16 patients on the first day and in 23 patients on the second day. Single‐day sensory discrimination was unrelated to patients’ outcome in both modalities. However, improvement of auditory discrimination from first to the second day was predictive of good outcome with a positive predictive power (PPV) of 0.73 (CI = 0.52–0.88). Analyses considering the improvement of tactile, auditory and tactile, or either auditory or tactile discrimination showed no significant prediction of good outcome (PPVs = 0.58–0.68).
Interpretation
Our results show that in the acute phase of coma deviance detection is largely preserved for both auditory and tactile modalities. However, we found no evidence for an added value of somatosensory to auditory deviance detection function for coma‐outcome prediction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/acn3.600 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_883ab7d92f27461cb57813c0577dc685</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_883ab7d92f27461cb57813c0577dc685</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2112197324</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5040-271cddddba8bb90a93f7380f9110eb23673fd23ed05dec4148a56abe91248bbd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kkFvFCEUgCdGY5vaxF9gJvHiZeoDhoG5mDSb2jZp9KCePJA3wKxsZmAFprr_XtattTWRC4_Hx5cX3quqlwTOCAB9i9qzsw7gSXVMGZVNz4E9fRAfVacpbQCAEMqZoM-rIwaUg-T9cfX1U5gxh2R9CnFXozc1Lsbl_cHYW4de2xJkq7MLvh5DrMOSdZhtvY3WuEPaLNH5db0NKaMPP52uC4EvqmcjTsme3u0n1Zf3F59XV83Nx8vr1flNozm00FBBtClrQDkMPWDPRsEkjD0hYAfKOsFGQ5k1wI3VLWkl8g4H2xPalheGnVTXB68JuFHb6GaMOxXQqd-JENcKY3Z6skpKhoMwPR2paDuiBy4kYRq4EEZ3khfXu4NruwyzNdr6HHF6JH184903tQ63qiNtWawI3twJYvi-2JTV7JK204TehiUpWrpAesFoW9DX_6CbsERfvqpQICX0kou_Qh1DStGO98UQUPsBUPsBUGUACvrqYfH34J92F6A5AD_cZHf_Fanz1Qe2F_4CzxO6jA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2108809857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Somatosensory and auditory deviance detection for outcome prediction during postanoxic coma</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Pfeiffer, Christian ; Nguissi, Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo ; Chytiris, Magali ; Bidlingmeyer, Phanie ; Haenggi, Matthias ; Kurmann, Rebekka ; Zubler, Frédéric ; Accolla, Ettore ; Viceic, Dragana ; Rusca, Marco ; Oddo, Mauro ; Rossetti, Andrea O. ; De Lucia, Marzia</creator><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, Christian ; Nguissi, Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo ; Chytiris, Magali ; Bidlingmeyer, Phanie ; Haenggi, Matthias ; Kurmann, Rebekka ; Zubler, Frédéric ; Accolla, Ettore ; Viceic, Dragana ; Rusca, Marco ; Oddo, Mauro ; Rossetti, Andrea O. ; De Lucia, Marzia</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
Prominent research in patients with disorders of consciousness investigated the electrophysiological correlates of auditory deviance detection as a marker of consciousness recovery. Here, we extend previous studies by investigating whether somatosensory deviance detection provides an added value for outcome prediction in postanoxic comatose patients.
Methods
Electroencephalography responses to frequent and rare stimuli were obtained from 66 patients on the first and second day after coma onset.
Results
Multivariate decoding analysis revealed an above chance‐level auditory discrimination in 25 patients on the first day and in 31 patients on the second day. Tactile discrimination was significant in 16 patients on the first day and in 23 patients on the second day. Single‐day sensory discrimination was unrelated to patients’ outcome in both modalities. However, improvement of auditory discrimination from first to the second day was predictive of good outcome with a positive predictive power (PPV) of 0.73 (CI = 0.52–0.88). Analyses considering the improvement of tactile, auditory and tactile, or either auditory or tactile discrimination showed no significant prediction of good outcome (PPVs = 0.58–0.68).
Interpretation
Our results show that in the acute phase of coma deviance detection is largely preserved for both auditory and tactile modalities. However, we found no evidence for an added value of somatosensory to auditory deviance detection function for coma‐outcome prediction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2328-9503</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-9503</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acn3.600</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30250859</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Coma ; Consciousness</subject><ispartof>Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2018-09, Vol.5 (9), p.1016-1024</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc on behalf of American Neurological Association.</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5040-271cddddba8bb90a93f7380f9110eb23673fd23ed05dec4148a56abe91248bbd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5040-271cddddba8bb90a93f7380f9110eb23673fd23ed05dec4148a56abe91248bbd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7825-7701 ; 0000-0001-8792-7885</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2108809857/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2108809857?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,11541,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,46027,46451,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30250859$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguissi, Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chytiris, Magali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bidlingmeyer, Phanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haenggi, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurmann, Rebekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zubler, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Accolla, Ettore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viceic, Dragana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rusca, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oddo, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossetti, Andrea O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Lucia, Marzia</creatorcontrib><title>Somatosensory and auditory deviance detection for outcome prediction during postanoxic coma</title><title>Annals of clinical and translational neurology</title><addtitle>Ann Clin Transl Neurol</addtitle><description>Objective
Prominent research in patients with disorders of consciousness investigated the electrophysiological correlates of auditory deviance detection as a marker of consciousness recovery. Here, we extend previous studies by investigating whether somatosensory deviance detection provides an added value for outcome prediction in postanoxic comatose patients.
Methods
Electroencephalography responses to frequent and rare stimuli were obtained from 66 patients on the first and second day after coma onset.
Results
Multivariate decoding analysis revealed an above chance‐level auditory discrimination in 25 patients on the first day and in 31 patients on the second day. Tactile discrimination was significant in 16 patients on the first day and in 23 patients on the second day. Single‐day sensory discrimination was unrelated to patients’ outcome in both modalities. However, improvement of auditory discrimination from first to the second day was predictive of good outcome with a positive predictive power (PPV) of 0.73 (CI = 0.52–0.88). Analyses considering the improvement of tactile, auditory and tactile, or either auditory or tactile discrimination showed no significant prediction of good outcome (PPVs = 0.58–0.68).
Interpretation
Our results show that in the acute phase of coma deviance detection is largely preserved for both auditory and tactile modalities. However, we found no evidence for an added value of somatosensory to auditory deviance detection function for coma‐outcome prediction.</description><subject>Coma</subject><subject>Consciousness</subject><issn>2328-9503</issn><issn>2328-9503</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kkFvFCEUgCdGY5vaxF9gJvHiZeoDhoG5mDSb2jZp9KCePJA3wKxsZmAFprr_XtattTWRC4_Hx5cX3quqlwTOCAB9i9qzsw7gSXVMGZVNz4E9fRAfVacpbQCAEMqZoM-rIwaUg-T9cfX1U5gxh2R9CnFXozc1Lsbl_cHYW4de2xJkq7MLvh5DrMOSdZhtvY3WuEPaLNH5db0NKaMPP52uC4EvqmcjTsme3u0n1Zf3F59XV83Nx8vr1flNozm00FBBtClrQDkMPWDPRsEkjD0hYAfKOsFGQ5k1wI3VLWkl8g4H2xPalheGnVTXB68JuFHb6GaMOxXQqd-JENcKY3Z6skpKhoMwPR2paDuiBy4kYRq4EEZ3khfXu4NruwyzNdr6HHF6JH184903tQ63qiNtWawI3twJYvi-2JTV7JK204TehiUpWrpAesFoW9DX_6CbsERfvqpQICX0kou_Qh1DStGO98UQUPsBUPsBUGUACvrqYfH34J92F6A5AD_cZHf_Fanz1Qe2F_4CzxO6jA</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Pfeiffer, Christian</creator><creator>Nguissi, Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo</creator><creator>Chytiris, Magali</creator><creator>Bidlingmeyer, Phanie</creator><creator>Haenggi, Matthias</creator><creator>Kurmann, Rebekka</creator><creator>Zubler, Frédéric</creator><creator>Accolla, Ettore</creator><creator>Viceic, Dragana</creator><creator>Rusca, Marco</creator><creator>Oddo, Mauro</creator><creator>Rossetti, Andrea O.</creator><creator>De Lucia, Marzia</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7825-7701</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8792-7885</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Somatosensory and auditory deviance detection for outcome prediction during postanoxic coma</title><author>Pfeiffer, Christian ; Nguissi, Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo ; Chytiris, Magali ; Bidlingmeyer, Phanie ; Haenggi, Matthias ; Kurmann, Rebekka ; Zubler, Frédéric ; Accolla, Ettore ; Viceic, Dragana ; Rusca, Marco ; Oddo, Mauro ; Rossetti, Andrea O. ; De Lucia, Marzia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5040-271cddddba8bb90a93f7380f9110eb23673fd23ed05dec4148a56abe91248bbd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Coma</topic><topic>Consciousness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguissi, Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chytiris, Magali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bidlingmeyer, Phanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haenggi, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurmann, Rebekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zubler, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Accolla, Ettore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viceic, Dragana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rusca, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oddo, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossetti, Andrea O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Lucia, Marzia</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Annals of clinical and translational neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pfeiffer, Christian</au><au>Nguissi, Nathalie Ata Nguepnjo</au><au>Chytiris, Magali</au><au>Bidlingmeyer, Phanie</au><au>Haenggi, Matthias</au><au>Kurmann, Rebekka</au><au>Zubler, Frédéric</au><au>Accolla, Ettore</au><au>Viceic, Dragana</au><au>Rusca, Marco</au><au>Oddo, Mauro</au><au>Rossetti, Andrea O.</au><au>De Lucia, Marzia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Somatosensory and auditory deviance detection for outcome prediction during postanoxic coma</atitle><jtitle>Annals of clinical and translational neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Clin Transl Neurol</addtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1016</spage><epage>1024</epage><pages>1016-1024</pages><issn>2328-9503</issn><eissn>2328-9503</eissn><abstract>Objective
Prominent research in patients with disorders of consciousness investigated the electrophysiological correlates of auditory deviance detection as a marker of consciousness recovery. Here, we extend previous studies by investigating whether somatosensory deviance detection provides an added value for outcome prediction in postanoxic comatose patients.
Methods
Electroencephalography responses to frequent and rare stimuli were obtained from 66 patients on the first and second day after coma onset.
Results
Multivariate decoding analysis revealed an above chance‐level auditory discrimination in 25 patients on the first day and in 31 patients on the second day. Tactile discrimination was significant in 16 patients on the first day and in 23 patients on the second day. Single‐day sensory discrimination was unrelated to patients’ outcome in both modalities. However, improvement of auditory discrimination from first to the second day was predictive of good outcome with a positive predictive power (PPV) of 0.73 (CI = 0.52–0.88). Analyses considering the improvement of tactile, auditory and tactile, or either auditory or tactile discrimination showed no significant prediction of good outcome (PPVs = 0.58–0.68).
Interpretation
Our results show that in the acute phase of coma deviance detection is largely preserved for both auditory and tactile modalities. However, we found no evidence for an added value of somatosensory to auditory deviance detection function for coma‐outcome prediction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30250859</pmid><doi>10.1002/acn3.600</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7825-7701</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8792-7885</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2328-9503 |
ispartof | Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2018-09, Vol.5 (9), p.1016-1024 |
issn | 2328-9503 2328-9503 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_883ab7d92f27461cb57813c0577dc685 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Wiley Online Library Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Coma Consciousness |
title | Somatosensory and auditory deviance detection for outcome prediction during postanoxic coma |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A17%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Somatosensory%20and%20auditory%20deviance%20detection%20for%20outcome%20prediction%20during%20postanoxic%20coma&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20clinical%20and%20translational%20neurology&rft.au=Pfeiffer,%20Christian&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1016&rft.epage=1024&rft.pages=1016-1024&rft.issn=2328-9503&rft.eissn=2328-9503&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acn3.600&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2112197324%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5040-271cddddba8bb90a93f7380f9110eb23673fd23ed05dec4148a56abe91248bbd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2108809857&rft_id=info:pmid/30250859&rfr_iscdi=true |