Loading…

iPhone-Based Cartilage Topography Scanning Yields Similar Results to Computed Tomography Scanning

To investigate the feasibility and accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D) iPhone scans using commercially available applications compared with computed tomography (CT) for mapping chondral surface topography of the knee. Ten cadaveric dysplastic trochleae, 16 patellae, and 24 distal femoral condyles (DFCs)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation, 2024-08, Vol.6 (4), p.100936, Article 100936
Main Authors: Huddleston, Hailey P., Credille, Kevin, Alzein, Mohamad M., Cregar, William M., Hevesi, Mario, Inoue, Nozomu, Yanke, Adam B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To investigate the feasibility and accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D) iPhone scans using commercially available applications compared with computed tomography (CT) for mapping chondral surface topography of the knee. Ten cadaveric dysplastic trochleae, 16 patellae, and 24 distal femoral condyles (DFCs) underwent CT scans and 3D scans using 3 separate optical scanning applications on an iPhone X. The 3D surface models were compared by measuring surface-to-surface least distance distribution of overlapped models using a validated 3D-3D registration volume merge method. The absolute least mean square distances for the iPhone-generated models from each scanning application were calculated in comparison to CT models using a point-to-surface distance algorithm allowing regional “inside/outside” measurement of the absolute distance between models. Only 1 of the 3 scanning applications created models usable for quantitative analysis. Overall, there was a median absolute least mean square distance between the usable model and CT-generated models of 0.18 mm. The trochlea group had a significantly lower median absolute least mean square distance compared with the DFC group (0.14 mm [interquartile range, 0.13-0.17] vs 0.19 mm [0.17-0.25], P = .002). iPhone models were smaller compared with CT models (negative signed distances) for all trochleae, 83% of DFCs, and 69% of patellae. In this study, we found minimal differences between a 3D iPhone scanning application and conventional CT scanning when analyzing surface topography. Emerging 3D iPhone scanning technology can create accurate, inexpensive, real-time 3D models of the intended target. Surface topography evaluation may be useful in graft selection during surgical procedures such as osteochondral allograft transplantation.
ISSN:2666-061X
2666-061X
DOI:10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100936