Loading…

Cosmesis and body image after single-port laparoscopic or conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double blinded randomised controlled trial (SPOCC-trial)

Emerging attempts have been made to reduce operative trauma and improve cosmetic results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There is a trend towards minimizing the number of incisions such as natural transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC). Many retr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC surgery 2011-09, Vol.11 (1), p.24-24, Article 24
Main Authors: Steinemann, Daniel C, Raptis, Dimitri A, Lurje, Georg, Oberkofler, Christian E, Wyss, Roland, Zehnder, Adrian, Lesurtel, Mickael, Vonlanthen, René, Clavien, Pierre-Alain, Breitenstein, Stefan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b611t-fa6030a5559c36492b85ee0a22b4edd822314ee2044632c8614b7d2c9a274703
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b611t-fa6030a5559c36492b85ee0a22b4edd822314ee2044632c8614b7d2c9a274703
container_end_page 24
container_issue 1
container_start_page 24
container_title BMC surgery
container_volume 11
creator Steinemann, Daniel C
Raptis, Dimitri A
Lurje, Georg
Oberkofler, Christian E
Wyss, Roland
Zehnder, Adrian
Lesurtel, Mickael
Vonlanthen, René
Clavien, Pierre-Alain
Breitenstein, Stefan
description Emerging attempts have been made to reduce operative trauma and improve cosmetic results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There is a trend towards minimizing the number of incisions such as natural transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC). Many retrospective case series propose excellent cosmesis and reduced pain in SPLC. As the latter has been confirmed in a randomized controlled trial, patient's satisfaction on cosmesis is still controversially debated. The SPOCC trial is a prospective, multi-center, double blinded, randomized controlled study comparing SPLC with 4-port conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4PLC) in elective surgery. The hypothesis and primary objective is that patients undergoing SPLC will have a better outcome in cosmesis and body image 12 weeks after surgery. This primary endpoint is assessed using a validated 8-item multiple choice type questionnaire on cosmesis and body image. The secondary endpoint has three entities: the quality of life 12 weeks after surgery assessed by the validated Short-Form-36 Health Survey questionnaire, postoperative pain assessed by a visual analogue scale and the use of analgesics. Operative time, surgeon's experience with SPLC and 4PLC, use of additional ports, conversion to 4PLC or open cholecystectomy, length of stay, costs, time of work as well as intra- and postoperative complications are further aspects of the secondary endpoint. Patients are randomly assigned either to SPLC or to 4PLC. Patients as well as treating physicians, nurses and assessors are blinded until the 7th postoperative day. Sample size calculation performed by estimating a difference of cosmesis of 20% (alpha = 0.05 and beta = 0.90, drop out rate of 10%) resulted in a number of 55 randomized patients per arm. The SPOCC-trial is a prospective, multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled study to assess cosmesis and body image after SPLC. (clinicaltrial.gov): NCT 01278472.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1471-2482-11-24
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_88fa4ba3b12d44bf81e85e171b810de9</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A269084873</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_88fa4ba3b12d44bf81e85e171b810de9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A269084873</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b611t-fa6030a5559c36492b85ee0a22b4edd822314ee2044632c8614b7d2c9a274703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kktv1DAQxyMEoqVw5oYsOACHtLbjTRwOSGXFo1KlItG75cdk68rJbO2k0n4mviROt6y6qCiHcWb-_o3nURSvGT1mTNYnTDSs5ELyks32SXG48zx9cD4oXqR0TSlr5GLxvDjgrGVUts1h8XuJqYfkE9GDIwbdhvher4DoboRIkh9WAco1xpEEvdYRk8W1twQjsTjcwjB6HHTYD9orDGA3aQQ7Yr_5RDTppzB6m-UZ6nAyAYgJfnDgSMyZsfcpHzNyjBhCPo7RZ-yHXz8vlsvy7ufjy-JZp0OCV_f2qLj89vVy-aM8v_h-tjw9L03N2Fh2uqYV1YvForVVLVpu5AKAas6NAOck5xUTAJwKUVfcypoJ0zhuW80b0dDqqDjbYh3qa7WOuR9xo1B7defAuFI65mICKCk7LYyuDONOCNNJBjkXa5iRjDpoM-vzlrWeTA9ubkDUYQ-6Hxn8lVrhraqYbKt2fsyXLcB4_A9gP2KxV_Pc1Tx3xWabIe_vXxHxZoI0qtxuCyHoAXBKKm-CZJy2s_LtP8prnGIecFIt5ZxKWVVZ9G4rWuncAz90mDPbGalOed1SKWQzq44fUeXPQe_zoKHz2b934WR7weZFShG6XZWMqnnbH6nrzcPu7vR_17v6AwIw_O0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902208833</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cosmesis and body image after single-port laparoscopic or conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double blinded randomised controlled trial (SPOCC-trial)</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Steinemann, Daniel C ; Raptis, Dimitri A ; Lurje, Georg ; Oberkofler, Christian E ; Wyss, Roland ; Zehnder, Adrian ; Lesurtel, Mickael ; Vonlanthen, René ; Clavien, Pierre-Alain ; Breitenstein, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Steinemann, Daniel C ; Raptis, Dimitri A ; Lurje, Georg ; Oberkofler, Christian E ; Wyss, Roland ; Zehnder, Adrian ; Lesurtel, Mickael ; Vonlanthen, René ; Clavien, Pierre-Alain ; Breitenstein, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>Emerging attempts have been made to reduce operative trauma and improve cosmetic results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There is a trend towards minimizing the number of incisions such as natural transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC). Many retrospective case series propose excellent cosmesis and reduced pain in SPLC. As the latter has been confirmed in a randomized controlled trial, patient's satisfaction on cosmesis is still controversially debated. The SPOCC trial is a prospective, multi-center, double blinded, randomized controlled study comparing SPLC with 4-port conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4PLC) in elective surgery. The hypothesis and primary objective is that patients undergoing SPLC will have a better outcome in cosmesis and body image 12 weeks after surgery. This primary endpoint is assessed using a validated 8-item multiple choice type questionnaire on cosmesis and body image. The secondary endpoint has three entities: the quality of life 12 weeks after surgery assessed by the validated Short-Form-36 Health Survey questionnaire, postoperative pain assessed by a visual analogue scale and the use of analgesics. Operative time, surgeon's experience with SPLC and 4PLC, use of additional ports, conversion to 4PLC or open cholecystectomy, length of stay, costs, time of work as well as intra- and postoperative complications are further aspects of the secondary endpoint. Patients are randomly assigned either to SPLC or to 4PLC. Patients as well as treating physicians, nurses and assessors are blinded until the 7th postoperative day. Sample size calculation performed by estimating a difference of cosmesis of 20% (alpha = 0.05 and beta = 0.90, drop out rate of 10%) resulted in a number of 55 randomized patients per arm. The SPOCC-trial is a prospective, multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled study to assess cosmesis and body image after SPLC. (clinicaltrial.gov): NCT 01278472.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2482</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2482</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-11-24</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21910897</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Body Image ; Care and treatment ; Cholecystectomy ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods ; Cholecystolithiasis - surgery ; Clinical trials ; Design ; Double-Blind Method ; Elective Surgical Procedures - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gallbladder diseases ; Health aspects ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Laparoscopic surgery ; Laparoscopy ; Liver cirrhosis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain ; Patient Satisfaction ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of life ; Questionnaires ; Risk factors ; Self image ; Standard deviation ; Study Protocol ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>BMC surgery, 2011-09, Vol.11 (1), p.24-24, Article 24</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2011 Steinemann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright ©2011 Steinemann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011 Steinemann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b611t-fa6030a5559c36492b85ee0a22b4edd822314ee2044632c8614b7d2c9a274703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b611t-fa6030a5559c36492b85ee0a22b4edd822314ee2044632c8614b7d2c9a274703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3189390/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/902208833?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21910897$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steinemann, Daniel C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raptis, Dimitri A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lurje, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oberkofler, Christian E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyss, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zehnder, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lesurtel, Mickael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vonlanthen, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clavien, Pierre-Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breitenstein, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>Cosmesis and body image after single-port laparoscopic or conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double blinded randomised controlled trial (SPOCC-trial)</title><title>BMC surgery</title><addtitle>BMC Surg</addtitle><description>Emerging attempts have been made to reduce operative trauma and improve cosmetic results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There is a trend towards minimizing the number of incisions such as natural transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC). Many retrospective case series propose excellent cosmesis and reduced pain in SPLC. As the latter has been confirmed in a randomized controlled trial, patient's satisfaction on cosmesis is still controversially debated. The SPOCC trial is a prospective, multi-center, double blinded, randomized controlled study comparing SPLC with 4-port conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4PLC) in elective surgery. The hypothesis and primary objective is that patients undergoing SPLC will have a better outcome in cosmesis and body image 12 weeks after surgery. This primary endpoint is assessed using a validated 8-item multiple choice type questionnaire on cosmesis and body image. The secondary endpoint has three entities: the quality of life 12 weeks after surgery assessed by the validated Short-Form-36 Health Survey questionnaire, postoperative pain assessed by a visual analogue scale and the use of analgesics. Operative time, surgeon's experience with SPLC and 4PLC, use of additional ports, conversion to 4PLC or open cholecystectomy, length of stay, costs, time of work as well as intra- and postoperative complications are further aspects of the secondary endpoint. Patients are randomly assigned either to SPLC or to 4PLC. Patients as well as treating physicians, nurses and assessors are blinded until the 7th postoperative day. Sample size calculation performed by estimating a difference of cosmesis of 20% (alpha = 0.05 and beta = 0.90, drop out rate of 10%) resulted in a number of 55 randomized patients per arm. The SPOCC-trial is a prospective, multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled study to assess cosmesis and body image after SPLC. (clinicaltrial.gov): NCT 01278472.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Body Image</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</subject><subject>Cholecystolithiasis - surgery</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gallbladder diseases</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopic surgery</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Liver cirrhosis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Self image</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Study Protocol</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1471-2482</issn><issn>1471-2482</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kktv1DAQxyMEoqVw5oYsOACHtLbjTRwOSGXFo1KlItG75cdk68rJbO2k0n4mviROt6y6qCiHcWb-_o3nURSvGT1mTNYnTDSs5ELyks32SXG48zx9cD4oXqR0TSlr5GLxvDjgrGVUts1h8XuJqYfkE9GDIwbdhvher4DoboRIkh9WAco1xpEEvdYRk8W1twQjsTjcwjB6HHTYD9orDGA3aQQ7Yr_5RDTppzB6m-UZ6nAyAYgJfnDgSMyZsfcpHzNyjBhCPo7RZ-yHXz8vlsvy7ufjy-JZp0OCV_f2qLj89vVy-aM8v_h-tjw9L03N2Fh2uqYV1YvForVVLVpu5AKAas6NAOck5xUTAJwKUVfcypoJ0zhuW80b0dDqqDjbYh3qa7WOuR9xo1B7defAuFI65mICKCk7LYyuDONOCNNJBjkXa5iRjDpoM-vzlrWeTA9ubkDUYQ-6Hxn8lVrhraqYbKt2fsyXLcB4_A9gP2KxV_Pc1Tx3xWabIe_vXxHxZoI0qtxuCyHoAXBKKm-CZJy2s_LtP8prnGIecFIt5ZxKWVVZ9G4rWuncAz90mDPbGalOed1SKWQzq44fUeXPQe_zoKHz2b934WR7weZFShG6XZWMqnnbH6nrzcPu7vR_17v6AwIw_O0</recordid><startdate>20110912</startdate><enddate>20110912</enddate><creator>Steinemann, Daniel C</creator><creator>Raptis, Dimitri A</creator><creator>Lurje, Georg</creator><creator>Oberkofler, Christian E</creator><creator>Wyss, Roland</creator><creator>Zehnder, Adrian</creator><creator>Lesurtel, Mickael</creator><creator>Vonlanthen, René</creator><creator>Clavien, Pierre-Alain</creator><creator>Breitenstein, Stefan</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110912</creationdate><title>Cosmesis and body image after single-port laparoscopic or conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double blinded randomised controlled trial (SPOCC-trial)</title><author>Steinemann, Daniel C ; Raptis, Dimitri A ; Lurje, Georg ; Oberkofler, Christian E ; Wyss, Roland ; Zehnder, Adrian ; Lesurtel, Mickael ; Vonlanthen, René ; Clavien, Pierre-Alain ; Breitenstein, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b611t-fa6030a5559c36492b85ee0a22b4edd822314ee2044632c8614b7d2c9a274703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Body Image</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</topic><topic>Cholecystolithiasis - surgery</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gallbladder diseases</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopic surgery</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Liver cirrhosis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Self image</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Study Protocol</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steinemann, Daniel C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raptis, Dimitri A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lurje, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oberkofler, Christian E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyss, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zehnder, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lesurtel, Mickael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vonlanthen, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clavien, Pierre-Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breitenstein, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steinemann, Daniel C</au><au>Raptis, Dimitri A</au><au>Lurje, Georg</au><au>Oberkofler, Christian E</au><au>Wyss, Roland</au><au>Zehnder, Adrian</au><au>Lesurtel, Mickael</au><au>Vonlanthen, René</au><au>Clavien, Pierre-Alain</au><au>Breitenstein, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cosmesis and body image after single-port laparoscopic or conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double blinded randomised controlled trial (SPOCC-trial)</atitle><jtitle>BMC surgery</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Surg</addtitle><date>2011-09-12</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>24-24</pages><artnum>24</artnum><issn>1471-2482</issn><eissn>1471-2482</eissn><abstract>Emerging attempts have been made to reduce operative trauma and improve cosmetic results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There is a trend towards minimizing the number of incisions such as natural transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC). Many retrospective case series propose excellent cosmesis and reduced pain in SPLC. As the latter has been confirmed in a randomized controlled trial, patient's satisfaction on cosmesis is still controversially debated. The SPOCC trial is a prospective, multi-center, double blinded, randomized controlled study comparing SPLC with 4-port conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4PLC) in elective surgery. The hypothesis and primary objective is that patients undergoing SPLC will have a better outcome in cosmesis and body image 12 weeks after surgery. This primary endpoint is assessed using a validated 8-item multiple choice type questionnaire on cosmesis and body image. The secondary endpoint has three entities: the quality of life 12 weeks after surgery assessed by the validated Short-Form-36 Health Survey questionnaire, postoperative pain assessed by a visual analogue scale and the use of analgesics. Operative time, surgeon's experience with SPLC and 4PLC, use of additional ports, conversion to 4PLC or open cholecystectomy, length of stay, costs, time of work as well as intra- and postoperative complications are further aspects of the secondary endpoint. Patients are randomly assigned either to SPLC or to 4PLC. Patients as well as treating physicians, nurses and assessors are blinded until the 7th postoperative day. Sample size calculation performed by estimating a difference of cosmesis of 20% (alpha = 0.05 and beta = 0.90, drop out rate of 10%) resulted in a number of 55 randomized patients per arm. The SPOCC-trial is a prospective, multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled study to assess cosmesis and body image after SPLC. (clinicaltrial.gov): NCT 01278472.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>21910897</pmid><doi>10.1186/1471-2482-11-24</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2482
ispartof BMC surgery, 2011-09, Vol.11 (1), p.24-24, Article 24
issn 1471-2482
1471-2482
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_88fa4ba3b12d44bf81e85e171b810de9
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Aged
Body Image
Care and treatment
Cholecystectomy
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods
Cholecystolithiasis - surgery
Clinical trials
Design
Double-Blind Method
Elective Surgical Procedures - methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gallbladder diseases
Health aspects
Hospitals
Humans
Laparoscopic surgery
Laparoscopy
Liver cirrhosis
Male
Middle Aged
Pain
Patient Satisfaction
Prospective Studies
Quality of life
Questionnaires
Risk factors
Self image
Standard deviation
Study Protocol
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
title Cosmesis and body image after single-port laparoscopic or conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double blinded randomised controlled trial (SPOCC-trial)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A41%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cosmesis%20and%20body%20image%20after%20single-port%20laparoscopic%20or%20conventional%20laparoscopic%20cholecystectomy:%20a%20multicenter%20double%20blinded%20randomised%20controlled%20trial%20(SPOCC-trial)&rft.jtitle=BMC%20surgery&rft.au=Steinemann,%20Daniel%20C&rft.date=2011-09-12&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=24-24&rft.artnum=24&rft.issn=1471-2482&rft.eissn=1471-2482&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1471-2482-11-24&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA269084873%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b611t-fa6030a5559c36492b85ee0a22b4edd822314ee2044632c8614b7d2c9a274703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902208833&rft_id=info:pmid/21910897&rft_galeid=A269084873&rfr_iscdi=true