Comparison of Flexible Laryngeal Mask Insertion and Endotracheal Intubation in Adenotonsillectomy Surgery

This study compared the effectiveness of flexible laryngeal mask (F-LMA) insertion and endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy surgery. A total of 60 patients aged 2-12 years were included in the study. Patients were divided into the F-LMA group (n=30) and endotra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta clinica Croatica (Tisak) 2022-01, Vol.61 (4), p.613-619
Main Author: Duran, Mehmet
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adenotonsillectomy
Airway pressure
Endotracheal tube
Flexible laryngeal mask airway
Operative field of view
Original Scientific Papers
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 619
container_issue 4
container_start_page 613
container_title Acta clinica Croatica (Tisak)
container_volume 61
creator Duran, Mehmet
description This study compared the effectiveness of flexible laryngeal mask (F-LMA) insertion and endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy surgery. A total of 60 patients aged 2-12 years were included in the study. Patients were divided into the F-LMA group (n=30) and endotracheal tube (ETT) group (n=30). The groups were compared according to intubation time, heart rate, SpO2, EtCO2, airway pressure, surgical field of view, and recovery time. Both the insertion time and recovery time were shorter in the F-LMA group than in the ETT group (16.93±4.84 s vs. 23.93±8.74 s; and 10±2 min vs. 14.5±3 min; p
doi_str_mv 10.20471/acc.2022.61.04.07
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_891a24036a6a42c4b6cc6fda20c144d1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_891a24036a6a42c4b6cc6fda20c144d1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2880824771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-c0e9b5a823e7143f4bf839bec60822f5aedf46e7bce70011316c06987a168b5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU-P0zAQxS0EEmXhC3DKkUuL_8VOTmhV7UKlIg7A2Ro7k64Xxy52gui3x21XSHuaGb_Rb_z0CHnP6IZTqdlHcK52nG8U21C5ofoFWTEhxLqXLXtJVlS0516p1-RNKY-0zqxtV8Rv03SE7EuKTRqb-4B_vQ3Y7CGf4gEhNF-h_Gp2sWCefV2CODR3cUhzBvdw1ndxXixcNB-b2wFjmlMsPgR0c5pOzfclHzCf3pJXI4SC757qDfl5f_dj-2W9__Z5t73dr53o9bx2FHvbQscFaibFKO3Yid6iU7TjfGwBh1Eq1NahppQxwZSjqu80MNXZ1okbsrtyhwSP5pj9VK2YBN5cHlI-GKhWXEDT9Qy4pEKBAsmdtMo5NQ7AqWNSDqyyPl1Zx8VOODiM1XZ4Bn2uRP9gDumPYbTt6rdVJXx4IuT0e8Eym8kXhyFAxLQUw7uu-pJan4_x66rLqZSM4_87jJpLyqambM4pG8UMlYZq8Q9zep3o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2880824771</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Flexible Laryngeal Mask Insertion and Endotracheal Intubation in Adenotonsillectomy Surgery</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Duran, Mehmet</creator><creatorcontrib>Duran, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><description>This study compared the effectiveness of flexible laryngeal mask (F-LMA) insertion and endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy surgery. A total of 60 patients aged 2-12 years were included in the study. Patients were divided into the F-LMA group (n=30) and endotracheal tube (ETT) group (n=30). The groups were compared according to intubation time, heart rate, SpO2, EtCO2, airway pressure, surgical field of view, and recovery time. Both the insertion time and recovery time were shorter in the F-LMA group than in the ETT group (16.93±4.84 s vs. 23.93±8.74 s; and 10±2 min vs. 14.5±3 min; p&lt;0.001 both). The airway pressure measurements at 5-min intervals were significantly lower in the F-LMA group than in the ETT group (p&lt;0.001). F-LMA may be a useful alternative to ETT for adenotonsillectomy surgery because it is safe, provides shorter induction and recovery times, reduces intraoperative airway pressure, and provides an adequate operative field of view.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0353-9466</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1333-9451</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.20471/acc.2022.61.04.07</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb</publisher><subject>Adenotonsillectomy ; Airway pressure ; Endotracheal tube ; Flexible laryngeal mask airway ; Operative field of view ; Original Scientific Papers</subject><ispartof>Acta clinica Croatica (Tisak), 2022-01, Vol.61 (4), p.613-619</ispartof><rights>Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital 2022 Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588396/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588396/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duran, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Flexible Laryngeal Mask Insertion and Endotracheal Intubation in Adenotonsillectomy Surgery</title><title>Acta clinica Croatica (Tisak)</title><description>This study compared the effectiveness of flexible laryngeal mask (F-LMA) insertion and endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy surgery. A total of 60 patients aged 2-12 years were included in the study. Patients were divided into the F-LMA group (n=30) and endotracheal tube (ETT) group (n=30). The groups were compared according to intubation time, heart rate, SpO2, EtCO2, airway pressure, surgical field of view, and recovery time. Both the insertion time and recovery time were shorter in the F-LMA group than in the ETT group (16.93±4.84 s vs. 23.93±8.74 s; and 10±2 min vs. 14.5±3 min; p&lt;0.001 both). The airway pressure measurements at 5-min intervals were significantly lower in the F-LMA group than in the ETT group (p&lt;0.001). F-LMA may be a useful alternative to ETT for adenotonsillectomy surgery because it is safe, provides shorter induction and recovery times, reduces intraoperative airway pressure, and provides an adequate operative field of view.</description><subject>Adenotonsillectomy</subject><subject>Airway pressure</subject><subject>Endotracheal tube</subject><subject>Flexible laryngeal mask airway</subject><subject>Operative field of view</subject><subject>Original Scientific Papers</subject><issn>0353-9466</issn><issn>1333-9451</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU-P0zAQxS0EEmXhC3DKkUuL_8VOTmhV7UKlIg7A2Ro7k64Xxy52gui3x21XSHuaGb_Rb_z0CHnP6IZTqdlHcK52nG8U21C5ofoFWTEhxLqXLXtJVlS0516p1-RNKY-0zqxtV8Rv03SE7EuKTRqb-4B_vQ3Y7CGf4gEhNF-h_Gp2sWCefV2CODR3cUhzBvdw1ndxXixcNB-b2wFjmlMsPgR0c5pOzfclHzCf3pJXI4SC757qDfl5f_dj-2W9__Z5t73dr53o9bx2FHvbQscFaibFKO3Yid6iU7TjfGwBh1Eq1NahppQxwZSjqu80MNXZ1okbsrtyhwSP5pj9VK2YBN5cHlI-GKhWXEDT9Qy4pEKBAsmdtMo5NQ7AqWNSDqyyPl1Zx8VOODiM1XZ4Bn2uRP9gDumPYbTt6rdVJXx4IuT0e8Eym8kXhyFAxLQUw7uu-pJan4_x66rLqZSM4_87jJpLyqambM4pG8UMlYZq8Q9zep3o</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Duran, Mehmet</creator><general>Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb</general><general>Sestre Milosrdnice University hospital, Institute of Clinical Medical Research</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Comparison of Flexible Laryngeal Mask Insertion and Endotracheal Intubation in Adenotonsillectomy Surgery</title><author>Duran, Mehmet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-c0e9b5a823e7143f4bf839bec60822f5aedf46e7bce70011316c06987a168b5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adenotonsillectomy</topic><topic>Airway pressure</topic><topic>Endotracheal tube</topic><topic>Flexible laryngeal mask airway</topic><topic>Operative field of view</topic><topic>Original Scientific Papers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duran, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Acta clinica Croatica (Tisak)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duran, Mehmet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Flexible Laryngeal Mask Insertion and Endotracheal Intubation in Adenotonsillectomy Surgery</atitle><jtitle>Acta clinica Croatica (Tisak)</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>613</spage><epage>619</epage><pages>613-619</pages><issn>0353-9466</issn><eissn>1333-9451</eissn><abstract>This study compared the effectiveness of flexible laryngeal mask (F-LMA) insertion and endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy surgery. A total of 60 patients aged 2-12 years were included in the study. Patients were divided into the F-LMA group (n=30) and endotracheal tube (ETT) group (n=30). The groups were compared according to intubation time, heart rate, SpO2, EtCO2, airway pressure, surgical field of view, and recovery time. Both the insertion time and recovery time were shorter in the F-LMA group than in the ETT group (16.93±4.84 s vs. 23.93±8.74 s; and 10±2 min vs. 14.5±3 min; p&lt;0.001 both). The airway pressure measurements at 5-min intervals were significantly lower in the F-LMA group than in the ETT group (p&lt;0.001). F-LMA may be a useful alternative to ETT for adenotonsillectomy surgery because it is safe, provides shorter induction and recovery times, reduces intraoperative airway pressure, and provides an adequate operative field of view.</abstract><pub>Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb</pub><doi>10.20471/acc.2022.61.04.07</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0353-9466
ispartof Acta clinica Croatica (Tisak), 2022-01, Vol.61 (4), p.613-619
issn 0353-9466
1333-9451
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_891a24036a6a42c4b6cc6fda20c144d1
source PubMed Central
subjects Adenotonsillectomy
Airway pressure
Endotracheal tube
Flexible laryngeal mask airway
Operative field of view
Original Scientific Papers
title Comparison of Flexible Laryngeal Mask Insertion and Endotracheal Intubation in Adenotonsillectomy Surgery
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-10T00%3A30%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Flexible%20Laryngeal%20Mask%20Insertion%20and%20Endotracheal%20Intubation%20in%20Adenotonsillectomy%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=Acta%20clinica%20Croatica%20(Tisak)&rft.au=Duran,%20Mehmet&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=613&rft.epage=619&rft.pages=613-619&rft.issn=0353-9466&rft.eissn=1333-9451&rft_id=info:doi/10.20471/acc.2022.61.04.07&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2880824771%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-c0e9b5a823e7143f4bf839bec60822f5aedf46e7bce70011316c06987a168b5c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2880824771&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true