Loading…
Working mothers during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study on mental health status and associations with the receipt of employment benefits
Beyond the sweeping physiological effects of COVID-19 infections in 2020 and 2021, the psychosocial impacts of lockdowns, social distancing, and the associated disruptions to daily life have brought on a simultaneous mental health crisis, particularly among many working mothers who are disproportion...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC public health 2022-03, Vol.22 (1), p.435-15, Article 435 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-7ad04b8a6aac46e91733438dff248809f4e21f483095289b8c15368f4edbc7b03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-7ad04b8a6aac46e91733438dff248809f4e21f483095289b8c15368f4edbc7b03 |
container_end_page | 15 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 435 |
container_title | BMC public health |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Kirwin, Melissa A Ettinger, Anna K |
description | Beyond the sweeping physiological effects of COVID-19 infections in 2020 and 2021, the psychosocial impacts of lockdowns, social distancing, and the associated disruptions to daily life have brought on a simultaneous mental health crisis, particularly among many working mothers who are disproportionately balancing childcare, virtual schooling, and employment vulnerability. The aim of this study was to measure the mental health status of working mothers in the United States and associations with the provision of family-friendly employment benefits one year into the pandemic.
Cross-sectional data were collected from a sample of working mothers in the U.S. using an online survey of mental health status and the receipt of employer-provided family-friendly benefits. Mental health was measured with the Kessler 6 (K-6) and the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS). Perceived helpfulness of benefits was assessed through self-reported Likert-scale scores of 0 (not at all helpful) to 4 (extremely helpful) to determine mean helpfulness scores for benefit types. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine associations between receipt of employment benefits and serious mental illness (SMI).
A total of 728 participants met the study criteria, 83.7% were non-Hispanic/Latino white and 61.1% were 35-44 years of age. Among study participants, 54.3% (n = 395) and 21.8% (n = 159) reported psychological distress levels associated with moderate mental illness (MMI) and serious mental illness (SMI), respectively. Not receiving benefits was associated with a 50% increase in odds of SMI (aOR = 1.50, 95% CI [1.03-2.20], p = 0.036). Benefits perceived to be the most helpful for participants were flexible hours/schedule (3.5; SD ± 0.9), flexible work location (3.3; SD ± 1.1), and supplemental paid time off (3.1; SD ± 1.1), with mean scores above very helpful.
Results suggest employment benefits may help support the mental health of working mothers and provide a call to action to employers and policy stakeholders to develop solutions addressing gaps in workplace benefits and mental health support for working parents, with sustainable reform in mind to mitigate employment benefit inequities exposed by the pandemic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12889-021-12468-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_894ff2aa04b44335bdebfea8562f849e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A699500369</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_894ff2aa04b44335bdebfea8562f849e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A699500369</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-7ad04b8a6aac46e91733438dff248809f4e21f483095289b8c15368f4edbc7b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkstu1DAUhiMEoqXwAiyQJTbdpPiWjM0CqRpuI1XqhsvSOnFOZlySeLAd0PQNeGucmVJ1JJSF4-P__3xs_0XxktELxlT9JjKulC4pZyXjslbl7aPilMkFK7ms1OMH_yfFsxhvKGULVfGnxYmosp5qcVr8-e7DDzeuyeDTBkMk7RTm6fL62-p9yfRbAsQGH2MZ0SbnR-hJTFO7I34kA44pzzcIfdrkMqQpEhhbAjF662DWR_Lb5cUMJwEtum0iviM4bHu_m_2kwRE7l-Lz4kkHfcQXd-NZ8fXjhy_Lz-XV9afV8vKqtJWoUrmAlspGQQ1gZY2aLYSQQrVdx6VSVHcSOeukElRXXOlGWVaJWuVy29hFQ8VZsTpwWw83ZhvcAGFnPDizL_iwNhCSsz0apWXGAuQNpRSialpsOgRV1bxTUmNmvTuwtlMzYGvzeQL0R9DjldFtzNr_MvndclcsA87vAMH_nDAmM7hose9hRD9Fw-uskkKzWfr6IF1Dbs2Nnc9EO8vNZa11RamodVZd_EeVvxYHZ_181bl-ZOAHw_6VA3b33TNq5piZQ8xMjpnZx8zcZtOrh-e-t_zLlfgLgxjPuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2636143911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Working mothers during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study on mental health status and associations with the receipt of employment benefits</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Kirwin, Melissa A ; Ettinger, Anna K</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirwin, Melissa A ; Ettinger, Anna K</creatorcontrib><description>Beyond the sweeping physiological effects of COVID-19 infections in 2020 and 2021, the psychosocial impacts of lockdowns, social distancing, and the associated disruptions to daily life have brought on a simultaneous mental health crisis, particularly among many working mothers who are disproportionately balancing childcare, virtual schooling, and employment vulnerability. The aim of this study was to measure the mental health status of working mothers in the United States and associations with the provision of family-friendly employment benefits one year into the pandemic.
Cross-sectional data were collected from a sample of working mothers in the U.S. using an online survey of mental health status and the receipt of employer-provided family-friendly benefits. Mental health was measured with the Kessler 6 (K-6) and the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS). Perceived helpfulness of benefits was assessed through self-reported Likert-scale scores of 0 (not at all helpful) to 4 (extremely helpful) to determine mean helpfulness scores for benefit types. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine associations between receipt of employment benefits and serious mental illness (SMI).
A total of 728 participants met the study criteria, 83.7% were non-Hispanic/Latino white and 61.1% were 35-44 years of age. Among study participants, 54.3% (n = 395) and 21.8% (n = 159) reported psychological distress levels associated with moderate mental illness (MMI) and serious mental illness (SMI), respectively. Not receiving benefits was associated with a 50% increase in odds of SMI (aOR = 1.50, 95% CI [1.03-2.20], p = 0.036). Benefits perceived to be the most helpful for participants were flexible hours/schedule (3.5; SD ± 0.9), flexible work location (3.3; SD ± 1.1), and supplemental paid time off (3.1; SD ± 1.1), with mean scores above very helpful.
Results suggest employment benefits may help support the mental health of working mothers and provide a call to action to employers and policy stakeholders to develop solutions addressing gaps in workplace benefits and mental health support for working parents, with sustainable reform in mind to mitigate employment benefit inequities exposed by the pandemic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12468-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35246093</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Communicable Disease Control ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Employee benefits ; Employment ; Employment benefits ; Epidemics ; Family friendly benefits ; Female ; Health aspects ; Health Status ; Humans ; Kessler 6 Psychological Distress Scale (K6) ; Mental health ; Mothers - psychology ; Psychiatric services ; Psychological aspects ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Social aspects ; United States ; Working mothers</subject><ispartof>BMC public health, 2022-03, Vol.22 (1), p.435-15, Article 435</ispartof><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-7ad04b8a6aac46e91733438dff248809f4e21f483095289b8c15368f4edbc7b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-7ad04b8a6aac46e91733438dff248809f4e21f483095289b8c15368f4edbc7b03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8895361/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8895361/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,37011,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246093$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirwin, Melissa A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ettinger, Anna K</creatorcontrib><title>Working mothers during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study on mental health status and associations with the receipt of employment benefits</title><title>BMC public health</title><addtitle>BMC Public Health</addtitle><description>Beyond the sweeping physiological effects of COVID-19 infections in 2020 and 2021, the psychosocial impacts of lockdowns, social distancing, and the associated disruptions to daily life have brought on a simultaneous mental health crisis, particularly among many working mothers who are disproportionately balancing childcare, virtual schooling, and employment vulnerability. The aim of this study was to measure the mental health status of working mothers in the United States and associations with the provision of family-friendly employment benefits one year into the pandemic.
Cross-sectional data were collected from a sample of working mothers in the U.S. using an online survey of mental health status and the receipt of employer-provided family-friendly benefits. Mental health was measured with the Kessler 6 (K-6) and the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS). Perceived helpfulness of benefits was assessed through self-reported Likert-scale scores of 0 (not at all helpful) to 4 (extremely helpful) to determine mean helpfulness scores for benefit types. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine associations between receipt of employment benefits and serious mental illness (SMI).
A total of 728 participants met the study criteria, 83.7% were non-Hispanic/Latino white and 61.1% were 35-44 years of age. Among study participants, 54.3% (n = 395) and 21.8% (n = 159) reported psychological distress levels associated with moderate mental illness (MMI) and serious mental illness (SMI), respectively. Not receiving benefits was associated with a 50% increase in odds of SMI (aOR = 1.50, 95% CI [1.03-2.20], p = 0.036). Benefits perceived to be the most helpful for participants were flexible hours/schedule (3.5; SD ± 0.9), flexible work location (3.3; SD ± 1.1), and supplemental paid time off (3.1; SD ± 1.1), with mean scores above very helpful.
Results suggest employment benefits may help support the mental health of working mothers and provide a call to action to employers and policy stakeholders to develop solutions addressing gaps in workplace benefits and mental health support for working parents, with sustainable reform in mind to mitigate employment benefit inequities exposed by the pandemic.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Communicable Disease Control</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Employee benefits</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Employment benefits</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Family friendly benefits</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kessler 6 Psychological Distress Scale (K6)</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mothers - psychology</subject><subject>Psychiatric services</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Working mothers</subject><issn>1471-2458</issn><issn>1471-2458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkstu1DAUhiMEoqXwAiyQJTbdpPiWjM0CqRpuI1XqhsvSOnFOZlySeLAd0PQNeGucmVJ1JJSF4-P__3xs_0XxktELxlT9JjKulC4pZyXjslbl7aPilMkFK7ms1OMH_yfFsxhvKGULVfGnxYmosp5qcVr8-e7DDzeuyeDTBkMk7RTm6fL62-p9yfRbAsQGH2MZ0SbnR-hJTFO7I34kA44pzzcIfdrkMqQpEhhbAjF662DWR_Lb5cUMJwEtum0iviM4bHu_m_2kwRE7l-Lz4kkHfcQXd-NZ8fXjhy_Lz-XV9afV8vKqtJWoUrmAlspGQQ1gZY2aLYSQQrVdx6VSVHcSOeukElRXXOlGWVaJWuVy29hFQ8VZsTpwWw83ZhvcAGFnPDizL_iwNhCSsz0apWXGAuQNpRSialpsOgRV1bxTUmNmvTuwtlMzYGvzeQL0R9DjldFtzNr_MvndclcsA87vAMH_nDAmM7hose9hRD9Fw-uskkKzWfr6IF1Dbs2Nnc9EO8vNZa11RamodVZd_EeVvxYHZ_181bl-ZOAHw_6VA3b33TNq5piZQ8xMjpnZx8zcZtOrh-e-t_zLlfgLgxjPuQ</recordid><startdate>20220304</startdate><enddate>20220304</enddate><creator>Kirwin, Melissa A</creator><creator>Ettinger, Anna K</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220304</creationdate><title>Working mothers during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study on mental health status and associations with the receipt of employment benefits</title><author>Kirwin, Melissa A ; Ettinger, Anna K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-7ad04b8a6aac46e91733438dff248809f4e21f483095289b8c15368f4edbc7b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Communicable Disease Control</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Employee benefits</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Employment benefits</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Family friendly benefits</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kessler 6 Psychological Distress Scale (K6)</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mothers - psychology</topic><topic>Psychiatric services</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Working mothers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirwin, Melissa A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ettinger, Anna K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirwin, Melissa A</au><au>Ettinger, Anna K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Working mothers during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study on mental health status and associations with the receipt of employment benefits</atitle><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Public Health</addtitle><date>2022-03-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>435-15</pages><artnum>435</artnum><issn>1471-2458</issn><eissn>1471-2458</eissn><abstract>Beyond the sweeping physiological effects of COVID-19 infections in 2020 and 2021, the psychosocial impacts of lockdowns, social distancing, and the associated disruptions to daily life have brought on a simultaneous mental health crisis, particularly among many working mothers who are disproportionately balancing childcare, virtual schooling, and employment vulnerability. The aim of this study was to measure the mental health status of working mothers in the United States and associations with the provision of family-friendly employment benefits one year into the pandemic.
Cross-sectional data were collected from a sample of working mothers in the U.S. using an online survey of mental health status and the receipt of employer-provided family-friendly benefits. Mental health was measured with the Kessler 6 (K-6) and the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS). Perceived helpfulness of benefits was assessed through self-reported Likert-scale scores of 0 (not at all helpful) to 4 (extremely helpful) to determine mean helpfulness scores for benefit types. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine associations between receipt of employment benefits and serious mental illness (SMI).
A total of 728 participants met the study criteria, 83.7% were non-Hispanic/Latino white and 61.1% were 35-44 years of age. Among study participants, 54.3% (n = 395) and 21.8% (n = 159) reported psychological distress levels associated with moderate mental illness (MMI) and serious mental illness (SMI), respectively. Not receiving benefits was associated with a 50% increase in odds of SMI (aOR = 1.50, 95% CI [1.03-2.20], p = 0.036). Benefits perceived to be the most helpful for participants were flexible hours/schedule (3.5; SD ± 0.9), flexible work location (3.3; SD ± 1.1), and supplemental paid time off (3.1; SD ± 1.1), with mean scores above very helpful.
Results suggest employment benefits may help support the mental health of working mothers and provide a call to action to employers and policy stakeholders to develop solutions addressing gaps in workplace benefits and mental health support for working parents, with sustainable reform in mind to mitigate employment benefit inequities exposed by the pandemic.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>35246093</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12889-021-12468-z</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2458 |
ispartof | BMC public health, 2022-03, Vol.22 (1), p.435-15, Article 435 |
issn | 1471-2458 1471-2458 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_894ff2aa04b44335bdebfea8562f849e |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Analysis Communicable Disease Control COVID-19 COVID-19 - epidemiology Cross-Sectional Studies Employee benefits Employment Employment benefits Epidemics Family friendly benefits Female Health aspects Health Status Humans Kessler 6 Psychological Distress Scale (K6) Mental health Mothers - psychology Psychiatric services Psychological aspects SARS-CoV-2 Social aspects United States Working mothers |
title | Working mothers during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study on mental health status and associations with the receipt of employment benefits |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A04%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Working%20mothers%20during%20COVID-19:%20a%20cross-sectional%20study%20on%20mental%20health%20status%20and%20associations%20with%20the%20receipt%20of%20employment%20benefits&rft.jtitle=BMC%20public%20health&rft.au=Kirwin,%20Melissa%20A&rft.date=2022-03-04&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=435-15&rft.artnum=435&rft.issn=1471-2458&rft.eissn=1471-2458&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12889-021-12468-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA699500369%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-7ad04b8a6aac46e91733438dff248809f4e21f483095289b8c15368f4edbc7b03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2636143911&rft_id=info:pmid/35246093&rft_galeid=A699500369&rfr_iscdi=true |