Loading…

Effect of Glyphosate on Guineagrass Submitted to Different Soil Water Potential

The action of herbicides on weeds that develop under water deficit can be compromised, because the routes of penetration of hydrophilic herbicides are reduced due to the lower hydration of the cuticle in these plants. Moreover, hydrophobic compounds found in the epicuticular wax coating of plants un...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in Weed Science 2018-01, Vol.36
Main Authors: SILVA JR, A.C., GONÇALVES, C.G., SCARANO, M.C., PEREIRA, M.R.R., MARTINS, D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-482d075a8ac4decbae201b93cc380746bc794f2f65df27f0efa3223f41ecbc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-482d075a8ac4decbae201b93cc380746bc794f2f65df27f0efa3223f41ecbc3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Advances in Weed Science
container_volume 36
creator SILVA JR, A.C.
GONÇALVES, C.G.
SCARANO, M.C.
PEREIRA, M.R.R.
MARTINS, D.
description The action of herbicides on weeds that develop under water deficit can be compromised, because the routes of penetration of hydrophilic herbicides are reduced due to the lower hydration of the cuticle in these plants. Moreover, hydrophobic compounds found in the epicuticular wax coating of plants under water stress, hinder the penetration of hydrophilic compounds. This study evaluated the control efficiency of glyphosate on guineagrass plants when submitted to different water deficits. The study was conducted in a greenhouse, and treatments were composed of guineagrass plants submitted to three soil water conditions [low water deficit (13%), intermediate water deficit (10%) and high water restriction (8%)], three doses of glyphosate (0.0, 270.0 and 540.0 g ha-1) and two phenological stages of plant development (4-6 leaves and 1-3 tillers). The water management started when plants presented two developed leaves. Visual evaluations were performed 7, 14, 21 and 35 days after the application of the herbicide; the morpho-physiological parameters of the specific leaf area, stomatal conductance and the difference between the environment temperature and the leaf temperature on the day of the herbicide application were also analyzed at the end of the study, as well as the dry matter of shoot and root. With the increase of the water restriction, there was a decrease in the analyzed morpho-physiological parameters, as well as in the dry matter accumulation of the shoot and roots of the studied plants. Plant control was more efficient when a 540 g ha-1 dose of glyphosate was applied, and when they were controlled at their vegetative stage of 1-3 tiller, and with a water management of 13%. It is possible to state that guineagrass under water restriction have less control efficacy when treated with glyphosate. RESUMO: A ação de herbicidas sobre plantas daninhas que se desenvolvem sob déficit hídrico pode ser comprometida, pois as rotas de penetração de herbicidas hidrofílicos são reduzidas em razão da menor hidratação da cutícula nessas plantas. Além disso, compostos hidrofóbicos presentes na camada de cera epicuticular em plantas estressadas hidricamente dificultam sobremaneira a penetração de compostos hidrofílicos. Avaliou-se neste estudo a eficiência de controle do herbicida glyphosate em plantas de capim-colonião quando submetidas a distintos déficits hídricos. O estudo foi conduzido em casa de vegetação, sendo os tratamentos compostos por plantas de capim-colonião
doi_str_mv 10.1590/s0100-83582018360100121
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_89f13b020ae04c8cb1824d2904a4055b</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0100_83582018000100320</scielo_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_89f13b020ae04c8cb1824d2904a4055b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2139113024</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-482d075a8ac4decbae201b93cc380746bc794f2f65df27f0efa3223f41ecbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkVtLAzEQhYMoWC-_wYDPWyeX3U0exUstFBQq-Biy2URTtk1N0of-e1OrFZ-GGb5zOJxB6IrAmNQSbhIQgEqwWlAggjW7lVByhEZEQFPJRpBjNDpAp-gspQUAlXXTjtDzg3PWZBwcngzb9UdIOlscVniy8Sur36NOCc833dLnbHucA773RRHtKuN58AN-K3zELyGXi9fDBTpxekj28meeo_njw-vdUzV7nkzvbmeV4UzmigvaQ1troQ3vrem0LeE7yYxhAlredKaV3FHX1L2jrQPrNKOUOU4KbNg5mu5d-6AXah39UsetCtqr70OI70rH7M1glZCOsA4oaAvcCNMRQXlPJXDNoa674jXeeyXj7RDUImziqkRX811n6rdYgN3KKBTB9V6wjuFzY1P-k1DCJCEMKC9Uu6dMDClF6w4xCajd41T65394HPsChqOIDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2139113024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Glyphosate on Guineagrass Submitted to Different Soil Water Potential</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>SciELO</source><creator>SILVA JR, A.C. ; GONÇALVES, C.G. ; SCARANO, M.C. ; PEREIRA, M.R.R. ; MARTINS, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>SILVA JR, A.C. ; GONÇALVES, C.G. ; SCARANO, M.C. ; PEREIRA, M.R.R. ; MARTINS, D.</creatorcontrib><description>The action of herbicides on weeds that develop under water deficit can be compromised, because the routes of penetration of hydrophilic herbicides are reduced due to the lower hydration of the cuticle in these plants. Moreover, hydrophobic compounds found in the epicuticular wax coating of plants under water stress, hinder the penetration of hydrophilic compounds. This study evaluated the control efficiency of glyphosate on guineagrass plants when submitted to different water deficits. The study was conducted in a greenhouse, and treatments were composed of guineagrass plants submitted to three soil water conditions [low water deficit (13%), intermediate water deficit (10%) and high water restriction (8%)], three doses of glyphosate (0.0, 270.0 and 540.0 g ha-1) and two phenological stages of plant development (4-6 leaves and 1-3 tillers). The water management started when plants presented two developed leaves. Visual evaluations were performed 7, 14, 21 and 35 days after the application of the herbicide; the morpho-physiological parameters of the specific leaf area, stomatal conductance and the difference between the environment temperature and the leaf temperature on the day of the herbicide application were also analyzed at the end of the study, as well as the dry matter of shoot and root. With the increase of the water restriction, there was a decrease in the analyzed morpho-physiological parameters, as well as in the dry matter accumulation of the shoot and roots of the studied plants. Plant control was more efficient when a 540 g ha-1 dose of glyphosate was applied, and when they were controlled at their vegetative stage of 1-3 tiller, and with a water management of 13%. It is possible to state that guineagrass under water restriction have less control efficacy when treated with glyphosate. RESUMO: A ação de herbicidas sobre plantas daninhas que se desenvolvem sob déficit hídrico pode ser comprometida, pois as rotas de penetração de herbicidas hidrofílicos são reduzidas em razão da menor hidratação da cutícula nessas plantas. Além disso, compostos hidrofóbicos presentes na camada de cera epicuticular em plantas estressadas hidricamente dificultam sobremaneira a penetração de compostos hidrofílicos. Avaliou-se neste estudo a eficiência de controle do herbicida glyphosate em plantas de capim-colonião quando submetidas a distintos déficits hídricos. O estudo foi conduzido em casa de vegetação, sendo os tratamentos compostos por plantas de capim-colonião submetidas a três condições hídricas do solo [baixo déficit hídrico (13%), déficit hídrico intermediário (10%) e alta restrição hídrica (8%)], três doses do herbicida glyphosate (0,0, 270,0 e 540,0 g e.a. ha-1) e dois estádios fenológicos de desenvolvimento da planta (4-6 folhas e 1-3 perfilhos). O manejo hídrico teve início quando as plantas apresentaram duas folhas desenvolvidas. Foram realizadas avaliações visuais de controle aos 7, 14, 21 e 35 dias após a aplicação do herbicida; analisaram-se ainda os parâmetros morfofisiológicos área foliar específica, condutância estomática e a diferença de temperatura do ambiente com a temperatura foliar no dia da aplicação do herbicida, bem como a matéria seca da parte aérea e da raiz ao final do estudo. Com o aumento da restrição hídrica, houve decréscimo nos parâmetros morfofisiológicos analisados, bem como no acúmulo de matéria seca da parte aérea e das raízes das plantas estudadas. O controle das plantas foi mais eficiente quando ocorreu a aplicação da dose de 540 g ha-1 de glyphosate, quando elas foram controladas no estádio vegetativo de 1-3 perfilhos, e no manejo hídrico de 13%. Pode-se afirmar que plantas de capim-colonião sob restrição hídrica têm menor eficácia de controle quando tratadas com glyphosate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0100-8358</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1806-9681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1806-9681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2675-9462</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/s0100-83582018360100121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Jaboticabal: Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas, UFV - Depto de Fitotecnia</publisher><subject>Abiotic stress ; Agricultural production ; Conductance ; Corn ; Cuticles ; Developmental stages ; Dry matter ; Genetically altered foods ; Glyphosate ; herbicide ; Herbicides ; Hydrophobicity ; Intermediate water ; Leaf area ; Leaves ; Metabolism ; Moisture content ; Morphology ; Panicum maximum ; Parameters ; Penetration ; Physiology ; PLANT SCIENCES ; Plants ; Resistance ; Salinity ; Senescence ; Soil conditions ; Soil water ; Soil water potential ; Stomata ; Stomatal conductance ; Temperature ; Tillers ; Water deficit ; Water management ; Water potential ; Water stress ; weed</subject><ispartof>Advances in Weed Science, 2018-01, Vol.36</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-482d075a8ac4decbae201b93cc380746bc794f2f65df27f0efa3223f41ecbc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-482d075a8ac4decbae201b93cc380746bc794f2f65df27f0efa3223f41ecbc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2139113024/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2139113024?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,24129,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SILVA JR, A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GONÇALVES, C.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCARANO, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PEREIRA, M.R.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARTINS, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Glyphosate on Guineagrass Submitted to Different Soil Water Potential</title><title>Advances in Weed Science</title><addtitle>Planta daninha</addtitle><description>The action of herbicides on weeds that develop under water deficit can be compromised, because the routes of penetration of hydrophilic herbicides are reduced due to the lower hydration of the cuticle in these plants. Moreover, hydrophobic compounds found in the epicuticular wax coating of plants under water stress, hinder the penetration of hydrophilic compounds. This study evaluated the control efficiency of glyphosate on guineagrass plants when submitted to different water deficits. The study was conducted in a greenhouse, and treatments were composed of guineagrass plants submitted to three soil water conditions [low water deficit (13%), intermediate water deficit (10%) and high water restriction (8%)], three doses of glyphosate (0.0, 270.0 and 540.0 g ha-1) and two phenological stages of plant development (4-6 leaves and 1-3 tillers). The water management started when plants presented two developed leaves. Visual evaluations were performed 7, 14, 21 and 35 days after the application of the herbicide; the morpho-physiological parameters of the specific leaf area, stomatal conductance and the difference between the environment temperature and the leaf temperature on the day of the herbicide application were also analyzed at the end of the study, as well as the dry matter of shoot and root. With the increase of the water restriction, there was a decrease in the analyzed morpho-physiological parameters, as well as in the dry matter accumulation of the shoot and roots of the studied plants. Plant control was more efficient when a 540 g ha-1 dose of glyphosate was applied, and when they were controlled at their vegetative stage of 1-3 tiller, and with a water management of 13%. It is possible to state that guineagrass under water restriction have less control efficacy when treated with glyphosate. RESUMO: A ação de herbicidas sobre plantas daninhas que se desenvolvem sob déficit hídrico pode ser comprometida, pois as rotas de penetração de herbicidas hidrofílicos são reduzidas em razão da menor hidratação da cutícula nessas plantas. Além disso, compostos hidrofóbicos presentes na camada de cera epicuticular em plantas estressadas hidricamente dificultam sobremaneira a penetração de compostos hidrofílicos. Avaliou-se neste estudo a eficiência de controle do herbicida glyphosate em plantas de capim-colonião quando submetidas a distintos déficits hídricos. O estudo foi conduzido em casa de vegetação, sendo os tratamentos compostos por plantas de capim-colonião submetidas a três condições hídricas do solo [baixo déficit hídrico (13%), déficit hídrico intermediário (10%) e alta restrição hídrica (8%)], três doses do herbicida glyphosate (0,0, 270,0 e 540,0 g e.a. ha-1) e dois estádios fenológicos de desenvolvimento da planta (4-6 folhas e 1-3 perfilhos). O manejo hídrico teve início quando as plantas apresentaram duas folhas desenvolvidas. Foram realizadas avaliações visuais de controle aos 7, 14, 21 e 35 dias após a aplicação do herbicida; analisaram-se ainda os parâmetros morfofisiológicos área foliar específica, condutância estomática e a diferença de temperatura do ambiente com a temperatura foliar no dia da aplicação do herbicida, bem como a matéria seca da parte aérea e da raiz ao final do estudo. Com o aumento da restrição hídrica, houve decréscimo nos parâmetros morfofisiológicos analisados, bem como no acúmulo de matéria seca da parte aérea e das raízes das plantas estudadas. O controle das plantas foi mais eficiente quando ocorreu a aplicação da dose de 540 g ha-1 de glyphosate, quando elas foram controladas no estádio vegetativo de 1-3 perfilhos, e no manejo hídrico de 13%. Pode-se afirmar que plantas de capim-colonião sob restrição hídrica têm menor eficácia de controle quando tratadas com glyphosate.</description><subject>Abiotic stress</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Conductance</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Cuticles</subject><subject>Developmental stages</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Genetically altered foods</subject><subject>Glyphosate</subject><subject>herbicide</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Hydrophobicity</subject><subject>Intermediate water</subject><subject>Leaf area</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Panicum maximum</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Penetration</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>PLANT SCIENCES</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Senescence</subject><subject>Soil conditions</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Soil water potential</subject><subject>Stomata</subject><subject>Stomatal conductance</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Tillers</subject><subject>Water deficit</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>Water potential</subject><subject>Water stress</subject><subject>weed</subject><issn>0100-8358</issn><issn>1806-9681</issn><issn>1806-9681</issn><issn>2675-9462</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkVtLAzEQhYMoWC-_wYDPWyeX3U0exUstFBQq-Biy2URTtk1N0of-e1OrFZ-GGb5zOJxB6IrAmNQSbhIQgEqwWlAggjW7lVByhEZEQFPJRpBjNDpAp-gspQUAlXXTjtDzg3PWZBwcngzb9UdIOlscVniy8Sur36NOCc833dLnbHucA773RRHtKuN58AN-K3zELyGXi9fDBTpxekj28meeo_njw-vdUzV7nkzvbmeV4UzmigvaQ1troQ3vrem0LeE7yYxhAlredKaV3FHX1L2jrQPrNKOUOU4KbNg5mu5d-6AXah39UsetCtqr70OI70rH7M1glZCOsA4oaAvcCNMRQXlPJXDNoa674jXeeyXj7RDUImziqkRX811n6rdYgN3KKBTB9V6wjuFzY1P-k1DCJCEMKC9Uu6dMDClF6w4xCajd41T65394HPsChqOIDA</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>SILVA JR, A.C.</creator><creator>GONÇALVES, C.G.</creator><creator>SCARANO, M.C.</creator><creator>PEREIRA, M.R.R.</creator><creator>MARTINS, D.</creator><general>Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas, UFV - Depto de Fitotecnia</general><general>Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Effect of Glyphosate on Guineagrass Submitted to Different Soil Water Potential</title><author>SILVA JR, A.C. ; GONÇALVES, C.G. ; SCARANO, M.C. ; PEREIRA, M.R.R. ; MARTINS, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-482d075a8ac4decbae201b93cc380746bc794f2f65df27f0efa3223f41ecbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abiotic stress</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Conductance</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Cuticles</topic><topic>Developmental stages</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Genetically altered foods</topic><topic>Glyphosate</topic><topic>herbicide</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Hydrophobicity</topic><topic>Intermediate water</topic><topic>Leaf area</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Panicum maximum</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Penetration</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>PLANT SCIENCES</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Senescence</topic><topic>Soil conditions</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Soil water potential</topic><topic>Stomata</topic><topic>Stomatal conductance</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Tillers</topic><topic>Water deficit</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>Water potential</topic><topic>Water stress</topic><topic>weed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SILVA JR, A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GONÇALVES, C.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCARANO, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PEREIRA, M.R.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARTINS, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Advances in Weed Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SILVA JR, A.C.</au><au>GONÇALVES, C.G.</au><au>SCARANO, M.C.</au><au>PEREIRA, M.R.R.</au><au>MARTINS, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Glyphosate on Guineagrass Submitted to Different Soil Water Potential</atitle><jtitle>Advances in Weed Science</jtitle><addtitle>Planta daninha</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>36</volume><issn>0100-8358</issn><issn>1806-9681</issn><eissn>1806-9681</eissn><eissn>2675-9462</eissn><abstract>The action of herbicides on weeds that develop under water deficit can be compromised, because the routes of penetration of hydrophilic herbicides are reduced due to the lower hydration of the cuticle in these plants. Moreover, hydrophobic compounds found in the epicuticular wax coating of plants under water stress, hinder the penetration of hydrophilic compounds. This study evaluated the control efficiency of glyphosate on guineagrass plants when submitted to different water deficits. The study was conducted in a greenhouse, and treatments were composed of guineagrass plants submitted to three soil water conditions [low water deficit (13%), intermediate water deficit (10%) and high water restriction (8%)], three doses of glyphosate (0.0, 270.0 and 540.0 g ha-1) and two phenological stages of plant development (4-6 leaves and 1-3 tillers). The water management started when plants presented two developed leaves. Visual evaluations were performed 7, 14, 21 and 35 days after the application of the herbicide; the morpho-physiological parameters of the specific leaf area, stomatal conductance and the difference between the environment temperature and the leaf temperature on the day of the herbicide application were also analyzed at the end of the study, as well as the dry matter of shoot and root. With the increase of the water restriction, there was a decrease in the analyzed morpho-physiological parameters, as well as in the dry matter accumulation of the shoot and roots of the studied plants. Plant control was more efficient when a 540 g ha-1 dose of glyphosate was applied, and when they were controlled at their vegetative stage of 1-3 tiller, and with a water management of 13%. It is possible to state that guineagrass under water restriction have less control efficacy when treated with glyphosate. RESUMO: A ação de herbicidas sobre plantas daninhas que se desenvolvem sob déficit hídrico pode ser comprometida, pois as rotas de penetração de herbicidas hidrofílicos são reduzidas em razão da menor hidratação da cutícula nessas plantas. Além disso, compostos hidrofóbicos presentes na camada de cera epicuticular em plantas estressadas hidricamente dificultam sobremaneira a penetração de compostos hidrofílicos. Avaliou-se neste estudo a eficiência de controle do herbicida glyphosate em plantas de capim-colonião quando submetidas a distintos déficits hídricos. O estudo foi conduzido em casa de vegetação, sendo os tratamentos compostos por plantas de capim-colonião submetidas a três condições hídricas do solo [baixo déficit hídrico (13%), déficit hídrico intermediário (10%) e alta restrição hídrica (8%)], três doses do herbicida glyphosate (0,0, 270,0 e 540,0 g e.a. ha-1) e dois estádios fenológicos de desenvolvimento da planta (4-6 folhas e 1-3 perfilhos). O manejo hídrico teve início quando as plantas apresentaram duas folhas desenvolvidas. Foram realizadas avaliações visuais de controle aos 7, 14, 21 e 35 dias após a aplicação do herbicida; analisaram-se ainda os parâmetros morfofisiológicos área foliar específica, condutância estomática e a diferença de temperatura do ambiente com a temperatura foliar no dia da aplicação do herbicida, bem como a matéria seca da parte aérea e da raiz ao final do estudo. Com o aumento da restrição hídrica, houve decréscimo nos parâmetros morfofisiológicos analisados, bem como no acúmulo de matéria seca da parte aérea e das raízes das plantas estudadas. O controle das plantas foi mais eficiente quando ocorreu a aplicação da dose de 540 g ha-1 de glyphosate, quando elas foram controladas no estádio vegetativo de 1-3 perfilhos, e no manejo hídrico de 13%. Pode-se afirmar que plantas de capim-colonião sob restrição hídrica têm menor eficácia de controle quando tratadas com glyphosate.</abstract><cop>Jaboticabal</cop><pub>Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas, UFV - Depto de Fitotecnia</pub><doi>10.1590/s0100-83582018360100121</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0100-8358
ispartof Advances in Weed Science, 2018-01, Vol.36
issn 0100-8358
1806-9681
1806-9681
2675-9462
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_89f13b020ae04c8cb1824d2904a4055b
source Publicly Available Content Database; SciELO
subjects Abiotic stress
Agricultural production
Conductance
Corn
Cuticles
Developmental stages
Dry matter
Genetically altered foods
Glyphosate
herbicide
Herbicides
Hydrophobicity
Intermediate water
Leaf area
Leaves
Metabolism
Moisture content
Morphology
Panicum maximum
Parameters
Penetration
Physiology
PLANT SCIENCES
Plants
Resistance
Salinity
Senescence
Soil conditions
Soil water
Soil water potential
Stomata
Stomatal conductance
Temperature
Tillers
Water deficit
Water management
Water potential
Water stress
weed
title Effect of Glyphosate on Guineagrass Submitted to Different Soil Water Potential
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T00%3A12%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Glyphosate%20on%20Guineagrass%20Submitted%20to%20Different%20Soil%20Water%20Potential&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20Weed%20Science&rft.au=SILVA%20JR,%20A.C.&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issn=0100-8358&rft.eissn=1806-9681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100121&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2139113024%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-482d075a8ac4decbae201b93cc380746bc794f2f65df27f0efa3223f41ecbc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2139113024&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S0100_83582018000100320&rfr_iscdi=true