Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study

• Published in: Emergency Medicine International 2016-01, Vol.2016 (2016), p.63-67
• Main Authors: Patrick, Ward, Patrick, Gredi, Petrie, David A., Jensen, Jan L., Campbell, Samuel G., Cain, Edward, Travers, Andrew H., Green, Robert S., Erdogan, Mete
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cross infection; Medical care; Nosocomial infections; Quality management; Risk factors; Sepsis
• ISSN: 2090-2840; 2090-2859
• DOI: 10.1155/2016/6717261

Background. Patients with sepsis benefit from early diagnosis and treatment. Accurate paramedic recognition of sepsis is important to initiate care promptly for patients who arrive by Emergency Medical Services. Methods. Prospective observational study of adult patients (age ≥ 16 years) transported by paramedics to the emergency department (ED) of a Canadian tertiary hospital. Paramedic identification of sepsis was assessed using a novel prehospital sepsis screening tool developed by the study team and compared to blind, independent documentation of ED diagnoses by attending emergency physicians (EPs). Specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive value, and likelihood ratios were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Results. Overall, 629 patients were included in the analysis. Sepsis was identified by paramedics in 170 (27.0%) patients and by EPs in 71 (11.3%) patients. Sensitivity of paramedic sepsis identification compared to EP diagnosis was 73.2% (95% CI 61.4–83.0), while specificity was 78.8% (95% CI 75.2–82.2). The accuracy of paramedic identification of sepsis was 78.2% (492/629, 52 true positive, 440 true negative). Positive and negative predictive values were 30.6% (95% CI 23.8–38.1) and 95.9% (95% CI 93.6–97.5), respectively. Conclusion. Using a novel prehospital sepsis screening tool, paramedic recognition of sepsis had greater specificity than sensitivity with reasonable accuracy.