Loading…

Analysis of Crisis Management of Medical Disputes in China and Australia: A Narrative Review Article

At present, the increasing trend of medical disputes has become a serious problem in the work of medical institutions, and directly affects the social stability and orderly development of the institutions. We searched the literature on medical disputes and crisis management in China and Australia wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Iranian journal of public health 2019-12, Vol.48 (12), p.2116-2123
Main Authors: Yin, Tianlu, Liu, Zhaojie, Xu, Yanli
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-b55ae661f2ebb9c0c2ac49d7749509de389139f0769521929e6ecf1c8adbd3b83
cites
container_end_page 2123
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2116
container_title Iranian journal of public health
container_volume 48
creator Yin, Tianlu
Liu, Zhaojie
Xu, Yanli
description At present, the increasing trend of medical disputes has become a serious problem in the work of medical institutions, and directly affects the social stability and orderly development of the institutions. We searched the literature on medical disputes and crisis management in China and Australia within PubMed (2010-2019), China Knowledge Network (CNKI, 2010-2019), and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform (2010-2019). There are several drawbacks in the management of hospital medical disputes in China: 1) the knowledge of crisis is unilateral and not systematic; 2) there are too much stereotype thoughts in crisis management; 3) the crisis attribution is too simple; the crisis impact assessment is insufficient. It is worth learning from Australia's system, including the legal system, relevant non-governmental organizations, and doctor-patient communication. In view of the malpractice existing in China's medical dispute management, Australia's legal system for handling disputes, doctor-patient communication and other aspects are worthy of our reference. In particular, the construction of third-party supervision and mediation institutions and the prevention of doctor-patient disputes should be optimized.
doi_str_mv 10.18502/ijph.v48i12.3542
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8a090b9579a94f598562802d2bd9bba8</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8a090b9579a94f598562802d2bd9bba8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2348215648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-b55ae661f2ebb9c0c2ac49d7749509de389139f0769521929e6ecf1c8adbd3b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkk2P0zAQhiMEYj_gB3BBlrhwafF3PByQorLASrsgIThb49hpXaVJsZOi_fck26ViOXk0887jGfstileMLplRlL-L2_1meZAmMr4USvInxTnnii00BfH0FBt1VlzkvKVUaq7K58WZYABClHBe-KrD9i7HTPqGrFKco1vscB12oRvm5G3wscaWfIx5Pw4hk9iR1SZ2SLDzpBrzkLCN-J5U5CumhEM8BPI9HGL4Tao0xLoNL4pnDbY5vHw4L4ufn65-rL4sbr59vl5VN4taghgWTikMWrOGB-egpjXHqeDLUoKi4IMwwAQ0tNSgOAMOQYe6YbVB77xwRlwW10eu73Fr9ynuMN3ZHqO9T_RpbfE4kTVIgTpQJSDIRoFRmhvKPXcenMOZ9eHI2o9uF3w9vca05yPo40oXN3bdH6yGUhqpJsDbB0Dqf40hD3YXcx3aFrvQj9lyIQ1nSsv5rjf_Sbf9mKaPmVWKl0YbSScVO6rq1OecQnMahlF77wc7-8Ee_WBnP0w9r__d4tTx1wDiD4QJsk0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2352786840</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of Crisis Management of Medical Disputes in China and Australia: A Narrative Review Article</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><creator>Yin, Tianlu ; Liu, Zhaojie ; Xu, Yanli</creator><creatorcontrib>Yin, Tianlu ; Liu, Zhaojie ; Xu, Yanli</creatorcontrib><description>At present, the increasing trend of medical disputes has become a serious problem in the work of medical institutions, and directly affects the social stability and orderly development of the institutions. We searched the literature on medical disputes and crisis management in China and Australia within PubMed (2010-2019), China Knowledge Network (CNKI, 2010-2019), and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform (2010-2019). There are several drawbacks in the management of hospital medical disputes in China: 1) the knowledge of crisis is unilateral and not systematic; 2) there are too much stereotype thoughts in crisis management; 3) the crisis attribution is too simple; the crisis impact assessment is insufficient. It is worth learning from Australia's system, including the legal system, relevant non-governmental organizations, and doctor-patient communication. In view of the malpractice existing in China's medical dispute management, Australia's legal system for handling disputes, doctor-patient communication and other aspects are worthy of our reference. In particular, the construction of third-party supervision and mediation institutions and the prevention of doctor-patient disputes should be optimized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2251-6085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2251-6093</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18502/ijph.v48i12.3542</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31993379</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Iran: Tehran University of Medical Sciences</publisher><subject>Australia ; China ; Crises ; Crisis management ; Health care facilities ; Institutions ; Malpractice ; Management ; Management of crises ; Medical dispute ; Medical malpractice ; NGOs ; Nongovernmental organizations ; Patients ; Review</subject><ispartof>Iranian journal of public health, 2019-12, Vol.48 (12), p.2116-2123</ispartof><rights>Copyright© Iranian Public Health Association &amp; Tehran University of Medical Sciences.</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright© Iranian Public Health Association &amp; Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-b55ae661f2ebb9c0c2ac49d7749509de389139f0769521929e6ecf1c8adbd3b83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6974845/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6974845/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993379$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yin, Tianlu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhaojie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yanli</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of Crisis Management of Medical Disputes in China and Australia: A Narrative Review Article</title><title>Iranian journal of public health</title><addtitle>Iran J Public Health</addtitle><description>At present, the increasing trend of medical disputes has become a serious problem in the work of medical institutions, and directly affects the social stability and orderly development of the institutions. We searched the literature on medical disputes and crisis management in China and Australia within PubMed (2010-2019), China Knowledge Network (CNKI, 2010-2019), and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform (2010-2019). There are several drawbacks in the management of hospital medical disputes in China: 1) the knowledge of crisis is unilateral and not systematic; 2) there are too much stereotype thoughts in crisis management; 3) the crisis attribution is too simple; the crisis impact assessment is insufficient. It is worth learning from Australia's system, including the legal system, relevant non-governmental organizations, and doctor-patient communication. In view of the malpractice existing in China's medical dispute management, Australia's legal system for handling disputes, doctor-patient communication and other aspects are worthy of our reference. In particular, the construction of third-party supervision and mediation institutions and the prevention of doctor-patient disputes should be optimized.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>Crisis management</subject><subject>Health care facilities</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Malpractice</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Management of crises</subject><subject>Medical dispute</subject><subject>Medical malpractice</subject><subject>NGOs</subject><subject>Nongovernmental organizations</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Review</subject><issn>2251-6085</issn><issn>2251-6093</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkk2P0zAQhiMEYj_gB3BBlrhwafF3PByQorLASrsgIThb49hpXaVJsZOi_fck26ViOXk0887jGfstileMLplRlL-L2_1meZAmMr4USvInxTnnii00BfH0FBt1VlzkvKVUaq7K58WZYABClHBe-KrD9i7HTPqGrFKco1vscB12oRvm5G3wscaWfIx5Pw4hk9iR1SZ2SLDzpBrzkLCN-J5U5CumhEM8BPI9HGL4Tao0xLoNL4pnDbY5vHw4L4ufn65-rL4sbr59vl5VN4taghgWTikMWrOGB-egpjXHqeDLUoKi4IMwwAQ0tNSgOAMOQYe6YbVB77xwRlwW10eu73Fr9ynuMN3ZHqO9T_RpbfE4kTVIgTpQJSDIRoFRmhvKPXcenMOZ9eHI2o9uF3w9vca05yPo40oXN3bdH6yGUhqpJsDbB0Dqf40hD3YXcx3aFrvQj9lyIQ1nSsv5rjf_Sbf9mKaPmVWKl0YbSScVO6rq1OecQnMahlF77wc7-8Ee_WBnP0w9r__d4tTx1wDiD4QJsk0</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Yin, Tianlu</creator><creator>Liu, Zhaojie</creator><creator>Xu, Yanli</creator><general>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Analysis of Crisis Management of Medical Disputes in China and Australia: A Narrative Review Article</title><author>Yin, Tianlu ; Liu, Zhaojie ; Xu, Yanli</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-b55ae661f2ebb9c0c2ac49d7749509de389139f0769521929e6ecf1c8adbd3b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>Crisis management</topic><topic>Health care facilities</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Malpractice</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Management of crises</topic><topic>Medical dispute</topic><topic>Medical malpractice</topic><topic>NGOs</topic><topic>Nongovernmental organizations</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yin, Tianlu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhaojie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yanli</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Iranian journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yin, Tianlu</au><au>Liu, Zhaojie</au><au>Xu, Yanli</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of Crisis Management of Medical Disputes in China and Australia: A Narrative Review Article</atitle><jtitle>Iranian journal of public health</jtitle><addtitle>Iran J Public Health</addtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2116</spage><epage>2123</epage><pages>2116-2123</pages><issn>2251-6085</issn><eissn>2251-6093</eissn><abstract>At present, the increasing trend of medical disputes has become a serious problem in the work of medical institutions, and directly affects the social stability and orderly development of the institutions. We searched the literature on medical disputes and crisis management in China and Australia within PubMed (2010-2019), China Knowledge Network (CNKI, 2010-2019), and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform (2010-2019). There are several drawbacks in the management of hospital medical disputes in China: 1) the knowledge of crisis is unilateral and not systematic; 2) there are too much stereotype thoughts in crisis management; 3) the crisis attribution is too simple; the crisis impact assessment is insufficient. It is worth learning from Australia's system, including the legal system, relevant non-governmental organizations, and doctor-patient communication. In view of the malpractice existing in China's medical dispute management, Australia's legal system for handling disputes, doctor-patient communication and other aspects are worthy of our reference. In particular, the construction of third-party supervision and mediation institutions and the prevention of doctor-patient disputes should be optimized.</abstract><cop>Iran</cop><pub>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</pub><pmid>31993379</pmid><doi>10.18502/ijph.v48i12.3542</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2251-6085
ispartof Iranian journal of public health, 2019-12, Vol.48 (12), p.2116-2123
issn 2251-6085
2251-6093
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8a090b9579a94f598562802d2bd9bba8
source Open Access: PubMed Central
subjects Australia
China
Crises
Crisis management
Health care facilities
Institutions
Malpractice
Management
Management of crises
Medical dispute
Medical malpractice
NGOs
Nongovernmental organizations
Patients
Review
title Analysis of Crisis Management of Medical Disputes in China and Australia: A Narrative Review Article
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T07%3A19%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20Crisis%20Management%20of%20Medical%20Disputes%20in%20China%20and%20Australia:%20A%20Narrative%20Review%20Article&rft.jtitle=Iranian%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Yin,%20Tianlu&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2116&rft.epage=2123&rft.pages=2116-2123&rft.issn=2251-6085&rft.eissn=2251-6093&rft_id=info:doi/10.18502/ijph.v48i12.3542&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2348215648%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-b55ae661f2ebb9c0c2ac49d7749509de389139f0769521929e6ecf1c8adbd3b83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2352786840&rft_id=info:pmid/31993379&rfr_iscdi=true