Loading…
The COVID-19 pandemic death toll in India: can we know better?
Background Timely and accurate mortality statistics are essential for health policy, monitoring and evaluation of health programmes, and epidemiological research.1 The COVID-19 pandemic brought into sharp focus the critical need for reliable mortality data to monitor its impact across time, place an...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMJ global health 2023-08, Vol.8 (8), p.e012818 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-201997e783c1df5a0dcef07c563617b81eda7f1fa43dffcc2b0003a707756c003 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | e012818 |
container_title | BMJ global health |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Gupta, M Rao, Chalapati Yadav, Arun Kumar Jat, Munita Dhamija, Rajinder K Saikia, Nandita |
description | Background Timely and accurate mortality statistics are essential for health policy, monitoring and evaluation of health programmes, and epidemiological research.1 The COVID-19 pandemic brought into sharp focus the critical need for reliable mortality data to monitor its impact across time, place and person. [...]the surveillance community turned its attention to evaluate pandemic impact through the assessment of ‘excess’ mortality, defined as the increase in observed deaths in a defined time period, as compared with mortality expectations based on prepandemic trends. [...]mathematical models were formed to derive both prepandemic mortality patterns as well as excess mortality attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic for such populations.3 The inherent limitation of these mathematical models are the assumptions on which calculations are based, as well as potential inaccuracies in primary data used as model inputs, which together create considerable uncertainty in estimated mortality patterns.4 In India too, the national government implemented mortality reporting according to the WHO pandemic surveillance guidelines, but these data were inadequate for the same reasons.5 In response to public interest in tracking the pandemic, various compilations of pandemic period mortality data were reported by independent investigators in national newspapers.6 This article evaluates the characteristics of pandemic period mortality data available from different sources for India, and potential biases in them that could impact accuracy of mortality models and excess mortality estimates. The most recent report is for 2020, released in June 2022.7 Although the CRS has evolved over the past five decades with significantly improved data completeness at national level, the system performance has remained patchy across the country.8Table 1 Input data sources and their characteristics which recorded deaths during COVID-19 pandemic in India Input data source Description Populations covered Data period Potential data biases Civil Registration System Data obtained from state CRS department websites/provided through public information requests Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Gujarat Chhattisgarh, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal Monthly data from January 2018 till May 2021 (except) Gujarat—March–May 2021 Website data lower than deaths published in annual CRS reports for 2018–2020 in all states For 2021, n |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012818 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8a23497dd8414646b547c523c42f5dc4</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8a23497dd8414646b547c523c42f5dc4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2858987525</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-201997e783c1df5a0dcef07c563617b81eda7f1fa43dffcc2b0003a707756c003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtPGzEUha2KqqCUH9CdpW7YTPH70UURCo9GQmJDu7U8fiSTztjBMyHqv8chCJVu7r2yj757dA8AXzD6hjEV5-2wXq4agghtECYKqw_ghCCuG6mROvpnPgan47hGCGFZCxKfwDGVglGF-An48bAKcH7_e3HVYA03NvkwdA76YKcVnHLfwy7BRfKd_Q6dTXAX4J-Ud7AN0xTKxWfwMdp-DKevfQZ-3Vw_zH82d_e3i_nlXeMYoVN1ibWWQSrqsI_cIu9CRNJxQQWWrcLBWxlxtIz6GJ0jbTVKrURScuHqOAOLA9dnuzab0g22_DXZdublIZelsWXqXB-MsoQyLb1XDDPBRMtZXURodRK5d6yyLg6szbYdQnWSpmL7d9D3P6lbmWV-MhgxwXU9_gycvRJKftyGcTJDN7rQ9zaFvB0NUVxpJTnhVfr1P-k6b0uqt9qrNCWEIVVV-KByJY9jCfHNDUZmn7Z5Sdvs0zaHtOkzafeY2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2859322408</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The COVID-19 pandemic death toll in India: can we know better?</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Gupta, M ; Rao, Chalapati ; Yadav, Arun Kumar ; Jat, Munita ; Dhamija, Rajinder K ; Saikia, Nandita</creator><creatorcontrib>Gupta, M ; Rao, Chalapati ; Yadav, Arun Kumar ; Jat, Munita ; Dhamija, Rajinder K ; Saikia, Nandita</creatorcontrib><description>Background Timely and accurate mortality statistics are essential for health policy, monitoring and evaluation of health programmes, and epidemiological research.1 The COVID-19 pandemic brought into sharp focus the critical need for reliable mortality data to monitor its impact across time, place and person. [...]the surveillance community turned its attention to evaluate pandemic impact through the assessment of ‘excess’ mortality, defined as the increase in observed deaths in a defined time period, as compared with mortality expectations based on prepandemic trends. [...]mathematical models were formed to derive both prepandemic mortality patterns as well as excess mortality attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic for such populations.3 The inherent limitation of these mathematical models are the assumptions on which calculations are based, as well as potential inaccuracies in primary data used as model inputs, which together create considerable uncertainty in estimated mortality patterns.4 In India too, the national government implemented mortality reporting according to the WHO pandemic surveillance guidelines, but these data were inadequate for the same reasons.5 In response to public interest in tracking the pandemic, various compilations of pandemic period mortality data were reported by independent investigators in national newspapers.6 This article evaluates the characteristics of pandemic period mortality data available from different sources for India, and potential biases in them that could impact accuracy of mortality models and excess mortality estimates. The most recent report is for 2020, released in June 2022.7 Although the CRS has evolved over the past five decades with significantly improved data completeness at national level, the system performance has remained patchy across the country.8Table 1 Input data sources and their characteristics which recorded deaths during COVID-19 pandemic in India Input data source Description Populations covered Data period Potential data biases Civil Registration System Data obtained from state CRS department websites/provided through public information requests Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Gujarat Chhattisgarh, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal Monthly data from January 2018 till May 2021 (except) Gujarat—March–May 2021 Website data lower than deaths published in annual CRS reports for 2018–2020 in all states For 2021, not specified if monthly data are based on date of death or date of registration News articles/blogs Data from multiple sources local hospitals, cremation grounds, municipal corporations, local CRS offices Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Chennai, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Mumbai, Nagpur Weekly, monthly and quarterly data from January 2018 till May 2021 (varying periods across cities) City death data based on place of occurrence hence includes non-residents Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Annual HMIS reports HMIS 2020–2021 and 2021–2022—analytical report All reporting hospitals 2018–2019, 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 Increase in reported deaths could potentially be due to improved institutional reporting compliance with government pandemic surveillance orders C Voter Tracker Survey Telephonic household survey on COVID-19 deaths from 1 July 2021 to 15 September 2021 Pan India Covered 15 700 households and 57 000 individuals No of deaths reported=2107 Jan 2019–June 2021 Very small sample size—not representative of Indian population Information bias—no evidence how much valid data was collected telephonically Consumer Pyramid Household Survey (CPHS) Household survey Pan India covered 0.87 million individuals in 0.18 million households No. of deaths reported=8694 2015–2018, 2019–June 2021 Insufficient sample size Type of questions asked for capturing mortality is uncertain Railway employees Railways data on number of COVID-19 deaths Pan India except mountainous areas 1.3 million employees No of deaths reported=1952 March 2020–7 May 2021 Small sample of 1952 deaths Population characteristics and availability of medical facilities not representative for general population CRS, Civil Registration System; HMIS, Health Management Information System.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2059-7908</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2059-7908</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012818</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37643805</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>COVID-19 ; Estimates ; Households ; Management information systems ; Mathematical models ; Mortality ; Pandemics ; Population ; Registration ; Surveillance ; Voters</subject><ispartof>BMJ global health, 2023-08, Vol.8 (8), p.e012818</ispartof><rights>2023 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-201997e783c1df5a0dcef07c563617b81eda7f1fa43dffcc2b0003a707756c003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9554-0581</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465911/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465911/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gupta, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Chalapati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Arun Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jat, Munita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhamija, Rajinder K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saikia, Nandita</creatorcontrib><title>The COVID-19 pandemic death toll in India: can we know better?</title><title>BMJ global health</title><description>Background Timely and accurate mortality statistics are essential for health policy, monitoring and evaluation of health programmes, and epidemiological research.1 The COVID-19 pandemic brought into sharp focus the critical need for reliable mortality data to monitor its impact across time, place and person. [...]the surveillance community turned its attention to evaluate pandemic impact through the assessment of ‘excess’ mortality, defined as the increase in observed deaths in a defined time period, as compared with mortality expectations based on prepandemic trends. [...]mathematical models were formed to derive both prepandemic mortality patterns as well as excess mortality attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic for such populations.3 The inherent limitation of these mathematical models are the assumptions on which calculations are based, as well as potential inaccuracies in primary data used as model inputs, which together create considerable uncertainty in estimated mortality patterns.4 In India too, the national government implemented mortality reporting according to the WHO pandemic surveillance guidelines, but these data were inadequate for the same reasons.5 In response to public interest in tracking the pandemic, various compilations of pandemic period mortality data were reported by independent investigators in national newspapers.6 This article evaluates the characteristics of pandemic period mortality data available from different sources for India, and potential biases in them that could impact accuracy of mortality models and excess mortality estimates. The most recent report is for 2020, released in June 2022.7 Although the CRS has evolved over the past five decades with significantly improved data completeness at national level, the system performance has remained patchy across the country.8Table 1 Input data sources and their characteristics which recorded deaths during COVID-19 pandemic in India Input data source Description Populations covered Data period Potential data biases Civil Registration System Data obtained from state CRS department websites/provided through public information requests Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Gujarat Chhattisgarh, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal Monthly data from January 2018 till May 2021 (except) Gujarat—March–May 2021 Website data lower than deaths published in annual CRS reports for 2018–2020 in all states For 2021, not specified if monthly data are based on date of death or date of registration News articles/blogs Data from multiple sources local hospitals, cremation grounds, municipal corporations, local CRS offices Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Chennai, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Mumbai, Nagpur Weekly, monthly and quarterly data from January 2018 till May 2021 (varying periods across cities) City death data based on place of occurrence hence includes non-residents Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Annual HMIS reports HMIS 2020–2021 and 2021–2022—analytical report All reporting hospitals 2018–2019, 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 Increase in reported deaths could potentially be due to improved institutional reporting compliance with government pandemic surveillance orders C Voter Tracker Survey Telephonic household survey on COVID-19 deaths from 1 July 2021 to 15 September 2021 Pan India Covered 15 700 households and 57 000 individuals No of deaths reported=2107 Jan 2019–June 2021 Very small sample size—not representative of Indian population Information bias—no evidence how much valid data was collected telephonically Consumer Pyramid Household Survey (CPHS) Household survey Pan India covered 0.87 million individuals in 0.18 million households No. of deaths reported=8694 2015–2018, 2019–June 2021 Insufficient sample size Type of questions asked for capturing mortality is uncertain Railway employees Railways data on number of COVID-19 deaths Pan India except mountainous areas 1.3 million employees No of deaths reported=1952 March 2020–7 May 2021 Small sample of 1952 deaths Population characteristics and availability of medical facilities not representative for general population CRS, Civil Registration System; HMIS, Health Management Information System.</description><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Management information systems</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Voters</subject><issn>2059-7908</issn><issn>2059-7908</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtPGzEUha2KqqCUH9CdpW7YTPH70UURCo9GQmJDu7U8fiSTztjBMyHqv8chCJVu7r2yj757dA8AXzD6hjEV5-2wXq4agghtECYKqw_ghCCuG6mROvpnPgan47hGCGFZCxKfwDGVglGF-An48bAKcH7_e3HVYA03NvkwdA76YKcVnHLfwy7BRfKd_Q6dTXAX4J-Ud7AN0xTKxWfwMdp-DKevfQZ-3Vw_zH82d_e3i_nlXeMYoVN1ibWWQSrqsI_cIu9CRNJxQQWWrcLBWxlxtIz6GJ0jbTVKrURScuHqOAOLA9dnuzab0g22_DXZdublIZelsWXqXB-MsoQyLb1XDDPBRMtZXURodRK5d6yyLg6szbYdQnWSpmL7d9D3P6lbmWV-MhgxwXU9_gycvRJKftyGcTJDN7rQ9zaFvB0NUVxpJTnhVfr1P-k6b0uqt9qrNCWEIVVV-KByJY9jCfHNDUZmn7Z5Sdvs0zaHtOkzafeY2w</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Gupta, M</creator><creator>Rao, Chalapati</creator><creator>Yadav, Arun Kumar</creator><creator>Jat, Munita</creator><creator>Dhamija, Rajinder K</creator><creator>Saikia, Nandita</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9554-0581</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>The COVID-19 pandemic death toll in India: can we know better?</title><author>Gupta, M ; Rao, Chalapati ; Yadav, Arun Kumar ; Jat, Munita ; Dhamija, Rajinder K ; Saikia, Nandita</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-201997e783c1df5a0dcef07c563617b81eda7f1fa43dffcc2b0003a707756c003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Management information systems</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Voters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gupta, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Chalapati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Arun Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jat, Munita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhamija, Rajinder K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saikia, Nandita</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMJ global health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gupta, M</au><au>Rao, Chalapati</au><au>Yadav, Arun Kumar</au><au>Jat, Munita</au><au>Dhamija, Rajinder K</au><au>Saikia, Nandita</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The COVID-19 pandemic death toll in India: can we know better?</atitle><jtitle>BMJ global health</jtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e012818</spage><pages>e012818-</pages><issn>2059-7908</issn><eissn>2059-7908</eissn><abstract>Background Timely and accurate mortality statistics are essential for health policy, monitoring and evaluation of health programmes, and epidemiological research.1 The COVID-19 pandemic brought into sharp focus the critical need for reliable mortality data to monitor its impact across time, place and person. [...]the surveillance community turned its attention to evaluate pandemic impact through the assessment of ‘excess’ mortality, defined as the increase in observed deaths in a defined time period, as compared with mortality expectations based on prepandemic trends. [...]mathematical models were formed to derive both prepandemic mortality patterns as well as excess mortality attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic for such populations.3 The inherent limitation of these mathematical models are the assumptions on which calculations are based, as well as potential inaccuracies in primary data used as model inputs, which together create considerable uncertainty in estimated mortality patterns.4 In India too, the national government implemented mortality reporting according to the WHO pandemic surveillance guidelines, but these data were inadequate for the same reasons.5 In response to public interest in tracking the pandemic, various compilations of pandemic period mortality data were reported by independent investigators in national newspapers.6 This article evaluates the characteristics of pandemic period mortality data available from different sources for India, and potential biases in them that could impact accuracy of mortality models and excess mortality estimates. The most recent report is for 2020, released in June 2022.7 Although the CRS has evolved over the past five decades with significantly improved data completeness at national level, the system performance has remained patchy across the country.8Table 1 Input data sources and their characteristics which recorded deaths during COVID-19 pandemic in India Input data source Description Populations covered Data period Potential data biases Civil Registration System Data obtained from state CRS department websites/provided through public information requests Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Gujarat Chhattisgarh, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal Monthly data from January 2018 till May 2021 (except) Gujarat—March–May 2021 Website data lower than deaths published in annual CRS reports for 2018–2020 in all states For 2021, not specified if monthly data are based on date of death or date of registration News articles/blogs Data from multiple sources local hospitals, cremation grounds, municipal corporations, local CRS offices Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Chennai, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Mumbai, Nagpur Weekly, monthly and quarterly data from January 2018 till May 2021 (varying periods across cities) City death data based on place of occurrence hence includes non-residents Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Annual HMIS reports HMIS 2020–2021 and 2021–2022—analytical report All reporting hospitals 2018–2019, 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 Increase in reported deaths could potentially be due to improved institutional reporting compliance with government pandemic surveillance orders C Voter Tracker Survey Telephonic household survey on COVID-19 deaths from 1 July 2021 to 15 September 2021 Pan India Covered 15 700 households and 57 000 individuals No of deaths reported=2107 Jan 2019–June 2021 Very small sample size—not representative of Indian population Information bias—no evidence how much valid data was collected telephonically Consumer Pyramid Household Survey (CPHS) Household survey Pan India covered 0.87 million individuals in 0.18 million households No. of deaths reported=8694 2015–2018, 2019–June 2021 Insufficient sample size Type of questions asked for capturing mortality is uncertain Railway employees Railways data on number of COVID-19 deaths Pan India except mountainous areas 1.3 million employees No of deaths reported=1952 March 2020–7 May 2021 Small sample of 1952 deaths Population characteristics and availability of medical facilities not representative for general population CRS, Civil Registration System; HMIS, Health Management Information System.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>37643805</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012818</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9554-0581</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2059-7908 |
ispartof | BMJ global health, 2023-08, Vol.8 (8), p.e012818 |
issn | 2059-7908 2059-7908 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8a23497dd8414646b547c523c42f5dc4 |
source | BMJ Open Access Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | COVID-19 Estimates Households Management information systems Mathematical models Mortality Pandemics Population Registration Surveillance Voters |
title | The COVID-19 pandemic death toll in India: can we know better? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T09%3A54%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20COVID-19%20pandemic%20death%20toll%20in%20India:%20can%20we%20know%20better?&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20global%20health&rft.au=Gupta,%20M&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e012818&rft.pages=e012818-&rft.issn=2059-7908&rft.eissn=2059-7908&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012818&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2858987525%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-201997e783c1df5a0dcef07c563617b81eda7f1fa43dffcc2b0003a707756c003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2859322408&rft_id=info:pmid/37643805&rfr_iscdi=true |