"We are not the same": African women's view of multipurpose prevention products in the TRIO clinical study

• Published in: International journal of women's health 2019-01, Vol.11, p.97-107
• Main Authors: Shapley-Quinn, Mary Kate, Manenzhe, Kgahlisho N, Agot, Kawango, Minnis, Alexandra M, van der Straten, Ariane
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome; AIDS; Clinical trials; contraception; end-user research; Health aspects; HIV; HIV infection; HIV prevention; Human immunodeficiency virus; Original Research; Prevention; Product development; product preference; Qualitative research; Sexually transmitted diseases; Womens health
• ISSN: 1179-1411; 1179-1411
• DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S185712

Unintended pregnancy and HIV infection present dual risks for young women in sub-Saharan Africa. New multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs) are in development to simultaneously prevent unintended pregnancy and HIV, but there is a need for end-user research to ensure these products suit women's needs. The Tablet, Rings and Injectables as Options (TRIO) for women study took place in Kisumu, Kenya, and Soshanguve, South Africa, with the goal of eliciting young women's feedback on three potential MPTs. Women in TRIO used three placebo products that represented potential MPTs: daily oral tablets, monthly vaginal rings, and monthly dual injections in a randomized crossover design followed by a period in which they chose a product to use. Eighty-eight TRIO participants completed in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to understand their experiences using each product. Qualitative analyses were conducted after stratifying by product preference at the end of the crossover period. The majority (65%) of participants preferred injections, with the remainder evenly split between tablets and rings. Discussions of preference for one product were closely linked with expressed dislike of another product's attributes. Participants recognized heterogeneity in preferences and choices across users and stressed the need for multiple MPT options that confer a low burden on women's daily lives. Rather than choosing a product to use based on the product's perceived advantages, women's choices were based on the unfavorable attributes of other TRIO products. Moreover, the importance that women placed on a given disadvantage varied. Disadvantages that women deemed as most important emerged as a greater driver of product preference than selecting products based on their advantages and favorable characteristics.