Loading…

Comparison of renal safety and bone mineral density of tenofovir and entecavir in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and meta-analysis

•Provides insights into the drug use for patients with chronic hepatitis B.•Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is more harmful to renal function than entecavir (ETV) at 24 months or less.•The effects of TDF and ETV on renal function were not different over 24 months.•There was no significant differ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of infectious diseases 2022-11, Vol.124, p.133-142
Main Authors: Yang, Xiaoxian, Yan, Haiyi, Zhang, Xiuju, Qin, Xueying, Guo, Peng
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Provides insights into the drug use for patients with chronic hepatitis B.•Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is more harmful to renal function than entecavir (ETV) at 24 months or less.•The effects of TDF and ETV on renal function were not different over 24 months.•There was no significant difference in the effects of TDF and ETV on bone density. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) are recommended as first-line treatments for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, the safety of these two drugs remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate and compare renal function and bone mineral density in patients with CHB who took TDF or ETV. The electronic databases of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase were searched. The keywords were: “CHB”, “tenofovir”, and “entecavir”. Heterogeneity and subgroups were analyzed. A total of 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in serum creatinine levels between the TDF and the ETV group. There was a significant standardized mean difference (SMD) in the serum estimated glomerular filtration rate between months (12 months: SMD [95% confidence interval] = -0.07 [-0.12, -0.01]; 18-24 months: SMD [95% confidence interval] = -0.11 [-0.17, -0.05]), but no significant difference emerged in the long-term drug use for over 24 months. There was no significant difference in the incidence of osteopenia/osteoporosis (I2 = 41%, risk ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.29 [0.93, 1.77], P-value = 0.13 >0.05). Compared with the ETV group, a greater reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate and serum phosphorus levels was observed in the TDF group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of osteopenia/osteoporosis between the two groups.
ISSN:1201-9712
1878-3511
DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2022.09.021