Loading…

Interaction between shock coils increased the incidence of inappropriate therapies and lead failure in implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Shock coil interaction in patients with multiple implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads is occasionally observed. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of shock coil interaction and its clinical relevance. All ICD patients (646 patients) who came to follow up control in our ICD ambulance be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal 2018-01, Vol.18 (1), p.20-24
Main Authors: El Garhy, Mohammad, Ohlow, Marc-Alexander, Lauer, Bernward
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4363-27d7c972f0be402f61cbf9b36455e70eb34f64a497f2d47f050000dd40e3eb633
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4363-27d7c972f0be402f61cbf9b36455e70eb34f64a497f2d47f050000dd40e3eb633
container_end_page 24
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20
container_title Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal
container_volume 18
creator El Garhy, Mohammad
Ohlow, Marc-Alexander
Lauer, Bernward
description Shock coil interaction in patients with multiple implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads is occasionally observed. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of shock coil interaction and its clinical relevance. All ICD patients (646 patients) who came to follow up control in our ICD ambulance between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2011 in the department of cardiology in Bad Berka hospital were retrospectively evaluated in this study. All baseline demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics and postoperative chest x ray in postero-anterior and lateral view as well as clinical and ICD follow up data were evaluated. Among 646 patients 42 had multiple ICD leads (6.5%) of whom 36 patients (5.5% of total cohort patients and 85.7% of patients with multiple ICD leads) had shock coil interaction and presented the study group (Group I). The control group (Group II) consisted of 610 patients without coil-coil interaction including patients with single shock lead (604 patients) or patients with multiple leads but without interaction between shock coils (6 patients). Inappropriate anti-tachycardia therapies and RV lead revisions were more frequent in patients with interaction between shock coils (Group I vs Group II: 27.7% and 5.7%; p = 0.049 and 30.6% vs 6.4; p = 0.0001, respectively). Interaction between shock coils may be one of possible causes of lead failure and resulted in inappropriate therapies and subsequent lead revision.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ipej.2017.10.003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8ba104ae42cd4235b0765c1f6bf8c418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0972629217301845</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8ba104ae42cd4235b0765c1f6bf8c418</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1961634658</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4363-27d7c972f0be402f61cbf9b36455e70eb34f64a497f2d47f050000dd40e3eb633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksGOFCEQhjtG466rL-DBcPQyI9A0dCfGxGxcnWQTL3omBRQ7jD1NC8wYH8J3XtpZN7sXuUAVVV9Rxd80rxldM8rku906zLhbc8pUdawpbZ8053RQfCX5wJ8-OJ81L3LeUco7MajnzRkfGFWq686bP5upYAJbQpyIwfILcSJ5G-0PYmMYMwmTTQgZHSlbXKzgcLJIoq8GzHOKcwpQcLlOMAfMBCZHRgRHPITxkJYsEvbzCFMBMyKxkFyIR0y1MnHog0lhHKHE9LJ55mHM-Opuv2i-X336dvlldf318-by4_XKila2K66csrU3Tw0Kyr1k1vjBtFJ0HSqKphVeCqi9eu6E8rSjdTknKLZoZNteNJsT10XY6drAHtJvHSHov46YbjSkEuyIujfAqAAU3DrB285QJTvLvDS-t4L1lfXhxJoPZo_O4lQSjI-gj2-msNU38ai7XtBeqAp4ewdI8ecBc9H7kC3WiUwYD1mzQTLZCtkttfgp1KaYc0J_X4ZRvWhC7_SiCb1oYvFVTdSkNw8feJ_yTwQ14P0pAOvIjwGTzjYsn-xCQlvqTML_-Le2w8xI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1961634658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interaction between shock coils increased the incidence of inappropriate therapies and lead failure in implantable cardioverter defibrillator</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><creator>El Garhy, Mohammad ; Ohlow, Marc-Alexander ; Lauer, Bernward</creator><creatorcontrib>El Garhy, Mohammad ; Ohlow, Marc-Alexander ; Lauer, Bernward</creatorcontrib><description>Shock coil interaction in patients with multiple implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads is occasionally observed. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of shock coil interaction and its clinical relevance. All ICD patients (646 patients) who came to follow up control in our ICD ambulance between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2011 in the department of cardiology in Bad Berka hospital were retrospectively evaluated in this study. All baseline demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics and postoperative chest x ray in postero-anterior and lateral view as well as clinical and ICD follow up data were evaluated. Among 646 patients 42 had multiple ICD leads (6.5%) of whom 36 patients (5.5% of total cohort patients and 85.7% of patients with multiple ICD leads) had shock coil interaction and presented the study group (Group I). The control group (Group II) consisted of 610 patients without coil-coil interaction including patients with single shock lead (604 patients) or patients with multiple leads but without interaction between shock coils (6 patients). Inappropriate anti-tachycardia therapies and RV lead revisions were more frequent in patients with interaction between shock coils (Group I vs Group II: 27.7% and 5.7%; p = 0.049 and 30.6% vs 6.4; p = 0.0001, respectively). Interaction between shock coils may be one of possible causes of lead failure and resulted in inappropriate therapies and subsequent lead revision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-6292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0972-6292</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2017.10.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29107755</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal, 2018-01, Vol.18 (1), p.20-24</ispartof><rights>2018 Indian Heart Rhythm Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018, Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. 2018 Indian Heart Rhythm Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4363-27d7c972f0be402f61cbf9b36455e70eb34f64a497f2d47f050000dd40e3eb633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4363-27d7c972f0be402f61cbf9b36455e70eb34f64a497f2d47f050000dd40e3eb633</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8578-0135</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840847/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629217301845$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3549,27924,27925,45780,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29107755$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>El Garhy, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohlow, Marc-Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauer, Bernward</creatorcontrib><title>Interaction between shock coils increased the incidence of inappropriate therapies and lead failure in implantable cardioverter defibrillator</title><title>Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal</title><addtitle>Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J</addtitle><description>Shock coil interaction in patients with multiple implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads is occasionally observed. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of shock coil interaction and its clinical relevance. All ICD patients (646 patients) who came to follow up control in our ICD ambulance between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2011 in the department of cardiology in Bad Berka hospital were retrospectively evaluated in this study. All baseline demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics and postoperative chest x ray in postero-anterior and lateral view as well as clinical and ICD follow up data were evaluated. Among 646 patients 42 had multiple ICD leads (6.5%) of whom 36 patients (5.5% of total cohort patients and 85.7% of patients with multiple ICD leads) had shock coil interaction and presented the study group (Group I). The control group (Group II) consisted of 610 patients without coil-coil interaction including patients with single shock lead (604 patients) or patients with multiple leads but without interaction between shock coils (6 patients). Inappropriate anti-tachycardia therapies and RV lead revisions were more frequent in patients with interaction between shock coils (Group I vs Group II: 27.7% and 5.7%; p = 0.049 and 30.6% vs 6.4; p = 0.0001, respectively). Interaction between shock coils may be one of possible causes of lead failure and resulted in inappropriate therapies and subsequent lead revision.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>0972-6292</issn><issn>0972-6292</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksGOFCEQhjtG466rL-DBcPQyI9A0dCfGxGxcnWQTL3omBRQ7jD1NC8wYH8J3XtpZN7sXuUAVVV9Rxd80rxldM8rku906zLhbc8pUdawpbZ8053RQfCX5wJ8-OJ81L3LeUco7MajnzRkfGFWq686bP5upYAJbQpyIwfILcSJ5G-0PYmMYMwmTTQgZHSlbXKzgcLJIoq8GzHOKcwpQcLlOMAfMBCZHRgRHPITxkJYsEvbzCFMBMyKxkFyIR0y1MnHog0lhHKHE9LJ55mHM-Opuv2i-X336dvlldf318-by4_XKila2K66csrU3Tw0Kyr1k1vjBtFJ0HSqKphVeCqi9eu6E8rSjdTknKLZoZNteNJsT10XY6drAHtJvHSHov46YbjSkEuyIujfAqAAU3DrB285QJTvLvDS-t4L1lfXhxJoPZo_O4lQSjI-gj2-msNU38ai7XtBeqAp4ewdI8ecBc9H7kC3WiUwYD1mzQTLZCtkttfgp1KaYc0J_X4ZRvWhC7_SiCb1oYvFVTdSkNw8feJ_yTwQ14P0pAOvIjwGTzjYsn-xCQlvqTML_-Le2w8xI</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>El Garhy, Mohammad</creator><creator>Ohlow, Marc-Alexander</creator><creator>Lauer, Bernward</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8578-0135</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Interaction between shock coils increased the incidence of inappropriate therapies and lead failure in implantable cardioverter defibrillator</title><author>El Garhy, Mohammad ; Ohlow, Marc-Alexander ; Lauer, Bernward</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4363-27d7c972f0be402f61cbf9b36455e70eb34f64a497f2d47f050000dd40e3eb633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>El Garhy, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohlow, Marc-Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauer, Bernward</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>El Garhy, Mohammad</au><au>Ohlow, Marc-Alexander</au><au>Lauer, Bernward</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interaction between shock coils increased the incidence of inappropriate therapies and lead failure in implantable cardioverter defibrillator</atitle><jtitle>Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal</jtitle><addtitle>Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>20-24</pages><issn>0972-6292</issn><eissn>0972-6292</eissn><abstract>Shock coil interaction in patients with multiple implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads is occasionally observed. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of shock coil interaction and its clinical relevance. All ICD patients (646 patients) who came to follow up control in our ICD ambulance between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2011 in the department of cardiology in Bad Berka hospital were retrospectively evaluated in this study. All baseline demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics and postoperative chest x ray in postero-anterior and lateral view as well as clinical and ICD follow up data were evaluated. Among 646 patients 42 had multiple ICD leads (6.5%) of whom 36 patients (5.5% of total cohort patients and 85.7% of patients with multiple ICD leads) had shock coil interaction and presented the study group (Group I). The control group (Group II) consisted of 610 patients without coil-coil interaction including patients with single shock lead (604 patients) or patients with multiple leads but without interaction between shock coils (6 patients). Inappropriate anti-tachycardia therapies and RV lead revisions were more frequent in patients with interaction between shock coils (Group I vs Group II: 27.7% and 5.7%; p = 0.049 and 30.6% vs 6.4; p = 0.0001, respectively). Interaction between shock coils may be one of possible causes of lead failure and resulted in inappropriate therapies and subsequent lead revision.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29107755</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ipej.2017.10.003</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8578-0135</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0972-6292
ispartof Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal, 2018-01, Vol.18 (1), p.20-24
issn 0972-6292
0972-6292
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8ba104ae42cd4235b0765c1f6bf8c418
source ScienceDirect; Open Access: PubMed Central
subjects Original
title Interaction between shock coils increased the incidence of inappropriate therapies and lead failure in implantable cardioverter defibrillator
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T19%3A28%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interaction%20between%20shock%20coils%20increased%20the%20incidence%20of%20inappropriate%20therapies%20and%20lead%20failure%20in%20implantable%20cardioverter%20defibrillator&rft.jtitle=Indian%20pacing%20and%20electrophysiology%20journal&rft.au=El%20Garhy,%20Mohammad&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=20-24&rft.issn=0972-6292&rft.eissn=0972-6292&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ipej.2017.10.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1961634658%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4363-27d7c972f0be402f61cbf9b36455e70eb34f64a497f2d47f050000dd40e3eb633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1961634658&rft_id=info:pmid/29107755&rfr_iscdi=true