The Reliability and Validity of the OneStep Smartphone Application for Gait Analysis among Patients Undergoing Rehabilitation for Unilateral Lower Limb Disability

• Published in: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2024-06, Vol.24 (11), p.3594
• Main Authors: Marom, Pnina, Brik, Michael, Agay, Nirit, Dankner, Rachel, Katzir, Zoya, Keshet, Naama, Doron, Dana
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Clinical medicine; Comparative analysis; Disability; Disabled Persons - rehabilitation; Electronic health records; Exercise equipment; Exercise Test - methods; Female; Fitness equipment; Gait; Gait - physiology; gait analysis; Gait Analysis - instrumentation; Gait Analysis - methods; gait dysfunction; Handicapped accessibility; Humans; Laboratories; Lower Extremity - physiology; Lower Extremity - physiopathology; Male; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Middle Aged; Mobile Applications; Pain; Patients; Rehabilitation; reliability; Reproducibility of Results; Sensors; Smart phones; Smartphone; smartphone application; Smartphones; Validity; Walking
• ISSN: 1424-8220; 1424-8220
• DOI: 10.3390/s24113594

An easy-to-use and reliable tool is essential for gait assessment of people with gait pathologies. This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the OneStep smartphone application compared to the C-Mill-VR+ treadmill (Motek, Nederlands), among patients undergoing rehabilitation for unilateral lower extremity disability. Spatiotemporal gait parameters were extracted from the treadmill and from two smartphones, one on each leg. Inter-device reliability was evaluated using Pearson correlation, intra-cluster correlation coefficient (ICC), and Cohen's d, comparing the application's readings from the two phones. Validity was assessed by comparing readings from each phone to the treadmill. Twenty-eight patients completed the study; the median age was 45.5 years, and 61% were males. The ICC between the phones showed a high correlation (r = 0.89-1) and good-to-excellent reliability (ICC range, 0.77-1) for all the gait parameters examined. The correlations between the phones and the treadmill were mostly above 0.8. The ICC between each phone and the treadmill demonstrated moderate-to-excellent validity for all the gait parameters (range, 0.58-1). Only 'step length of the impaired leg' showed poor-to-good validity (range, 0.37-0.84). Cohen's d effect size was small (d < 0.5) for all the parameters. The studied application demonstrated good reliability and validity for spatiotemporal gait assessment in patients with unilateral lower limb disability.