Loading…

A bidirectional comparison of English and Japanese learners' willingness to communicate in their foreign language

This bidirectional study investigates the willingness to communicate (WTC) by first language (L1) Japanese learners of English as the foreign language (EFL) (n = 27) and L1 English learners of Japanese as the foreign language (JFL) learners (n = 12). Previous studies [e.g., 8, 25] have found that Ja...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ampersand (Oxford, UK) UK), 2022, Vol.9, p.100081, Article 100081
Main Author: Muroya, Akiko
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3291-d4af16e276f0a1aa3132405119fcfea8cd03a36f55e1650445862743de80d3fd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3291-d4af16e276f0a1aa3132405119fcfea8cd03a36f55e1650445862743de80d3fd3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 100081
container_title Ampersand (Oxford, UK)
container_volume 9
creator Muroya, Akiko
description This bidirectional study investigates the willingness to communicate (WTC) by first language (L1) Japanese learners of English as the foreign language (EFL) (n = 27) and L1 English learners of Japanese as the foreign language (JFL) learners (n = 12). Previous studies [e.g., 8, 25] have found that Japanese university students still struggled to improve their willingness to speak English, despite several years of oral communication classes. The goal of this study is to identify what makes Japanese EFL learners less willing to speak English, by comparing them with English JFL learners. This study examines 1) which factor affects the two learner groups' WTC in their foreign language more, actual or self-perceived linguistic competence; 2) whether speaking an L1 or L2 affects the WTC and self-perceived competence. A total of five linguistic tasks were administered to the two groups (age range 18–22) to measure their actual linguistic competence. An online questionnaire explored the group differences in WTC and self-perceived linguistic competence in L1 and L2 speaking contexts. Only the Japanese EFL group showed that self-perceived linguistic competence could have more impact on L2 WTC than actual linguistic competence. Both EFL and JFL groups showed higher WTC with individual and situational factors and self-perceived linguistic competence in the L1 speaking context than the L2 speaking context. •English JFL learners outperformed Japanese EFL learners in terms of willingness to communicate, actual, and self-perceived linguistic competence.•Only Japanese EFL learners showed that self-perceived linguistic competence affected L2 WTC more than actual linguistic competence.•Both groups showed that L2 WTC was positively correlated to actual linguistic competence, but only to wh-related accuracy rates.•Both groups showed higher WTC and self-perceived linguistic competence in the L1 speaking context than the L2 speaking context.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amper.2021.100081
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8bd42e60e46a45e88543925f0dc46f1e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2215039021000096</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8bd42e60e46a45e88543925f0dc46f1e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>S2215039021000096</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3291-d4af16e276f0a1aa3132405119fcfea8cd03a36f55e1650445862743de80d3fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9vFDEMxUcIpFaln6CX3DjtEudfZw4cqqrQokpc4By5iTP1ajZZkimo357ZDqo4cbL14veT49d1FyC3IMF93G1xf6C6VVLBokjZw5vuVCmwG6kH-faf_qQ7b223jIAF6QZ72v28Eg8cuVKYuWScRCj7A1ZuJYuSxE0eJ26PAnMUX_GAmRqJibBmqu2D-M3TxHlc1CbmcvTunzIHnElwFvMjcRWpVOIxiwnz-IQjve_eJZwanf-tZ92Pzzffr28399--3F1f3W-CVgNsosEEjtSlSxIBUYNWRlqAIYVE2IcoNWqXrCVwVhpje6cujY7Uy6hT1Gfd3cqNBXf-UHmP9dkXZP8ilDp6rDOHiXz_EI0iJ8k4NJb63ho9KJtkDMYloIWlV1aopbVK6ZUH0h9D8Dv_EoI_huDXEBbXp9VFyzd_8fLaAlMOtN572YP_6_8DUoeRYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A bidirectional comparison of English and Japanese learners' willingness to communicate in their foreign language</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><creator>Muroya, Akiko</creator><creatorcontrib>Muroya, Akiko</creatorcontrib><description>This bidirectional study investigates the willingness to communicate (WTC) by first language (L1) Japanese learners of English as the foreign language (EFL) (n = 27) and L1 English learners of Japanese as the foreign language (JFL) learners (n = 12). Previous studies [e.g., 8, 25] have found that Japanese university students still struggled to improve their willingness to speak English, despite several years of oral communication classes. The goal of this study is to identify what makes Japanese EFL learners less willing to speak English, by comparing them with English JFL learners. This study examines 1) which factor affects the two learner groups' WTC in their foreign language more, actual or self-perceived linguistic competence; 2) whether speaking an L1 or L2 affects the WTC and self-perceived competence. A total of five linguistic tasks were administered to the two groups (age range 18–22) to measure their actual linguistic competence. An online questionnaire explored the group differences in WTC and self-perceived linguistic competence in L1 and L2 speaking contexts. Only the Japanese EFL group showed that self-perceived linguistic competence could have more impact on L2 WTC than actual linguistic competence. Both EFL and JFL groups showed higher WTC with individual and situational factors and self-perceived linguistic competence in the L1 speaking context than the L2 speaking context. •English JFL learners outperformed Japanese EFL learners in terms of willingness to communicate, actual, and self-perceived linguistic competence.•Only Japanese EFL learners showed that self-perceived linguistic competence affected L2 WTC more than actual linguistic competence.•Both groups showed that L2 WTC was positively correlated to actual linguistic competence, but only to wh-related accuracy rates.•Both groups showed higher WTC and self-perceived linguistic competence in the L1 speaking context than the L2 speaking context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2215-0390</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2215-0390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amper.2021.100081</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Actual linguistic competence ; English JFL learners ; Japanese EFL learners ; Self-perceived linguistic competence ; Willingness to communicate (WTC)</subject><ispartof>Ampersand (Oxford, UK), 2022, Vol.9, p.100081, Article 100081</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3291-d4af16e276f0a1aa3132405119fcfea8cd03a36f55e1650445862743de80d3fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3291-d4af16e276f0a1aa3132405119fcfea8cd03a36f55e1650445862743de80d3fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039021000096$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,4010,27900,27901,27902,45756</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muroya, Akiko</creatorcontrib><title>A bidirectional comparison of English and Japanese learners' willingness to communicate in their foreign language</title><title>Ampersand (Oxford, UK)</title><description>This bidirectional study investigates the willingness to communicate (WTC) by first language (L1) Japanese learners of English as the foreign language (EFL) (n = 27) and L1 English learners of Japanese as the foreign language (JFL) learners (n = 12). Previous studies [e.g., 8, 25] have found that Japanese university students still struggled to improve their willingness to speak English, despite several years of oral communication classes. The goal of this study is to identify what makes Japanese EFL learners less willing to speak English, by comparing them with English JFL learners. This study examines 1) which factor affects the two learner groups' WTC in their foreign language more, actual or self-perceived linguistic competence; 2) whether speaking an L1 or L2 affects the WTC and self-perceived competence. A total of five linguistic tasks were administered to the two groups (age range 18–22) to measure their actual linguistic competence. An online questionnaire explored the group differences in WTC and self-perceived linguistic competence in L1 and L2 speaking contexts. Only the Japanese EFL group showed that self-perceived linguistic competence could have more impact on L2 WTC than actual linguistic competence. Both EFL and JFL groups showed higher WTC with individual and situational factors and self-perceived linguistic competence in the L1 speaking context than the L2 speaking context. •English JFL learners outperformed Japanese EFL learners in terms of willingness to communicate, actual, and self-perceived linguistic competence.•Only Japanese EFL learners showed that self-perceived linguistic competence affected L2 WTC more than actual linguistic competence.•Both groups showed that L2 WTC was positively correlated to actual linguistic competence, but only to wh-related accuracy rates.•Both groups showed higher WTC and self-perceived linguistic competence in the L1 speaking context than the L2 speaking context.</description><subject>Actual linguistic competence</subject><subject>English JFL learners</subject><subject>Japanese EFL learners</subject><subject>Self-perceived linguistic competence</subject><subject>Willingness to communicate (WTC)</subject><issn>2215-0390</issn><issn>2215-0390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9vFDEMxUcIpFaln6CX3DjtEudfZw4cqqrQokpc4By5iTP1ajZZkimo357ZDqo4cbL14veT49d1FyC3IMF93G1xf6C6VVLBokjZw5vuVCmwG6kH-faf_qQ7b223jIAF6QZ72v28Eg8cuVKYuWScRCj7A1ZuJYuSxE0eJ26PAnMUX_GAmRqJibBmqu2D-M3TxHlc1CbmcvTunzIHnElwFvMjcRWpVOIxiwnz-IQjve_eJZwanf-tZ92Pzzffr28399--3F1f3W-CVgNsosEEjtSlSxIBUYNWRlqAIYVE2IcoNWqXrCVwVhpje6cujY7Uy6hT1Gfd3cqNBXf-UHmP9dkXZP8ilDp6rDOHiXz_EI0iJ8k4NJb63ho9KJtkDMYloIWlV1aopbVK6ZUH0h9D8Dv_EoI_huDXEBbXp9VFyzd_8fLaAlMOtN572YP_6_8DUoeRYg</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Muroya, Akiko</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>A bidirectional comparison of English and Japanese learners' willingness to communicate in their foreign language</title><author>Muroya, Akiko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3291-d4af16e276f0a1aa3132405119fcfea8cd03a36f55e1650445862743de80d3fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Actual linguistic competence</topic><topic>English JFL learners</topic><topic>Japanese EFL learners</topic><topic>Self-perceived linguistic competence</topic><topic>Willingness to communicate (WTC)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muroya, Akiko</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Ampersand (Oxford, UK)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muroya, Akiko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A bidirectional comparison of English and Japanese learners' willingness to communicate in their foreign language</atitle><jtitle>Ampersand (Oxford, UK)</jtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>100081</spage><pages>100081-</pages><artnum>100081</artnum><issn>2215-0390</issn><eissn>2215-0390</eissn><abstract>This bidirectional study investigates the willingness to communicate (WTC) by first language (L1) Japanese learners of English as the foreign language (EFL) (n = 27) and L1 English learners of Japanese as the foreign language (JFL) learners (n = 12). Previous studies [e.g., 8, 25] have found that Japanese university students still struggled to improve their willingness to speak English, despite several years of oral communication classes. The goal of this study is to identify what makes Japanese EFL learners less willing to speak English, by comparing them with English JFL learners. This study examines 1) which factor affects the two learner groups' WTC in their foreign language more, actual or self-perceived linguistic competence; 2) whether speaking an L1 or L2 affects the WTC and self-perceived competence. A total of five linguistic tasks were administered to the two groups (age range 18–22) to measure their actual linguistic competence. An online questionnaire explored the group differences in WTC and self-perceived linguistic competence in L1 and L2 speaking contexts. Only the Japanese EFL group showed that self-perceived linguistic competence could have more impact on L2 WTC than actual linguistic competence. Both EFL and JFL groups showed higher WTC with individual and situational factors and self-perceived linguistic competence in the L1 speaking context than the L2 speaking context. •English JFL learners outperformed Japanese EFL learners in terms of willingness to communicate, actual, and self-perceived linguistic competence.•Only Japanese EFL learners showed that self-perceived linguistic competence affected L2 WTC more than actual linguistic competence.•Both groups showed that L2 WTC was positively correlated to actual linguistic competence, but only to wh-related accuracy rates.•Both groups showed higher WTC and self-perceived linguistic competence in the L1 speaking context than the L2 speaking context.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.amper.2021.100081</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2215-0390
ispartof Ampersand (Oxford, UK), 2022, Vol.9, p.100081, Article 100081
issn 2215-0390
2215-0390
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8bd42e60e46a45e88543925f0dc46f1e
source ScienceDirect
subjects Actual linguistic competence
English JFL learners
Japanese EFL learners
Self-perceived linguistic competence
Willingness to communicate (WTC)
title A bidirectional comparison of English and Japanese learners' willingness to communicate in their foreign language
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T04%3A16%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20bidirectional%20comparison%20of%20English%20and%20Japanese%20learners'%20willingness%20to%20communicate%20in%20their%20foreign%20language&rft.jtitle=Ampersand%20(Oxford,%20UK)&rft.au=Muroya,%20Akiko&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=100081&rft.pages=100081-&rft.artnum=100081&rft.issn=2215-0390&rft.eissn=2215-0390&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amper.2021.100081&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_doaj_%3ES2215039021000096%3C/elsevier_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3291-d4af16e276f0a1aa3132405119fcfea8cd03a36f55e1650445862743de80d3fd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true