Loading…
Influence of Gallic Acid-Containing Mouth Spray on Dental Health and Oral Microbiota of Healthy Dogs: A Pilot Study
The pilot study aimed to investigate the effects of GAMS on oral microbiota in healthy dog subjects. Thirty-eight dogs were recruited and randomly allocated to the placebo ( = 19) and treatment groups ( = 19). The dogs were treated with mouth spray once daily for 42 days. The changes in the gingival...
Saved in:
Published in: | Veterinary sciences 2023-06, Vol.10 (7), p.424 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-1672187d01c973b5f91f53bbf90c33fabe9f46045ad88cb682b04d46e1ab1a2c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-1672187d01c973b5f91f53bbf90c33fabe9f46045ad88cb682b04d46e1ab1a2c3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 424 |
container_title | Veterinary sciences |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Thongma, Nichaphat Sivamaruthi, Bhagavathi Sundaram Bharathi, Muruganantham Tansrisook, Chawin Peerajan, Sartjin Tanongpitchayes, Kittidaj Chawnan, Natcha Rashmi, Subramanian Thongkorn, Kriangkrai Chaiyasut, Chaiyavat |
description | The pilot study aimed to investigate the effects of GAMS on oral microbiota in healthy dog subjects. Thirty-eight dogs were recruited and randomly allocated to the placebo (
= 19) and treatment groups (
= 19). The dogs were treated with mouth spray once daily for 42 days. The changes in the gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), and calculus index (CI) were measured at baseline (day 0) and end of the study (42nd day). The changes in the oral microbial composition of representative dogs (placebo,
= 7; and treatment,
= 7) were also evaluated at baseline and end of the study. Oral microbial composition was assessed by sequencing. The sequences were annotated using the QIIME 2.0
. The GI, PI, and CI indexes were reduced after the GAMS usage. The abundance of the commensal bacterial phylum Actinobacteria and Chloroflexi, genera
, and
was improved after six weeks of GAMS usage. GAMS reduced the pathogenic bacterial species, including
sp.,
sp.,
, and
Moreover, some pathogenic bacterial abundances were increased at the end of the study. All the microbial variations were observed within the group. The inter-group analysis revealed that the changes were unrelated to GAMS usage. Further studies need to be carried out using more experimental subjects to confirm the effectiveness of GAMS. More metagenomic data are required to evidence the GMAS impact on the oral microbiome of healthy dogs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/vetsci10070424 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8c77f8909cfa433eaba9c4a0249d710b</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A759237220</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8c77f8909cfa433eaba9c4a0249d710b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A759237220</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-1672187d01c973b5f91f53bbf90c33fabe9f46045ad88cb682b04d46e1ab1a2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1rGzEQhpfS0oQ01x6LoJdeNtXnatVLMU6bGBJSSHsWI63kyKwld7Ub8L-vXKcmLkEHSTPvPGJeTVW9J_iCMYU_P7ox20AwlphT_qo6pQw3tWQtef3sfFKd57zCGBPGqZDkbXXCpMCipeq0yovo-8lF61Dy6Ar6Plg0s6Gr5ymOEGKIS3SbpvEB3W8G2KIU0aUrmR5dO-hLGGKH7oZyvw12SCakEXaofXaLLtMyf0Ez9CP0aUT349Rt31VvPPTZnT_tZ9Wv799-zq_rm7urxXx2U1sh6FiTRlLSyg4TqyQzwiviBTPGK2wZ82Cc8rzBXEDXttY0LTWYd7xxBAwBatlZtdhzuwQrvRnCGoatThD030AalhqGMdje6dZK6VuFlfXAGXNgQFkOmHLVSYJNYX3dszaTWbvOFgtKz0fQ40wMD3qZHjXBrBWMkUL49EQY0u_J5VGvQ7au7yG6NGVNW86xajgXRfrxP-kqTUMsXu1UjFDeFORBtYTSQYg-lYftDqpnUijKJKW4qC5eUJXVuXWwKTofSvylgvKbOQ_OH5okWO_GTh-PXSn48Nyag_zfkLE_tlfRtg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2843124653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Gallic Acid-Containing Mouth Spray on Dental Health and Oral Microbiota of Healthy Dogs: A Pilot Study</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central (Open access)</source><creator>Thongma, Nichaphat ; Sivamaruthi, Bhagavathi Sundaram ; Bharathi, Muruganantham ; Tansrisook, Chawin ; Peerajan, Sartjin ; Tanongpitchayes, Kittidaj ; Chawnan, Natcha ; Rashmi, Subramanian ; Thongkorn, Kriangkrai ; Chaiyasut, Chaiyavat</creator><creatorcontrib>Thongma, Nichaphat ; Sivamaruthi, Bhagavathi Sundaram ; Bharathi, Muruganantham ; Tansrisook, Chawin ; Peerajan, Sartjin ; Tanongpitchayes, Kittidaj ; Chawnan, Natcha ; Rashmi, Subramanian ; Thongkorn, Kriangkrai ; Chaiyasut, Chaiyavat</creatorcontrib><description>The pilot study aimed to investigate the effects of GAMS on oral microbiota in healthy dog subjects. Thirty-eight dogs were recruited and randomly allocated to the placebo (
= 19) and treatment groups (
= 19). The dogs were treated with mouth spray once daily for 42 days. The changes in the gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), and calculus index (CI) were measured at baseline (day 0) and end of the study (42nd day). The changes in the oral microbial composition of representative dogs (placebo,
= 7; and treatment,
= 7) were also evaluated at baseline and end of the study. Oral microbial composition was assessed by sequencing. The sequences were annotated using the QIIME 2.0
. The GI, PI, and CI indexes were reduced after the GAMS usage. The abundance of the commensal bacterial phylum Actinobacteria and Chloroflexi, genera
, and
was improved after six weeks of GAMS usage. GAMS reduced the pathogenic bacterial species, including
sp.,
sp.,
, and
Moreover, some pathogenic bacterial abundances were increased at the end of the study. All the microbial variations were observed within the group. The inter-group analysis revealed that the changes were unrelated to GAMS usage. Further studies need to be carried out using more experimental subjects to confirm the effectiveness of GAMS. More metagenomic data are required to evidence the GMAS impact on the oral microbiome of healthy dogs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2306-7381</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2306-7381</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/vetsci10070424</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37505829</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Acids ; Analysis ; Anesthesia ; Bacteria ; Biofilms ; calculus index ; Dogs ; Gallic acid ; Gingival index ; Metagenomics ; Microbiomes ; Microbiota ; Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) ; Microorganisms ; Mouth ; Oral health ; Oral hygiene ; oral microbiome ; Pathogens ; Periodontal diseases ; Phenols ; Placebos ; Plaque index ; Preservatives ; QIIME 2.0TM ; Statistical significance ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>Veterinary sciences, 2023-06, Vol.10 (7), p.424</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-1672187d01c973b5f91f53bbf90c33fabe9f46045ad88cb682b04d46e1ab1a2c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-1672187d01c973b5f91f53bbf90c33fabe9f46045ad88cb682b04d46e1ab1a2c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5499-8350 ; 0000-0002-1712-2851 ; 0009-0005-1271-5120 ; 0000-0002-1633-2419</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2843124653/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2843124653?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37505829$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thongma, Nichaphat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivamaruthi, Bhagavathi Sundaram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bharathi, Muruganantham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tansrisook, Chawin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peerajan, Sartjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanongpitchayes, Kittidaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chawnan, Natcha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rashmi, Subramanian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thongkorn, Kriangkrai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaiyasut, Chaiyavat</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Gallic Acid-Containing Mouth Spray on Dental Health and Oral Microbiota of Healthy Dogs: A Pilot Study</title><title>Veterinary sciences</title><addtitle>Vet Sci</addtitle><description>The pilot study aimed to investigate the effects of GAMS on oral microbiota in healthy dog subjects. Thirty-eight dogs were recruited and randomly allocated to the placebo (
= 19) and treatment groups (
= 19). The dogs were treated with mouth spray once daily for 42 days. The changes in the gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), and calculus index (CI) were measured at baseline (day 0) and end of the study (42nd day). The changes in the oral microbial composition of representative dogs (placebo,
= 7; and treatment,
= 7) were also evaluated at baseline and end of the study. Oral microbial composition was assessed by sequencing. The sequences were annotated using the QIIME 2.0
. The GI, PI, and CI indexes were reduced after the GAMS usage. The abundance of the commensal bacterial phylum Actinobacteria and Chloroflexi, genera
, and
was improved after six weeks of GAMS usage. GAMS reduced the pathogenic bacterial species, including
sp.,
sp.,
, and
Moreover, some pathogenic bacterial abundances were increased at the end of the study. All the microbial variations were observed within the group. The inter-group analysis revealed that the changes were unrelated to GAMS usage. Further studies need to be carried out using more experimental subjects to confirm the effectiveness of GAMS. More metagenomic data are required to evidence the GMAS impact on the oral microbiome of healthy dogs.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>calculus index</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Gallic acid</subject><subject>Gingival index</subject><subject>Metagenomics</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Mouth</subject><subject>Oral health</subject><subject>Oral hygiene</subject><subject>oral microbiome</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Periodontal diseases</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Plaque index</subject><subject>Preservatives</subject><subject>QIIME 2.0TM</subject><subject>Statistical significance</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>2306-7381</issn><issn>2306-7381</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1rGzEQhpfS0oQ01x6LoJdeNtXnatVLMU6bGBJSSHsWI63kyKwld7Ub8L-vXKcmLkEHSTPvPGJeTVW9J_iCMYU_P7ox20AwlphT_qo6pQw3tWQtef3sfFKd57zCGBPGqZDkbXXCpMCipeq0yovo-8lF61Dy6Ar6Plg0s6Gr5ymOEGKIS3SbpvEB3W8G2KIU0aUrmR5dO-hLGGKH7oZyvw12SCakEXaofXaLLtMyf0Ez9CP0aUT349Rt31VvPPTZnT_tZ9Wv799-zq_rm7urxXx2U1sh6FiTRlLSyg4TqyQzwiviBTPGK2wZ82Cc8rzBXEDXttY0LTWYd7xxBAwBatlZtdhzuwQrvRnCGoatThD030AalhqGMdje6dZK6VuFlfXAGXNgQFkOmHLVSYJNYX3dszaTWbvOFgtKz0fQ40wMD3qZHjXBrBWMkUL49EQY0u_J5VGvQ7au7yG6NGVNW86xajgXRfrxP-kqTUMsXu1UjFDeFORBtYTSQYg-lYftDqpnUijKJKW4qC5eUJXVuXWwKTofSvylgvKbOQ_OH5okWO_GTh-PXSn48Nyag_zfkLE_tlfRtg</recordid><startdate>20230630</startdate><enddate>20230630</enddate><creator>Thongma, Nichaphat</creator><creator>Sivamaruthi, Bhagavathi Sundaram</creator><creator>Bharathi, Muruganantham</creator><creator>Tansrisook, Chawin</creator><creator>Peerajan, Sartjin</creator><creator>Tanongpitchayes, Kittidaj</creator><creator>Chawnan, Natcha</creator><creator>Rashmi, Subramanian</creator><creator>Thongkorn, Kriangkrai</creator><creator>Chaiyasut, Chaiyavat</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5499-8350</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1712-2851</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1271-5120</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1633-2419</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230630</creationdate><title>Influence of Gallic Acid-Containing Mouth Spray on Dental Health and Oral Microbiota of Healthy Dogs: A Pilot Study</title><author>Thongma, Nichaphat ; Sivamaruthi, Bhagavathi Sundaram ; Bharathi, Muruganantham ; Tansrisook, Chawin ; Peerajan, Sartjin ; Tanongpitchayes, Kittidaj ; Chawnan, Natcha ; Rashmi, Subramanian ; Thongkorn, Kriangkrai ; Chaiyasut, Chaiyavat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-1672187d01c973b5f91f53bbf90c33fabe9f46045ad88cb682b04d46e1ab1a2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>calculus index</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Gallic acid</topic><topic>Gingival index</topic><topic>Metagenomics</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Mouth</topic><topic>Oral health</topic><topic>Oral hygiene</topic><topic>oral microbiome</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Periodontal diseases</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Plaque index</topic><topic>Preservatives</topic><topic>QIIME 2.0TM</topic><topic>Statistical significance</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thongma, Nichaphat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivamaruthi, Bhagavathi Sundaram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bharathi, Muruganantham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tansrisook, Chawin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peerajan, Sartjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanongpitchayes, Kittidaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chawnan, Natcha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rashmi, Subramanian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thongkorn, Kriangkrai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaiyasut, Chaiyavat</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Veterinary sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thongma, Nichaphat</au><au>Sivamaruthi, Bhagavathi Sundaram</au><au>Bharathi, Muruganantham</au><au>Tansrisook, Chawin</au><au>Peerajan, Sartjin</au><au>Tanongpitchayes, Kittidaj</au><au>Chawnan, Natcha</au><au>Rashmi, Subramanian</au><au>Thongkorn, Kriangkrai</au><au>Chaiyasut, Chaiyavat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Gallic Acid-Containing Mouth Spray on Dental Health and Oral Microbiota of Healthy Dogs: A Pilot Study</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Sci</addtitle><date>2023-06-30</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>424</spage><pages>424-</pages><issn>2306-7381</issn><eissn>2306-7381</eissn><abstract>The pilot study aimed to investigate the effects of GAMS on oral microbiota in healthy dog subjects. Thirty-eight dogs were recruited and randomly allocated to the placebo (
= 19) and treatment groups (
= 19). The dogs were treated with mouth spray once daily for 42 days. The changes in the gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), and calculus index (CI) were measured at baseline (day 0) and end of the study (42nd day). The changes in the oral microbial composition of representative dogs (placebo,
= 7; and treatment,
= 7) were also evaluated at baseline and end of the study. Oral microbial composition was assessed by sequencing. The sequences were annotated using the QIIME 2.0
. The GI, PI, and CI indexes were reduced after the GAMS usage. The abundance of the commensal bacterial phylum Actinobacteria and Chloroflexi, genera
, and
was improved after six weeks of GAMS usage. GAMS reduced the pathogenic bacterial species, including
sp.,
sp.,
, and
Moreover, some pathogenic bacterial abundances were increased at the end of the study. All the microbial variations were observed within the group. The inter-group analysis revealed that the changes were unrelated to GAMS usage. Further studies need to be carried out using more experimental subjects to confirm the effectiveness of GAMS. More metagenomic data are required to evidence the GMAS impact on the oral microbiome of healthy dogs.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>37505829</pmid><doi>10.3390/vetsci10070424</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5499-8350</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1712-2851</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1271-5120</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1633-2419</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2306-7381 |
ispartof | Veterinary sciences, 2023-06, Vol.10 (7), p.424 |
issn | 2306-7381 2306-7381 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8c77f8909cfa433eaba9c4a0249d710b |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central (Open access) |
subjects | Acids Analysis Anesthesia Bacteria Biofilms calculus index Dogs Gallic acid Gingival index Metagenomics Microbiomes Microbiota Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) Microorganisms Mouth Oral health Oral hygiene oral microbiome Pathogens Periodontal diseases Phenols Placebos Plaque index Preservatives QIIME 2.0TM Statistical significance Teeth |
title | Influence of Gallic Acid-Containing Mouth Spray on Dental Health and Oral Microbiota of Healthy Dogs: A Pilot Study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A07%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Gallic%20Acid-Containing%20Mouth%20Spray%20on%20Dental%20Health%20and%20Oral%20Microbiota%20of%20Healthy%20Dogs:%20A%20Pilot%20Study&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20sciences&rft.au=Thongma,%20Nichaphat&rft.date=2023-06-30&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=424&rft.pages=424-&rft.issn=2306-7381&rft.eissn=2306-7381&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/vetsci10070424&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA759237220%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-1672187d01c973b5f91f53bbf90c33fabe9f46045ad88cb682b04d46e1ab1a2c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2843124653&rft_id=info:pmid/37505829&rft_galeid=A759237220&rfr_iscdi=true |