A dosimetric comparison of different treatment plans of palliative spinal bone irradiation: analysis of dose coverage with respect to ICRU 50 Report

• Published in: Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research 2009-01, Vol.28 (1), p.2-2, Article 2
• Main Authors: Andic, Fundagul, Baz Cifci, Sule, Ors, Yasemin, Niang, Umar, Dirier, Ahmet, Adli, Mustafa
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Antineoplastic Protocols; Bone cancer; Bone Neoplasms - radiotherapy; Care and treatment; Diagnosis; Dosimeters; Health aspects; Humans; Palliative Care; Radiometry; Radiotherapy; Spine - radiation effects
• ISSN: 1756-9966; 0392-9078; 1756-9966
• DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-28-2

This study aimed to analyze three-dimensional (3D) dosimetric data of conventional two-dimensional (2D) palliative spinal bone irradiation using different reference points and treatment plans with respect to the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) Report 50. Forty-five simulation CT scans of 39 patients previously treated for thoraco-lumbar spinal bone metastases were used. Three different treatment plans were created: (1) single posterior field plans using the ICRU reference points (ICRUrps); (2) single posterior field plans using the International Bone Metastasis Consensus Working Party reference points (IBMCrps); (3) two opposed anterior-posterior (AP-PA) field plans using the ICRUrps. The intended dose range for planning target volume (PTV) was 90% to 110% of the prescribed dose for AP-PA field plans. Cumulative dose-volume histograms were generated for each plan, and minimum, maximum and mean doses to the PTV, medulla spinalis, esophagus and intestines were analyzed. The mean percentages of minimum, maximum and mean PTV doses +/- standard deviation were, respectively, 91 +/- 1.3%, 108.8 +/- 1.3% and 99.7 +/- 1.3% in AP-PA field plans; 77.3 +/- 2.6%, 122.2 +/- 4.3% and 99.8 +/- 2.6% in ICRUrp single field plans; and 83.7 +/- 3.3%, 133.9 +/- 7.1% and 108.8 +/- 3.3% in IBMCrp single field plans. Minimum doses of both single field plans were significantly lower (p < 0.001) while maximum doses were significantly higher (p < 0.001) than AP-PA field plans. Minimum, maximum and mean doses were higher in IBMCrp single field plans than in ICRUrp single field plans (p < 0.001). The mean medulla spinalis doses were lower in AP-PA field plans than single posterior field plans (p < 0.001). Maximum doses for medulla spinalis were higher than 120% of the prescribed dose in 22 of 45 (49%) IBMCrp single field plans. Mean esophagus and intestinal doses were higher (p < 0.001) in AP-PA field plans than single field plans, however, less than 95% of the prescribed dose. In palliative spinal bone irradiation, 2D conventional single posterior field radiotherapy did not accomplish the ICRU Report 50 recommendations for PTV dose distribution, while the AP-PA field plans did achieve the intended dose ranges with a homogenous distribution and reasonable doses to the medulla spinalis, esophagus and intestines.