Biomechanical characteristic differences of two new types of intramedullary nail devices in the treatment of comminuted intertrochanteric fractures of femur: a comparative study based on finite element analysis

• Published in: Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2024-09, Vol.19 (1), p.583-9, Article 583
• Main Authors: Tang, Zhongjian, Lv, Yongxiang, Zhu, Zhexi, Lu, Yafei, Zhou, Haibin, Zhang, Yazhong, Liao, Yifeng, Wang, Bin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biomechanical Phenomena; Bone Nails; Care and treatment; Comparative analysis; Computer software industry; Femoral intertrochanteric fractures; Femur - surgery; Finite Element Analysis; Finite element method; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - instrumentation; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods; Fractures; Fractures, Comminuted - surgery; Hip Fractures - surgery; Humans; Innovations; Internal fixation in fractures; International economic relations; Intramedullary nail devices; New intramedullary systems; Proximal femoral bionic nails; Simulation methods
• ISSN: 1749-799X; 1749-799X
• DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05073-4

Given the recent application of two new types of intramedullary nail devices in the treatment of comminuted femoral intertrochanteric fractures (CFIFs), there is still a lack of deep understanding and comparative evaluation of their biomechanical properties. Therefore, this study aims to systematically compare the advantages and disadvantages of these two new devices with traditional proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and InterTan nails in the fixation of CFIFs through finite element analysis. Based on the validated finite element model, this study constructed an accurate CFIFs model. In this model, PFNA, InterTan nails, proximal femoral bionic nails (PFBN), and new intramedullary systems (NIS) were implanted, totaling four groups of finite element models. Each group of models was subjected to simulation tests under a vertical load of 2100 N to evaluate the displacement and Von Mises stress (VMS) distribution of the femur and intramedullary nail devices. Under a vertical load of 2100 N, a comparative analysis of the four finite element models showed that the NIS device exhibited the most superior performance in terms of peak displacement, while the PFNA device performed relatively poorly. Although the NIS device had the highest peak stress in the femur, it had the smallest peak displacement of both the femur and intramedullary nail devices, and the peak stress was mainly concentrated on the lateral side of the femur, with significantly lower stress in the proximal femur compared to the other three intramedullary nail devices. In contrast, the PFBN device had the lowest peak stress in the femur, and its peak displacement of both the femur and intramedullary nail devices was also less than that of PFNA and InterTan nails. This study demonstrates that in the treatment of CFIFs, PFBN and NIS devices exhibit superior biomechanical performance compared to traditional PFNA and InterTan nail devices. Especially the NIS device, which can achieve good biomechanical results when fixing femoral intertrochanteric fractures with missing medial wall. Therefore, both PFBN and NIS devices can be considered reliable closed reduction and internal fixation techniques for the treatment of CFIFs, with potential clinical application value.