Loading…

Effect of the Timber Legality Requirement System on Lumber Trade: Focusing on EUTR and Lacey Act

This study provides novel insights into the policy effects of timber legality verification methods, specifically Due-diligence (under the European Union Timber Regulation (EUTR)) and Due-care (under the Lacey Act), on coniferous and non-coniferous lumber trade, highlighting their significance in the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Forests 2023-11, Vol.14 (11), p.2232
Main Authors: Kim, Ki-Dong, Shim, Gyuhun, Choi, Hyun-Im, Kim, Dong-Hyun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-3957fa10b552e5854db4c7742757569f006ca421a645b43c36713be12484b8ad3
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2232
container_title Forests
container_volume 14
creator Kim, Ki-Dong
Shim, Gyuhun
Choi, Hyun-Im
Kim, Dong-Hyun
description This study provides novel insights into the policy effects of timber legality verification methods, specifically Due-diligence (under the European Union Timber Regulation (EUTR)) and Due-care (under the Lacey Act), on coniferous and non-coniferous lumber trade, highlighting their significance in the context of global lumber trade. Timber legality verification plays a pivotal role in the global timber trade. We comprehensively assess the impact of verification methods on coniferous and non-coniferous lumber trade, utilizing two decades of trade data (1997–2017) across approximately 160 countries. We employ the difference-in-differences method based on the gravity model of international trade, utilizing robust export–import data and demographic profiles. Our findings demonstrate that the effect of EUTR on coniferous lumber imports ranged between −0.32% and −0.05%, and that on non-coniferous lumber imports ranged between −0.44% and −0.05%, whereas the effect of the Lacey Act on coniferous lumber imports ranged between −0.93% and −0.09%. Non-coniferous lumber imports remained unaffected. The Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA) led to decreased exports to the EU and US. Our findings hold two key implications. First, Due-diligence exhibits more consistent policy effects than Due-care. Second, supporting VPA-participating countries is crucial for facilitating timber trade. These insights inform timber trade policies and sustainable practices.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/f14112232
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8cd803ea8b1144a982727fdc755d07a0</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A774320491</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8cd803ea8b1144a982727fdc755d07a0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A774320491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-3957fa10b552e5854db4c7742757569f006ca421a645b43c36713be12484b8ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUU1rHDEMHUoLDWkO_QeGnnrY1J9ru7clbNrAQCHdnF2NLW-97IwTj-ew_z5OtoRKBwnp6fEkdd1nRq-FsPRbZJIxzgV_110wa-1KWqrf_5d_7K7m-UCbKW0slxfdn22M6CvJkdS_SHZpHLCQHvdwTPVE7vFpSQVHnCr5fZorjiRPpF9eUbsCAb-T2-yXOU37l872YXdPYAqkB48nsvH1U_chwnHGq3_xsnu43e5ufq76Xz_ubjb9ygul60pYpSMwOijFURklwyC91pJrpdXaRkrXHiRnsJZqkMKLtWZiQMalkYOBIC67uzNvyHBwjyWNUE4uQ3KvhVz2DkpN_ojO-GCoQDADY1KCNVxzHYPXSgWqgTauL2eux5KfFpyrO-SlTE2-48YK2jRq21DXZ1S7Fbo0xVwL-OYBx-TzhDG1-qYtITiVlrWBr-cBX_I8F4xvMhl1Lw90bw8Uz_JdiOI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2893055279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of the Timber Legality Requirement System on Lumber Trade: Focusing on EUTR and Lacey Act</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Kim, Ki-Dong ; Shim, Gyuhun ; Choi, Hyun-Im ; Kim, Dong-Hyun</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ki-Dong ; Shim, Gyuhun ; Choi, Hyun-Im ; Kim, Dong-Hyun</creatorcontrib><description>This study provides novel insights into the policy effects of timber legality verification methods, specifically Due-diligence (under the European Union Timber Regulation (EUTR)) and Due-care (under the Lacey Act), on coniferous and non-coniferous lumber trade, highlighting their significance in the context of global lumber trade. Timber legality verification plays a pivotal role in the global timber trade. We comprehensively assess the impact of verification methods on coniferous and non-coniferous lumber trade, utilizing two decades of trade data (1997–2017) across approximately 160 countries. We employ the difference-in-differences method based on the gravity model of international trade, utilizing robust export–import data and demographic profiles. Our findings demonstrate that the effect of EUTR on coniferous lumber imports ranged between −0.32% and −0.05%, and that on non-coniferous lumber imports ranged between −0.44% and −0.05%, whereas the effect of the Lacey Act on coniferous lumber imports ranged between −0.93% and −0.09%. Non-coniferous lumber imports remained unaffected. The Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA) led to decreased exports to the EU and US. Our findings hold two key implications. First, Due-diligence exhibits more consistent policy effects than Due-care. Second, supporting VPA-participating countries is crucial for facilitating timber trade. These insights inform timber trade policies and sustainable practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1999-4907</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1999-4907</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/f14112232</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Deforestation ; difference-in-differences ; Economic aspects ; Economic crisis ; Environmental aspects ; Exports ; Forests ; gravity model ; Imports ; International trade ; Land degradation ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Lumber ; Lumber industry ; lumber trade ; Supply chains ; Sustainable practices ; Timber ; timber legality requirement system ; Trade policy ; Trends ; Valproic acid ; Verification ; VPA ; Wood</subject><ispartof>Forests, 2023-11, Vol.14 (11), p.2232</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-3957fa10b552e5854db4c7742757569f006ca421a645b43c36713be12484b8ad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0925-5520 ; 0000-0002-5374-0593</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2893055279/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2893055279?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,38516,43895,44590,74412,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ki-Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shim, Gyuhun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Hyun-Im</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong-Hyun</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of the Timber Legality Requirement System on Lumber Trade: Focusing on EUTR and Lacey Act</title><title>Forests</title><description>This study provides novel insights into the policy effects of timber legality verification methods, specifically Due-diligence (under the European Union Timber Regulation (EUTR)) and Due-care (under the Lacey Act), on coniferous and non-coniferous lumber trade, highlighting their significance in the context of global lumber trade. Timber legality verification plays a pivotal role in the global timber trade. We comprehensively assess the impact of verification methods on coniferous and non-coniferous lumber trade, utilizing two decades of trade data (1997–2017) across approximately 160 countries. We employ the difference-in-differences method based on the gravity model of international trade, utilizing robust export–import data and demographic profiles. Our findings demonstrate that the effect of EUTR on coniferous lumber imports ranged between −0.32% and −0.05%, and that on non-coniferous lumber imports ranged between −0.44% and −0.05%, whereas the effect of the Lacey Act on coniferous lumber imports ranged between −0.93% and −0.09%. Non-coniferous lumber imports remained unaffected. The Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA) led to decreased exports to the EU and US. Our findings hold two key implications. First, Due-diligence exhibits more consistent policy effects than Due-care. Second, supporting VPA-participating countries is crucial for facilitating timber trade. These insights inform timber trade policies and sustainable practices.</description><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>difference-in-differences</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Exports</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>gravity model</subject><subject>Imports</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Land degradation</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Lumber</subject><subject>Lumber industry</subject><subject>lumber trade</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Sustainable practices</subject><subject>Timber</subject><subject>timber legality requirement system</subject><subject>Trade policy</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Valproic acid</subject><subject>Verification</subject><subject>VPA</subject><subject>Wood</subject><issn>1999-4907</issn><issn>1999-4907</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUU1rHDEMHUoLDWkO_QeGnnrY1J9ru7clbNrAQCHdnF2NLW-97IwTj-ew_z5OtoRKBwnp6fEkdd1nRq-FsPRbZJIxzgV_110wa-1KWqrf_5d_7K7m-UCbKW0slxfdn22M6CvJkdS_SHZpHLCQHvdwTPVE7vFpSQVHnCr5fZorjiRPpF9eUbsCAb-T2-yXOU37l872YXdPYAqkB48nsvH1U_chwnHGq3_xsnu43e5ufq76Xz_ubjb9ygul60pYpSMwOijFURklwyC91pJrpdXaRkrXHiRnsJZqkMKLtWZiQMalkYOBIC67uzNvyHBwjyWNUE4uQ3KvhVz2DkpN_ojO-GCoQDADY1KCNVxzHYPXSgWqgTauL2eux5KfFpyrO-SlTE2-48YK2jRq21DXZ1S7Fbo0xVwL-OYBx-TzhDG1-qYtITiVlrWBr-cBX_I8F4xvMhl1Lw90bw8Uz_JdiOI</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Kim, Ki-Dong</creator><creator>Shim, Gyuhun</creator><creator>Choi, Hyun-Im</creator><creator>Kim, Dong-Hyun</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0925-5520</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5374-0593</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Effect of the Timber Legality Requirement System on Lumber Trade: Focusing on EUTR and Lacey Act</title><author>Kim, Ki-Dong ; Shim, Gyuhun ; Choi, Hyun-Im ; Kim, Dong-Hyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-3957fa10b552e5854db4c7742757569f006ca421a645b43c36713be12484b8ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>difference-in-differences</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Exports</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>gravity model</topic><topic>Imports</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Land degradation</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Lumber</topic><topic>Lumber industry</topic><topic>lumber trade</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Sustainable practices</topic><topic>Timber</topic><topic>timber legality requirement system</topic><topic>Trade policy</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Valproic acid</topic><topic>Verification</topic><topic>VPA</topic><topic>Wood</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ki-Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shim, Gyuhun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Hyun-Im</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong-Hyun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Forests</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Ki-Dong</au><au>Shim, Gyuhun</au><au>Choi, Hyun-Im</au><au>Kim, Dong-Hyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of the Timber Legality Requirement System on Lumber Trade: Focusing on EUTR and Lacey Act</atitle><jtitle>Forests</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2232</spage><pages>2232-</pages><issn>1999-4907</issn><eissn>1999-4907</eissn><abstract>This study provides novel insights into the policy effects of timber legality verification methods, specifically Due-diligence (under the European Union Timber Regulation (EUTR)) and Due-care (under the Lacey Act), on coniferous and non-coniferous lumber trade, highlighting their significance in the context of global lumber trade. Timber legality verification plays a pivotal role in the global timber trade. We comprehensively assess the impact of verification methods on coniferous and non-coniferous lumber trade, utilizing two decades of trade data (1997–2017) across approximately 160 countries. We employ the difference-in-differences method based on the gravity model of international trade, utilizing robust export–import data and demographic profiles. Our findings demonstrate that the effect of EUTR on coniferous lumber imports ranged between −0.32% and −0.05%, and that on non-coniferous lumber imports ranged between −0.44% and −0.05%, whereas the effect of the Lacey Act on coniferous lumber imports ranged between −0.93% and −0.09%. Non-coniferous lumber imports remained unaffected. The Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA) led to decreased exports to the EU and US. Our findings hold two key implications. First, Due-diligence exhibits more consistent policy effects than Due-care. Second, supporting VPA-participating countries is crucial for facilitating timber trade. These insights inform timber trade policies and sustainable practices.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/f14112232</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0925-5520</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5374-0593</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1999-4907
ispartof Forests, 2023-11, Vol.14 (11), p.2232
issn 1999-4907
1999-4907
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8cd803ea8b1144a982727fdc755d07a0
source Publicly Available Content Database; Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Deforestation
difference-in-differences
Economic aspects
Economic crisis
Environmental aspects
Exports
Forests
gravity model
Imports
International trade
Land degradation
Laws, regulations and rules
Lumber
Lumber industry
lumber trade
Supply chains
Sustainable practices
Timber
timber legality requirement system
Trade policy
Trends
Valproic acid
Verification
VPA
Wood
title Effect of the Timber Legality Requirement System on Lumber Trade: Focusing on EUTR and Lacey Act
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A21%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20the%20Timber%20Legality%20Requirement%20System%20on%20Lumber%20Trade:%20Focusing%20on%20EUTR%20and%20Lacey%20Act&rft.jtitle=Forests&rft.au=Kim,%20Ki-Dong&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2232&rft.pages=2232-&rft.issn=1999-4907&rft.eissn=1999-4907&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/f14112232&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA774320491%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-3957fa10b552e5854db4c7742757569f006ca421a645b43c36713be12484b8ad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2893055279&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A774320491&rfr_iscdi=true