Are Front-of-Pack Labels a Health Policy Tool?

• Published in: Nutrients 2022-02, Vol.14 (4), p.771
• Main Authors: Muzzioli, Luca, Penzavecchia, Claudia, Donini, Lorenzo Maria, Pinto, Alessandro
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Carbohydrates; Choice Behavior; Community involvement; Consumer Behavior; Consumers; Descriptive labeling; Diet; Dietary guidelines; Dietary minerals; Fatty acids; Food industry; Food Labeling; Food Preferences - psychology; Food products; FOPL; front of pack labeling; Health Behavior; Health care; Health Policy; Labels; non-communicable diseases; nutrient profiling; Nutrients; nutrition labeling; Nutrition Policy; Nutrition research; Nutritive Value; Obesity; Packaging; Public health; Regulation; Retrospective Studies; Review; traditional foods
• ISSN: 2072-6643; 2072-6643
• DOI: 10.3390/nu14040771

To stem the increasing incidence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and obesity, front-of-pack labels (FOPLs) have been developed since 1989. Whereas several countries have already adopted one voluntarily, the European Community wants to harmonize an FOPL system that will be mandatory for all member states. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe what could be achieved or not by FOPLs, and to discuss if there is enough evidence to establish whether such labels are effective in modifying purchasing behavior, in directing individual dietary patterns towards a healthy and sustainable diet, and in reformulating food products by the food industry. Non-directive FOPLs, which are still under study, appear to be informative and well-accepted by consumers even if they require a cognitive effort. Conversely, directive FOPLs are supported by several studies, but they are mostly conducted in simulated scenarios and/or performed as retrospective studies. Nevertheless, directive FOPLs are rated as an intuitive tool, and they have demonstrated a high capacity to help consumers rank food products as more or less healthy. In conclusion, directive and non-directive FOPLs convey different messages. No FOPL individually can be considered exhaustive in relation to all the objectives outlined in this narrative review, and therefore, the development of a model synthesizing both messages is advisable. Many questions remain open, such as the possibility of reformulating pre-packaged products, how to deal with traditional products, and the impact on the incidence of NCDs and obesity. In the light of the complexity of factors that condition consumption choices and health, none of the current FOPLs can be considered a health policy tool on its own. The possibility of development remains open, but as the state of the art, these tools do not seem to be able to achieve all the European Community goals together. We can speculate that they could meet these goals only if they are integrated into a multi-tiered, structured health policy intervention.