MRI before biopsy correlates with depth of invasion corrected for shrinkage rate of the histopathological specimen in tongue carcinoma

• Published in: Scientific reports 2021-10, Vol.11 (1), p.20992-20992, Article 20992
• Main Authors: Harada, Hiroyuki, Tomioka, Hirofumi, Hirai, Hideaki, Kuroshima, Takeshi, Oikawa, Yu, Nojima, Hitomi, Sakamoto, Junichiro, Kurabayashi, Tohru, Kayamori, Kou, Ikeda, Tohru
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 631/67; 631/67/1536; 631/67/1536/1665; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biopsy; Biopsy - methods; Clinical Decision-Making; Disease Management; Female; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Male; Middle Aged; multidisciplinary; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Staging; Oral cancer; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Shrinkage; Specimen preparation; Time Factors; Tongue; Tongue Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Tongue Neoplasms - pathology; Ultrasonography; Young Adult
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00398-0

The purpose of this study was to evaluate which radiological depth of invasion (r-DOI) measurement is the most concordant to clinical DOI (c-DOI) derived from correction for the shrinkage rate of the histopathological specimens. We retrospectively reviewed 128 patients with tongue carcinoma who had undergone glossectomy between 2006 and 2019. At first, the width shrinkage rate during formalin fixation and preparation process of histopathological specimens was evaluated. From the shrinking rates, a formula to calculate c-DOI from pathological DOI (p-DOI) was developed. The correlation between c-DOI and r-DOI was evaluated. The specimen shrinkage rate during the histopathological specimen preparation process was 10.3%. Based on that, we yielded the correct formula for c-DOI based on p-DOI and preparation shrinkage rate: c-DOI = p-DOI × 100/89.7. The regression equations for the association of c-DOI with r-DOI measured by ultrasound (n = 128), MRI before biopsy (n = 18), and MRI after biopsy (n = 110) were y = 1.12 * x + 0.21, y = 0.89 * x − 0.26, and y = 0.52 * x + 2.63, respectively, while the coefficients of determination were 0.664, 0.891, and 0.422, respectively. In conclusion, r-DOI using MRI before biopsy most strongly correlated with c-DOI.