Minimally Invasive Approach versus Sternotomy for Bentall Procedure: A Single-Center Experience

Background. The need for minimally invasive Bentall surgery for the treatment of aortic lesions with aortic insufficiency is increasing; however, comparative studies on the safety of the minimally invasive Bentall procedure and sternotomy Bentall procedure are lacking. Methods. Clinical data of 56 p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of interventional cardiology 2024-03, Vol.2024, p.1-7
Main Authors: Zou, Hong-Peng, Lu, Feng, Long, Xiang, Zhu, Shu-Qiang, Lin, Kun, Qiu, Bai-Quan, Yang, Xin, Xu, Jian-Jun, Wu, Yong-Bing
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background. The need for minimally invasive Bentall surgery for the treatment of aortic lesions with aortic insufficiency is increasing; however, comparative studies on the safety of the minimally invasive Bentall procedure and sternotomy Bentall procedure are lacking. Methods. Clinical data of 56 patients who underwent the Bentall procedure performed by the same surgical team at our center between December 2018 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed and followed up for 6 months after discharge. After dividing the patients into a right anterior chest minimally invasive Bentall surgery (RAT-Bentall) group (n = 13) and a conventional sternotomy Bentall surgery (C-Bentall) group (n = 43), intraoperative and early postoperative clinical data and echocardiography at 6 months after discharge were compared. Results. Compared with the C-Bentall group, the RAT-Bentall group had a lower postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score [(3.00 ± 2.08) VS (5.77 ± 1.84), P
ISSN:0896-4327
1540-8183
DOI:10.1155/2024/7034466