Involving patients and carers in patient safety in primary care: A qualitative study of a co‐designed patient safety guide

• Published in: Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy 2023-04, Vol.26 (2), p.630-639
• Main Authors: Morris, Rebecca L., Giles, Sally, Campbell, Stephen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anxiety; Arthritis; Asthma; Blood pressure; Caregivers; Chronic fatigue syndrome; Chronic illnesses; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Citizen participation; Co-design; Embedding; Family; Family physicians; Health care; Health care policy; healthcare professional experience; Humans; Hyperlipidemia; Hypertension; improvement; International policy; Interviews; Medical personnel; Original; patient experience; Patient Safety; Patient satisfaction; Patients; Primary care; Primary Health Care; Public involvement; Qualitative Research; Recruitment; Safety; Thyroid gland; Willingness
• ISSN: 1369-6513; 1369-7625
• DOI: 10.1111/hex.13673

Background Involving patients is a key premise of national and international policies on patient safety, which requires understanding how patients or carers want to be involved and developing resources to support this. This paper examines patients' and carers' views of being involved in patient safety in primary care and their views of potentially using a co‐designed patient safety guide for primary care (PSG‐PC) to foster both involvement and their safety. Methods A qualitative study using semistructured face‐to‐face interviews with 18 patients and/or carers in primary care. Interviews were transcribed and analysis was conducted using an inductive thematic approach. Results Overall participants expressed enthusiasm for the PSG‐PC as a tool to support patients and carers to be involved in patient safety in primary care. However, for some participants being involved in patient safety was seen as taking on the role of General Practitioner and had the potential to add an additional workload for patients. Participants' willingness or ability to be involved in patient safety was influenced by a range of factors including an invisible, often underacknowledged role of everyday safety for patients' interactions with primary care; the levels of involvement that patients wanted in their care and safety and the work of embedding the PSG‐PC for patients into their routine interactions with primary care. Participants identified components of the PSG‐PC that would be useful to them, in particular, if they had a responsibility for caring for a family member if they had more complex care or long‐term conditions. Conclusion Involving patients and carers in patient safety needs a tailored and personalized approach that enables patients and carers to use resources like the PSG‐PC routinely and helps challenge assumptions about their willingness and ability to be involved in patient safety. Doing so would raise awareness of opportunities to be involved in safety in line with personal preference. Patient or Public Contribution Patient and public involvement were central to the research study. This included working in partnership to develop the PSG‐PC with patients and carers and throughout our study including in the design of the study, recruiting participants, interpretation of findings.