Loading…
Reasons for Tooth Removal in Adults: A Systematic Review
Most tooth extractions are performed for dental reasons, but there are also nondental and nonmedical reasons for extractions; these include psychological, financial, religious, and cultural reasons as well as simply granting a patient's request. This systematic review was performed to examine t...
Saved in:
Published in: | International dental journal 2022-02, Vol.72 (1), p.52-57 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-a664364b00d8fb3f4ca6762316b71d9bd2fd1b56fab185ce968edf601e501d7c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-a664364b00d8fb3f4ca6762316b71d9bd2fd1b56fab185ce968edf601e501d7c3 |
container_end_page | 57 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 52 |
container_title | International dental journal |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Broers, Dyonne L.M. Dubois, Leander de Lange, Jan Su, Naichuan de Jongh, Ad |
description | Most tooth extractions are performed for dental reasons, but there are also nondental and nonmedical reasons for extractions; these include psychological, financial, religious, and cultural reasons as well as simply granting a patient's request. This systematic review was performed to examine the proportion and range of indications associated with tooth removal in context of dental, nondental, and medical reasons.
A search conducted using PubMed, Embase, and APA PsycINFO identified 6038 studies. Three studies (4396 extractions in total) could be included for the risk of bias assessment and qualitative data synthesis.
The reported indications for tooth extraction on dental and medical grounds included caries with the proportion of all extractions ranging from 36.0% to 55.3%, periodontitis from 24.8% to 38.1%, trauma from 0.8% to 4.4%, periapical disease from 7.3% to 19.1%, orthodontics from 2.5% to 7.2%, and other reasons from 4.5% to 9.2%. The proportion for patient requests ranged from 3.6% to 5.9%, but specific information regarding the actual reasons for extraction could not be determined.
The results suggest that caries and periodontitis are the most common indications for tooth extraction and that studies to reliably estimate the incidence of nondental and nonmedical motivation for extraction are lacking. Given that the final decision on performing or refusing extractions, whether it be based on dental, nondental, or nonmedical reasons, largely rests with the dentist and oral surgeon, detailed guidelines are warranted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.identj.2021.01.011 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8f394d07dc5240d5a87a9e5117f92f52</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020653921000137</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8f394d07dc5240d5a87a9e5117f92f52</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2495407022</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-a664364b00d8fb3f4ca6762316b71d9bd2fd1b56fab185ce968edf601e501d7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVFrFDEUhYModlv9ByLz6MusN5lJMvFBWIraQkGoFXwLmeSmzTA7qcnslv57M26t9kW4EMjN_c7NOYS8obCmQMX7YR0cTvOwZsDoGpaiz8iKdpLXXPEfz8kKgEEteKOOyHHOA0DbNSBekqOmEW0nJVuR7hJNjlOufEzVVYzzTXWJ27g3YxWmauN245w_VJvq232ecWvmYEt_H_DuFXnhzZjx9cN5Qr5__nR1elZffP1yfrq5qC1naq6NEG0R6wFc5_vGt9YIKVhDRS-pU71j3tGeC2962nGLSnTovACKHKiTtjkh5weui2bQtylsTbrX0QT9-yKma21SWWtE3flGtQ6kK9ItOG46aRRySqVXzHNWWB8PrNtdv0Vni33JjE-gTztTuNHXca8Vk7zhogDePQBS_LnDPOttyBbH0UwYd1mzVvEWJLBFqz08tSnmnNA_ylDQS4B60IcA9RKghqVoGXv774qPQ38S-_sHLKaXIJLONuBk0YWEdi6uhP8r_AJDbK2q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2495407022</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reasons for Tooth Removal in Adults: A Systematic Review</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><creator>Broers, Dyonne L.M. ; Dubois, Leander ; de Lange, Jan ; Su, Naichuan ; de Jongh, Ad</creator><creatorcontrib>Broers, Dyonne L.M. ; Dubois, Leander ; de Lange, Jan ; Su, Naichuan ; de Jongh, Ad</creatorcontrib><description>Most tooth extractions are performed for dental reasons, but there are also nondental and nonmedical reasons for extractions; these include psychological, financial, religious, and cultural reasons as well as simply granting a patient's request. This systematic review was performed to examine the proportion and range of indications associated with tooth removal in context of dental, nondental, and medical reasons.
A search conducted using PubMed, Embase, and APA PsycINFO identified 6038 studies. Three studies (4396 extractions in total) could be included for the risk of bias assessment and qualitative data synthesis.
The reported indications for tooth extraction on dental and medical grounds included caries with the proportion of all extractions ranging from 36.0% to 55.3%, periodontitis from 24.8% to 38.1%, trauma from 0.8% to 4.4%, periapical disease from 7.3% to 19.1%, orthodontics from 2.5% to 7.2%, and other reasons from 4.5% to 9.2%. The proportion for patient requests ranged from 3.6% to 5.9%, but specific information regarding the actual reasons for extraction could not be determined.
The results suggest that caries and periodontitis are the most common indications for tooth extraction and that studies to reliably estimate the incidence of nondental and nonmedical motivation for extraction are lacking. Given that the final decision on performing or refusing extractions, whether it be based on dental, nondental, or nonmedical reasons, largely rests with the dentist and oral surgeon, detailed guidelines are warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-6539</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-595X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2021.01.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33648772</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Clinical decision-making ; Dental Care ; Dental Caries - therapy ; Humans ; Motivation ; Orthodontics ; Patient preference ; Periodontitis ; Scientific Research Report ; Tooth Extraction</subject><ispartof>International dental journal, 2022-02, Vol.72 (1), p.52-57</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-a664364b00d8fb3f4ca6762316b71d9bd2fd1b56fab185ce968edf601e501d7c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-a664364b00d8fb3f4ca6762316b71d9bd2fd1b56fab185ce968edf601e501d7c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275356/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653921000137$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3549,27924,27925,45780,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33648772$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Broers, Dyonne L.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubois, Leander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lange, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Naichuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jongh, Ad</creatorcontrib><title>Reasons for Tooth Removal in Adults: A Systematic Review</title><title>International dental journal</title><addtitle>Int Dent J</addtitle><description>Most tooth extractions are performed for dental reasons, but there are also nondental and nonmedical reasons for extractions; these include psychological, financial, religious, and cultural reasons as well as simply granting a patient's request. This systematic review was performed to examine the proportion and range of indications associated with tooth removal in context of dental, nondental, and medical reasons.
A search conducted using PubMed, Embase, and APA PsycINFO identified 6038 studies. Three studies (4396 extractions in total) could be included for the risk of bias assessment and qualitative data synthesis.
The reported indications for tooth extraction on dental and medical grounds included caries with the proportion of all extractions ranging from 36.0% to 55.3%, periodontitis from 24.8% to 38.1%, trauma from 0.8% to 4.4%, periapical disease from 7.3% to 19.1%, orthodontics from 2.5% to 7.2%, and other reasons from 4.5% to 9.2%. The proportion for patient requests ranged from 3.6% to 5.9%, but specific information regarding the actual reasons for extraction could not be determined.
The results suggest that caries and periodontitis are the most common indications for tooth extraction and that studies to reliably estimate the incidence of nondental and nonmedical motivation for extraction are lacking. Given that the final decision on performing or refusing extractions, whether it be based on dental, nondental, or nonmedical reasons, largely rests with the dentist and oral surgeon, detailed guidelines are warranted.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Clinical decision-making</subject><subject>Dental Care</subject><subject>Dental Caries - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Orthodontics</subject><subject>Patient preference</subject><subject>Periodontitis</subject><subject>Scientific Research Report</subject><subject>Tooth Extraction</subject><issn>0020-6539</issn><issn>1875-595X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVFrFDEUhYModlv9ByLz6MusN5lJMvFBWIraQkGoFXwLmeSmzTA7qcnslv57M26t9kW4EMjN_c7NOYS8obCmQMX7YR0cTvOwZsDoGpaiz8iKdpLXXPEfz8kKgEEteKOOyHHOA0DbNSBekqOmEW0nJVuR7hJNjlOufEzVVYzzTXWJ27g3YxWmauN245w_VJvq232ecWvmYEt_H_DuFXnhzZjx9cN5Qr5__nR1elZffP1yfrq5qC1naq6NEG0R6wFc5_vGt9YIKVhDRS-pU71j3tGeC2962nGLSnTovACKHKiTtjkh5weui2bQtylsTbrX0QT9-yKma21SWWtE3flGtQ6kK9ItOG46aRRySqVXzHNWWB8PrNtdv0Vni33JjE-gTztTuNHXca8Vk7zhogDePQBS_LnDPOttyBbH0UwYd1mzVvEWJLBFqz08tSnmnNA_ylDQS4B60IcA9RKghqVoGXv774qPQ38S-_sHLKaXIJLONuBk0YWEdi6uhP8r_AJDbK2q</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Broers, Dyonne L.M.</creator><creator>Dubois, Leander</creator><creator>de Lange, Jan</creator><creator>Su, Naichuan</creator><creator>de Jongh, Ad</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Reasons for Tooth Removal in Adults: A Systematic Review</title><author>Broers, Dyonne L.M. ; Dubois, Leander ; de Lange, Jan ; Su, Naichuan ; de Jongh, Ad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-a664364b00d8fb3f4ca6762316b71d9bd2fd1b56fab185ce968edf601e501d7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Clinical decision-making</topic><topic>Dental Care</topic><topic>Dental Caries - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Orthodontics</topic><topic>Patient preference</topic><topic>Periodontitis</topic><topic>Scientific Research Report</topic><topic>Tooth Extraction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Broers, Dyonne L.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubois, Leander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lange, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Naichuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jongh, Ad</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International dental journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Broers, Dyonne L.M.</au><au>Dubois, Leander</au><au>de Lange, Jan</au><au>Su, Naichuan</au><au>de Jongh, Ad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reasons for Tooth Removal in Adults: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>International dental journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int Dent J</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>52</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>52-57</pages><issn>0020-6539</issn><eissn>1875-595X</eissn><abstract>Most tooth extractions are performed for dental reasons, but there are also nondental and nonmedical reasons for extractions; these include psychological, financial, religious, and cultural reasons as well as simply granting a patient's request. This systematic review was performed to examine the proportion and range of indications associated with tooth removal in context of dental, nondental, and medical reasons.
A search conducted using PubMed, Embase, and APA PsycINFO identified 6038 studies. Three studies (4396 extractions in total) could be included for the risk of bias assessment and qualitative data synthesis.
The reported indications for tooth extraction on dental and medical grounds included caries with the proportion of all extractions ranging from 36.0% to 55.3%, periodontitis from 24.8% to 38.1%, trauma from 0.8% to 4.4%, periapical disease from 7.3% to 19.1%, orthodontics from 2.5% to 7.2%, and other reasons from 4.5% to 9.2%. The proportion for patient requests ranged from 3.6% to 5.9%, but specific information regarding the actual reasons for extraction could not be determined.
The results suggest that caries and periodontitis are the most common indications for tooth extraction and that studies to reliably estimate the incidence of nondental and nonmedical motivation for extraction are lacking. Given that the final decision on performing or refusing extractions, whether it be based on dental, nondental, or nonmedical reasons, largely rests with the dentist and oral surgeon, detailed guidelines are warranted.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33648772</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.identj.2021.01.011</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-6539 |
ispartof | International dental journal, 2022-02, Vol.72 (1), p.52-57 |
issn | 0020-6539 1875-595X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8f394d07dc5240d5a87a9e5117f92f52 |
source | ScienceDirect; Open Access: PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Clinical decision-making Dental Care Dental Caries - therapy Humans Motivation Orthodontics Patient preference Periodontitis Scientific Research Report Tooth Extraction |
title | Reasons for Tooth Removal in Adults: A Systematic Review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A05%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reasons%20for%20Tooth%20Removal%20in%20Adults:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=International%20dental%20journal&rft.au=Broers,%20Dyonne%20L.M.&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=52&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=52-57&rft.issn=0020-6539&rft.eissn=1875-595X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.identj.2021.01.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2495407022%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-a664364b00d8fb3f4ca6762316b71d9bd2fd1b56fab185ce968edf601e501d7c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2495407022&rft_id=info:pmid/33648772&rfr_iscdi=true |