Low intensity stimulation of aortic baroreceptor afferent fibers as a potential therapeutic alternative for hypertension treatment

• Published in: Scientific reports 2022-07, Vol.12 (1), p.12242-12242, Article 12242
• Main Authors: Salman, Ibrahim M., Ameer, Omar Z., McMurray, Sheridan, Hassan, Sarah F., Sridhar, Arun, Lewis, Stephen J., Hsieh, Yee-Hsee
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 631/378; 631/443; 692/4019/2773; 692/420; Antihypertensives; Aorta; Blood pressure; Electrical stimuli; Energy consumption; Heart rate; Humanities and Social Sciences; Hypertension; multidisciplinary; Neuromodulation; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Sensory neurons
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15761-y

Carotid baroreceptor stimulation has been clinically explored for antihypertensive benefits, but neuromodulation of aortic baroreceptor afferents remains unexplored for potential translation into the clinic. Published studies have used supramaximal stimulations, which are unphysiological and energy inefficient. The objective of the present study was to identify optimal low-charge nerve stimulation parameters that would provide a clinically-relevant (20–30 mmHg) decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) in anesthetized spontaneously hypertensive rats. Stimulations of 20 s were delivered to the left aortic depressor nerve (ADN) of these rats using low ranges of pulse amplitudes (≤ 0.6 mA), widths (≤ 0.5 ms) and frequencies (≤ 5 Hz). We also assessed the effects of continuous (20 s) versus intermittent (5 s ON/3 s OFF and 5 s ON/3 s OFF for 20 s) stimulation on MAP, heart rate (HR), mesenteric (MVR) and femoral (FVR) vascular resistance using low (5 Hz) and high (15 Hz) frequencies. Lower pulse amplitudes (0.2 mA) produced 9 ± 2 to 18 ± 2 mmHg decreases in MAP. Higher pulse amplitudes (0.4 mA) produced a median MAP reduction of 28 ± 4 mmHg at 0.2 ms and 5 Hz, with no added benefit seen above 0.4 mA. Continuous and intermittent low frequency stimulation at 0.4 mA and 0.2 ms produced similar sustained decreases in MAP, HR, MVR and FVR. Continuous high frequency stimulation at 0.4 mA and 0.2 ms produced larger reductions in MAP, HR, MVR and FVR compared with all low frequency and/or intermittent high frequency stimulations. We conclude from these findings that “low intensity intermittent” electrical stimulation is an effective alternate way for neuromodulation of the aortic baroreceptor afferents and to evoke a required restoration of MAP levels in spontaneously hypertensive rats. This approach enables low energy consumption and markedly lowers the excessive decreases in MAP and hemodynamic disturbances elicited by continuous high-charge injection protocols.