Influence of titanium and titanium-zirconium alloy as implant materials on implant stability of maxillary implant retained overdenture: a randomized clinical trial

Long-term success of implant restoration depends on many factors one of them is the sufficient implant stability which is lowered in compromised bone density sites such as the maxilla as it is categorized as type III & IV bone, so searching for a new innovation and updates in implant material an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC oral health 2024-08, Vol.24 (1), p.902-12, Article 902
Main Authors: El-Hady, Amany Ibrahim Abd, Eid, Hany Ibrahim, Mohamed, Shaimaa Lotfy, Fadl, Sawsan Maged
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aged
Alloys
Bone density
Bones
Clinical trials
Composition
Corrosion resistance
Density
Dental Alloys - chemistry
Dental Implants
Dental Materials - chemistry
Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
Dentistry
Denture Retention
Denture, Overlay
Dentures
Female
Humans
Implant dentures
Implant Stability
Innovations
Long bone
Male
Maxilla
Maxilla - surgery
Middle Aged
Ostell
Patients
Prostheses
Roxolid
Statistical analysis
Success
Titanium
Titanium alloys
Zirconium
Zirconium alloys
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Long-term success of implant restoration depends on many factors one of them is the sufficient implant stability which is lowered in compromised bone density sites such as the maxilla as it is categorized as type III & IV bone, so searching for a new innovation and updates in implant material and features is very mandatory. So, the aim of this study was to compare between two implant materials (roxolid and traditional titanium) on the primary and secondary stability of implant retained maxillary overdenture. Eighteen completely edentulous patients were selected. All patients received maxillary implant-retained overdentures and lower complete dentures; patients were divided equally into two groups according to the type of implant materials. Group A received a total number of 36 implants made of roxolid material and Group B received a total number of 36 implants made of traditional titanium alloys. Implant stability was assessed using ostell device, the primary implant stability was measured at the day of implant installation however, secondary implant stability was measured after six weeks of implant placement. Paired t-test was used to compare between primary and secondary stability in the same group and an independent t-test was used to compare between the two groups with a significant level 
ISSN:1472-6831
1472-6831
DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-04692-x