Gender health gap pre- and post-joint arthroplasty: identifying affected patient-reported health domains

• Published in: International journal for equity in health 2024-02, Vol.23 (1), p.44-44, Article 44
• Main Authors: Steinbeck, Viktoria, Bischof, Anja Yvonne, Schöner, Lukas, Langenberger, Benedikt, Kuklinski, David, Geissler, Alexander, Pross, Christoph, Busse, Reinhard
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Arthritis; Arthroplasty (hip); Arthroplasty (knee); Bone surgery; Clinical outcomes; Clinical trials; Datasets; Demographic aspects; Depression, Mental; Fatigue; Gender; Gender aspects; Gender differences; Gender health gap; Health aspects; Health care disparities; Health disparities; Hip joint; Hospitals; Joint replacement; Joints (anatomy); Knee; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Men; Mental depression; Orthopedics; Osteoarthritis; Pain; Patient outcomes; Patient-reported outcomes; Patients; Quality of life; Sex differences; Standard deviation; Surgery; Time measurement; Variables; Women; Womens health
• ISSN: 1475-9276; 1475-9276
• DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02131-5

As patient-reported outcomes (PROs) gain prominence in hip and knee arthroplasty (HA and KA), studies indicate PRO variations between genders. Research on the specific health domains particularly impacted is lacking. Hence, we aim to quantify the gender health gap in PROs for HA/KA patients, differentiating between general health, health-related quality of life (HrQoL), physical functioning, pain, fatigue, and depression. The study included 3,693 HA patients (1,627 men, 2,066 women) and 3,110 KA patients (1,430 men, 1,680 women) receiving surgery between 2020 to 2021 in nine German hospitals, followed up until March 2022. Questionnaires used were: EQ-VAS, EQ-5D-5L, HOOS-PS, KOOS-PS, PROMIS-F-SF, PROMIS-D-SF, and a joint-specific numeric pain scale. PROs at admission, discharge, 12-months post-surgery, and the change from admission to 12-months (PRO-improvement) were compared by gender, tested for differences, and assessed using multivariate linear regressions. To enable comparability, PROs were transformed into z-scores (standard deviations from the mean). Observed differences between genders were small in all health domains and differences reduced over time. Men reported significantly better health versus women pre-HA (KA), with a difference of 0.252 (0.224) standard deviations from the mean for pain, 0.353 (0.243) for fatigue (PROMIS-F-SF), 0.327 (0.310) for depression (PROMIS-D-SF), 0.336 (0.273) for functionality (H/KOOS-PS), 0.177 (0.186) for general health (EQ-VAS) and 0.266 (0.196) for HrQoL (EQ-5D-5L). At discharge, the gender health gap reduced and even disappeared for some health dimensions since women improved in health to a greater extent than men. No gender health gap was observed in most PRO-improvements and at month 12. Men experiencing slightly better health than women in all health dimensions before surgery while experiencing similar health benefits 12-months post-surgery, might be an indicator of men receiving surgery inappropriately early, women unnecessarily late or both. As studies often investigate the PRO-improvement, they miss pre-surgery gender differences, which could be an important target for improvement initiatives in patient-centric care. Moreover, future research on cutoffs for meaningful between-group PRO differences per measurement time would aid the interpretation of gender health disparities. German Register for Clinical Trials, DRKS00019916, 26 November 2019.