Loading…
New Pyrazole-Clubbed Pyrimidine or Pyrazoline Hybrids as Anti-Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Agents: Design, Synthesis, In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation, and Molecular Modeling Simulation
Two hybrid series of pyrazole-clubbed pyrimidines 5a-c and pyrazole-clubbed pyrazoline compounds 6a,b and 7 were designed as attractive scaffolds to be investigated in vitro and in vivo for antibacterial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa....
Saved in:
Published in: | ACS omega 2023-11, Vol.8 (46), p.44250-44264 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Two hybrid series of pyrazole-clubbed pyrimidines 5a-c and pyrazole-clubbed pyrazoline compounds 6a,b and 7 were designed as attractive scaffolds to be investigated in vitro and in vivo for antibacterial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. From the results of the in vitro antibacterial screening, compound 5c showed excellent activity (minimal inhibitory concentration, MIC = 521 μM) when compared with that of the reference antibiotic levofloxacin (MIC = 346 μM). The inhibition of the target dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) enzyme by compounds 4 and 5a-c (IC50 = 5.00 ± 0.23, 4.20 ± 0.20, 4.10 ± 0.19, and 4.00 ± 0.18 μM, respectively) was found to be better than the reference drug trimethoprim (IC50 = 5.54 ± 0.28 μM). Molecular modeling simulation results have justified the order of activity of all the newly synthesized compounds as DHFR enzyme inhibitors, and compound 5c exhibited the best binding profile (-13.6169386 kcal/mol). Hence, the most potent inhibitor of the DHFR enzyme, 5c, was chosen to be evaluated in vivo for its activity in treating MRSA-induced keratitis in rats and that, in turn, significantly (P < 0.0001) reduced infection in rats when compared to MRSA-treated group results. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2470-1343 2470-1343 |
DOI: | 10.1021/acsomega.3c06936 |